Re: [galaxy-dev] Galaxy packages for Bio-Linux - an update + Apache proxying

2014-04-04 Thread Nate Coraor
Hi Tim, I agree the single tool_data_table_conf.xml is a problem and it would be nice to implement functionality for multiple. I've added a Trello card for it here: https://trello.com/c/rm2p8PpZ As to the location file collections, I can foresee a few problems, e.g. conflicting definitions, bad f

Re: [galaxy-dev] Galaxy packages for Bio-Linux - an update + Apache proxying

2014-03-31 Thread Tim Booth
Hi Nate, It's great to hear that my rearrangements for packaging Galaxy are somewhat in line with what you are doing. My package is a bit of a rats-nest of symlinks right now but I'll clean these up as things become more configurable. One thing I'm a bit stuck on is the tool_data_table_conf.xml

Re: [galaxy-dev] Galaxy packages for Bio-Linux - an update + Apache proxying

2014-03-28 Thread Nate Coraor
Hi Tim, I have recently been working on getting Galaxy Main's configs and server-modified files and directories out of the galaxy-dist directory, so our goals are aligning. Not everything can be moved without some trickery (e.g. symlinks) but most paths, including the paths to shed_*.xml are confi

Re: [galaxy-dev] Galaxy packages for Bio-Linux - an update + Apache proxying

2014-03-24 Thread Tim Booth
Hi, This is mainly a message to Carlos and Eric who volunteered to get involved with my Debian packaging, but of course any other help will also be appreciated. If either of you can spare time now it is a good moment to do so. I've been working on my package stuff over the last couple of weeks a

Re: [galaxy-dev] Galaxy packages for Bio-Linux - an update + Apache proxying

2013-12-20 Thread Tim Booth
Hi John and Carlos, Thanks for your replies regarding my DEB packaging work. Some quick answers to questions you raised. > > In response to the eggs comment in the changelog - there are upsides > and downsides to the way Galaxy handles dependency fetching but I > think there should at least be a

Re: [galaxy-dev] Galaxy packages for Bio-Linux - an update + Apache proxying

2013-12-16 Thread Carlos Borroto
Hi Tim, This sounds great. I'll be happy to help testing and hopefully find some time to help packaging once it gets into Debian Med(are you submitting all your packages there?). One question, for apache/nginx configuration why not use something ala phpMyAdmin which ask you if you want to preconf

Re: [galaxy-dev] Galaxy packages for Bio-Linux - an update + Apache proxying

2013-12-13 Thread John Chilton
This is quite awesome! Thanks for all the hard work Tim. In response to the eggs comment in the changelog - there are upsides and downsides to the way Galaxy handles dependency fetching but I think there should at least be an off switch. I thought that would be easy, but it sounds like not: >From