Re: [galaxy-dev] Dynamic job runner status? Could I use it in combination with job splitting?

On Nov 2, 2012, at 3:58 PM, Carlos Borroto wrote: > > Please, could you share your rules related to blast. I would love to > take a look at them. > > Thanks, > Carlos Here is the blastn rule procedure code and the relevant snippet of the default runner procedure. I just added the database ba

Re: [galaxy-dev] Dynamic job runner status? Could I use it in combination with job splitting?

On Nov 2, 2012, at 4:42 PM, Carlos Borroto wrote: > On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 3:58 PM, Carlos Borroto > wrote: >> On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 9:53 AM, Oleksandr Moskalenko >> wrote: >>> >>> The dynamic runner is alive and well thanks to the continuous work of the >>> author John Chilton and others

Re: [galaxy-dev] Dynamic job runner status? Could I use it in combination with job splitting?

On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 3:58 PM, Carlos Borroto wrote: > On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 9:53 AM, Oleksandr Moskalenko wrote: >> >> The dynamic runner is alive and well thanks to the continuous work of the >> author John Chilton and others. For instance, yesterday John committed code >> to galaxy-central

Re: [galaxy-dev] Dynamic job runner status? Could I use it in combination with job splitting?

Hi Alex, On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 9:53 AM, Oleksandr Moskalenko wrote: > > The dynamic runner is alive and well thanks to the continuous work of the > author John Chilton and others. For instance, yesterday John committed code > to galaxy-central that propagates tracebacks from the dynamic job ru

Re: [galaxy-dev] Dynamic job runner status? Could I use it in combination with job splitting?

On Nov 1, 2012, at 4:22 PM, Carlos Borroto wrote: > Hi, > > I've been researching the possibility of using dynamic job runner in > combination with job splitting for blast jobs. My main interest is to > create a rule where both the size of the query and the database are > taken into considerati

Re: [galaxy-dev] Dataset upload fail

On 11/02/2012 02:20 PM, Vladimir Yamshchikov wrote: Someone has advised also that SQLite, which is the default option, > is not adequate for serious work. Is this something I need to > change too? Indeed, see: http://wiki.g2.bx.psu.edu/Admin/Config/Performance/Production%20Server > I mean c

Re: [galaxy-dev] hg18.fa on rsync? [was: which .loc file for "SAM to BAM"?]

Oh, I forgot to mention it: hg18.fa.fai is already in tool-data/shared/ucsc/hg18/sam_index/ as a link to tool-data/shared/ucsc/hg18/seq Replacing the link with the actual file did not help (not suprising). regards, Andreas On 01.11.2012 17:56, Dave Bouvier wrote: Andreas, I recommend movi