: [Ganglia-developers] Memory leak in gmond
Hi All,
I am still seeing some memory leak in the nodes
Now the problem is not in the deaf mode but in the mute mode. To reduce the
debugging complexity I am running the 3.0.7
on 2 nodes one in deaf mode and other in mute mode. The deaf mode is working
Becker wrote:
On Feb 19, 2008 7:39 PM, Martin Knoblauch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message
From: Jesse Becker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Ganglia Developers ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2008 11:25:54 PM
Subject: Re: [Ganglia-developers] Memory
On Feb 19, 2008 7:39 PM, Martin Knoblauch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message
From: Jesse Becker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Ganglia Developers ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2008 11:25:54 PM
Subject: Re: [Ganglia-developers] Memory leak
- Original Message
From: Jesse Becker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Martin Knoblauch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Ganglia Developers ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 4:01:26 PM
Subject: Re: [Ganglia-developers] Memory leak in gmond
On Feb 19, 2008 7:39
On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 10:41:08PM -0600, Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon wrote:
On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 09:43:21AM +0530, Kumar Vaibhav wrote:
Did You tried the latest patched Version that Bernard send on last
friday. A lot of memory leak fixes have been done.
Vaibhav, the only memory
On 2/18/2008 at 9:41 PM, in message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Carlo
Marcelo Arenas Belon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 09:43:21AM +0530, Kumar Vaibhav wrote:
Did You tried the latest patched Version that Bernard send on last
friday. A lot of memory leak fixes have been done.
On Feb 15, 2008 5:42 PM, Bernard Li [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sure, please update us after the weekend, we'll likely release 3.0.7 then.
Running valgrind on the ganglia-3.0.6.200802141157.tar.gz tarball you
posted for testing:
==2590== 5,554 bytes in 1,282 blocks are definitely lost in loss
On 2/19/08, Jesse Becker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I modified my gmond.conf to report much more aggressively than usual
so that the test time would be shorter. However, with *this
configuration*, it works out to about 770 bytes per minute.
So did we want to hunt this other memory leak down
On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 08:17:27AM -0700, Brad Nicholes wrote:
All of the other memory leak fixes in 3.1.0 were specific to that code
base. Although there might be something similar going on in 3.0.x.
The other memory leak fixes dealt with the XDR functions that create
and free the XDR
I'm not sure if this is right--I've only take a really quick check in
libmetrics/linux/metrics.c, and my C-fu is rusty.
It looks like strndup() is called in linux/metrics.c:hash_lookup
(about line 131) to dupliate an interface name, which is included in
the stats structure as stats-name. The
- Original Message
From: Jesse Becker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Ganglia Developers ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2008 11:25:54 PM
Subject: Re: [Ganglia-developers] Memory leak in gmond
I'm not sure if this is right--I've only take a really quick
: Brad Nicholes [EMAIL PROTECTED];
ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net; Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon [EMAIL
PROTECTED]; Martin Knoblauch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2008 5:07:49 AM
Subject: Re: [Ganglia-developers] Memory leak in gmond
Hi Bernard,
I think the problem
On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 04:17:07PM +0530, Kumar Vaibhav wrote:
I am using ganglia-3.0.5 on a woodcrest processor cluster. and I see
that after running for weeks the memory consumption of the gmond process
is something about 400 MB. I tried to debug the problem by isolating a
single node.
Hi MAartin,
Did You tried the latest patched Version that Bernard send on last
friday. A lot of memory leak fixes have been done.
Vaibhav
Martin Hicks wrote:
On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 04:17:07PM +0530, Kumar Vaibhav wrote:
I am using ganglia-3.0.5 on a woodcrest processor cluster. and I see
Hi Bernard,
I think the problem is solved. I don't see any rise in memory of gmond
for the last three days. Thanks for the fix. I will be waiting for 3.0.7
with this patch.
Once again thanks a lot.
Vaibhav
Bernard Li wrote:
Hi Vaibhav:
On 2/15/08, Kumar Vaibhav [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I am testing the new release on my systems. Initial results are
encouraging. I can tell the final words after weekend since I am keeping
it for the test over the weekend.
Vaibhav
Bernard Li wrote:
Hi Vaibhav:
On 2/14/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks a lot for
Hi Vaibhav:
On 2/15/08, Kumar Vaibhav [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am testing the new release on my systems. Initial results are
encouraging. I can tell the final words after weekend since I am keeping
it for the test over the weekend.
Sure, please update us after the weekend, we'll likely
AT knobisoft DOT de
www: http://www.knobisoft.de
- Original Message
From: Kumar Vaibhav [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Saturday, February 9, 2008 8:59:18 AM
Subject: Re: [Ganglia-developers] Memory leak
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Kumar Vaibhav [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
Cc: ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2008 11:36:37 AM
Subject: Re: [Ganglia-developers] Memory leak in gmond
Hi,
after looking at one of my employerss
- Original Message
From: Martin Knoblauch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Kumar Vaibhav [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2008 11:36:37 AM
Subject: Re: [Ganglia-developers] Memory leak in gmond
://www.knobisoft.de
- Original Message
From: Martin Knoblauch
To: Kumar Vaibhav ; Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
Cc: ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2008 11:36:37 AM
Subject: Re: [Ganglia-developers] Memory leak in gmond
Hi
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Kumar Vaibhav [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Martin Knoblauch [EMAIL PROTECTED];
Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2008 4:40:10 PM
Subject: Re: [Ganglia-developers] Memory leak in gmond
PROTECTED]
Cc: ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2008 11:36:37 AM
Subject: Re: [Ganglia-developers] Memory leak in gmond
Hi,
after looking at one of my employerss customers installations, it
definitely
seems that metrics-collecting/non-mute gmonds are growing
Hi all:
On 2/14/08, Martin Knoblauch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
thanks. My tests are still running. The new binaries do not grow anymore.
Or at least a lot slower than the original 3.0.4
Since I can't reproduce this, can someone please explain to me what
configuration triggers this? I'll
Hi Vaibhav:
On 2/14/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks a lot for the solution. Should I wait for a day or two for a
release with patches or procedd to aplly the patches and rebuild gmond.
I just posted a beta for 3.0.7 with the patches. Please see the email
I just sent
On 2/14/2008 at 3:31 PM, in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Bernard Li
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Brad:
On 2/14/08, Brad Nicholes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Basically it is just the standard configuration with gmond reporting
bytes_in, bytes_out, pkts_in, pkts_out metrics. As part of these
Hi Brad:
On 2/14/08, Brad Nicholes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Basically it is just the standard configuration with gmond reporting
bytes_in, bytes_out, pkts_in, pkts_out metrics. As part of these metric
gathering functions, interface names needed to be added to a hash table.
Each time the
Hi Vaibhav:
On 2/8/08, Kumar Vaibhav [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have tried it on Scientific linux 5.0 (a clone of RHEL 5.0). I see
similar problem in Scientific linux 4.1 ( clone of RHEL 4 update 1).
I'm running gmond on CentOS 4.x and didn't have any issues.
I had a subscription to
Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon wrote:
On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 04:17:07PM +0530, Kumar Vaibhav wrote:
I am using ganglia-3.0.5 on a woodcrest processor cluster. and I see
that after running for weeks the memory consumption of the gmond process
is something about 400 MB.
did you check what was
Bernard Li wrote:
Hi Vaibhav:
On 1/22/08, Kumar Vaibhav [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am using ganglia-3.0.5 on a woodcrest processor cluster. and I see
that after running for weeks the memory consumption of the gmond process
is something about 400 MB. I tried to debug the problem by
Hi Vaibhav:
On 1/22/08, Kumar Vaibhav [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am using ganglia-3.0.5 on a woodcrest processor cluster. and I see
that after running for weeks the memory consumption of the gmond process
is something about 400 MB. I tried to debug the problem by isolating a
single node. But
On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 04:17:07PM +0530, Kumar Vaibhav wrote:
I am using ganglia-3.0.5 on a woodcrest processor cluster. and I see
that after running for weeks the memory consumption of the gmond process
is something about 400 MB.
did you check what was the size 1 hour after all gmond
32 matches
Mail list logo
