On Mar 21, 11:49 am, Barney Guzzo guz...@gmail.com wrote:
PM G4 933 running Apple Mail 2.1.3. If I BCC someone in Mail and then
later go to review the mail I sent in my Sent box, I do not see the
people I BCC'd in the original. Is there any way for me to see who I
BCC'd?
Do one of the
Thanks a bunch. I'll poke around over there.
On Mar 19, 9:49 pm, Kris Tilford ktilfo...@cox.net wrote:
On Mar 19, 2011, at 8:47 PM, jason wrote:
I had the pismo in target disk mode and it transferred the
6.5 gb worth of pictures, however, some pictures were psychedelic
colors, and some
Tina - you hit the nail on the head here. I was running Dual 1.25GHz
MDD G4 which I still love, 3 of them helping to keep my house warm.
The only thing they are slow at is the video encode. You Tube, no
issue. But the encode? 2-4 hours per hour of video depending on the
format change.
I bought the
Thanks.
On Mar 22, 2011 2:26 AM, Judith Berkowitz sfjb...@mac.com wrote:
On Mar 21, 11:49 am, Barney Guzzo guz...@gmail.com wrote:
PM G4 933 running Apple Mail 2.1.3. If I BCC someone in Mail and then
later go to review the mail I sent in my Sent box, I do not see the
people I BCC'd in the
On Mar 21, 2011, at 10:32 PM, Daniel Stewart wrote:
But truth be told they have
found they are much more impressed with the old G4s because unlike the
new faster Intel macs the G4s are actually consistently reliable.
Their Intel Macs are consistently crashing or malfunctioning in some
other
On Mar 22, 7:10 am, JoeTaxpayer joetaxpaye...@gmail.com wrote:
Tina - you hit the nail on the head here. I was running Dual 1.25GHz
MDD G4 which I still love, 3 of them helping to keep my house warm.
The only thing they are slow at is the video encode. You Tube, no
issue. But the encode? 2-4
On Mar 22, 2011, at 7:42 AM, ah...clem wrote:
there you go AGAIN, confusing software performance with CPU
performance. the apps you refer to were written for the Win/Tel
architecture, and ported to the PPC by lazy and/or incompetent boobs
who wouldn't or couldn't rewrite the program from
On Mar 22, 2011, at 10:25 AM, Bruce Johnson wrote:
On Mar 21, 2011, at 10:32 PM, Daniel Stewart wrote:
But truth be told they have
found they are much more impressed with the old G4s because unlike the
new faster Intel macs the G4s are actually consistently reliable.
Their Intel Macs
Well I am glad others have had a better experience. My point was Simply that
on any computer platform good benchmarks does not always mean an improvement of
real world performance.
Sent on the TELUS Mobility network with BlackBerry
-Original Message-
From: James E. Therrault
Actually you can roll your own apps for PPC. That's what Linux for
PPC or if you want serious geek cred NetBSD PPC is for. lol
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 1:31 PM, Tina K. penguir...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2011/03/22 08:42, ah...clem so eloquently wrote:
On Mar 22, 7:10 am,
I remember it taking about four days to rip a DVD (REALLY high quality rip)
using HandBrake on a Dual 1GHZ MDD. I then ripped the same DVD on a 2.8GHZ
P4 Hackintosh in one day.
I will say that I have seen A LOT more hardware problems with the newer
Macs, as oposed to the rock solid G4 towers.
Not surprising that you have had hardware issues with the Intel Macs.
I have been doing service work on PCs for years and that is pretty
standard with intel based systems.I have to ask though with the
X86 Mac what on earth was Apple thinking with Intel integrated
graphics. Intel integrated
On Mar 22, 2011, at 11:46 AM, Daniel Stewart wrote:
Actually you can roll your own apps for PPC. That's what Linux for
PPC or if you want serious geek cred NetBSD PPC is for. lol
Or Apple's developer tools
--
Bruce Johnson
University of Arizona
College of Pharmacy
Information
Very true. That comment was intended to only be half serious with a
little humour. That certainly works too.
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 2:14 PM, Bruce Johnson
john...@pharmacy.arizona.edu wrote:
On Mar 22, 2011, at 11:46 AM, Daniel Stewart wrote:
Actually you can roll your own apps for PPC.
On Mar 22, 10:42 am, ah...clem boneheads...@gmail.com wrote:
there you go AGAIN, confusing software performance with CPU
performance. the apps you refer to were written for the Win/Tel
architecture, and ported to the PPC by lazy and/or incompetent boobs
who wouldn't or couldn't rewrite the
On Mar 22, 2:52 pm, Jonas Ulrich jonasulrich3...@gmail.com wrote:
I remember it taking about four days to rip a DVD (REALLY high quality rip)
using HandBrake on a Dual 1GHZ MDD. I then ripped the same DVD on a 2.8GHZ
P4 Hackintosh in one day.
Jonas, when you say rip do you mean encode? My G4s
On Mar 22, 2011, at 12:09 PM, Daniel Stewart wrote:
I have to ask though with the
X86 Mac what on earth was Apple thinking with Intel integrated
graphics. Intel integrated GPUs were considered a joke on the Wintel
side long before Apple made the switch so why got with a graphics
platform
I have to ask though with the
X86 Mac what on earth was Apple thinking with Intel integrated
graphics. Intel integrated GPUs were considered a joke on the Wintel
side long before Apple made the switch so why got with a graphics
platform that many consider to be an oxymoron especially
On Mar 22, 2011, at 2:26 PM, Bruce Johnson wrote:
Only one Mac uses Intel graphics
A few more than one.
I'm counting at least 12 models with three different families of Intel
graphics.
Without these many hackintosh would be SOL.
Intel GMA 800: developer Mac Pro
Intel GMA 950: MacBook
Only one Mac uses Intel graphics
A few more than one.
I'm counting at least 12 models with three different families of Intel
graphics.
Without these many [ a ] hackintosh would be SOL.
And, the Macks would be SOL, too.
Although all standard distributions have GMA950 and GMAX3100 support
Thanks, Dan. Anything similar for Quicksilver 2002?
--
You received this message because you are a member of G-Group, a group for
those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette
I use GMA900 graphics on four different Hackintosh machines and it
works great with full ability to change resolutions, as well QE CI.
From my experience, HP is terrible. There have been a couple machines
that are descent, but I go with Dell.
-Jonas
--
You received this message because you
I've never used integrated graphics on any of my hackintoshes, mainly because I
play some games and run a multiple monitor setup, but when I did use a Mac Mini
with GMA 950 it wasn't that bad.
As far as system brands go, most of my hacks are custom built boxes, it's just
easier in my opinion
I'd love to have the IIci?
Baldassare Guzzo
guz...@gmail.com
The Big Bang theory may be true...
but it was God who made the bang
On Mar 22, 2011, at 2:38 PM, Wayne Stewart wrote:
I have a lot of Apple IIs, IIIs and Macs and I really need to
downsize. Some input into what to get rid of
At 12:24 PM -0700 3/22/2011, JoeTaxpayer wrote:
On Mar 22, 2:52 pm, Jonas Ulrich jonasulrich3...@gmail.com wrote:
I remember it taking about four days to rip a DVD (REALLY high quality rip)
using HandBrake on a Dual 1GHZ MDD. I then ripped the same DVD on a 2.8GHZ
P4 Hackintosh in one day.
On Mar 22, 7:42 pm, Dan dantear...@gmail.com wrote:
At 12:24 PM -0700 3/22/2011, JoeTaxpayer wrote:
On Mar 22, 2:52 pm, Jonas Ulrich jonasulrich3...@gmail.com wrote:
I remember it taking about four days to rip a DVD (REALLY high quality
rip)
using HandBrake on a Dual 1GHZ MDD. I then
On 3/22/2011 1:52 PM, Jonas Ulrich wrote:
I remember it taking about four days to rip a DVD (REALLY high quality
rip) using HandBrake on a Dual 1GHZ MDD. I then ripped the same DVD on
a 2.8GHZ P4 Hackintosh in one day.
I will say that I have seen A LOT more hardware problems with the
newer
My experience has been the inverse of yours.
My iBook G3's graphics chip went out (yes, it's a know flaw, but
regardless, the system failed) and the L3 cache on my 1.42GHz MDD G4
failed, causing instability and requiring a replacement CPU card. The
iMac G4 I gave to my sister died too, it
On Mar 22, 11:57 am, Bruce Johnson john...@pharmacy.arizona.edu
wrote:
Oh puleeeze. You're claiming a dual 1.25 Ghz G4 on a 333 mHz bus can compare
to a Mac Pro (which at a MINIMUM has 2 2.66Ghz dual core Xeons with 667 Mhz
memory bus) with a few COMPILER TWEAKS??? (which tweaks, BTW,
29 matches
Mail list logo
