Re: [galaxy-dev] R bioconductor dependencies when creating toolshed installation
Say option 3 is the way to go, would you say every new version of an R package should be wrapped in a new galaxy package (and give them names like matrixStats_0_10_0) or create one package (matrixStats) and update that one if a new version is worth an update. In the first way there would be an enormous amount of packages ;) Also if you do need an external R script as you say, how would I construct my tool_dependencies.xml to execute R code? And last, if that approach doesn't work out for me, how can copy a file in the repository to the installation dir? (to execute it with Rscript) Many thanks, Stef - Original message - From: Kandalaft, Iyad iyad.kandal...@agr.gc.ca To: Stef van Lieshout stefvanliesh...@fastmail.fm, galaxy-dev@lists.bx.psu.edu galaxy-dev@lists.bx.psu.edu Subject: RE: [galaxy-dev] R bioconductor dependencies when creating toolshed installation Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2014 18:19:46 + I would typically recommend Option 3 as it is the best practice. However, human resources limit this as a viable option even though this should be the Gold Standard that you aim for. This allows you to reuse the dependencies later for other tool wrappers AND you don't have to re-install dependencies every time you make a modification to your tool wrapper repository. While briefly looking at Bioconductor, it seems that they keep old version of packages (ex: http://www.bioconductor.org/packages/2.13/data/experiment/bin/windows/contrib/3.0/AmpAffyExample_1.2.13.zip), where using the URLs directly might be advantageous if their BiocLite doesn't allow you to define which version to install. You don't necessarily need to have an external R script for the installation because many of these commands can be done within the tool_dependencies.xml. Regards, Iyad Kandalaft Microbial Biodiversity Bioinformatics Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada | Agriculture et Agroalimentaire Canada 960 Carling Ave.| 960 Ave. Carling Ottawa, ON| Ottawa (ON) K1A 0C6 E-mail Address / Adresse courriel iyad.kandal...@agr.gc.ca Telephone | Téléphone 613-759-1228 Facsimile | Télécopieur 613-759-1701 Teletypewriter | Téléimprimeur 613-773-2600 Government of Canada | Gouvernement du Canada -Original Message- From: galaxy-dev-boun...@lists.bx.psu.edu [mailto:galaxy-dev-boun...@lists.bx.psu.edu] On Behalf Of Stef van Lieshout Sent: Monday, June 16, 2014 10:04 AM To: galaxy-dev@lists.bx.psu.edu Subject: [galaxy-dev] R bioconductor dependencies when creating toolshed installation Hi all, I'm running into some difficulties on how to setup the installation procedure for a galaxy tool which executes an R script and has certain dependencies (mainly bioconductor packages). R can deal with dependencies, packages can be installed with install.packages (has a dependencies argument) or biocLite() for bioconductor packages. Yet, now I want my tool to be available at toolsheds. To do this I see several options: 1) setting up tool_dependencies.xml with R CMD INSTALL for all packages. BUT: need to download all dependencies before install, and can older versions still be downloaded? Maybe need to upload them to toolshed too.. 2) setting up tool_dependencies.xml to call an installation script with Rscript (where I could use install.packages), BUT: Dependencies are taken care of. But how do I select specific (older) versions, because if I dont, installing at different time can give different version. 3) creating a repository for each package and have all of them as requirement in my galaxy tool. BUT: a lot of work for a lot of dependencies All have pros and cons, how do people deal with this? Stef ___ Please keep all replies on the list by using reply all in your mail client. To manage your subscriptions to this and other Galaxy lists, please use the interface at: http://lists.bx.psu.edu/ To search Galaxy mailing lists use the unified search at: http://galaxyproject.org/search/mailinglists/ ___ Please keep all replies on the list by using reply all in your mail client. To manage your subscriptions to this and other Galaxy lists, please use the interface at: http://lists.bx.psu.edu/ To search Galaxy mailing lists use the unified search at: http://galaxyproject.org/search/mailinglists/
Re: [galaxy-dev] R bioconductor dependencies when creating toolshed installation
Hi Stef, for R packages we have a special installation routine that will (hapefully) make your life easier. I'm running into some difficulties on how to setup the installation procedure for a galaxy tool which executes an R script and has certain dependencies (mainly bioconductor packages). R can deal with dependencies, packages can be installed with install.packages (has a dependencies argument) or biocLite() for bioconductor packages. Yet, now I want my tool to be available at toolsheds. To do this I see several options: Great! 1) setting up tool_dependencies.xml with R CMD INSTALL for all packages. BUT: need to download all dependencies before install, and can older versions still be downloaded? Maybe need to upload them to toolshed too.. It is all a matter of how reproducible you want to have your tool. If you want 100% reproducibility, you need to mirror the source packages somehow, because bioc will not store older versions. At least that is not guaranteed. I'm using a special github repository for that purpose: https://github.com/bgruening/download_store R CMD INSTALL is not needed, see below. 2) setting up tool_dependencies.xml to call an installation script with Rscript (where I could use install.packages), BUT: Dependencies are taken care of. But how do I select specific (older) versions, because if I dont, installing at different time can give different version. Older versions is not possible as far as I know. 3) creating a repository for each package and have all of them as requirement in my galaxy tool. BUT: a lot of work for a lot of dependencies Imho, we should have one R repository with a handful of standard packages included in the toolshed. Like packages_r_3_0_1. You should depend on that repository and additionally define one second dependency. Lets say your tool is called deseq2 than create one additional tool_dependencies.xml file called package_deseq2_1_2_10. In that definition you will install every dependency you need in addition to R. Here is one example: https://github.com/bgruening/galaxytools/blob/master/deseq2/tool_dependencies.xml https://github.com/bgruening/galaxytools/blob/master/orphan_tool_dependencies/package_deseq2_1_2_10/tool_dependencies.xml The really nice part is the setup_r_environment function from the toolshed. It will install source packages for you automatically. All you need to do is to name the package or, as shown in the example, specify the location of the source package. The only downside is that the order of these packages is important. If you are interested we have a script that will give you the correct dependency tree of a given package. Hope that helps, Bjoern All have pros and cons, how do people deal with this? Stef ___ Please keep all replies on the list by using reply all in your mail client. To manage your subscriptions to this and other Galaxy lists, please use the interface at: http://lists.bx.psu.edu/ To search Galaxy mailing lists use the unified search at: http://galaxyproject.org/search/mailinglists/ ___ Please keep all replies on the list by using reply all in your mail client. To manage your subscriptions to this and other Galaxy lists, please use the interface at: http://lists.bx.psu.edu/ To search Galaxy mailing lists use the unified search at: http://galaxyproject.org/search/mailinglists/
Re: [galaxy-dev] R bioconductor dependencies when creating toolshed installation
Hi Stef, fortunately it is way easier than that. Please have a look at the setup_r_environment installation routine :) Cheers, Bjoern Am 17.06.2014 11:07, schrieb Stef van Lieshout: Say option 3 is the way to go, would you say every new version of an R package should be wrapped in a new galaxy package (and give them names like matrixStats_0_10_0) or create one package (matrixStats) and update that one if a new version is worth an update. In the first way there would be an enormous amount of packages ;) Also if you do need an external R script as you say, how would I construct my tool_dependencies.xml to execute R code? And last, if that approach doesn't work out for me, how can copy a file in the repository to the installation dir? (to execute it with Rscript) Many thanks, Stef - Original message - From: Kandalaft, Iyad iyad.kandal...@agr.gc.ca To: Stef van Lieshout stefvanliesh...@fastmail.fm, galaxy-dev@lists.bx.psu.edu galaxy-dev@lists.bx.psu.edu Subject: RE: [galaxy-dev] R bioconductor dependencies when creating toolshed installation Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2014 18:19:46 + I would typically recommend Option 3 as it is the best practice. However, human resources limit this as a viable option even though this should be the Gold Standard that you aim for. This allows you to reuse the dependencies later for other tool wrappers AND you don't have to re-install dependencies every time you make a modification to your tool wrapper repository. While briefly looking at Bioconductor, it seems that they keep old version of packages (ex: http://www.bioconductor.org/packages/2.13/data/experiment/bin/windows/contrib/3.0/AmpAffyExample_1.2.13.zip), where using the URLs directly might be advantageous if their BiocLite doesn't allow you to define which version to install. You don't necessarily need to have an external R script for the installation because many of these commands can be done within the tool_dependencies.xml. Regards, Iyad Kandalaft Microbial Biodiversity Bioinformatics Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada | Agriculture et Agroalimentaire Canada 960 Carling Ave.| 960 Ave. Carling Ottawa, ON| Ottawa (ON) K1A 0C6 E-mail Address / Adresse courriel iyad.kandal...@agr.gc.ca Telephone | Téléphone 613-759-1228 Facsimile | Télécopieur 613-759-1701 Teletypewriter | Téléimprimeur 613-773-2600 Government of Canada | Gouvernement du Canada -Original Message- From: galaxy-dev-boun...@lists.bx.psu.edu [mailto:galaxy-dev-boun...@lists.bx.psu.edu] On Behalf Of Stef van Lieshout Sent: Monday, June 16, 2014 10:04 AM To: galaxy-dev@lists.bx.psu.edu Subject: [galaxy-dev] R bioconductor dependencies when creating toolshed installation Hi all, I'm running into some difficulties on how to setup the installation procedure for a galaxy tool which executes an R script and has certain dependencies (mainly bioconductor packages). R can deal with dependencies, packages can be installed with install.packages (has a dependencies argument) or biocLite() for bioconductor packages. Yet, now I want my tool to be available at toolsheds. To do this I see several options: 1) setting up tool_dependencies.xml with R CMD INSTALL for all packages. BUT: need to download all dependencies before install, and can older versions still be downloaded? Maybe need to upload them to toolshed too.. 2) setting up tool_dependencies.xml to call an installation script with Rscript (where I could use install.packages), BUT: Dependencies are taken care of. But how do I select specific (older) versions, because if I dont, installing at different time can give different version. 3) creating a repository for each package and have all of them as requirement in my galaxy tool. BUT: a lot of work for a lot of dependencies All have pros and cons, how do people deal with this? Stef ___ Please keep all replies on the list by using reply all in your mail client. To manage your subscriptions to this and other Galaxy lists, please use the interface at: http://lists.bx.psu.edu/ To search Galaxy mailing lists use the unified search at: http://galaxyproject.org/search/mailinglists/ ___ Please keep all replies on the list by using reply all in your mail client. To manage your subscriptions to this and other Galaxy lists, please use the interface at: http://lists.bx.psu.edu/ To search Galaxy mailing lists use the unified search at: http://galaxyproject.org/search/mailinglists/ ___ Please keep all replies on the list by using reply all in your mail client. To manage your subscriptions to this and other Galaxy lists, please use the interface at: http://lists.bx.psu.edu/ To search Galaxy mailing lists use the unified search at: http://galaxyproject.org/search/mailinglists/
Re: [galaxy-dev] R bioconductor dependencies when creating toolshed installation
Hi Bjoern, That looks much better indeed ;) The only problem I still have then is that I need R 3.1.0 for a bioconductor 2.14 package (have send a new mailing list msg for that). Looking at the xml of other versions it's not something I will easily do myself. What will happen if I do not specify the R dependency (package_r_3_0_3 in your example code) but do specify the download/install of packages, guess these get installed in the default R instance? Related to that, how can I call a specific instance of R in de tool.xml without specifying the full path to the tool. Eg, in the tool.xml I now do: command /path/to/lib/R/R-3.1.0/bin/Rscript /path/to/galaxy-dist/tools/testdir/tool.R $config /command Where normally you can do: command interpreter=Rscript tool.R $config /command Thanks again! Stef - Original message - From: Björn Grüning bjoern.gruen...@gmail.com To: Stef van Lieshout stefvanliesh...@fastmail.fm, galaxy-dev@lists.bx.psu.edu Subject: Re: [galaxy-dev] R bioconductor dependencies when creating toolshed installation Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 15:17:36 +0200 Hi Stef, for R packages we have a special installation routine that will (hapefully) make your life easier. I'm running into some difficulties on how to setup the installation procedure for a galaxy tool which executes an R script and has certain dependencies (mainly bioconductor packages). R can deal with dependencies, packages can be installed with install.packages (has a dependencies argument) or biocLite() for bioconductor packages. Yet, now I want my tool to be available at toolsheds. To do this I see several options: Great! 1) setting up tool_dependencies.xml with R CMD INSTALL for all packages. BUT: need to download all dependencies before install, and can older versions still be downloaded? Maybe need to upload them to toolshed too.. It is all a matter of how reproducible you want to have your tool. If you want 100% reproducibility, you need to mirror the source packages somehow, because bioc will not store older versions. At least that is not guaranteed. I'm using a special github repository for that purpose: https://github.com/bgruening/download_store R CMD INSTALL is not needed, see below. 2) setting up tool_dependencies.xml to call an installation script with Rscript (where I could use install.packages), BUT: Dependencies are taken care of. But how do I select specific (older) versions, because if I dont, installing at different time can give different version. Older versions is not possible as far as I know. 3) creating a repository for each package and have all of them as requirement in my galaxy tool. BUT: a lot of work for a lot of dependencies Imho, we should have one R repository with a handful of standard packages included in the toolshed. Like packages_r_3_0_1. You should depend on that repository and additionally define one second dependency. Lets say your tool is called deseq2 than create one additional tool_dependencies.xml file called package_deseq2_1_2_10. In that definition you will install every dependency you need in addition to R. Here is one example: https://github.com/bgruening/galaxytools/blob/master/deseq2/tool_dependencies.xml https://github.com/bgruening/galaxytools/blob/master/orphan_tool_dependencies/package_deseq2_1_2_10/tool_dependencies.xml The really nice part is the setup_r_environment function from the toolshed. It will install source packages for you automatically. All you need to do is to name the package or, as shown in the example, specify the location of the source package. The only downside is that the order of these packages is important. If you are interested we have a script that will give you the correct dependency tree of a given package. Hope that helps, Bjoern All have pros and cons, how do people deal with this? Stef ___ Please keep all replies on the list by using reply all in your mail client. To manage your subscriptions to this and other Galaxy lists, please use the interface at: http://lists.bx.psu.edu/ To search Galaxy mailing lists use the unified search at: http://galaxyproject.org/search/mailinglists/ ___ Please keep all replies on the list by using reply all in your mail client. To manage your subscriptions to this and other Galaxy lists, please use the interface at: http://lists.bx.psu.edu/ To search Galaxy mailing lists use the unified search at: http://galaxyproject.org/search/mailinglists/
Re: [galaxy-dev] R bioconductor dependencies when creating toolshed installation
Hi Stef, Am 17.06.2014 15:40, schrieb Stef van Lieshout: Hi Bjoern, That looks much better indeed ;) The only problem I still have then is that I need R 3.1.0 for a bioconductor 2.14 package (have send a new mailing list msg for that). Looking at the xml of other versions it's not something I will easily do myself. If you can wait a little bit we (the IUC, or more concrete Dave Bouvier) will take care of that and create such a repository. What will happen if I do not specify the R dependency (package_r_3_0_3 in your example code) but do specify the download/install of packages, guess these get installed in the default R instance? Puh, to be honest, I do not know. I never tested it without a real instance. I guess it will pick the default version. Related to that, how can I call a specific instance of R in de tool.xml without specifying the full path to the tool. Eg, in the tool.xml I now do: command /path/to/lib/R/R-3.1.0/bin/Rscript /path/to/galaxy-dist/tools/testdir/tool.R $config /command Where normally you can do: command interpreter=Rscript tool.R $config /command You should always use the latter version, without a path to R. Setting the correct path or assuming the default should be handled by Galaxy. The correct R version will be created with the requirement tag. You can specify 3.1 as soon as we have it :) You can thank Dave for the new R packages, he spend much time in creating a big R binary that can run on almost all architectures. Cheers, Bjoern Thanks again! Stef - Original message - From: Björn Grüning bjoern.gruen...@gmail.com To: Stef van Lieshout stefvanliesh...@fastmail.fm, galaxy-dev@lists.bx.psu.edu Subject: Re: [galaxy-dev] R bioconductor dependencies when creating toolshed installation Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 15:17:36 +0200 Hi Stef, for R packages we have a special installation routine that will (hapefully) make your life easier. I'm running into some difficulties on how to setup the installation procedure for a galaxy tool which executes an R script and has certain dependencies (mainly bioconductor packages). R can deal with dependencies, packages can be installed with install.packages (has a dependencies argument) or biocLite() for bioconductor packages. Yet, now I want my tool to be available at toolsheds. To do this I see several options: Great! 1) setting up tool_dependencies.xml with R CMD INSTALL for all packages. BUT: need to download all dependencies before install, and can older versions still be downloaded? Maybe need to upload them to toolshed too.. It is all a matter of how reproducible you want to have your tool. If you want 100% reproducibility, you need to mirror the source packages somehow, because bioc will not store older versions. At least that is not guaranteed. I'm using a special github repository for that purpose: https://github.com/bgruening/download_store R CMD INSTALL is not needed, see below. 2) setting up tool_dependencies.xml to call an installation script with Rscript (where I could use install.packages), BUT: Dependencies are taken care of. But how do I select specific (older) versions, because if I dont, installing at different time can give different version. Older versions is not possible as far as I know. 3) creating a repository for each package and have all of them as requirement in my galaxy tool. BUT: a lot of work for a lot of dependencies Imho, we should have one R repository with a handful of standard packages included in the toolshed. Like packages_r_3_0_1. You should depend on that repository and additionally define one second dependency. Lets say your tool is called deseq2 than create one additional tool_dependencies.xml file called package_deseq2_1_2_10. In that definition you will install every dependency you need in addition to R. Here is one example: https://github.com/bgruening/galaxytools/blob/master/deseq2/tool_dependencies.xml https://github.com/bgruening/galaxytools/blob/master/orphan_tool_dependencies/package_deseq2_1_2_10/tool_dependencies.xml The really nice part is the setup_r_environment function from the toolshed. It will install source packages for you automatically. All you need to do is to name the package or, as shown in the example, specify the location of the source package. The only downside is that the order of these packages is important. If you are interested we have a script that will give you the correct dependency tree of a given package. Hope that helps, Bjoern All have pros and cons, how do people deal with this? Stef ___ Please keep all replies on the list by using reply all in your mail client. To manage your subscriptions to this and other Galaxy lists, please use the interface at: http://lists.bx.psu.edu/ To search Galaxy mailing lists use the unified search at: http://galaxyproject.org/search/mailinglists
Re: [galaxy-dev] R bioconductor dependencies when creating toolshed installation
Bjoern and Dave, That sounds great. Of course my next question will be how much is a little bit ;) It just that I have to move on for now and make things at least work, so I might try it with using the default R instance now, but as soon as a 3.1.0 package is out I will definitely pick it up! Stef - Original message - From: Björn Grüning bjoern.gruen...@gmail.com To: Stef van Lieshout stefvanliesh...@fastmail.fm, galaxy-dev@lists.bx.psu.edu, Dave Bouvier d...@bx.psu.edu Subject: Re: [galaxy-dev] R bioconductor dependencies when creating toolshed installation Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 17:37:24 +0200 Hi Stef, Am 17.06.2014 15:40, schrieb Stef van Lieshout: Hi Bjoern, That looks much better indeed ;) The only problem I still have then is that I need R 3.1.0 for a bioconductor 2.14 package (have send a new mailing list msg for that). Looking at the xml of other versions it's not something I will easily do myself. If you can wait a little bit we (the IUC, or more concrete Dave Bouvier) will take care of that and create such a repository. What will happen if I do not specify the R dependency (package_r_3_0_3 in your example code) but do specify the download/install of packages, guess these get installed in the default R instance? Puh, to be honest, I do not know. I never tested it without a real instance. I guess it will pick the default version. Related to that, how can I call a specific instance of R in de tool.xml without specifying the full path to the tool. Eg, in the tool.xml I now do: command /path/to/lib/R/R-3.1.0/bin/Rscript /path/to/galaxy-dist/tools/testdir/tool.R $config /command Where normally you can do: command interpreter=Rscript tool.R $config /command You should always use the latter version, without a path to R. Setting the correct path or assuming the default should be handled by Galaxy. The correct R version will be created with the requirement tag. You can specify 3.1 as soon as we have it :) You can thank Dave for the new R packages, he spend much time in creating a big R binary that can run on almost all architectures. Cheers, Bjoern Thanks again! Stef - Original message - From: Björn Grüning bjoern.gruen...@gmail.com To: Stef van Lieshout stefvanliesh...@fastmail.fm, galaxy-dev@lists.bx.psu.edu Subject: Re: [galaxy-dev] R bioconductor dependencies when creating toolshed installation Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 15:17:36 +0200 Hi Stef, for R packages we have a special installation routine that will (hapefully) make your life easier. I'm running into some difficulties on how to setup the installation procedure for a galaxy tool which executes an R script and has certain dependencies (mainly bioconductor packages). R can deal with dependencies, packages can be installed with install.packages (has a dependencies argument) or biocLite() for bioconductor packages. Yet, now I want my tool to be available at toolsheds. To do this I see several options: Great! 1) setting up tool_dependencies.xml with R CMD INSTALL for all packages. BUT: need to download all dependencies before install, and can older versions still be downloaded? Maybe need to upload them to toolshed too.. It is all a matter of how reproducible you want to have your tool. If you want 100% reproducibility, you need to mirror the source packages somehow, because bioc will not store older versions. At least that is not guaranteed. I'm using a special github repository for that purpose: https://github.com/bgruening/download_store R CMD INSTALL is not needed, see below. 2) setting up tool_dependencies.xml to call an installation script with Rscript (where I could use install.packages), BUT: Dependencies are taken care of. But how do I select specific (older) versions, because if I dont, installing at different time can give different version. Older versions is not possible as far as I know. 3) creating a repository for each package and have all of them as requirement in my galaxy tool. BUT: a lot of work for a lot of dependencies Imho, we should have one R repository with a handful of standard packages included in the toolshed. Like packages_r_3_0_1. You should depend on that repository and additionally define one second dependency. Lets say your tool is called deseq2 than create one additional tool_dependencies.xml file called package_deseq2_1_2_10. In that definition you will install every dependency you need in addition to R. Here is one example: https://github.com/bgruening/galaxytools/blob/master/deseq2/tool_dependencies.xml https://github.com/bgruening/galaxytools/blob/master/orphan_tool_dependencies/package_deseq2_1_2_10/tool_dependencies.xml The really nice part is the setup_r_environment function from the toolshed. It will install source packages for you automatically. All you need to do is to name the package or, as shown in the example, specify the location of the source package. The only
[galaxy-dev] R bioconductor dependencies when creating toolshed installation
Hi all, I'm running into some difficulties on how to setup the installation procedure for a galaxy tool which executes an R script and has certain dependencies (mainly bioconductor packages). R can deal with dependencies, packages can be installed with install.packages (has a dependencies argument) or biocLite() for bioconductor packages. Yet, now I want my tool to be available at toolsheds. To do this I see several options: 1) setting up tool_dependencies.xml with R CMD INSTALL for all packages. BUT: need to download all dependencies before install, and can older versions still be downloaded? Maybe need to upload them to toolshed too.. 2) setting up tool_dependencies.xml to call an installation script with Rscript (where I could use install.packages), BUT: Dependencies are taken care of. But how do I select specific (older) versions, because if I dont, installing at different time can give different version. 3) creating a repository for each package and have all of them as requirement in my galaxy tool. BUT: a lot of work for a lot of dependencies All have pros and cons, how do people deal with this? Stef ___ Please keep all replies on the list by using reply all in your mail client. To manage your subscriptions to this and other Galaxy lists, please use the interface at: http://lists.bx.psu.edu/ To search Galaxy mailing lists use the unified search at: http://galaxyproject.org/search/mailinglists/
Re: [galaxy-dev] R bioconductor dependencies when creating toolshed installation
I would typically recommend Option 3 as it is the best practice. However, human resources limit this as a viable option even though this should be the Gold Standard that you aim for. This allows you to reuse the dependencies later for other tool wrappers AND you don't have to re-install dependencies every time you make a modification to your tool wrapper repository. While briefly looking at Bioconductor, it seems that they keep old version of packages (ex: http://www.bioconductor.org/packages/2.13/data/experiment/bin/windows/contrib/3.0/AmpAffyExample_1.2.13.zip), where using the URLs directly might be advantageous if their BiocLite doesn't allow you to define which version to install. You don't necessarily need to have an external R script for the installation because many of these commands can be done within the tool_dependencies.xml. Regards, Iyad Kandalaft Microbial Biodiversity Bioinformatics Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada | Agriculture et Agroalimentaire Canada 960 Carling Ave.| 960 Ave. Carling Ottawa, ON| Ottawa (ON) K1A 0C6 E-mail Address / Adresse courriel iyad.kandal...@agr.gc.ca Telephone | Téléphone 613-759-1228 Facsimile | Télécopieur 613-759-1701 Teletypewriter | Téléimprimeur 613-773-2600 Government of Canada | Gouvernement du Canada -Original Message- From: galaxy-dev-boun...@lists.bx.psu.edu [mailto:galaxy-dev-boun...@lists.bx.psu.edu] On Behalf Of Stef van Lieshout Sent: Monday, June 16, 2014 10:04 AM To: galaxy-dev@lists.bx.psu.edu Subject: [galaxy-dev] R bioconductor dependencies when creating toolshed installation Hi all, I'm running into some difficulties on how to setup the installation procedure for a galaxy tool which executes an R script and has certain dependencies (mainly bioconductor packages). R can deal with dependencies, packages can be installed with install.packages (has a dependencies argument) or biocLite() for bioconductor packages. Yet, now I want my tool to be available at toolsheds. To do this I see several options: 1) setting up tool_dependencies.xml with R CMD INSTALL for all packages. BUT: need to download all dependencies before install, and can older versions still be downloaded? Maybe need to upload them to toolshed too.. 2) setting up tool_dependencies.xml to call an installation script with Rscript (where I could use install.packages), BUT: Dependencies are taken care of. But how do I select specific (older) versions, because if I dont, installing at different time can give different version. 3) creating a repository for each package and have all of them as requirement in my galaxy tool. BUT: a lot of work for a lot of dependencies All have pros and cons, how do people deal with this? Stef ___ Please keep all replies on the list by using reply all in your mail client. To manage your subscriptions to this and other Galaxy lists, please use the interface at: http://lists.bx.psu.edu/ To search Galaxy mailing lists use the unified search at: http://galaxyproject.org/search/mailinglists/ ___ Please keep all replies on the list by using reply all in your mail client. To manage your subscriptions to this and other Galaxy lists, please use the interface at: http://lists.bx.psu.edu/ To search Galaxy mailing lists use the unified search at: http://galaxyproject.org/search/mailinglists/
