Re: [galaxy-dev] bwa_mem and "-t" option

2017-06-01 Thread David Kovalic
Bjoern, Thanks so much, I'll check it out. If I can't figure this out I am sure I can ask around in Montpellier at GCC'17! I am looking forward to the meeting and being able to visit Montpellier for the first time ever The help is greatly appreciated. David On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 2:21 PM, Björn

Re: [galaxy-dev] bwa_mem and "-t" option

2017-06-01 Thread Björn Grüning
Your are joining GCC? Cool! Looking forward to see you there! Bjoern Am 01.06.2017 um 21:25 schrieb David Kovalic: > Bjoern, > > Thanks so much, I'll check it out. > > If I can't figure this out I am sure I can ask around in Montpellier at > GCC'17! I am looking forward to the meeting and bein

Re: [galaxy-dev] bwa_mem and "-t" option

2017-06-01 Thread Björn Grüning
HI David, have a look at https://galaxyproject.org/admin/config/jobs/ and this config file: https://github.com/galaxyproject/galaxy/blob/dev/config/job_resource_params_conf.xml.sample and here: https://github.com/galaxyproject/galaxy/blob/dev/config/job_conf.xml.sample_advanced#L791 I couldn'

Re: [galaxy-dev] bwa_mem and "-t" option

2017-06-01 Thread David Kovalic
Bjoern, Thanks for the response. I agree with the first approach (admin control of the per tool environment). Do you know… are there docs or similar resources you could point me to that describe how to achieve this? Thanks again, David On Sun, May 28, 2017 4:41 AM, Björn Grüning bjoern.gruen.

Re: [galaxy-dev] bwa_mem and "-t" option

2017-05-28 Thread Björn Grüning
Hi David, this is possible via the GALAXY_SLOTS mechanism. An admin can give every tool it's own environment and can set GALAXY_SLOTS dynamically. A user can not do this, as this is highly dependent on the node this tool will run and normally a user does not know about this. However, if you reall

[galaxy-dev] bwa_mem and "-t" option

2017-05-26 Thread David Kovalic
Hi, Is it possible, and if so how, to run the galaxy devteam (version546ada4a9f43) of bwa_mem with the "-t" option and a value >1? "-t INT number of threads [1]" This would be quite useful, and used, for accelerating single bwa mem jobs. Thanks, David___