Re: Spam, bounces and gcc list removal

2020-03-22 Thread Winfried Magerl
Hello Maciej, On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 09:22:31PM +, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: [..] > Spam bouncing is evil and often hits an innocent person [..] others like me might see it different: Spam discarding is evil and often hits an innocent person. Silently discarding a legal

Re: dejagnu version update?

2017-08-25 Thread Winfried Magerl
Hi, On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 09:55:29AM -0400, David Edelsohn wrote: > On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 9:50 AM, Rainer Orth > wrote: > > Hi H.J., > > > >> On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 6:32 AM, David Edelsohn wrote: > >>> On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 9:24 AM, H.J.

Re: bootstrap broken for '-O3'

2014-01-22 Thread Winfried Magerl
On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 07:39:12PM +0100, Winfried Magerl wrote: Hi, since trunk revision 206525 I'm unable to bootstrap gcc with '-O3' as optimisation. No problem until revision 2065250. From the diff-output it looks like this entry from ChangeLog is the only candidate

bootstrap broken for '-O3'

2014-01-19 Thread Winfried Magerl
High, since trunk revision 206525 I'm unable to bootstrap gcc with '-O3' as optimisation. No problem until revision 2065250. From the diff-output it looks like this entry from ChangeLog is the only candidate: --- diff -urN -x.svn gcc-head-206520/LAST_UPDATED

gcc-4.8 + tree-loop-distribute-patterns breaks glibc-2.18

2013-05-20 Thread Winfried Magerl
Hi, I've tried to compile upcoming glibc-2.18 with gcc-4.8.x and optimized with '-O3' and testsuite breaks horrible with SIGSEGV and eating up all available memory. I've tracked it down to the flag 'tree-loop-distribute-patterns' and can reproduce the problem with CFLAGS='-g -O2

Re: gcc-4.8 + tree-loop-distribute-patterns breaks glibc-2.18

2013-05-20 Thread Winfried Magerl
Hi, On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 09:40:52AM -0300, Adhemerval Zanella wrote: Hi, Thanks for reporting it, I saw it too when building glibc with gcc-trunk. Carlos O'Donell already reported it could be an issue to glibc at http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2013-02/msg00299.html and I also noted

Re: increasing testsuite-errors when optimizing for amdfam10/bdver2

2013-04-17 Thread Winfried Magerl
Hi, looks like XOP/FAM4/FAM is responsible for the additional errors I see when running gcc-testsuite or glibc-testsuite. I've opened Bug 56866 as a starting point, so the subject is a little bit misleading: Bug 56866 - gcc 4.7.x/gcc-4.8.x with '-O3 -march=bdver2' misscompiles

increasing testsuite-errors when optimizing for amdfam10/bdver2

2013-04-01 Thread winfried . magerl
Hi, replacing my AMD Phenom2 with a AMD Piledriver (Bulldozer Version2) was reason enough for me to recompile gcc (and the whole linux-system) with hard optimisation set to bdver2 (as I've done since my first linux on an 68030). But this time an increasing number of errors makes me a little bit