Re: libtoolization ?

2002-03-31 Thread Dominik Vogt
On Fri, Mar 29, 2002 at 04:29:59PM +0100, Olivier Chapuis wrote: > Hello, > > At present time the fvwm lib is used in a totally static way. > Moreover, an external module should be compiled inside the fvwm > source tree to take advantage of the libs. > > One way to overcome these is to "libtooliz

Re: libtoolization ?

2002-03-30 Thread Dan Espen
Olivier Chapuis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sat, Mar 30, 2002 at 10:35:14AM -0500, Dan Espen wrote: > > The reason I posted was to point out that you could get more > > detailed data. Jason showed how to do that on Linux. > > Yes, /proc/$PID/maps gives some info but I need to write > a scrip

Re: libtoolization ?

2002-03-30 Thread Olivier Chapuis
; > > > I do not know a lot of things on memory management (any good > > > > doc and better tool than top and free?). > > > ... > > > > So the difference is not big when you really use fvwm. > > > > > > > > So now the big question: should I finish the

Re: libtoolization ?

2002-03-30 Thread Dan Espen
). > > ... > > > So the difference is not big when you really use fvwm. > > > > > > So now the big question: should I finish the libtoolization of fvwm > > > and commit the change? > > > > It doesn't seem to be buying us much. > > >

Re: libtoolization ?

2002-03-30 Thread Olivier Chapuis
On Sat, Mar 30, 2002 at 01:53:26PM +0600, Dmitry Yu. Bolkhovityanov wrote: > On Fri, 29 Mar 2002, Olivier Chapuis wrote: > > > - if shared is enabled (and the system support shared lib) fvwm > > will build and install a sharable library libfvwm.so-version and > > fvwm2 and the modules will be dyna

Re: libtoolization ?

2002-03-30 Thread Olivier Chapuis
t; source tree to take advantage of the libs. > ... > > Any way > > I do not know a lot of things on memory management (any good > > doc and better tool than top and free?). > ... > > So the difference is not big when you really use fvwm. > > > > So now the b

Re: libtoolization ?

2002-03-30 Thread Dmitry Yu. Bolkhovityanov
On Fri, 29 Mar 2002, Olivier Chapuis wrote: > - if shared is enabled (and the system support shared lib) fvwm > will build and install a sharable library libfvwm.so-version and > fvwm2 and the modules will be dynamically linked to this library. > Of course the system must be able to perform the dy

Re: libtoolization ?

2002-03-29 Thread Jason L Tibbitts III
> "DE" == Dan Espen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: DE> If you have access to Solaris, you can get some nice information DE> from "pmap". In Linux, this info (and more, I think) is in /proc/$PID/maps - J< -- Visit the official FVWM web page at http://www.fvwm.org/>. To unsubscribe from the list

Re: libtoolization ?

2002-03-29 Thread Dan Espen
things on memory management (any good > doc and better tool than top and free?). ... > So the difference is not big when you really use fvwm. > > So now the big question: should I finish the libtoolization of fvwm > and commit the change? It doesn't seem to be buying us much.

libtoolization ?

2002-03-29 Thread Olivier Chapuis
FvwmBacker:224 80 144 128 (96) | 332 168 164 144 (188) REAL is SIZE - SHARE Note: I use --enable-xft and a big part of the shared mem come from Xft, around 500k for fvwm2 at startup. --- So the difference is not big when you really use fvwm. So now the big question: should I finish t