Comment #6 on issue 1175 by hostingn...@gmail.com: ext3 filesystem
hardcoded in fstab of import script
https://code.google.com/p/ganeti/issues/detail?id=1175
@ius... thanks for the tip but backports packages are not considered as
stable, hence "backports", and as such I do not want such
2016-06-10 16:25 GMT+02:00 'Brian Foley' via ganeti-devel <
ganeti-devel@googlegroups.com>:
> commit 7eb49311e18865db76c4e8da5eb4b2e166db2d55
> Merge: a32eb3c 17a1c27
> Author: Brian Foley
> Date: Fri Jun 10 15:20:33 2016 +0100
>
> Merge branch 'stable-2.17'
>
> *
commit 7eb49311e18865db76c4e8da5eb4b2e166db2d55
Merge: a32eb3c 17a1c27
Author: Brian Foley
Date: Fri Jun 10 15:20:33 2016 +0100
Merge branch 'stable-2.17'
* stable-2.17
* stable-2.16
Fix optimisation: Correctly extract secondary node
2016-06-10 15:40 GMT+02:00 'Brian Foley' via ganeti-devel <
ganeti-devel@googlegroups.com>:
> commit b462d8c77bff0789e8a951288dea34226ab8b6d7
> Merge: 20c24a8 90281b4
> Author: Brian Foley
> Date: Fri Jun 10 14:35:13 2016 +0100
>
> Merge branch 'stable-2.16' into
Comment #5 on issue 1175 by ius...@google.com: ext3 filesystem hardcoded in
fstab of import script
https://code.google.com/p/ganeti/issues/detail?id=1175
@hosting: FYI, there's a newer package in jeesie-backports; I'd recommend
using that.
--
You received this message because this
commit b462d8c77bff0789e8a951288dea34226ab8b6d7
Merge: 20c24a8 90281b4
Author: Brian Foley
Date: Fri Jun 10 14:35:13 2016 +0100
Merge branch 'stable-2.16' into stable-2.17
* stable-2.16
Fix optimisation: Correctly extract secondary node
Tune
2016-06-10 15:28 GMT+02:00 'Brian Foley' via ganeti-devel <
ganeti-devel@googlegroups.com>:
> commit 5785f214a9e728465a4bfc1aef7ded306225cfa2
> Merge: 40cd52f 2429235
> Author: Brian Foley
> Date: Fri Jun 10 14:23:10 2016 +0100
>
> Merge branch 'stable-2.15' into
commit 5785f214a9e728465a4bfc1aef7ded306225cfa2
Merge: 40cd52f 2429235
Author: Brian Foley
Date: Fri Jun 10 14:23:10 2016 +0100
Merge branch 'stable-2.15' into stable-2.16
* stable-2.15
Fixup compatibility with GHC 7.4/base 4.5
Signed-off-by:
On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 01:51:56PM +0200, 'Iustin Pop' via ganeti-devel wrote:
> It looks like commit c429dd26 introduced the use of
> atomicModifyIORef', which is only present in base 4.6 (GHC 7.6).
> Let's fix that by importing the actual implementation of said function
> from base 4.6 in case
It looks like commit c429dd26 introduced the use of
atomicModifyIORef', which is only present in base 4.6 (GHC 7.6).
Let's fix that by importing the actual implementation of said function
from base 4.6 in case we're running with earlier versions.
Signed-off-by: Iustin Pop
---
On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 12:07:45PM +0100, Brian Foley wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 12:33:23PM +0200, 'Iustin Pop' via ganeti-devel wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 12:30:03PM +0200, Iustin Pop wrote:
> > > It looks like commit c429dd26 introduced the use of atomicModifyIORef',
> > > which
>
On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 12:33:23PM +0200, 'Iustin Pop' via ganeti-devel wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 12:30:03PM +0200, Iustin Pop wrote:
> > It looks like commit c429dd26 introduced the use of atomicModifyIORef',
> > which
> > is only present in base 4.6 (GHC 7.6). Let's temporarily fix that
On Thu, Jun 09, 2016 at 11:13:58PM +0200, Iustin Pop wrote:
> From: Iustin Pop
>
> Reading the source for that function is scary: it uses local time conversions
> in the context of what should be absolute (not local) time, so of course it
> has
> daylight savings time issues.
On Thu, Jun 09, 2016 at 11:13:57PM +0200, Iustin Pop wrote:
> From: Iustin Pop
>
> Do this in cases where this should already be the case:
> - some functions are explicitly denoted to take UUIDs (documentation/parameter
> name)
> - some functions (e.g. clusterMasterNode,
On Thu, Jun 09, 2016 at 11:13:56PM +0200, Iustin Pop wrote:
> From: Iustin Pop
>
> The function getInstDisksFromObj takes an Instance object, extracts its uuids,
> and passes that to getInstDisks. This function then looks up the given UUID in
> the configuration, retrieves the
On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 12:30:03PM +0200, Iustin Pop wrote:
> It looks like commit c429dd26 introduced the use of atomicModifyIORef', which
> is only present in base 4.6 (GHC 7.6). Let's temporarily fix that by adding a
> small compat layer (which undoes the optimisations of using strict on 7.4,
On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 11:28:16AM +0100, Brian Foley wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 09, 2016 at 11:13:54PM +0200, Iustin Pop wrote:
> > From: Iustin Pop
> >
> > This function (and getNode, next patch) were two pain points when I tried to
> > convert UUIDs to another type, since they're
It looks like commit c429dd26 introduced the use of atomicModifyIORef', which
is only present in base 4.6 (GHC 7.6). Let's temporarily fix that by adding a
small compat layer (which undoes the optimisations of using strict on 7.4, but
at least it works), until we decide to officially drop support
On Thu, Jun 09, 2016 at 11:13:55PM +0200, Iustin Pop wrote:
> From: Iustin Pop
>
> This follows the getInstance changes, with the same rationale.
>
> Signed-off-by: Iustin Pop
LGTM
On Thu, Jun 09, 2016 at 11:13:54PM +0200, Iustin Pop wrote:
> From: Iustin Pop
>
> This function (and getNode, next patch) were two pain points when I tried to
> convert UUIDs to another type, since they're called via a single type
> (currently String) that wants to dispatch
On Thu, Jun 09, 2016 at 11:13:53PM +0200, Iustin Pop wrote:
> From: Iustin Pop
>
> This started from the fact that recent QuickCheck declares itself an arbitrary
> instance "(Arbitrary a) => Arbitrary (Set a)", which conflicts with our
> slightly more specific instance. The
On Thu, Jun 09, 2016 at 11:13:52PM +0200, Iustin Pop wrote:
> From: Iustin Pop
>
> For some reason, this test doesn't pass on Debian unstable. I don't know if it
> passes on other versions of QuickCheck, but upon investigation, I think it was
> always broken, but the use of
LGTM
On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 10:13 PM, Iustin Pop wrote:
> From: Iustin Pop
>
> In Haskell world (at least as far as I know), dependencies of type "<=
> A.B.C"
> are rarely used, because incrementing the fourth version component (i.e. D
> in
> A.B.C.D)
On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 10:02 AM, Iustin Pop wrote:
> 2016-06-10 10:58 GMT+02:00 Viktor Bachraty :
>
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 11:33 PM, Iustin Pop wrote:
>>
>>> From: Iustin Pop
>>>
>>> Commit 8b2ec2f added
LGTM, thanks for catching this bug!
On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 11:33 PM, Iustin Pop wrote:
> From: Iustin Pop
>
> Old versions of mock were not strict, thus allowing to call any method on
> mocked objects, without complaining. More recent mock versions are
>
LGTM
On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 11:33 PM, Iustin Pop wrote:
> From: Iustin Pop
>
> It seems the two alternatives for python-mock's way of patching objects
> are not
> enough; more recent versions have patch.object, so let's support that as
> well.
> I think
2016-06-10 10:58 GMT+02:00 Viktor Bachraty :
>
> On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 11:33 PM, Iustin Pop wrote:
>
>> From: Iustin Pop
>>
>> Commit 8b2ec2f added unittests for KVM pinning, but it introduced a
>> non-obvious
>> local dependency in
On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 11:33 PM, Iustin Pop wrote:
> From: Iustin Pop
>
> Commit 8b2ec2f added unittests for KVM pinning, but it introduced a
> non-obvious
> local dependency in the tests: the CPU_PINNING_OFF calls work by looking
> at the
> (current)
28 matches
Mail list logo