On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 10:10:32PM -0400, Paul D. Smith wrote:
%% Mikhael Goikhman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
mg I can reproduce what Paul describes without FvwmAuto with
mg FvwmAnimate. Or without FvwmAnimate, but when the original icon
mg is already unfocused. (It is possible to get
Dominik Vogt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 10:10:32PM -0400, Paul D. Smith wrote:
%% Mikhael Goikhman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
mg I can reproduce what Paul describes without FvwmAuto with
mg FvwmAnimate. Or without FvwmAnimate, but when the original icon
mg
On 03 Jun 2001 21:33:48 -0400, Paul D. Smith wrote:
%% Dominik Vogt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
dv The one that Paul (PDS) reported with in conjunction with
dv FvwmAuto. Of course I still hope he'll provide some more details.
I posted this on May 1:
OK, I think I have more
%% Mikhael Goikhman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
mg I can reproduce what Paul describes without FvwmAuto with
mg FvwmAnimate. Or without FvwmAnimate, but when the original icon
mg is already unfocused. (It is possible to get unfocussed icon
mg under cursor if you enter it during All
On Sun, Jun 03, 2001 at 09:33:48PM -0400, Paul D. Smith wrote:
%% Dominik Vogt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
dv The one that Paul (PDS) reported with in conjunction with
dv FvwmAuto. Of course I still hope he'll provide some more details.
I posted this on May 1:
...
I never heard
On 03 Jun 2001 15:48:32 +0200, Tomas Ogren wrote:
Ok, I made some more changes to make it consistent now. The point is: It
doesn't matter what layer I request if I do it _before_ mapping the
window. Fvwm will still put it on the default layer.
As I already said I can't reproduce this. With
On 03 June, 2001 - Mikhael Goikhman sent me these 0.7K bytes:
As I already said I can't reproduce this. With no arguments the window
is initialy placed on the layer 2, with arguments it is iniatily placed
on layer 4 and then immediately switches to layer 2, as expected.
[..]
I can reproduce
On Sun, Jun 03, 2001 at 03:48:32PM +0200, Tomas Ogren wrote:
On 03 June, 2001 - Mikhael Goikhman sent me these 1.9K bytes:
On 03 Jun 2001 05:21:36 +0200, Tomas Ogren wrote:
There's still (cvs as of now) problems with focus in Nautilus.. I've
been busy+++ lately, but I will have
Is there anything we will do about the FvwmIconMan pipe problem?
It crashes quite often and I have no idea how to fix this or even
why it happens at all.
Bye
Dominik ^_^ ^_^
--
Dominik Vogt, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Visit the official FVWM web page at
On 03 June, 2001 - Dominik Vogt sent me these 3.6K bytes:
There's still (cvs as of now) problems with focus in Nautilus.. I've
been busy+++ lately, but I will have spare time to spend now.. It
doesn't get any focus..
[..]
Well, it's hard to fix without any feedback ;-)
I know.. I've
On 20 May 2001 15:55:09 +, Mikhael Goikhman wrote:
Sorry, I should object because there are at least 3 problems:
1) Locking on Wait in I functions, I am still waiting for Dominik's answer.
If nothing else I will undo that problematic commit.
2) IMHO import -frame problem should be
Mikhael Goikhman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I think we should release the last candidate beta 2.3.32 now.
And set the exact date of 2.4.0 release to be sure we don't postpone it
any more. Maybe May 10 or 15?
I don't have critical problems which may stop the new stable release.
There is a
Mikhael Goikhman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Sorry, I should object because there are at least 3 problems:
...
I am optimistic even if this means some more days. :)
OK.
--
Dan Espen
444 Hoes Lane Room RRC 1C-214 E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Piscataway, NJ 08854
13 matches
Mail list logo
