On 10 February 2010 07:48, John Carmonne carmo...@aol.com wrote:
On Feb 9, 2010, at 11:39 PM, Stephen Conrad wrote:
Mozilla announced they will drop tiger for future Firefox releases.
So, will Tiger using folks be forced to move up to Leopard?
--
Steve Conrad
Henrietta, MO 64036
On Feb 10, 2010, at 4:46 AM, Evan Thomas wrote:
Very happy with Firefox 3.5.2.
You should update to 3.5.7 for the bug and security fixes; or 3.6
which is the current GM version. I think 3.6 has one really nice new
feature, that is new tabs open next to the active tab rather than at
the
I've already dropped Firefox and have been very happy with Camino on
10.4.11 10.5.8 10.6.2
John Carmonne
Yorba Linda USA
Camino is a very fast reliable browser. I gave up Firefox in favor
of Camino a few months agoand I rarely look back.
Larry
--
You received this message
On 2/10/10 12:57 AM, Mike Linnett wrote:
Mozilla announced they will drop tiger for future Firefox releases.
So, will Tiger using folks be forced to move up to Leopard?
This is getting really tiring. What's next...computers with Tiger will
no longer be able to go online?
--
You received
Nope, its Dual Density.
On Feb 10, 2010, at 6:37 AM, Geke wrote:
The bottom line first:
If a 512MB PC133 SDRAM RAM module for the G4 Digital Audio has chips
on one side of the stick only, can it be low-density?
Thanks in advance!
Geke
History of this case:
My G4 DA had 3 RAM sticks: 128, 256,
On Feb 10, 2010, at 5:37 AM, Geke wrote:
The bottom line first:
If a 512MB PC133 SDRAM RAM module for the G4 Digital Audio has chips
on one side of the stick only, can it be low-density?
Thanks in advance!
Geke
History of this case:
My G4 DA had 3 RAM sticks: 128, 256, and 512MB. I
Nope, we will still use Safari, Opera, Camino... the list goes on.
On Feb 10, 2010, at 12:39 AM, Stephen Conrad wrote:
Mozilla announced they will drop tiger for future Firefox releases.
So, will Tiger using folks be forced to move up to Leopard?
--
Steve Conrad
Henrietta, MO 64036
The
On Feb 10, 2010, at 4:50 AM, Kris Tilford wrote:
On Feb 10, 2010, at 4:46 AM, Evan Thomas wrote:
Very happy with Firefox 3.5.2.
You should update to 3.5.7 for the bug and security fixes; or 3.6
which is the current GM version. I think 3.6 has one really nice
new feature, that is new
On Feb 10, 2010, at 6:24 AM, Kasey Smith wrote:
On Feb 10, 2010, at 4:50 AM, Kris Tilford wrote:
On Feb 10, 2010, at 4:46 AM, Evan Thomas wrote:
Very happy with Firefox 3.5.2.
You should update to 3.5.7 for the bug and security fixes; or 3.6 which is
the current GM version. I think
At some point updates to software won't run on a given OS. That's
life, no?
My prized G4 MDDs cannot load Snow Leopard (that I know). At some
point, I'd imagine, Firefox will want an Intel chip, and won't run on
the G4 or G5 for that matter.
On Feb 10, 9:06 am, Nestamicky nestami...@gmail.com
On Feb 10, 2010, at 9:30 AM, JoeTaxpayer wrote:
At some point updates to software won't run on a given OS. That's
life, no?
My prized G4 MDDs cannot load Snow Leopard (that I know). At some
point, I'd imagine, Firefox will want an Intel chip, and won't run on
the G4 or G5 for that matter.
On Feb 9, 2010, at 9:21 PM, Paxton wrote:
I want to buy a 5v power adapter that I can use on most of my stuff
ilke external FW USB drives and Pc cards cards and such. I want to
get some that work across the board, Is there something like this I
can get?
I am surprised no one has
At 1:39 AM -0600 2/10/2010, Stephen Conrad wrote:
Mozilla announced they will drop tiger for future Firefox releases.
This is a great example of the press creating FUD for the frack of it!
The announcement, by the Mozilla Foundation, was put out back in
September 2009 -- 5 MONTHS AGO! But
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 10:30 AM, JoeTaxpayer joetaxpaye...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd imagine, Firefox will want an Intel chip, and won't run on
the G4 or G5 for that matter.
Depends on what you mean by won't run on the G4 or G5.
Since Firefox is open source it's always possible (in theory at
At 9:59 AM -0600 2/10/2010, Jason Brown wrote:
To an extent yes. However I see no reason that someone cant trick
the newer versions of Firefox to install on 10.4.
It will be possible, of course, to take specific patches out of the
trunk (Minefield) and wedge them back into the 3.6 fork, even
At 11:24 AM -0500 2/10/2010, John Martz wrote:
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 10:30 AM, JoeTaxpayer joetaxpaye...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd imagine, Firefox will want an Intel chip, and won't run on
the G4 or G5 for that matter.
Depends on what you mean by won't run on the G4 or G5.
Since Firefox is
On 10/2/10 14:21, John Carmonne carmo...@aol.com wrote:
The bottom line first:
If a 512MB PC133 SDRAM RAM module for the G4 Digital Audio has chips
on one side of the stick only, can it be low-density?
Thanks in advance!
Geke
I don't think sosee
On Feb 9, 5:39 pm, Gorka L Martinez Mezo g...@gmx.net wrote:
You could if there were such a thing. I've never heard of one. The
internal FW connector (on this card and on some PowerMacs) was intended
for FW drives, HDs whose interface was FW, not via an IDE convertor but
directly.
On Feb 9, 3:38 pm, Kris Tilford ktilfo...@cox.net wrote:
Also, in my mind there isn't really room for an ATA card in a Beige.
With only three PCI slots, you need one for the Radeon video card, one
for a USB card, and one for a Firewire card. If you boot OS 9, the USB
card MUST be an OHCI
I just downloaded Camino. Seems to work ok (I've been using Firefox 3.5.7 or
iCab).
I am not getting any music to play on www.myspace.com though. Any suggestions?
--
You received this message because you are a member of G-Group, a group for
those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a
On 09-02-2010 20:13, Gus, gusr...@comcast.net, wrote:
What is the maximum ram you can put into
the beige G3 Desktop?
In my grandson's beige G3 DT/300 are mounted 3 256MB - PC66 3.3v,
unbuffered, 8-byte, x64 non-parity 168-pin SDRAM (Low Profile) sticks.
Works flawlessly!
Jo Hissel
--
Anybody have any experience with Disk Cataloging software ?
I am looking at CDFinder, a Mac application for cataloging removable
disks ( more).
http://www.cdfinder.de/
looks ok
I guess the personal Cumulus is dead.
thanks
--
You received this message because you are a member of G-Group, a
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 9:09 PM, M Christol chris...@fuse.net wrote:
Anybody have any experience with Disk Cataloging software ?
I am looking at CDFinder, a Mac application for cataloging removable disks
( more).
http://www.cdfinder.de/
looks ok
I guess the personal Cumulus is dead.
Thanks a lot!
That link from Pete is precious; I can mention it to the company so
they can check for themselves...
(Note that it runs over two lines that should be connected before
pasting into the browser.)
Geke
--
You received this message because you are a member of G-Group, a group for
On Feb 10, 2010, at 2:09 PM, M Christol wrote:
Anybody have any experience with Disk Cataloging software ?
I am looking at CDFinder, a Mac application for cataloging removable
disks ( more).
http://www.cdfinder.de/
looks ok
I guess the personal Cumulus is dead.
I've always used
On 08-02-2010 10:47, Stephen Conrad, khel...@gmail.com, wrote:
Was looking through my collection of loose RAM
Maybe some of you can help me ID one piece I cannot ID and can tell me what
some others can be used in (ESP. G3-G5 machines)
snip
Well Stephen, determining your sticks is not such
Anybody have any experience with Disk Cataloging software ?
I am looking at CDFinder, a Mac application for cataloging removable
disks ( more).
http://www.cdfinder.de/
looks ok
I guess the personal Cumulus is dead.
thanks
I used to use Disktracker http://www.disktracker.com/ on OS 9. I
Hello Everyone,
I bought a power mac G5 about two weeks ago. It is the 1.8 model, 900
mhz bus. I am in the process of upgrading the ram (tomorrow). I
also installed another HD, so now have a 160 gig model and a 300 gig
model. Have 10.4 installed on the 160. Is there an easy way to move
this
I tried several back in 2006, including some bundled apps that were
free to use, and in the end chose to buy CDFinder. I have been pleased
with it, continue to use it, and recommend it.
On Feb 10, 2:09 pm, M Christol chris...@fuse.net wrote:
Anybody have any experience with Disk Cataloging
On Feb 10, 2010, at 3:16 PM, Trickster wrote:
Hello Everyone,
I bought a power mac G5 about two weeks ago. It is the 1.8 model, 900
mhz bus. I am in the process of upgrading the ram (tomorrow). I
also installed another HD, so now have a 160 gig model and a 300 gig
model. Have 10.4
On 2/10/10 2:16 PM, Trickster wrote:
Hello Everyone,
I bought a power mac G5 about two weeks ago. It is the 1.8 model, 900
mhz bus. I am in the process of upgrading the ram (tomorrow). I
also installed another HD, so now have a 160 gig model and a 300 gig
model. Have 10.4 installed on the
On Feb 10, 2010, at 3:30 PM, Geke wrote:
Thanks a lot!
That link from Pete is precious; I can mention it to the company so
they can check for themselves...
(Note that it runs over two lines that should be connected before
pasting into the browser.)
Geke
Yes it is. Here is a link
Does anyone here use SeaMonkey? If so, have you upgraded to 2.02? I
tried at 2.01 and was appalled by
my experience (can't really remember what didn't work now).
How do you find it?
Mac G4, dual 367, 2GB DDR
--
Joan Duncan, ASID
Interior Architecture Design
(o) 575.751.3030
(c) 575.770.4252
On Feb 10, 2010, at 1:38 PM, J.M.P.Hissel wrote:
On 08-02-2010 10:47, Stephen Conrad, khel...@gmail.com, wrote:
Was looking through my collection of loose RAM
Maybe some of you can help me ID one piece I cannot ID and can tell me what
some others can be used in (ESP. G3-G5 machines)
Been using SeaMonkey since 1.x (A couple years probably) as my main
Mac browser and e-mail client. Yes, I have upgraded to 2.02 and it's
pretty cool. It doesn't have the Edit/Fill in forms function anymore,
but I can live without it. Version 1.1.18 was and is extremely buggy.-
I'm glad we've moved
35 matches
Mail list logo
