Hello *
long time ago, FVM supported # comments at the end of a line, but now,
lines like
Style * Title # !Title
Style * TitleAtTop # TitleAtLeft | TitleAtRight |
TitleAtBottom
Style * LeftTitleRotatedCCW # LeftTitleRotatedCW
Style * Rig
On 9/29/05, Giovanni Tumiati <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all, I'd like to suggest / request a feature:
>
> To allow icons to be displayed without their titles, and such that when
> the cursor is placed over an icon "i.e. hovering" to have the full title
> of the icon displayed - just like a "to
On Sat, Oct 01, 2005 at 10:55:27AM +0200, Viktor Griph wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Sep 2005, Zack Brown wrote:
> >I've confirmed that there is no way to control scrolling over an xorg
> >virtual
> >desktop. If the mouse brushes the edge of the screen, you scroll. Period.
> >:-(
> >
> >So this too turns o
On Fri, 30 Sep 2005, Zack Brown wrote:
On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 11:22:27PM +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote:
On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 12:58:02PM -0700, Zack Brown wrote:
On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 11:52:53AM +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote:
On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 11:05:23PM -0700, Zack Brown wrote:
So, I hav
On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 07:01:37PM -0700, Zack Brown wrote:
> My sense here is just that it can't be done, and I'll be stuck with one of
> the suboptimal workarounds already suggested here. And I guess my suggestion
> still stands, that FVWM implement some kind of control over the page-size,
> to
On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 11:22:27PM +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 12:58:02PM -0700, Zack Brown wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 11:52:53AM +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> > > On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 11:05:23PM -0700, Zack Brown wrote:
> > > >
> > > > So, I have my 800x600 scre
On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 05:42:41PM -0600, Jonathan Kotta wrote:
> On 9/29/05, Zack Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 04:53:35PM +, Mikhael Goikhman wrote:
> > > On 29 Sep 2005 09:04:06 -0700, Zack Brown wrote:
> > > >
> > > > It would be nice to be able to specify the
On 9/29/05, Zack Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 04:53:35PM +, Mikhael Goikhman wrote:
> > On 29 Sep 2005 09:04:06 -0700, Zack Brown wrote:
> > >
> > > It would be nice to be able to specify the page size at startup. A lot
> > > of folks run maximized xterms with no w
On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 12:58:02PM -0700, Zack Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 11:52:53AM +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 11:05:23PM -0700, Zack Brown wrote:
> > >
> > > So, I have my 800x600 screen in this hypothetical example. I set my page
> > > size to
> > > 830x
On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 11:52:53AM +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 11:05:23PM -0700, Zack Brown wrote:
> >
> > So, I have my 800x600 screen in this hypothetical example. I set my page
> > size to
> > 830x630 in the FVWM config file.
>
> I think you want that virtual desktop
On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 11:05:23PM -0700, Zack Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 09:56:16PM +, Mikhael Goikhman wrote:
> > On 29 Sep 2005 13:35:57 -0700, Zack Brown wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 04:53:35PM +, Mikhael Goikhman wrote:
> > > > On 29 Sep 2005 09:04:06 -0700,
On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 09:56:16PM +, Mikhael Goikhman wrote:
> On 29 Sep 2005 13:35:57 -0700, Zack Brown wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 04:53:35PM +, Mikhael Goikhman wrote:
> > > On 29 Sep 2005 09:04:06 -0700, Zack Brown wrote:
> > > >
> > > > It would be nice to be able to spec
On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 06:58:21PM -0400, Dan Espen wrote:
> Zack Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > > It would be nice to be able to specify the page size at startup. A lot
> > > > of folks run maximized xterms with no window decorations, just because
> > > > if they expanded the window to ke
Zack Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > It would be nice to be able to specify the page size at startup. A lot
> > > of folks run maximized xterms with no window decorations, just because
> > > if they expanded the window to keep the decorations outside of the
> > > screen, the decorations wou
On 29 Sep 2005 13:35:57 -0700, Zack Brown wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 04:53:35PM +, Mikhael Goikhman wrote:
> > On 29 Sep 2005 09:04:06 -0700, Zack Brown wrote:
> > >
> > > It would be nice to be able to specify the page size at startup. A lot
> > > of folks run maximized xterms with n
Hi all, I'd like to suggest / request a feature:
To allow icons to be displayed without their titles, and such that when
the cursor is placed over an icon "i.e. hovering" to have the full title
of the icon displayed - just like a "tooltip".
This currently occurs when placing the mouse cursor
On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 04:53:35PM +, Mikhael Goikhman wrote:
> On 29 Sep 2005 09:04:06 -0700, Zack Brown wrote:
> >
> > It would be nice to be able to specify the page size at startup. A lot
> > of folks run maximized xterms with no window decorations, just because
> > if they expanded the wi
On 29 Sep 2005 09:04:06 -0700, Zack Brown wrote:
>
> It would be nice to be able to specify the page size at startup. A lot
> of folks run maximized xterms with no window decorations, just because
> if they expanded the window to keep the decorations outside of the
> screen, the decorations would
Hi folks,
It would be nice to be able to specify the page size at startup. A lot of folks
run maximized xterms with no window decorations, just because if they expanded
the window to keep the decorations outside of the screen, the decorations would
encroach on neighboring pages. Having a page size
On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 03:09:01PM +0100, seventh guardian wrote:
> On 8/18/05, seventh guardian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 8/18/05, Dominik Vogt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 12:22:24AM +0100, seventh guardian wrote:
> > > > I currently need a way of binding key r
On 8/18/05, seventh guardian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/18/05, Dominik Vogt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 12:22:24AM +0100, seventh guardian wrote:
> > > I currently need a way of binding key releases to a function, so i
> > > searched the fvwm manual, the lists, the
On 8/18/05, Dominik Vogt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 12:22:24AM +0100, seventh guardian wrote:
> > I currently need a way of binding key releases to a function, so i
> > searched the fvwm manual, the lists, the web, the heck..
> >
> > I only found a really smart "hack"
On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 12:22:24AM +0100, seventh guardian wrote:
> I currently need a way of binding key releases to a function, so i
> searched the fvwm manual, the lists, the web, the heck..
>
> I only found a really smart "hack" that once the key (Super_L in that
> case) is pressed and rep
Hi!
I currently need a way of binding key releases to a function, so i
searched the fvwm manual, the lists, the web, the heck..
I only found a really smart "hack" that once the key (Super_L in that
case) is pressed and repeatedly sends a fake keypress to test for
modifiers every 50ms. But unf
Thanks folks. FVWM gets better and better, even in the past! I've
changed my .fvwm.
--
... _._. ._ ._. . _._. ._. ___ .__ ._. . .__. ._ .. ._.
Felix Finch: scarecrow repairman & rocket surgeon / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG = E987 4493 C860 246C 3B1E 6477 7838 76E9 182E 8151 ITAR l
On Sun, Jul 31, 2005 at 12:55:51PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I am not sure if a window manager is the right place to do this, but I
> thought I'd at least throw this out so the kind list readers can tell
> me where it has already been suggested and why it wouldn't work the
> way I hope :-)
Hello,
If i understood you correctly, this behaviour is already possible with
FPGrabFocus
and consorts (see the focus policy section of man fvwm)
"New normal or transient windows with the FPGrabFocus or FPGrabFocusTransient
style automatically receive the focus when they are created. FPGrabFoc
I am not sure if a window manager is the right place to do this, but I
thought I'd at least throw this out so the kind list readers can tell
me where it has already been suggested and why it wouldn't work the
way I hope :-)
One of the most annoying things about Mozilla / Firefox is the way it
will
I've seen metacity and openbox recently and noted a feature which
would be (I think) nice to have in FVWM.
When you cycle windows in those WMs black empty frame is drawn showing
geometry of obscured windows.
FvwmProxy does something remotely like that, but does not visually show
window geometry.
On 02 Jun 2002 00:54:23 +0200, Riswick, J.G.A. van wrote:
>
> Yes I guess you are right, maybe I should look at the
> gtk-theme engine for doing this instead...
>
> About the border handles, in cde, normal windows have them,
> but popup dialogs don't. The image I referred to in my mail
> was a s
HI!
(wow still working late..)
Yes I guess you are right, maybe I should look at the
gtk-theme engine for doing this instead...
About the border handles, in cde, normal windows have them,
but popup dialogs don't. The image I referred to in my mail
was a screenshot (edited) from a cde session.
On 01 Jun 2002 23:39:41 +0200, Riswick, J.G.A. van wrote:
>
> I've been tweaking my fvwm setup and have been looking
> quite a lot at cde/motif. One thing I saw in that setup
> is a 'double inset' around the inner rim of the window
> border. With the current mwm border style, the client area
> of
HI!
I've been tweaking my fvwm setup and have been looking
quite a lot at cde/motif. One thing I saw in that setup
is a 'double inset' around the inner rim of the window
border. With the current mwm border style, the client area
of the window appears sunken relative to the title bar and
window bo
33 matches
Mail list logo
