Re: [galaxy-dev] to put or not to put a tool suite into the toolshed

2014-06-06 Thread Hans-Rudolf Hotz
Hi Wolfgang short answer: Please, put your package into the Galaxy Tool Shed. This makes it visible to the whole Galaxy community and everybody can profit from it. long answer: I have been in the same boat. We never put the Galaxy wrappers and the perl scripts of our old NGS pipeline

Re: [galaxy-dev] Installing galaxy with Apache

2014-06-06 Thread John Chilton
Hmm... sorry for the delay I hope you got this to work. I feel like someone should respond to this but it is difficult to remotely debug web server configuration issues. Should your apache config line: RewriteRule ^(.*) http://localhost:8080$1 [P] be: RewriteRule ^/galaxy(.*)

Re: [galaxy-dev] Installing galaxy with Apache

2014-06-06 Thread Matthias Enders
Hi John, your solution perfectly solved my problem. Thank you! -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: John Chilton [mailto:jmchil...@gmail.com] Gesendet: Friday, June 06, 2014 3:32 PM An: Matthias Enders Cc: galaxy-...@bx.psu.edu Betreff: Re: [galaxy-dev] Installing galaxy with Apache Hmm...

[galaxy-dev] ToolShed for Visualisation Registry?

2014-06-06 Thread Saket Choudhary
I was wondering if there is a possibility of a 'Tool'Shed for Visualisation registry plugins(custom plugins, developed by users/developers)? The motivation for this comes from a small 'tool' I wrote for visualiing fastq phred scores using box plots[Still under development] here:

Re: [galaxy-dev] ToolShed for Visualisation Registry?

2014-06-06 Thread John Chilton
Hello Saket, Thanks for your interest - I totally agree, I think a lot of tools like this would be better served as visualization plugins. There is a Trello card for this request https://trello.com/c/YLA70rZx - please vote up if you are interested. This has been discussed by the core team and I

Re: [galaxy-dev] to put or not to put a tool suite into the toolshed

2014-06-06 Thread Wolfgang Maier
Thanks a lot for all the encouraging feedback. More than anything else the friendly atmosphere that seems to prevail on this mailing list makes me think that it may indeed be worthwhile to make the package available to this community ! I will have a closer look at the toolshed instructions and

Re: [galaxy-dev] ClustalW jobs aren't working

2014-06-06 Thread Ross
Hi Malcolm, That error makes me think you might be running an outdated version of galaxy code - the toolshed code has undergone extensive revision over the last few months? I just tested that repository on a freshly updated galaxy-central clone and it installed without drama, so I wonder what: hg

[galaxy-dev] Are there examples of tools that run processes in the background?

2014-06-06 Thread Melissa Cline
Hi folks, We're working on developing a VM which we'd like to be tightly coordinated with Galaxy, such that VM users can export data from the VM into Galaxy, perform further analyses on that data, and then import the analysis results into the VM for storage (from where it will serve additional

Re: [galaxy-dev] Are there examples of tools that run processes in the background?

2014-06-06 Thread Ross
Hi Melissa, The question in the title is easy to answer - most large galaxy instances run (most) jobs on a connected cluster which is effectively 'background' I guess so yes - all of them on cluster backed Galaxy instances might be a reasonable response. The questions in the text are more