oll. So I think we
need to
> resend the miss part immediately for tcp receive channel. I tested my
patch
> and it works well for my issue.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jerry
>
>
>
>
> 2009-02-25?23:36:34，"Brad?Nicholes"? ：
>>???apr_socket_send()?returns?t
>>> On 3/1/2009 at 10:12 PM, in message
<22391204.447591235970761341.javamail.corem...@bj126app61.126.com>, Jerry
wrote:
> Hi Brad,
>
> As you said, when the number of bytes actually sent does not match the
> expected bytes to send, apr_socket_send() automatically does some setting to
> force s
>>> On 2/25/2009 at 10:03 AM, in message
wrote:
>> I would probably agree with you that adding this to
>> apr_pollset_create() probably has no affect. Since gmond is
>> not threaded, I'm not sure it is helps out any other
>> situation either. Even though other modules might create
>> thre
>>> On 2/25/2009 at 8:39 AM, in message
wrote:
>
> Is there any harm in using APR_POLLSET_THREADSAFE in the call to
> apr_pollset_create in gmond.c?
>
> apr_pollset_create(&listen_channels, total_listen_channels,
> global_context, 0);
>
> becomes...
>
> apr_pollset_create(&listen_channels
apr_socket_send() returns the number of bytes sent in the 3rd
parameter. If the number of bytes actually sent does not match the
expected bytes to send, apr_socket_send() automatically sets the
apr_sockopt to APR_INCOMPLETE_WRITE. What that does is force
select/poll on the next write call to t
The Ganglia Project (http://ganglia.info) is pleased to announce the
official release of Ganglia 3.1.2 The official tarball is available for
immediate download at:
http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=43021&package_id=35280&release_id=661845
For a full description of the bu
>>> On 2/17/2009 at 8:29 AM, in message <499ad7bd.9000...@sara.nl>, Ramon
>>> Bastiaans
wrote:
> Will a final 3.1.2 release be issued soon?
>
> I think the two week testing period has passed and 'no news is good
> news'. ;)
>
Working on it. I hope to have it out today. I just need to do the
oping that it is the
latter. :) If anybody has anything to report (good or bad), please send a
quick email to the list.
thanks,
Brad
>>> On 1/30/2009 at 8:18 AM, in message
<4982b7ef02ac0003a...@lucius.provo.novell.com>, "Brad Nicholes"
wrote:
> In an effort
>>> On 2/5/2009 at 11:36 PM, in message
, Spike Spiegel
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> thanks for the clarification,
>
> On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 11:44 PM, Brad Nicholes wrote:
>
>> Anything else the spoofing module needs to do beyond this
>> it completely up to the mo
>>> On 2/5/2009 at 11:52 PM, in message ,
>>> Rick
Cobb wrote:
> I'm finding this discussion a bit ironic; in my environment, we're strongly
> considering pulling all of the naming out of gmond & gmetad, and only doing
> the hostname lookups in the PHP front-end. That way there's no need to de
A couple of clarifications.
1). Spoofing is achieved by creating a spoofing module and having that module
discover the hosts that should be spoofed, in any way the module wants. The
discovery could be done by querying the network for a specific type of device
or appliance or by simply readin
In an effort to continue improving the Ganglia software, the Ganglia Project
has released an official testing release of Ganglia 3.1.2. The testing tarball
is available for immediate download at:
http://www.ganglia.info/testing/
The intent of this testing release of Ganglia 3.1.2 is to valid
>>> On 1/28/2009 at 7:59 AM, in message <20090128145933.ga19...@imperial.ac.uk>,
Kostas Georgiou wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 06:09:48AM -0800, Gilad Raphaelli wrote:
>
>>
>> I think this is a well thought out email and I'm a little surprised at
>> the lack of response to it. Is it because
>>> On 1/25/2009 at 2:49 PM, in message <20090125214915.ga10...@sajinet.com.pe>,
Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 08:52:45AM -0700, Brad Nicholes wrote:
>>
>> Are we finished hashing this whole patch out yet?
>
> haven't see
>>> On 1/23/2009 at 3:11 AM, in message <20090123101118.gc29...@sajinet.com.pe>,
Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 10:36:19AM +0100, Ramon Bastiaans wrote:
>> I saw this pass by on my RSS feeds, not sure if you guys are aware of
>> these yet?
>
> yes, they were reported
>>> On 1/17/2009 at 8:10 PM, in message
, "Spike Spiegel"
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 5:04 AM, john allspaw wrote:
>>
>> Hey all -
>>
>> Wondering if there's ever been any talk about serving up the interactive
> port info via REST?
>
> I am kinda working on this already although n
>>> On 1/16/2009 at 8:44 AM, in message
<497048ea02ac0003a...@lucius.provo.novell.com>, "Brad Nicholes"
wrote:
>>>> On 1/16/2009 at 6:43 AM, in message
>>>> <20090116134353.ga15...@imperial.ac.uk>,
> Kostas Georgiou wrote:
>&g
>>> On 1/16/2009 at 6:43 AM, in message <20090116134353.ga15...@imperial.ac.uk>,
Kostas Georgiou wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 04:54:23PM -0700, Brad Nicholes wrote:
>
>> Since it is limited by REQUESTLEN, I am OK with it. So it sounds like
>> we just need
>>> On 1/15/2009 at 4:25 PM, in message
, "Spike Spiegel"
wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 7:04 AM, Kostas Georgiou
> wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 01:41:53PM -0700, Brad Nicholes wrote:
>>
>>> >>> On 1/15/2009 at 8:56 AM, in messag
>>> On 1/15/2009 at 8:56 AM, in message
<496efa2a02ac0003a...@lucius.provo.novell.com>, "Brad Nicholes"
wrote:
>>>> On 1/14/2009 at 3:10 PM, in message
> , "Jesse Becker"
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 12:56, Brad Nicholes wrot
>>> On 1/14/2009 at 3:10 PM, in message
, "Jesse Becker"
wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 12:56, Brad Nicholes wrote:
>> Sounds good, can we condense the description below into something that we
> can put into the 3.1 STATUS file so that we can start the proces
Sounds good, can we condense the description below into something that we
can put into the 3.1 STATUS file so that we can start the process of getting
this backported into 3.1?
Brad
>>> On 1/14/2009 at 10:00 AM, in message
, "Jesse Becker"
wrote:
> Committed to trunk for testing, r1946.
>
>>> On 12/8/2008 at 5:38 AM, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I've been getting a few questions about the Avg Utilization displayed on
> the web pages.
>
> Searching the code, I found it defined like this:
>
> meta_view.php: $cluster_util = sprintf("%.0f", ((
>>> On 12/7/2008 at 1:19 AM, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 01, 2008 at 12:19:25PM -0700, Brad Nicholes wrote:
>> I don't understand what you are trying to do with this patch.
>
> as
ing
a heartbeat metric.
* Bug fixes and Enhancements
This is just a testing BETA release that is not yet ready for production use.
Please test this code and let us know if we have missed or broken anything.
Thanks,
Brad
>>> On 12/4/2008 at 9:24 AM, in message
<[EMAIL PROT
All,
There is quite a large number of fixes and enhancements that have been
backported to the 3.1.x branch so I think that it is probably time to start
thinking about a 3.1.2 release. I know it is getting close to the holidays and
nobody needs any extra work to do at this time, so I am thin
For those that are interested in the module based spoofing feature, all of the
functionality should be complete and has been backported to the 3.1.x branch.
I have also added some spoofing module examples to trunk that can be downloaded
from monitor-core/gmond/python_modules/example/spfexample
All,
The new development policy has been posted on the wiki site
(http://ganglia.wiki.sourceforge.net/how_project_works). Please review and let
me know if I missed anything. These new guidelines can be used immediately.
thanks,
Brad
---
>>> On 11/20/2008 at 11:32 AM, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Brad
Nicholes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> All,
> There has been some discussion among the Ganglia admins around the topic
> of our current development and release procedures. Mainly ha
The biggest concern that I have with this patch, which is the same concern
that I had when I initially added the wildcard support, is how libconfuse is
doing the parsing. When libconfuse calls the custom include function, it is in
the middle of the lexer. This function turns around and calls
>>> On 12/1/2008 at 12:19 PM, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Brad Nicholes"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Carlo,
>
> Also, in libgmond.c I intentionally used malloc because I knew that the
> memory allocation was temporary. By using apr functions
Carlo,
I don't understand what you are trying to do with this patch. Once
libconfuse has finished reading and parsingn the entire configuration file
along with all of the individual modules sections, it automatically
consolidates them into a single section. There is no need to try to scan
>>> On 11/25/2008 at 2:26 AM, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 11:32:02AM -0700, Brad Nicholes wrote:
>>
>> I have put together a procedure change proposal and posted it on th
>>> On 11/21/2008 at 8:24 AM, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Matt Jamison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm building some custom C metric modules for gmond, and I've run into what
> seems like a strange limitation on the length of values for string type
> metrics. Perhaps I'm just mi
All,
There has been some discussion among the Ganglia admins around the topic of
our current development and release procedures. Mainly having to do with how
and where code is committed to our repositories. I have put together a
procedure change proposal and posted it on the Ganglia wiki
>>> On 11/7/2008 at 5:05 AM, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Carlo
Marcelo Arenas Belon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 06, 2008 at 10:26:42AM -0700, Brad Nicholes wrote:
>> >>> On 11/6/2008 at 5:07 AM, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Ca
>>> On 11/5/2008 at 5:21 PM, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Bernard Li"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear all:
>
> While trying to upgrade my current 3.1.0 installation of Ganglia with
> the 3.1.1.1901 + spoofing RPMs I just built, I noticed that gmond.conf
> was created as gmond.conf.rpmnew.
>
>>> On 11/6/2008 at 5:07 AM, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Carlo
Marcelo Arenas Belon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 06:13:47PM -0700, Brad Nicholes wrote:
>> Carlo,
>> In the STATUS file you commented that the spoofing patch nee
Carlo,
In the STATUS file you commented that the spoofing patch needs more work.
Can you explain what work needs to be done. Other than supporting the short
commandline for spoofing a heartbeat, AFAICT everything is working as it
should. I have committed a spoofing example python module i
>>> On 10/29/2008 at 12:37 PM, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Brad Nicholes"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>> On 10/29/2008 at 4:03 AM, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Carlo
> Marcelo Arenas Belon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>&g
>>> On 10/29/2008 at 4:03 AM, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Carlo
Marcelo Arenas Belon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 12:25:18PM -0600, Brad Nicholes wrote:
>> >>> On 10/28/2008 at 3:39 AM, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Ca
* libganglia: mcast_if support in gmond (BUG140)
http://www.mail-archive.com/ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net/msg03775.html
http://ganglia.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/ganglia?view=rev&revision=1734
+1: carenas
-1: bnicholes
bnicholes: The patch appears to be dependant
>>> On 10/28/2008 at 3:39 AM, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Carlo
Marcelo Arenas Belon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> while looking at the spoofing code in gmetric noticed the implementation by
> Yemi to be able to send a spoofed heartbeat by running :
>
> gmetric -S ${IP}:${NAME
I don't know about 20-50% increase but some areas did increase while others
decreased. For example, under 3.0.x if you were only monitoring the built in
metrics, the overhead in both XDR and XML was very low. The reason why is
because much of the data was hard coded in every instance of gmon
All,
We have a number of backport proposals in the STATUS file that have been
there for a while. Some of these proposals need to be reviewed and voted on,
some of them need to be fixed or removed due to -1 votes. The ability to move
forward with future versions of the Ganglia 3.1.x branch
>>> On 9/24/2008 at 11:44 PM, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Revision: 1825
> http://ganglia.svn.sourceforge.net/ganglia/?rev=1825&view=rev
> Author: carenas
> Date: 2008-09-25 05:44:07 + (Thu, 25 Sep 2008)
>
> Log Message:
> ---
> gmond:
>>> On 9/24/2008 at 11:28 PM, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Revision: 1824
> http://ganglia.svn.sourceforge.net/ganglia/?rev=1824&view=rev
> Author: carenas
> Date: 2008-09-25 05:28:37 + (Thu, 25 Sep 2008)
>
> Log Message:
> ---
> gmond:
>>> On 9/22/2008 at 7:37 AM, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Martin Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I'd like to vote for backporting Spoofed DSO metrics
>
> Index: monitor-core-3.1/STATUS
> ===
> --- monitor-core-3.1/STATUS (
>>> On 9/17/2008 at 9:13 AM, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Brad Nicholes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: 17 September 2008 15:53
>> To: Pocock, Daniel: IT (LDN);
ganglia-dev
>>> On 9/17/2008 at 8:23 AM, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> If you run gmond with -d 10, the debug output will show you
>> everything that gmond sent as well as everything that gmond
>> received. If you capture that output and then do some
>> analysis on it, is
>>> On 9/16/2008 at 6:50 PM, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Jesse
Becker"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Suggestion 2) Don't mess with other people's votes.
>>
>> -1
>>
>> votes are attached to patch proposals and so if the proposal changes
the
>> vote has to be recasted (indeed we talked about
>>> On 9/17/2008 at 4:42 AM, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> I've made up a dummy module that generates multiple test metrics.
The
> metrics have generic names, e.g. test0001, test0002
>
> Using the module parameter, I tell it how many metrics I want.
>
>
>>> On 9/2/2008 at 10:19 AM, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Liang
Han"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear ganglia developers,
>
> Ganglia is really a very cool tool. We can see the data from web
pages.
> But does ganglia has other interface (such as JAVA API) for
integration
> purpose? Thanks
>>> On 9/16/2008 at 3:39 AM, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Carlo
Marcelo Arenas Belon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 07:22:27PM -0400, Jesse Becker wrote:
>
>> A few of us (Bernard, Brad Nicholes, and myself) were musing on IRC
>> a
In general, I am on board with this as you outlined it. Let me make a
couple more suggestions (inline)
Brad
>>> On 9/15/2008 at 5:22 PM, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Jesse
Becker"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A few of us (Bernard, Brad Nicholes, and myse
>>> On 9/12/2008 at 11:48 AM, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Bernard
Li"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all:
>
> On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 10:00 AM, Ofer Inbar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I added a host to an existing cluster, and noticed the total number
of
>> CPU cores for the cluster fluc
[Resending under a new subject line]
>>> On 9/9/2008 at 5:32 PM, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Brad
Nicholes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>> On 9/9/2008 at 3:24 PM, in message
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
&
>>> On 9/9/2008 at 3:24 PM, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> - * gmond/gmetad: The gmetad code can not handle a host with no associated
> + * libganglia: The gmetad code can not handle a host with no associated
>cluster, therefore the gmond code must always
The Ganglia Project (http://ganglia.info) is pleased to announce the
official release of Ganglia 3.1.1 The official tarball is available for
immediate download at:
http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=43021&package_id=35280&release_id=625044
For a full description of the bu
All,
Attached is the release announcement for the Ganglia 3.1.1 release. This
release announcement contains minimal information and basically points to the
wiki for the release notes. I have already updated the wiki (minus the actual
download link) with the current release information. Le
>>> On 9/3/2008 at 9:00 AM, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Currently, gmetad will create RRD files for any new metrics, until disk
> space is completely exhausted
>
> It is not safe to assume that the gmetad administrator is always
> communicating with the gu
>>> On 9/3/2008 at 8:04 AM, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Carlo
Marcelo Arenas Belon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 03, 2008 at 09:39:57AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>> Here's a little something we discovered by accident: if you move some of
>> the module definitions into f
>>> On 8/30/2008 at 12:42 PM, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Carlo
Marcelo Arenas Belon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 01:52:03AM +0100, Kostas Georgiou wrote:
>>
>> Another option will be to have each module able to print some usable
>> configuration. I am attaching some pa
>>> On 8/29/2008 at 6:52 PM, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Kostas Georgiou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 09:01:43AM -0600, Brad Nicholes wrote:
>
>> Thanks Rich. This got me thinking a little about how the same thing
>> m
>>> On 8/29/2008 at 2:34 AM, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> I notice there is only one set of RRAs defined in gmetad.conf
>
> We've identified that most of our RRD storage is used by short term data
> (10 seconds between consolidated data points).
>
> How
Thanks Rich. This got me thinking a little about how the same thing might be
done only in a more generic way rather than just sequentially numbered metrics.
I am wondering if, rather than looping through numbers, we actually tried to
do some pattern matching over the known metrics. For ever
In an effort to continue improving the Ganglia software, the Ganglia Project
has released an official testing release of Ganglia 3.1.1. The testing tarball
is available for immediate download at:
http://www.ganglia.info/testing/
The intent of this testing release of Ganglia 3.1.1 is to valid
>>> On 8/22/2008 at 10:59 AM, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Carlo
Marcelo Arenas Belon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 05:23:13PM -0700, Bernard Li wrote:
>>
>> It looks like in this commit, you have removed the release name for Ganglia:
>>
>> http://ganglia.svn.sourceforge
>>> On 8/21/2008 at 11:54 AM, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Rich
Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm currently deploying ganglia 3.1.0. I noticed that there were
> problems with nodes appearing in the gmond xml feed with no metrics, or
> with fewer metrics than they should have.
>
> My networ
>>> On 8/21/2008 at 11:18 AM, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Brad
Nicholes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>> On 8/21/2008 at 11:04 AM, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Carlo
> Marcelo Arenas Belon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>&g
>>> On 8/22/2008 at 10:27 AM, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Carlo
Marcelo Arenas Belon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 02:57:02PM -0600, Brad Nicholes wrote:
>> >>> On 8/21/2008 at 12:19 PM, in message
>> <[EMAIL PROT
>>> On 8/21/2008 at 12:19 PM, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://bugzilla.ganglia.info/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
>
>What|Removed |Added
> ---
>>> On 8/21/2008 at 11:04 AM, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Carlo
Marcelo Arenas Belon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 09:46:47AM -0600, Brad Nicholes wrote:
>> >>> On 8/21/2008 at 9:34 AM, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>>> On 8/21/2008 at 9:34 AM, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Brad
Nicholes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bernard,
> If you haven't done it already, don't tag 3.1.1 yet. There is a
> segfault in gmetad that I am looking at. It is bug #200
shouldn't
happen under normal conditions. However, it is a segfault and we should
probably take care of it before tagging 3.1.1.
Brad
>>> On 8/15/2008 at 11:59 AM, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Bernard Li"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Brad:
>
>
>>> On 7/29/2008 at 10:06 AM, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Marc
Van Kerkhoven1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Brad,
> One minor bug would be that the gmetrics link is no longer visible in the
> host view. Not sure if this is because I have done anything wrong, but
> it's pretty much a vanil
>>> On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 11:07 AM, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 08:42:57AM -0600, Brad Nicholes wrote:
>> >>> On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 4:09 AM, in message <[EMAIL
>>> On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 4:09 AM, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 12:16:53AM -0700, Bernard Li wrote:
>> Hi Brad:
>>
>> On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 10:25 PM, Brad Nicholes
>>> On 8/17/2008 at 2:02 AM, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Carlo
Marcelo Arenas Belon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 11:28:06PM -0600, Brad Nicholes wrote:
>> >>> On 8/16/2008 at 11:26 AM, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Ca
>>> On 8/16/2008 at 11:26 AM, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Carlo
Marcelo Arenas Belon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 11:48:50AM -0600, Brad Nicholes wrote:
>>
>> But there have been some significant patches added to 3.1.1 includi
>>> On 8/16/2008 at 2:20 AM, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Carlo
Marcelo Arenas Belon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 10:59:46AM -0700, Bernard Li wrote:
>>
>> I am okay to roll new testing tarball as soon as we are ready
>
> first, you need to :
>
> * wait for a commit fr
All,
I know it seems like just yesterday that we shipped Ganglia 3.1.0 (well
probably because it was ;) But there have been some significant patches added
to 3.1.1 including a fix for a segfault in gmetad. Due mainly to the segfault
patch, I am proposing that we tag and roll a testing tarb
>>> On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 7:51 AM, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Kostas Georgiou
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 12:08:29PM -0600, Brad Nicholes wrote:
>
>> Actually this issue really isn't that hard solve. The python
>> c
>>> On 8/12/2008 at 7:14 AM, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> fair, and so for the sake of clarity let me explain again
>> what are the specification constrains :
>>
>> * must allow for nodes to specify where the configuration server is
>> * must allow for addi
>>> On 8/9/2008 at 2:22 PM, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Carlo Marcelo
Arenas Belon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 04, 2008 at 08:40:43PM +0100, Kostas Georgiou wrote:
>>
>> I've noticed that the python scripts are always initialized even if they
>> don't have any metrics collected.
>
>>> On 8/8/2008 at 5:51 PM, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Bernard Li"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Brad:
>
> On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 11:55 PM, Bernard Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I would just file a bug in bugzilla and upload the patch there.
>
> I just submitted the bug to bugzilla.gan
>>> On 8/8/2008 at 9:59 AM, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Bernard Li"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 5:23 AM, Kostas Georgiou
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> It will obviously be easier for all packagers to have easilly accessible
>> patches instead of having to backport
>>> On 8/7/2008 at 11:44 AM, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Carlo
Marcelo Arenas Belon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 07, 2008 at 09:51:14AM -0600, Brad Nicholes wrote:
>> I reverted the workaround in hash.c
>
> I think we should leave that one in t
I reverted the workaround in hash.c and fixed process_xml.c to process the
EXTRA_ELEMENT tag correctly. The problem was the fact that the EXTRA_ELEMENT
data should only be processing this tag if gmetad is in authority mode. It was
missing a simple check for authority mode that the other tags
>>> On 8/5/2008 at 12:26 PM, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Bernard Li"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Brad:
>
> On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 8:12 AM, Brad Nicholes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> "Minor non-code changes may not be subje
>>> On 8/5/2008 at 12:03 AM, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Carlo
Marcelo Arenas Belon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 04, 2008 at 05:09:52PM -0700, Bernard Li wrote:
>> Hi all:
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 3:04 PM, Jesse Becker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> > I'd suggest that minor
body that helped get Ganglia 3.1.0 out the door.
Brad
>>> On 7/30/2008 at 2:42 PM, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Brad
Nicholes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The Ganglia Project (http://ganglia.info) is pleased to announce the first
> official release of Ga
The Ganglia Project (http://ganglia.info) is pleased to announce the first
official release of Ganglia 3.1.0 The official tarball is available for
immediate download at:
http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=43021&package_id=35280&release_id=616721
Please refer to http://gang
do it over
#ganglia IRC or the mailing list.
Brad
>>> On 7/29/2008 at 9:33 AM, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Brad
Nicholes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It has been two weeks since the announcement of the availability of the
> Ganglia 3.1.0 testing
>>> On 7/29/2008 at 2:27 PM, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
>> Behalf Of Brad Nicholes
>> Sent: 29 July 2008 17:27
&
>>> On 7/29/2008 at 11:18 AM, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Bernard Li"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Brad:
>
> On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 9:27 AM, Brad Nicholes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Thanks for installing and testing the 3.1
>>> On 7/29/2008 at 10:06 AM, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Marc
Van Kerkhoven1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Brad,
> One minor bug would be that the gmetrics link is no longer visible in the
> host view. Not sure if this is because I have done anything wrong, but
> it's pretty much a vanil
e the 3.1.0 tarball as
first official release of the Ganglia 3.1.x series.
Comments? Votes?
Brad
>>> On 7/15/2008 at 1:57 PM, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Brad
Nicholes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The Ganglia Project is pleased to announce the first offic
Just as a reminder, there is currently a testing release of Ganglia 3.1
available for immediate testing and feedback. This testing release is
available at:
http://www.ganglia.info/testing/
Please see the previous announcement for more information.
http://www.mail-archive.com/ganglia-deve
>>> On 7/17/2008 at 11:05 AM, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Carlo
Marcelo Arenas Belon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 04:43:32PM -0700, Bernard Li wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 9:36 AM, Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
>> >
>> > Other than that, as Brad said, the XML interface
101 - 200 of 564 matches
Mail list logo
