+++ Uwe Pross [2003-09-03 13:14:48]:
It is a matter of time. Most times I took one image which
seems to me represent the logos and scaled it down. For some
authors I used gimp to make a overview image from more than
one logo. But this is quite much work.
I think montage from ImageMagick
CVSROOT:/home/cvs/fvwm
Module name:fvwm
Changes by: olicha 03/09/04 01:48:42
Modified files:
. : ChangeLog todo-2.6
Log message:
* Added E.18, added comments on C.9 and C.15
--
Visit the official FVWM web page at URL:http://www.fvwm.org/.
To unsubscribe
Hi there,
Sun1000 sent me the logo at
http://www-user.tu-chemnitz.de/~uwp/fvwm_grill.jpg
in private. The submission is belated and I don't like to
put this picture on the web site. It is funny, of course,
but it is not a logo actually.
If someone thinks this logo should be added I will do
On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 11:09:25AM +0200, Uwe Pross wrote:
Hi there,
Sun1000 sent me the logo at
http://www-user.tu-chemnitz.de/~uwp/fvwm_grill.jpg
in private. The submission is belated and I don't like to
put this picture on the web site. It is funny, of course,
but it is not a
On 04 Sep 2003 11:09:25 +0200, Uwe Pross wrote:
Sun1000 sent me the logo at
http://www-user.tu-chemnitz.de/~uwp/fvwm_grill.jpg
in private. The submission is belated and I don't like to
put this picture on the web site. It is funny, of course,
but it is not a logo actually.
If
On Thu, 2003-09-04 at 10:09, Uwe Pross wrote:
http://www-user.tu-chemnitz.de/~uwp/fvwm_grill.jpg
put this picture on the web site. It is funny, of course,
It's hilarious but it's not a logo. I think it should go on the web page
somewhere, maybe the cats page (erm - maybe not). How about a
On Thu, 2003-09-04 at 10:09, Uwe Pross wrote:
http://www-user.tu-chemnitz.de/~uwp/fvwm_grill.jpg
put this picture on the web site. It is funny, of course,
It's hilarious, but it's not a logo. I think it should go on the web
page somewhere, maybe the cats page (erm - maybe not). How about
a
Hi there,
On 04 Sep 2003 at 11:53:25 +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote:
I guess this wasn't seriously meant as a logo. In any
case, unless we officially extend the submission period,
we can not accept new logo submissions. This would not be
fair towards the people who submitted their logos in time
Hi there,
On 04 Sep 2003 at 13:10:17 +0300, Mikhael Goikhman wrote:
You may add it to the other fvwm related art of this
artist section, like it is done for Phil Harper.
I'll do so.
BTW, This is exactly why I think the artist is more
important then any his specific logo, a good artist may
On 04 Sep 2003 13:32:55 +0200, Uwe Pross wrote:
I see your point and I think too that voting for the artist
first and afterwards for a logo will simplify the logo
procedure.
But how about if you have two artists. One made a lot of
quite nice logos and the other made a couple of ugly ones
Eek, a very convolute if not clever way of doing it :)
There is a utility I use (as a debian package) called vdesk, which does
what you want.
HTH,
-- Thomas Adam
--- Elliot Sowadsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I use tr to do the desk calculation.
AddToFunc GotoDesk_func
+ I PipeRead
Hello all,
I am using fvwm 2.5.7 and am trying to make all icons of all
applications look the same save for the pixmap. I have the following
in my .fvwmrc:
Style * IconSize 32 32
Style * IconBackgroundColorset grey60
Style * IconBackgroundRelief 3
Style *
How can I set different affinity for placements ( top, bottom, left right and
so on ) on a per application basis ?
I have been looking at the doc's but I think I need a hint to start me off.
As an example of what I mean, I wan't my browser windows to the top/left, pdf
viewer bottom/left,
--- Ian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello all,
Hello,
I am using fvwm 2.5.7 and am trying to make all icons of all
applications look the same save for the pixmap. I have the following
in my .fvwmrc:
Style * IconSize 32 32
Style * IconBackgroundColorset grey60
Style *
On 04 Sep 2003 13:15:14 +0200, Lars Segerlund wrote:
How can I set different affinity for placements ( top, bottom, left
right and so on ) on a per application basis ?
I have been looking at the doc's but I think I need a hint to start me
off.
As an example of what I mean, I wan't my
On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 03:26:17PM +0100, Thomas Adam wrote:
--- Ian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello all,
Hello,
I am using fvwm 2.5.7 and am trying to make all icons of all
applications look the same save for the pixmap. I have the following
in my .fvwmrc:
Style *
On 04 Sep 2003 16:33:30 +0200, Ian wrote:
On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 03:26:17PM +0100, Thomas Adam wrote:
--- Ian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello all,
Hello,
I am using fvwm 2.5.7 and am trying to make all icons of all
applications look the same save for the pixmap. I have the
--- Mikhael Goikhman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 04 Sep 2003 16:33:30 +0200, Ian wrote:
On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 03:26:17PM +0100, Thomas Adam wrote:
--- Ian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello all,
Hello,
I am using fvwm 2.5.7 and am trying to make all icons of all
Hi everyone
Possibly this is the wrong forum for this question, but I'll risk asking
it here first. Is there any reason why Debian unstable only provides
fvwm 2.4.16, and not fvwm 2.5.7?
Thanks
--
Stuart Logie
Programmer
UNIVERSAL COMPUTER SERVICES (PTY) LTD
Tel : (011) 712 1371 Cell : 082
On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 06:11:15PM +0300, Mikhael Goikhman wrote:
On 04 Sep 2003 16:33:30 +0200, Ian wrote:
On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 03:26:17PM +0100, Thomas Adam wrote:
One of the more notorious for this is Netscape. I'd also be inclined to
add:
Style *
* Sep 04 17:36 stu [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi everyone
Hi, there!
Possibly this is the wrong forum for this question, but I'll risk
asking it here first. Is there any reason why Debian unstable only
provides fvwm 2.4.16, and not fvwm 2.5.7?
My guess is a lazy/inactive package maintainer. Mail
On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 06:11:15PM +0300, Mikhael Goikhman wrote:
On 04 Sep 2003 16:33:30 +0200, Ian wrote:
On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 03:26:17PM +0100, Thomas Adam wrote:
--- Ian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello all,
One of the more notorious for this is Netscape. I'd also be
On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 05:36:53PM +0200, Ian wrote:
On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 06:11:15PM +0300, Mikhael Goikhman wrote:
On 04 Sep 2003 16:33:30 +0200, Ian wrote:
On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 03:26:17PM +0100, Thomas Adam wrote:
--- Ian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello all,
On 04 Sep 2003 19:36:44 +0200, stu wrote:
Possibly this is the wrong forum for this question, but I'll risk asking
it here first. Is there any reason why Debian unstable only provides
fvwm 2.4.16, and not fvwm 2.5.7?
Meantime, you may try these deb snapshots from a month ago, newer than
Style * IconSize 32 32
Style * IconBackgroundColorset grey60
Style * IconBackgroundRelief 3
Style * IconBackgroundPadding 0
Style * IconTitleRelief 3
However, some applications seemt o ignore these styles, most notably,
java
stu wrote:
Hi everyone
Possibly this is the wrong forum for this question, but I'll risk asking
it here first. Is there any reason why Debian unstable only provides
fvwm 2.4.16, and not fvwm 2.5.7?
debian unstable is called unstable because it's not stable yet, not
because it includes
Do any of you know what's needed to use FVWM 2.4.6 with Gnome 2.2?
(I'm running the woody (stable) version of Debian GNU/Linux, with
the Gnome 2.2 backport to woody.)
The initial problem I'm having is that something in Gnome, apparently
the file manager, is creating a full-screen windows named
27 matches
Mail list logo
