On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 4:02 PM, John Chilton wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 9:55 AM, Peter Cock wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 12:35 PM, Peter Cock
>> wrote:
>>> On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 8:30 AM, John Chilton wrote:
With these change, I was able to write working functional tests for
>
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 9:55 AM, Peter Cock wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 12:35 PM, Peter Cock
> wrote:
>> On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 8:30 AM, John Chilton wrote:
>>> With these change, I was able to write working functional tests for
>>> your tool using the template you outlined in the Trello c
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 12:35 PM, Peter Cock wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 8:30 AM, John Chilton wrote:
>> With these change, I was able to write working functional tests for
>> your tool using the template you outlined in the Trello card. ...
>> I discovered no problems with auto_primary versu
On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 8:30 AM, John Chilton wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 9:36 AM, Peter Cock wrote:
>> ...
>>
>> As noted in my last email, for some reason when running the test case,
>> the input FASTA file is being included on the command line TWICE.
>> Curiously the -hash_index argument ha
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 9:36 AM, Peter Cock wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 3:08 PM, Peter Cock wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 7:19 PM, Daniel Blankenberg wrote:
>>> Hi Peter,
>>>
>>> What is the test error given when you do have a value defined for name in
>>> output?
>>>
>>>
>>> Can you try
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 4:30 PM, Peter Cock wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 3:36 PM, Peter Cock wrote:
>>
>> OK, I've updated to the latest galaxy-central default branch. Here's
>> the slightly revised test for ncbi_makeblastdb.xml,
>>
>> ...
>
> In the absence of any fresh feedback, I've filed
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 3:36 PM, Peter Cock wrote:
>
> OK, I've updated to the latest galaxy-central default branch. Here's
> the slightly revised test for ncbi_makeblastdb.xml,
>
> ...
In the absence of any fresh feedback, I've filed an issue on Trello for this
to make sure it gets tracked:
htt
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 3:08 PM, Peter Cock wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 7:19 PM, Daniel Blankenberg wrote:
>> Hi Peter,
>>
>> What is the test error given when you do have a value defined for name in
>> output?
>>
>>
>> Can you try using 'empty_file.dat'?
>>
>> e.g.
>>
>>
>>
>> or
>>
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 7:19 PM, Daniel Blankenberg wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> What is the test error given when you do have a value defined for name in
> output?
>
>
> Can you try using 'empty_file.dat'?
>
> e.g.
>
>
>
> or
>
>
>
> etc
Hi Daniel,
That seems to help (plus fixing a t
Hi Peter,
What is the test error given when you do have a value defined for name in
output?
Can you try using 'empty_file.dat'?
e.g.
or
etc
Thanks for using Galaxy,
Dan
On Apr 4, 2013, at 1:34 PM, Peter Cock wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 2:48 PM, Peter Cock wro
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 2:48 PM, Peter Cock wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 2:37 PM, Dave Bouvier wrote:
>> For the outputs, rgClean.xml provides an example of comparing a
>> composite output dataset with the expected test data.
>
> Here there is a tag used within the tag.
>
> Many thanks Dave -
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 2:37 PM, Dave Bouvier wrote:
> Peter,
>
> Yes, it is definitely possible to use a composite datatype in functional
> tests, and a number of tools in the Galaxy distribution do so.
Hooray - I was hoping this functionality already existed but was just
undocumented.
> For exa
Peter,
Yes, it is definitely possible to use a composite datatype in functional
tests, and a number of tools in the Galaxy distribution do so. For
examples on how to define composite inputs, you can look at the tools in
tools/rgenetics/, such as rgGLM.xml or rgHaploView.xml. For the outputs,
13 matches
Mail list logo
