If the Flower Pot you have has a 100 Bus it will be Slw.
Which machine do you have. IMHO Tiger is still the very fastest on
the PPC's except for the G5 PM's.
JOHN CARMONNE
John, the iMac has 80 gig hard drive, 768 mgs of RAM, 800 MHz speed
processor and 100 MHz Bus speed. He is going
I think it’s wise to leave it at Tiger, especially if you’re more
familiar with that and will do tech support.
If you give him an administrator account, then the best thing you can
do is to get an external HD with Firewire and set up a complete
(incremental) backup schedule with Carbon Copy
On Mar 2, 11:20 pm, Kris Tilford ktilfo...@cox.net wrote:
On Mar 2, 2011, at 10:13 PM, Jane, (Portland, OR) wrote:
Can this Mac handle 10.5 without a lot of slowdown?
The slowdown averages about 15% or so, you can check out the Xbench or
Geekbench archives for exact numbers for your
On Mar 2, 2011, at 8:13 PM, Jane, (Portland, OR) wrote:
I am giving my G4 flat screen iMac (lamp shade or 1/2 ball) to a
teenager. It has had 10.4 on it forever without any problems. But I am
thinking that he may want to run 10.5. Can this Mac handle 10.5
without a lot of slowdown?
Jane
If
On my Quicksilver dual 800 it took actually gave it better Geekbench scores.
It took a hit on the graphics performance though it was using a Rage 128.
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 7:49 AM, Al Poulin alfred.pou...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mar 2, 11:20 pm, Kris Tilford ktilfo...@cox.net wrote:
On Mar 2,
On Mar 2, 8:22 pm, John Carmonne carmo...@aol.com wrote:
On Mar 2, 2011, at 8:13 PM, Jane, (Portland, OR) wrote:
I am giving my G4 flat screen iMac (lamp shade or 1/2 ball) to a
teenager. It has had 10.4 on it forever without any problems. But I am
thinking that he may want to run 10.5.
On Mar 2, 8:20 pm, Kris Tilford ktilfo...@cox.net wrote:
On Mar 2, 2011, at 10:13 PM, Jane, (Portland, OR) wrote:
Can this Mac handle 10.5 without a lot of slowdown?
The slowdown averages about 15% or so, you can check out the Xbench or
Geekbench archives for exact numbers for your
On Mar 3, 2011, at 2:58 PM, Jane, (Portland, OR) wrote:
Kris, I am admitting ignorance here. I don't know how to interpret the
bench marks and what they mean.
They're just a scale for comparison. Sometimes the scale isn't very
good, but until there's a better scale, it's what we have.
In
On Mar 3, 2011, at 1:57 PM, Jane, (Portland, OR) wrote:
Another question I have is the Administrator Account. I planned to
leave me as an Administrator, but also add him as one, too. Does it
work well to have 2 Admins? I will probably do the tech support for
him.
It works just fine to have
I would keep it at 10.4, however if you want to, you could use Leopard
Assist to override the 867MHZ processor limit.
-Jonas
--
You received this message because you are a member of G-Group, a group for
those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on Power Macs.
The list
On 3/2/11 9:13 PM, Jane, (Portland, OR) wrote:
I am giving my G4 flat screen iMac (lamp shade or 1/2 ball) to a
teenager. It has had 10.4 on it forever without any problems. But I am
thinking that he may want to run 10.5. Can this Mac handle 10.5
without a lot of slowdown?
Though I am not a
On 3/2/11 9:13 PM, Jane, (Portland, OR) wrote:
I am giving my G4 flat screen iMac (lamp shade or 1/2 ball) to a
teenager. It has had 10.4 on it forever without any problems. But I am
thinking that he may want to run 10.5. Can this Mac handle 10.5
without a lot of slowdown?
Though I am not a
I am giving my G4 flat screen iMac (lamp shade or 1/2 ball) to a
teenager. It has had 10.4 on it forever without any problems. But I am
thinking that he may want to run 10.5. Can this Mac handle 10.5
without a lot of slowdown?
Jane
--
You received this message because you are a member of
On Mar 2, 2011, at 10:13 PM, Jane, (Portland, OR) wrote:
Can this Mac handle 10.5 without a lot of slowdown?
The slowdown averages about 15% or so, you can check out the Xbench or
Geekbench archives for exact numbers for your specific Mac:
http://db.xbench.com/
http://browse.geekbench.ca/
14 matches
Mail list logo
