A couple of weeks ago we were talking about upgrade SATA drives and
that the many drives have hit the 10 cents/GB (US) point. Now that
the Seagate 1.5TB 7200.11 SATA has hit $150 (latest deal includes a
4GB usb stick and free shipping), I thought I would warn people that
Seagate is having
On Nov 11, 2008, at 6:54 PM, Kyle Hansen wrote:
That being said I was not in any way trying to drive someone away.
It was
just that this is not the iMac list, and it seems like all the
people that
should be on the iMac list were just posting here. Either because
they
didn't
Dan wrote:
At 3:21 PM -0800 11/11/2008, Simon Royal wrote:
Well after being told this is a PowerMac list, I have joined the iMac
list for my eMacs.
See you later, it has been good while I was here.
Stay subscribed to all the LEM lists. Most of the knowledge and
activity is on
On Nov 11, 2008, at 1:48 PM, Dan wrote:
Im waiting for 'em to support segmenting for burning. The idea
being to to divide the backup into DVD-sided chunks, to facilitate
easy burning. Kindof the way DiskFit did, back in the early 1990s,
with floppies.
There's an old unix command-line
At 9:24 AM -0500 11/12/2008, Len Gerstel wrote:
A couple of weeks ago we were talking about upgrade SATA drives and
that the many drives have hit the 10 cents/GB (US) point.
Seagate is investigating an issue where a small number of Barracuda
7200.11 (1.5TB SATA) hard drives randomly pause or
At 9:35 PM -0800 11/11/2008, Jonas Lopez wrote:
Background speed test alert?
It would be nice to have a background speed test to alert us when
the network is below a min speed.
I got DSL 384/47 should be 1400/368.
Could a speed test be done using a ping test running in the
background just
On Nov 11, 8:54 pm, Kyle Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
here btw. I was just pointing out that this was not the iMac list. In the
meantime I will contact the list owner and see what he wants to do about
possible merging a couple lists or making an iMac exception of some sort.
Thanks for
At 9:27 AM -0700 11/12/2008, Bruce Johnson wrote:
On Nov 11, 2008, at 1:48 PM, Dan wrote:
Im waiting for 'em to support segmenting for burning. The idea
being to to divide the backup into DVD-sided chunks, to facilitate
easy burning. Kindof the way DiskFit did, back in the early 1990s,
At 9:03 AM -0800 11/12/2008, Jeffrey Engle wrote:
two external drives after minutes of being connected via USB2.0
unmount themselves?
Volumes do not spontaneously unmount. Check the system log.
- Dan.
--
- Psychoceramic Emeritus; South Jersey, USA, Earth
Background speed test alert?
It would be nice to have a background speed test to alert us when the network
is below a min speed.
I got DSL 384/47 should be 1400/368.
Could a speed test be done using a ping test running in the background just
like the clock checker does?
jml
At 9:24 AM -0500 11/12/2008, Len Gerstel wrote:
A couple of weeks ago we were talking about upgrade SATA drives and
that the many drives have hit the 10 cents/GB (US) point.
Seagate is investigating an issue where a small number of Barracuda
7200.11 (1.5TB SATA) hard drives randomly pause
On Nov 12, 2008, at 11:58 AM, Dan wrote:
On another note... There are a lot of 1 TB drives going for $99 or
less right now. Careful, folx! Many of them are LP size (normal
3.5 drives) but then they're 5400rpm instead of 7200 rpm! So they
cannot keep up with their fast SATA or USB 2 or
On Nov 12, 2008, at 11:58 AM, Dan wrote:
On another note... There are a lot of 1 TB drives going for $99 or
less right now. Careful, folx! Many of them are LP size (normal
3.5 drives) but then they're 5400rpm instead of 7200 rpm! So they
cannot keep up with their fast SATA or USB 2 or FW
At 12:44 PM -0500 11/12/2008, Len Gerstel wrote:
On Nov 12, 2008, at 11:58 AM, Dan wrote:
On another note... There are a lot of 1 TB drives going for $99 or
less right now. Careful, folx! Many of them are LP size (normal
3.5 drives) but then they're 5400rpm instead of 7200 rpm! So they
Well, it sure looks like I stirred up a hornet's nest!
Thanks to all for the input. I have the dual 867 G4 MDD maxed out at
2GB RAM and added a Radeon 9600 Pro some time back which greatly
improved video performance. And I keep an eye on internal and external
HD performance, so I guess I've done
Dennis Myhand wrote:
What is the difference between 10.4 and 10.4 server? Are they basically
the same OS with Server being able to provide network resources to
clients who log on? Or is there more to it than that? Thanks, Dennis
The OS is basically the same but Server includes several
On Nov 12, 2008, at 8:04 PM, Clark Martin wrote:
Dennis Myhand wrote:
What is the difference between 10.4 and 10.4 server? Are they
basically
the same OS with Server being able to provide network resources to
clients who log on? Or is there more to it than that? Thanks,
Dennis
Clark Martin wrote:
Dennis Myhand wrote:
What is the difference between 10.4 and 10.4 server? Are they basically
the same OS with Server being able to provide network resources to
clients who log on? Or is there more to it than that? Thanks, Dennis
The OS is basically the same but
I would to make a Mac OS X volume, but just enough of it to back up my
setting, and my user name to log on, not a whole Boot disk,
and have it on my USB jump disk, and have just enough of System and
Finder for the Migration Assistant to see it as an OS X to migrate
my User from.
So if l buy a
19 matches
Mail list logo
