On Sun, Mar 07, 2010 at 11:14:28PM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 07, 2010 at 08:35:16PM +, Thomas Adam wrote:
> > All,
> >
> > I said before Christmas 2009, I didn't want to do this. But I think we've
> > seen a number of sufficient changes in CVS since then which makes me
> > ques
On Sun, Mar 07, 2010 at 08:35:16PM +, Thomas Adam wrote:
> All,
>
> I said before Christmas 2009, I didn't want to do this. But I think we've
> seen a number of sufficient changes in CVS since then which makes me
> question whether I should undertake the release process and issue a new
> unst
All,
I said before Christmas 2009, I didn't want to do this. But I think we've
seen a number of sufficient changes in CVS since then which makes me
question whether I should undertake the release process and issue a new
unstable 2.5.29 release.
What do others think?
The only odd quirk I can see
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 11:16:38PM +, Thomas Adam wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> So I am going to raise this now, unlike last year where we only had a few
> days to come up with something.
>
> Is there anyone here who's thinking of wanting to work on FVWM via GSOC? At
> this stage, I am not interested
