Re: classic or no classic in leopard?

2010-12-29 Thread Jeff Bequette
On Dec 28, 2010, at 9:42 AM, TRGPN WebMaster wrote: --- On Tue, 12/28/10, Joshua Juran jju...@gmail.com wrote: Bottom line: If you want to run a supported OS and OS 9 (reliably), you need two machines. Not so. In its simplest terms, you need a separate volume for each OS you want to run

Re: classic or no classic in leopard?

2010-12-28 Thread Joshua Juran
On Dec 22, 2010, at 3:02 PM, Bruce Johnson wrote: On Dec 22, 2010, at 3:42 PM, Dan wrote: I've found Sheepshaver to be sluggish and/or crashy Sure that isn't just the experience of using OS 9 after living with OS X for so long? It's SheepShaver. Since it doesn't implement hardware

Re: classic or no classic in leopard?

2010-12-28 Thread TRGPN WebMaster
--- On Tue, 12/28/10, Joshua Juran jju...@gmail.com wrote: Bottom line: If you want to run a supported OS and OS 9 (reliably), you need two machines. Not so. In its simplest terms, you need a separate volume for each OS you want to run on your computer. Use the system preference Startup Disk

Re: classic or no classic in leopard?

2010-12-28 Thread Charles Davis
On Dec 28, 2010, at 10:42 AM, TRGPN WebMaster wrote: --- On Tue, 12/28/10, Joshua Juran jju...@gmail.com wrote: Bottom line: If you want to run a supported OS and OS 9 (reliably), you need two machines. Not so. In its simplest terms, you need a separate volume for each OS you want to run

classic or no classic in leopard?

2010-12-22 Thread ah...clem
hi all, i run tiger on all my macs (G4's G5's) except for the 2010 intelmac (10.6.4), but i have been thinking of getting 10.5 for the older ones. however, i use a number of classic apps regularly, and i don't remember if 10.5 supports the classic environment or not. i tried checking the apple

Re: classic or no classic in leopard?

2010-12-22 Thread Bruce Johnson
On Dec 22, 2010, at 11:43 AM, ah...clem wrote: hi all, i run tiger on all my macs (G4's G5's) except for the 2010 intelmac (10.6.4), but i have been thinking of getting 10.5 for the older ones. however, i use a number of classic apps regularly, and i don't remember if 10.5 supports the

Re: classic or no classic in leopard?

2010-12-22 Thread Dan
At 12:31 PM -0700 12/22/2010, Bruce Johnson wrote: On Dec 22, 2010, at 11:43 AM, ah...clem wrote: i run tiger on all my macs (G4's G5's) except for the 2010 intelmac (10.6.4), but i have been thinking of getting 10.5 for the older ones. however, i use a number of classic apps regularly,

Re: classic or no classic in leopard?

2010-12-22 Thread Bruce Johnson
On Dec 22, 2010, at 3:42 PM, Dan wrote: I've found Sheepshaver to be sluggish and/or crashy Sure that isn't just the experience of using OS 9 after living with OS X for so long? gdr -- Bruce Johnson University of Arizona College of Pharmacy Information Technology Group Institutions do

Re: classic or no classic in leopard?

2010-12-22 Thread Daniel Stewart
I have not tried it myself, but wouldn't dual booting being an option? Then you could just boot into whichever OS you need at the time. On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 5:02 PM, Bruce Johnson john...@pharmacy.arizona.edu wrote: On Dec 22, 2010, at 3:42 PM, Dan wrote: I've found Sheepshaver to be

Re: classic or no classic in leopard?

2010-12-22 Thread Bruce Johnson
On Dec 22, 2010, at 4:19 PM, Daniel Stewart wrote: I have not tried it myself, but wouldn't dual booting being an option? Then you could just boot into whichever OS you need at the time. Only on some of the G4's. No G5 will boot natively in OS 9, and the last model, perhaps the last two

Re: classic or no classic in leopard?

2010-12-22 Thread Bill Connelly
On Dec 22, 2010, at 6:19 PM, Daniel Stewart wrote: I have not tried it myself, but wouldn't dual booting being an option? Then you could just boot into whichever OS you need at the time. That has worked for me. Using Leopard 10.5.8, and having OS 9 Classic under Tiger 10.4.11, and going

Re: classic or no classic in leopard?

2010-12-22 Thread Bruce Johnson
On Dec 22, 2010, at 5:09 PM, Bill Connelly wrote: On Dec 22, 2010, at 6:19 PM, Daniel Stewart wrote: I have not tried it myself, but wouldn't dual booting being an option? Then you could just boot into whichever OS you need at the time. That has worked for me. Using Leopard 10.5.8, and

Re: classic or no classic in leopard?

2010-12-22 Thread Daniel Stewart
I didn't think of dual booting multiple versions of OS X either. lol Good to know about the OS9 /OS X dual boot option though. My trusty Quicksilver 2002 runs both just fine. On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 6:12 PM, Bruce Johnson john...@pharmacy.arizona.edu wrote: On Dec 22, 2010, at 5:09 PM, Bill

Re: classic or no classic in leopard?

2010-12-22 Thread John Carmonne
, and Leopard 10.5.8. My PowerMac G5 Dual 2.7 Boots Tiger 10.4.11 and runs Classic, it also boots Leopard 10.5.8. G4 PowerMacs with FireWire 800 and up will no longer boot OS 9 but will run Classic with Tiger. John Carmonne Yorba Linda USA Sent from my MBP -- You received this message because

Re: classic or no classic in leopard?

2010-12-22 Thread Bill Connelly
On Dec 22, 2010, at 7:12 PM, Bruce Johnson wrote: On Dec 22, 2010, at 5:09 PM, Bill Connelly wrote: On Dec 22, 2010, at 6:19 PM, Daniel Stewart wrote: I have not tried it myself, but wouldn't dual booting being an option? Then you could just boot into whichever OS you need at the time.

Re: classic or no classic in leopard?

2010-12-22 Thread Dan
At 9:01 PM -0500 12/22/2010, Bill Connelly wrote: The only issue I believe is that Spotlight under Tiger starts up when you first run it, after using Leopard ... as if it's never run, if I interpret what is going on correctly. Letting it run to completion, so it doesn't show its buggy-ness,