Re: Picasa?

2009-01-15 Thread oneoftheharts
site it appeared to require an Intel Mac. I assumed that was the reason for not installing, so I trashed it. I have Picasa on my PC and I love it. Since I only use the PC for work (real estate), I did not already have other apps in place to man

Re: Picasa?

2009-01-14 Thread Ray
- Original Message From: Paxton > love Picasa and use it heavily. It is so easy.   - Original Message From: Bruce Johnson john...@pharmacy.arizona.edu >iPhoto then and the iPhoto now are VASTLY different beasts,  essentially different programs, save for name and g

Re: Picasa?

2009-01-12 Thread Paxton
else seen > this? Has anyone found a solution if so? I love Picasa and use it heavily. It is so easy. If you read the offical Picasa Mac blog they say that there are still bugs in it they are working out. They promise full functionality down the road. I was really looking forward to the Mac ve

Re: Picasa?

2009-01-12 Thread Bruce Johnson
On Jan 12, 2009, at 6:28 AM, diane wrote: > Personally I tried iPhoto when it first came out (OS 9 was it?) and > didn't like it. iPhoto then and the iPhoto now are VASTLY different beasts, essentially different programs, save for name and general function. -- Bruce Johnson University of

Re: Picasa?

2009-01-12 Thread diane
Personally I tried iPhoto when it first came out (OS 9 was it?) and didn't like it. I found iView Media then and have been using it ever since. Luckily I was a registered user long before MS got their hands on it. I am up to version 3. something. I have used the PIcasa web app and liked

Re: Picasa?

2009-01-12 Thread starrf...@valley.net
>>  images (five different libraries since iPhoto gets strange when it > >>  refers to over 20,000 or so)  Google releases Picasa for Mac.  It is > >>  pretty cool for a lot of reasons.  And it isn't bothered by the large > >>  number of images. > > >>  B

Re: Picasa?

2009-01-11 Thread Wallace Adrian D'Alessio
er 20,000 or so) Google releases Picasa for Mac. It is >> pretty cool for a lot of reasons. And it isn't bothered by the large >> number of images. >> >> But the current Beta version seems a little buggy to me and I wonder >

Re: Picasa?

2009-01-11 Thread Steve R
At 3:56 PM -0800 1/11/09, starrf...@valley.net posted: > Just when I finally decided to use IPhoto to sort through our 50,000 > images (five different libraries since iPhoto gets strange when it > refers to over 20,000 or so) Google releases Picasa for Mac. It is > pretty cool

Picasa Whoops!

2009-01-11 Thread starrf...@valley.net
Please forgive the extra word in the subject of my previous post. It sounds almost rude and was not supposed to be there. I should have edited the subject as well as the content before hitting send. Whoops! Rich --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message be

Picasa?

2009-01-11 Thread starrf...@valley.net
Just when I finally decided to use IPhoto to sort through our 50,000 images (five different libraries since iPhoto gets strange when it refers to over 20,000 or so) Google releases Picasa for Mac. It is pretty cool for a lot of reasons. And it isn't bothered by the large number of images.

Picasa? You

2009-01-11 Thread starrf...@valley.net
Just when I finally decided to use IPhoto to sort through our 50,000 images (five different libraries since iPhoto gets strange when it refers to over 20,000 or so) Google releases Picasa for Mac. It is pretty cool for a lot of reasons. And it isn't bothered by the large number of images.