On Feb 18, 2010, at 10:41 PM, deadwinter wrote:
Hi folks:
I thought I had a partition for 10.2 and another for OS9.2, but upon
closer examination it looks like I have OS 10.2 and a folder labeled
OS9 applications, OS 9 System, etc. In the Startup Disk control
panel, I can choose that the
On Feb 19, 2010, at 2:11 AM, Clark Martin wrote:
On 2/18/10 10:41 PM, deadwinter wrote:
Hi folks:
I thought I had a partition for 10.2 and another for OS9.2, but upon
closer examination it looks like I have OS 10.2 and a folder labeled
OS9 applications, OS 9 System, etc. In the Startup Disk
On Feb 19, 2010, at 6:46 AM, Bill Connelly wrote:
On Feb 19, 2010, at 2:11 AM, Clark Martin wrote:
On 2/18/10 10:41 PM, deadwinter wrote:
Hi folks:
I thought I had a partition for 10.2 and another for OS9.2, but upon
closer examination it looks like I have OS 10.2 and a folder labeled
On 18 Feb 2010, at 23:30:14 PST, Clark Martin wrote:
On 2/18/10 11:09 PM, Ken Daggett wrote:
On my new Pismo, I installed a 4GB HD I had on hand. I installed
10.4.11 and then installed OS 9 on the same drive, no partitions.
OUCH, 4Gb! You must like living in closets too.
I have a new
On Feb 18, 2010, at 11:41 PM, deadwinter wrote:
Hi folks:
I thought I had a partition for 10.2 and another for OS9.2, but upon
closer examination it looks like I have OS 10.2 and a folder labeled
OS9 applications, OS 9 System, etc. In the Startup Disk control
panel, I can choose that the
On Feb 18, 11:41 pm, deadwinter thecar...@gmail.com wrote:
I thought I had a partition for 10.2 and another for OS9.2, but upon
closer examination it looks like I have OS 10.2 and a folder labeled
OS9 applications, OS 9 System, etc. In the Startup Disk control
panel, I can choose that the
Oh, I used a Quadra in school. I haven't forgotten (or forgiven)
System 7.
Anyway, the point (if there is one) of this G3 exercise of mine is to
squeeze performance out of this poor thing. I want to establish if
the way it's setup now would make a difference, performance wise. To
be clear, I
On Feb 19, 2010, at 5:26 PM, deadwinter wrote:
Oh, I used a Quadra in school. I haven't forgotten (or forgiven)
System 7.
Anyway, the point (if there is one) of this G3 exercise of mine is to
squeeze performance out of this poor thing. I want to establish if
the way it's setup now
On Feb 19, 2010, at 6:26 PM, deadwinter wrote:
Oh, I used a Quadra in school. I haven't forgotten (or forgiven)
System 7.
Anyway, the point (if there is one) of this G3 exercise of mine is to
squeeze performance out of this poor thing. I want to establish if
the way it's setup now would
On 18 Feb 2010, at 22:41:46 PST, deadwinter wrote:
I thought I had a partition for 10.2 and another for OS9.2, but upon
closer examination it looks like I have OS 10.2 and a folder labeled
OS9 applications, OS 9 System, etc. In the Startup Disk control
panel, I can choose that the system use
On 2/18/10 10:41 PM, deadwinter wrote:
Hi folks:
I thought I had a partition for 10.2 and another for OS9.2, but upon
closer examination it looks like I have OS 10.2 and a folder labeled
OS9 applications, OS 9 System, etc. In the Startup Disk control
panel, I can choose that the system use the
On 2/18/10 11:09 PM, Ken Daggett wrote:
On my new Pismo, I installed a 4GB HD I had on hand. I installed
10.4.11 and then installed OS 9 on the same drive, no partitions.
OUCH, 4Gb! You must like living in closets too.
I have a new Pismo too. It's a little roomier, 120 Gb, but it is
12 matches
Mail list logo
