Re: Tiger/Classic on dual G4/5

2012-04-28 Thread geraldcornish
Just restarted Tiger on my Pismo/400MHZ, 1GB ram), started Activity  
Monitor, no other programs -

System taking 1-5%
Idle 87-96%
Remainder would be Activity Monitor.

Started Classic
Started Pagemaker - no documents/files open -
System 13-25%
TrueBlue(Classic) 72-82%
Activity Monitor 3-7%
Idle 0% !

Always like that when Pagemaker is running.


On 27 /04/ 2012, at 04:24, Clark Martin wrote:



On Apr 26, 2012, at 12:38 PM, Dan wrote:


On Apr 22, 2012, at 3:39 PM, geraldcornish wrote:
Current setup is Pismo 500MHz/1GB Ram/100GB HDD Tiger 10.4.11   
OS 9.2.2

Intention is to upgrade to Dual G4/G5 but keeping Tiger/Classic.

My better half needs to use Pagemaker in classic while using OSX  
simultaneously.  Pagemaker uses up all the spare cpu cycles and  
slows down all other programs, and I assume this would still be  
the case with a faster Mac.


Depends on how PageMaker is written.  If it's polling for user  
input continuously, then it will certainly always (try to) use  
some cpu time, not a lot %-wise if you have lots to spare.


That's OS 9 (and below) for you.



Seems odd to me that PageMaker would be continuously piggy.  Have  
you watched the system with Activity Monitor, to see what  
resources are actually in such low demand that the whole system  
runs slowly?



if we move to a dual G4/G5 how does Tiger handle the two cpus?


OS X (and OS 9) supports multiple processors (discrete, multi  
core, threads) two ways.  First:  when a process or thread is  
ready for cpu time, it is dispatched to one of the CPU/cores.   
Second:  if the application knows how to use non-sequential  
threads, then the threads are dispatched the same way - to  
whichever CPU/core has time available.


OS 9 supports letting programs use multiple processors but it's up  
to the program to handle multiple threads.




Will it assign classic/pagemaker to one cpu only, leaving the  
other cpu to do any OSX work needed?


No.  Under OS X, scheduling is done preemptively, as resources are  
available.  That means a process is given a quantum time slice on  
a CPU/core, and the CPU is taken away when the slice ends or when  
the process becomes otherwise blocked (waiting for i/o, etc).   
Classic is a process under OS X... so when its slice ends, the app  
running within Classic is suspended.  When the next slice is  
available to that process, it is re-assigned to a CPU/core...  Of  
course, if the process is still loaded in one particular CPU/ 
core, then assignment preference is given to using that particular  
CPU/core.


But Pagemaker will be using only one CPU at a time (I'm guessing  
that OS X doesn't support OS 9's version of multiprocessor support.




This would be ideal for us if one cpu is kept free of the  
Pagemaker loading.


You need to think of the OS being the high muckety, not the CPU.   
The CPU, like memory, is *just* a resource that the OS controls /  
manages.


--
You received this message because you are a member of G-Group, a  
group for those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a  
particular focus on Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our  
netiquette guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml

To post to this group, send email to g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/ 
group/g3-5-list


--
You received this message because you are a member of G-Group, a group for 
those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette 
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list


Re: Tiger/Classic on dual G4/5

2012-04-26 Thread Dan

On Apr 22, 2012, at 3:39 PM, geraldcornish wrote:

Current setup is Pismo 500MHz/1GB Ram/100GB HDD Tiger 10.4.11  OS 9.2.2
Intention is to upgrade to Dual G4/G5 but keeping Tiger/Classic.

My better half needs to use Pagemaker in classic while using OSX 
simultaneously.  Pagemaker uses up all the spare cpu cycles and 
slows down all other programs, and I assume this would still be the 
case with a faster Mac.


Depends on how PageMaker is written.  If it's polling for user input 
continuously, then it will certainly always (try to) use some cpu 
time, not a lot %-wise if you have lots to spare.


Seems odd to me that PageMaker would be continuously piggy.  Have you 
watched the system with Activity Monitor, to see what resources are 
actually in such low demand that the whole system runs slowly?



  if we move to a dual G4/G5 how does Tiger handle the two cpus?


OS X (and OS 9) supports multiple processors (discrete, multi core, 
threads) two ways.  First:  when a process or thread is ready for cpu 
time, it is dispatched to one of the CPU/cores.  Second:  if the 
application knows how to use non-sequential threads, then the threads 
are dispatched the same way - to whichever CPU/core has time 
available.


Will it assign classic/pagemaker to one cpu only, leaving the other 
cpu to do any OSX work needed?


No.  Under OS X, scheduling is done preemptively, as resources are 
available.  That means a process is given a quantum time slice on a 
CPU/core, and the CPU is taken away when the slice ends or when the 
process becomes otherwise blocked (waiting for i/o, etc).  Classic is 
a process under OS X... so when its slice ends, the app running 
within Classic is suspended.  When the next slice is available to 
that process, it is re-assigned to a CPU/core...  Of course, if the 
process is still loaded in one particular CPU/core, then assignment 
preference is given to using that particular CPU/core.



This would be ideal for us if one cpu is kept free of the Pagemaker loading.


You need to think of the OS being the high muckety, not the CPU.  The 
CPU, like memory, is *just* a resource that the OS controls / manages.



See John's reply wrt machine choice and bootability.

- Dan.
--
- Psychoceramic Emeritus; South Jersey, USA, Earth.

--
You received this message because you are a member of G-Group, a group for 
those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette 
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list


Re: Tiger/Classic on dual G4/5

2012-04-26 Thread Cameron Kaiser
 Will it assign classic/pagemaker to one cpu only, leaving the other 
 cpu to do any OSX work needed?
 
 No.  Under OS X, scheduling is done preemptively, as resources are 
 available.  That means a process is given a quantum time slice on a 
 CPU/core, and the CPU is taken away when the slice ends or when the 
 process becomes otherwise blocked (waiting for i/o, etc).  Classic is 
 a process under OS X... so when its slice ends, the app running 
 within Classic is suspended.  When the next slice is available to 
 that process, it is re-assigned to a CPU/core...  Of course, if the 
 process is still loaded in one particular CPU/core, then assignment 
 preference is given to using that particular CPU/core.

Just to throw a wrench into this otherwise accurate description, I haven't
looked into how Classic handles apps that use the Multiprocessing API,
but I presume that TruBluEnvironment has all the tasks within it, including
MPTasks, as threads. I need to look into this at some point.

-- 
 personal: http://www.cameronkaiser.com/ --
  Cameron Kaiser * Floodgap Systems * www.floodgap.com * ckai...@floodgap.com
-- This message will self-destruct in five seconds. Good luck, Jim. -- M:I 

-- 
You received this message because you are a member of G-Group, a group for 
those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette 
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list


Re: Tiger/Classic on dual G4/5

2012-04-26 Thread Clark Martin

On Apr 26, 2012, at 12:38 PM, Dan wrote:

 On Apr 22, 2012, at 3:39 PM, geraldcornish wrote:
 Current setup is Pismo 500MHz/1GB Ram/100GB HDD Tiger 10.4.11  OS 9.2.2
 Intention is to upgrade to Dual G4/G5 but keeping Tiger/Classic.
 
 My better half needs to use Pagemaker in classic while using OSX 
 simultaneously.  Pagemaker uses up all the spare cpu cycles and slows down 
 all other programs, and I assume this would still be the case with a faster 
 Mac.
 
 Depends on how PageMaker is written.  If it's polling for user input 
 continuously, then it will certainly always (try to) use some cpu time, not a 
 lot %-wise if you have lots to spare.

That's OS 9 (and below) for you.  

 
 Seems odd to me that PageMaker would be continuously piggy.  Have you watched 
 the system with Activity Monitor, to see what resources are actually in such 
 low demand that the whole system runs slowly?
 
  if we move to a dual G4/G5 how does Tiger handle the two cpus?
 
 OS X (and OS 9) supports multiple processors (discrete, multi core, threads) 
 two ways.  First:  when a process or thread is ready for cpu time, it is 
 dispatched to one of the CPU/cores.  Second:  if the application knows how to 
 use non-sequential threads, then the threads are dispatched the same way - to 
 whichever CPU/core has time available.

OS 9 supports letting programs use multiple processors but it's up to the 
program to handle multiple threads.

 
 Will it assign classic/pagemaker to one cpu only, leaving the other cpu to 
 do any OSX work needed?
 
 No.  Under OS X, scheduling is done preemptively, as resources are available. 
  That means a process is given a quantum time slice on a CPU/core, and the 
 CPU is taken away when the slice ends or when the process becomes otherwise 
 blocked (waiting for i/o, etc).  Classic is a process under OS X... so when 
 its slice ends, the app running within Classic is suspended.  When the next 
 slice is available to that process, it is re-assigned to a CPU/core...  Of 
 course, if the process is still loaded in one particular CPU/core, then 
 assignment preference is given to using that particular CPU/core.

But Pagemaker will be using only one CPU at a time (I'm guessing that OS X 
doesn't support OS 9's version of multiprocessor support.

 
 This would be ideal for us if one cpu is kept free of the Pagemaker loading.
 
 You need to think of the OS being the high muckety, not the CPU.  The CPU, 
 like memory, is *just* a resource that the OS controls / manages.

-- 
You received this message because you are a member of G-Group, a group for 
those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette 
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list


Tiger/Classic on dual G4/5

2012-04-22 Thread geraldcornish

Hi all,

Current setup is Pismo 500MHz/1GB Ram/100GB HDD Tiger 10.4.11  OS 9.2.2
Intention is to upgrade to Dual G4/G5 but keeping Tiger/Classic.

My better half needs to use Pagemaker in classic while using OSX  
simultaneously.


Pagemaker uses up all the spare cpu cycles and slows down all other  
programs, and I assume this would still be the case with a faster Mac.


My question is - if we move to a dual G4/G5 how does Tiger handle the  
two cpus?


Will it assign classic/pagemaker to one cpu only, leaving the other  
cpu to do any OSX work needed?


This would be ideal for us if one cpu is kept free of the Pagemaker  
loading.


TIA

Ged

--
You received this message because you are a member of G-Group, a group for 
those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette 
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list


Re: Tiger/Classic on dual G4/5

2012-04-22 Thread John Carmonne

On Apr 22, 2012, at 3:39 PM, geraldcornish wrote:

 Hi all,
 
 Current setup is Pismo 500MHz/1GB Ram/100GB HDD Tiger 10.4.11  OS 9.2.2
 Intention is to upgrade to Dual G4/G5 but keeping Tiger/Classic.
 
 My better half needs to use Pagemaker in classic while using OSX 
 simultaneously.
 
 Pagemaker uses up all the spare cpu cycles and slows down all other programs, 
 and I assume this would still be the case with a faster Mac.
 
 My question is - if we move to a dual G4/G5 how does Tiger handle the two 
 cpus?
 
 Will it assign classic/pagemaker to one cpu only, leaving the other cpu to do 
 any OSX work needed?
 
 This would be ideal for us if one cpu is kept free of the Pagemaker loading.
 
 TIA
 
 Ged

G4 PM up to Dual 1.25 F/W 400  will boot both  9.2.2 and 10.4.11  where G5 PM 
will not boot OS9..2.2 but will run Classic along with Tiger. Ive done it with 
Pagemaker 7.


John Carmonne
Yorba Linda CA
92886 USA
MacBook Pro i7






-- 
You received this message because you are a member of G-Group, a group for 
those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette 
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list