Olivier Chapuis spake unto us the following wisdom:
- Executing the function without trying to grab at all. You suggest to
add such possibility.
- Try to grab just 2 times (this is really fast). If the grab succeed
everything is ok. If it fails execute the function any way. This is
maybe
Olivier Chapuis spake unto us the following wisdom:
Now a note on _NET_CURRENT_DESKTOP (and _NET_DESKTOP_VIEW PORT), the
EWMH spec says that this property (as a client msg) is for a pager. Thus
if gtk_window_present() uses this property (and one may understand that
it uses it in the *view of
Olivier Chapuis spake unto us the following wisdom:
Ethan Blanton a écrit :
Patrick Börjesson spake unto us the following wisdom:
If there is a bug or misfeature which should be fixed, I would like to
know so that I can make sure it is addressed.
http://sourceforge.net/forum/forum.php
Patrick Börjesson spake unto us the following wisdom:
If there is a bug or misfeature which should be fixed, I would like to
know so that I can make sure it is addressed.
http://sourceforge.net/forum/forum.php?thread_id=1455264forum_id=665
Ahh, this is actually a common problem for us
Dominik Vogt spake unto us the following wisdom:
A current discussion with the gaim developers about some gaim
mis-feature has made me think about abandoning EWMH support
completely. In my eyes, the only usefull message it has is the
FULLSCREEN stuff. Everything else is just causing trouble.
Jason Weber spake unto us the following wisdom:
On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 12:15:57PM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote:
In-block declarations must not be used in fvwm as they are not
covered by the C() standard.
It must have slipped by. Is there a gnu compile flag we can use
to enforce this?
With
Grzegorz Nieweglowski spake unto us the following wisdom:
Dominik Vogt wrote:
Any decent kernel is clever enough not to load multiple copies of the
same write-only data.
Dominik is completely correct here.
[ snip numbers ]
I guess that with 'a few hundreds' per module te amount of memory
Uwe Pross spake unto us the following wisdom:
On 31 Mar 2003 at 16:01:21 +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote:
We can't have gifs for copyright reasons.
What else? png and xpm is not supported by all browsers and
jpg is not good for small pics.
I don't see why gifs would be a problem as long as
Kingsly John spake unto us the following wisdom:
Are you left-handed by any chance? because I don't find it intuitive at all,
whenever there is sideways text, it's almost always with the base of the
letters facing right.(Look for any widthwise ads in magazines.. and you'll
find that the top of
Dominik Vogt spake unto us the following wisdom:
only one modifier like Meta_L works, not any Alt (there are two).
Um, your keyboard has two Alt keys? I have never seen such a
keyboard.
Virtually all US keyboards have two alt keys which produce Alt_L and
Alt_R, and no meta key at all...
Dominik Vogt spake unto us the following wisdom:
On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 12:00:18PM -0500, Ethan Blanton wrote:
Dominik Vogt spake unto us the following wisdom:
Virtually all US keyboards have two alt keys which produce Alt_L and
Alt_R, and no meta key at all... Typically the X clients
Dan Espen spake unto us the following wisdom:
I think we (every one else) is going to have to accept that
2.6 is going to happen very slowly.
Well, for what it's worth, there's at least one dude out here who
really appreciates everything you and Dominik and everyone else who's
ever helped out
jrc spake unto us the following wisdom:
However, I would like to print various things from your site
- especially some of the text advice and so forth. But, your
pages are all white text on black background - which does not
show up as anything readable on my printer. May I humbly
suggest
Nadim Shaikli spake unto us the following wisdom:
Maybe. But I would try to narrow the #if 0 code even more so that there
is still no problem.
That would be interesting to see. Ideally it would be wonderful to
simply run fvwm and this code under a debugger and single step around
for a
Olivier Chapuis spake unto us the following wisdom:
On Sun, Nov 03, 2002 at 08:25:37PM -0500, Ethan Blanton wrote:
If configure tries to check libXft without -lXrender, the checks fail
on my system. This patch adds -lXrender to the libs line for Xft. It
affects three lines in configure.in
This must not be necessary on all systems, but it sure is on mine...
And it shouldn't mess anything up on the systems where it is not.
If configure tries to check libXft without -lXrender, the checks fail
on my system. This patch adds -lXrender to the libs line for Xft. It
affects three lines
16 matches
Mail list logo
