On Wed, 15 Feb 2012, Křištof Želechovski wrote:
Please consider the following patch:
Thank you, Křištof!
I made some small tweaks, created a ChangeLog entry and applied the
variation of your patch that is included below.
Gerald
2012-08-25 Křištof Želechovski giecr...@stegny.2a.pl
*
On Tue, 29 May 2012, Andreas Karrenbauer wrote:
To whom it may concern:
Please find a small code example which causes an internal compiler error with
g++-4.7 (opensuse):
Thanks for the report, Andreas.
I tried this with a current snapshot of what will become GCC 4.8.0
in several months,
On Fri, 15 Jun 2012, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
They clause client code taking the address
= cause
structs adn classes
= and
So fix them, it's a wiki.
I saw these typos were still there, so I just fixed them.
Thanks for the report, Jay.
Gerald
On Tue, 7 Aug 2012, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
The official link at http://codesourcery.com/cxx-abi/ (note trailing
slash) still works.
It used to be http://sourcery.mentor.com/public/cxx-abi/ as of lately,
and now redirects to http://mentorembedded.github.com/cxx-abi/ .
I went ahead and updated
On Sun, 26 Aug 2012, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
It used to be http://sourcery.mentor.com/public/cxx-abi/ as of lately,
and now redirects to http://mentorembedded.github.com/cxx-abi/ .
I went ahead and updated all our references per the patch below.
I don't think that is wise. The document
On Thu, 26 Jul 2012, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
This page: http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/faq.html (and other
pages) don't include a utf-8 charset in the content-type http header,
See http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2012-04/msg00597.html and
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2012-06/msg00125.html
I am
On Sun, 26 Aug 2012, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
I tried this with a current snapshot of what will become GCC 4.8.0
in several months, and now get this:
$ cat x.cc
auto foo = [](int a) { return a this-b; };
$ g++ x.cc
x.cc:1:6: error: 'foo' does not name a type
auto foo = [](int
On Thu, 18 Oct 2012, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
That PR now has a link to a mocked up bugzilla page:
http://www.kayari.plus.com/gcc/enter_bug.cgi-1.html which I think
would be a significant improvement, without getting in the way or
being an eyesore.
Do any other maintainers have an opinion on
Hi Sri,
On Tue, 13 Nov 2012, Sriraman Tallam wrote:
I have added a release note for Function Multiversioning which is
checked into trunk. Please review.
Index: changes.html
===
+li Function Multiversioning Support with G++:
On Thu, 13 Dec 2012, John Marino wrote:
FreeBSD ports have every modern version of GCC in them, nothing stops a
user from building and using the latest GCC on FreeBSD (Note the ports
are well maintained).
Thanks, John. :-) (Note to those not aware I am taking care of those.)
On Thu, 13 Dec
...@google.com
Rainer Orth r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de
Gerald Pfeifer ger...@pfeifer.com
* configure.ac: Check for getexecname.
* fileline.c: #include errno.h. Define getexecname if not
available.
(fileline_initialize): Try to find
In bug 55237, Uros suggested to implement shortcuts from the like of
http://gcc.gnu.org/r194572
to
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=revisionrevision=194572
I implemented this now, but before making this a new standard, I
did want to ask here whether any of you have concerns or suggestions
Hi Martin,
On Sun, 10 Jun 2012, Martin von Gagern wrote:
On 10.06.2012 15:39, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
I had a quick look at telling docbook stylesheets to add the charset,
or not output utf8, and couldn't see how to do it. Maybe Benjamin
knows.
If that should prove difficult, there are at
On Tue, 17 Apr 2012, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
I belong to HP-UX Itanium/PA-RISC GCC compiler team. I noticed that the
GCC page (http://gcc.gnu.org/install/binaries.html) that lists out the
pre-compiled versions of GCC (for different platforms) does not contain
the web link of GCC for HP-UX
On Sat, 26 Jan 2013, Hongtao Yu wrote:
How can I set up a new project under GCC and make it open-sourced?
Thanks!
That depends on what you mean by under GCC, I'd say. If you
have improvements for GCC, submitting those as patches against
GCC will be best, cf. http://gcc.gnu.org/contribute.html
On Sat, 16 Feb 2013, Kenny Simpson wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org still shows:
Development: GCC 4.8.0 (changes, release criteria)
Status: 2013-01-08
but there just was a status update:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2013-02/msg00177.html
I have a mail filter/script in place that notifies me of
On Thu, 24 Jan 2013, Richard Biener wrote:
There are technical details of the maintaining part - like would the
material reside in SVN? Or in the CVS where we keep our webpages? Or
somewhere else public (github?)? Would we want to have an official
maintainer and use the usual patch /
On Sun, 17 Feb 2013, Tobias Burnus wrote:
I wonder if we could generate a version-specific page for the online
documentation. I think that should be trivial to maintain and I know
at least one vendor who would use it.
If we means that you are volunteering ;-), absolutely, go for it!
Give the
On Mon, 18 Feb 2013, Tobias Burnus wrote:
If we means that you are volunteering ;-), absolutely, go for it!
;-)
How about the following patch? If it is okay, I will add the remaining
index.html for 4.6 and 4.7 and update gcc-4.6/index.html – and then
commit it.
Looks good to me.
Perhaps
On Fri, 10 May 2013, Kenny Simpson wrote:
On http://gcc.gnu.org, the 4.8 status is still pointing to the original
release note from 4.8.0.
Shouldn't it be updated to the status report on 2013-05-07 ?
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2013-05/msg00074.html
Yes, you're right. Fixed thusly.
Thanks
Hi Timo,
On Fri, 24 May 2013, timo.ja...@go-part.com wrote:
I was wondering if you are still accepting mirrors for GCC.
http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html
If you are, I will like to provide one with HTTP, FTP and Rsync access via
a VPS located in Australia, USA, UK, Philippines or Japan or
On Fri, 26 Apr 2013, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 26 April 2013 13:09, Jurgis Upenieks wrote:
I think that I have found a bug in gcc home page gcc-4.7 changes.
In C++ paragraph about explicit override control.
In example code, is it really struct, not class?
Yes, that's valid C++, the example is
On Wed, 8 May 2013, Larry Evans wrote:
the verification command and result are:
~/download/gcc/4.8 $ gpg --verify --keyring ./gnu-keyring.gpg
./gcc-4.8.0.tar.bz2.sig
gpg: Signature made Fri Mar 22 08:32:18 2013 CDT using DSA key ID C3C45C06
gpg: Good signature from Jakub Jelinek
It's my pleasure to announce the appointment of Steven Bosscher
as RTL optimizers reviewer.
Congratulations and Happy Hacking, Steven!
Gerald
PS: Please update MAINTAINERS accordingly.
On Wed, 10 Jul 2013, Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote:
This points to other ideas:
1) how about adding a helper switch to show what is included in Wall?
such as -Wall-print
Doesn't
gcc -Q -Wall --help=warnings
give you this?
Yes, but...how would I know to use this?
For example, gcc --help
On Sun, 11 Aug 2013, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
I just added a different view. All results can also be viewed as a
timeline, both per-buildhost and per-target:
http://toolchain.lug-owl.de/buildbot/timeline.php
Nice! Would you like to add a reference to http://gcc.gnu.org/testing/ ?
Recently (three days perhaps) I started to notice the following
mkdir: plugin: mkdir: plugin: File exists
File exists
mkdir: mkdir: testsuitetestsuite: : File exists
File exists
in the log excerpts of my nightly builders that I get by mail.
(For successful builds the build environment
On Mon, 19 Aug 2013, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
Ok?
Index: htdocs/testing/index.html
===
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/testing/index.html,v
retrieving revision 1.29
diff -u -p -r1.29 index.html
--- htdocs/testing/index.html
On Mon, 19 Aug 2013, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
...and this on top of that:
Ok?
That one, too. :-)
Gerald
I am happy to announce Dodji Seketeli as diagnostics framework
maintainer.
Thanks for your contributions and agreeing to fill this role, Dodji!
And thanks to Gaby for his contributions in this area over the years
and the professional manner he has been initiating this transition
(including
To make it easier to reproduce builds of software and entire GNU/Linux
distributions, RMS had the idea of adding a warning to GCC that warns
about the use of __DATE__ and __TIME__.
Short of interesting changes to the environment or #defining these
two, as soon as a program uses __DATE__ or
On Sun, 27 Oct 2013, Tobias Burnus wrote:
I assume that he also likes to have a warning for __TIMESTAMP__.
So do I, but I asked to be sure.
Do you mean something like the attached patch? (Only lightly tested.)
Yep! Thanks.
+@item -Wdate-time
+@opindex Wdate-time
+@opindex
Hi Balaji,
On Wed, 23 Oct 2013, Iyer, Balaji V wrote:
Is there anything you were thinking about that I missed?
the question was in a different context, but making the code a
bit more portable would be good.
Right now FreeBSD bootstrap is broken due to the following in
On Wed, 30 Oct 2013, Iyer, Balaji V wrote:
This attached patch will check for usage of alloca.h before using it.
The change is entirely in libcilkrts and I am committing this change as
it is pretty obvious (the change was lifted from the autconf manual
example).
Thanks, Balaji!
Now my
cOn Thu, 31 Oct 2013, Iyer, Balaji V wrote:
It should include a 3 too. My bad sorry. I have fixed it. Attached,
please find a patch. It is committed as obvious.
Thanks.
Now the next failure mode, I'm afraid.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58951
libtool: link:
On Mon, 4 Nov 2013, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 28 October 2013 21:13, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
I don't have any strong objection, but I'll note that it's even easier
to use -D options.
CC='gcc -D__DATE__=today'
It's undefined behaviour in both C and C++ to redefine pre-defined
macros such as
Hi Jonathan,
On Sat, 8 Jun 2013, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
Once again the links from http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/ to the
libstdc++ docs don't work:
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.6.4/libstdc++/manual/
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.7.3/libstdc++/manual/
this works for me now and I
On Tue, 26 Nov 2013, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
I think it's time to remove targets that have been under --enable-obsolete
for a while - and to obsolete, for possible future removal, targets
without stdint.h type information configured in GCC (see list in
On Wed, 20 Nov 2013, Patrick Marlier wrote:
I have noticed that the link
Extended-asm-with-goto.html#Extended-asm-with-goto is wrong in
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Extended-Asm.html.
Locally when I generate the html doc, the link is good, ie a
href=#Extended-asm-with-goto.
I had a
Hi Paolo,
On Wed, 12 Dec 2012, Paolo Carlini wrote:
I just noticed a broken link (in case the issue is trivial I may get
around to fixing it myself, but at the moment I don't know):
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/X86-Built-in-Functions.html#X86-Built-in-Functions
(it appers twice)
I
Hi Stephan,
On Thu, 6 Jun 2013, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
the link of Extended asm with goto is
a href=Extended-asm-with-goto.html#Extended-asm-with-goto
to a non-existing
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.5.4/gcc/Extended-asm-with-goto.html#Extended-asm-with-goto
which gets
On Tue, 17 Jan 2012, Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
Trying to document some new options/name spaces, I ran into following
problem with hyperlinking inside the document.
It's best explained with an example from documentation:
Start at
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Variable-Attributes.html
Hi Odne,
On Sun, 17 Jun 2012, Odne Hellebø wrote:
Just wanted to report that these links on your page are broken:
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.7.1/libstdc++/manual/
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.7.1/libstdc++/api/
With their pdf, xml and html tarball links.
I noticed because
On Fri, 10 May 2013, Zvi Gilboa wrote:
On the _/contribute/.html_//page (http://gcc.gnu.org/contribute.html), the
link to the script that should help check conformance with GNU coding style is
broken (the root trunk is unknown, etc.)
Thanks for the report, Zvi. I fixed this by means of the
On Sun, 22 Dec 2013, Tae Wong wrote:
It will be better if you have enabled the Launchpad account seotaewong40.
This account has been suspended for renaming an answer title multiple times.
The GCC team has nothing to do with Launchpad.
There's also an ordering error on the GCC maintainer
Hi Gleb,
On Sun, 26 Jan 2014, Gleb Smirnov wrote:
I have been browsing the online docs here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.8.2/gcc/
Turns out that clicking on 3.6 Options Controlling Objective-C and
Objective-C++ Dialects results in a 404 error.
That is,
On Sat, 10 May 2014, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
Since (at least) 16:40 UTC that day my i386-unknown-freebsd10.0 builds
fail as follows:
Comparing stages 2 and 3
warning: gcc/cc1obj-checksum.o differs
warning: gcc/cc1-checksum.o differs
warning: gcc/cc1plus-checksum.o differs
On Sat, 17 May 2014, Richard Sandiford wrote:
To rule out one possibility: which GCC are you using for stage1?
I think that may the smoking gun. When I use GCC 4.7 to bootstrap,
FreeBSD 8, 9 and 10 all build fine on i386 (= i486) and amd64.
When I use the system compiler, which is GCC 4.2 on
On Tue, 10 Jun 2014, Hebenstreit, Michael wrote:
you are right - must be a Firefox problem; I had no problem using wget, IE8
works as well
Firefox is still redirected to https://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/infrastructure/
though
Does it work for you know? We made a number of changes in the last
On Mon, 30 Jun 2014, Hebenstreit, Michael wrote:
I tested from home to reach https://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/infrastructure/
Well, that is not supposed to be there to begin with.
The original report was about links to
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/infrastructure/
not working from
On Fri, 24 Jan 2014, Andrew Engelbrecht wrote:
there are no .sig files here:
http://www.netgull.com/gcc/releases/gcc-4.8.2/
i assumed that gcc didn't use gpg for releases, and became very
discouraged about the idea of building gcc from source.
then i noticed that there are .sig files at
Hi Tim,
On Wed, 2 Jul 2014, Tim Semeijn wrote:
I have set up a French gcc mirror. It is located in Roubaix, France.
isn't that where they like to torture bikes (and riders) once a year? ;-)
It is reachable through http, ftp and rsync:
http://mirror.bbln.nl/gcc
ftp://mirror.bbln.nl/gcc
Hi Martin,
On Wed, 11 Jun 2014, Martin Liška wrote:
More precisely, webkit based browsers have problems with combination of http
and https links for the same site,
Chrome console error from https://gcc.gnu.org/:
[blocked] The page at 'https://gcc.gnu.org/' was loaded over HTTPS, but ran
Hi Dan,
I see there is a later mail from Steven which I'm going to look
into wrt. adding the mirrors.
There seems to be a number of you looking into mirroring??
Gerald
On Fri, 14 Mar 2014, Dan D. wrote:
I made a small mistake below on the ftp/rsync mirrors for the USA
mirror. They should
I've been looking for a smoking gun, but did not find one. Interestingly
this only happens in stage3 on i386-unknown-freebsd10.0 where clang is the
bootstrap compiler:
build/genmodes -h tmp-modes.h
build/genmodes: config/i386/i386-modes.def:25: (TF) field format must not be set
build/genmodes:
On Wed, 9 Jul 2014, Tom Christensen wrote:
I just noticed that on the page with the list for binary packages for
Solaris at
https://gcc.gnu.org/install/binaries.html
the distributions „Blastwave“ and „SunFreeware“ are still listed.
Blastwave has closed its doors some month ago and
On Wed, 23 May 2012, Colin Prior wrote:
Please would you be good enough to update
http://gcc.gnu.org/install/binaries.html and add www.unixpackages.com
We as you will see from the Sunfreeware site we have removed the majority of
our packages including GCC (Solaris 2.5, 2.6 7, 8, and 9) over to
On Tue, 15 Jul 2014, Dan D. wrote:
Are you still interested in the mirrors?
Yep. This is the patch I just committed to our web site.
If there are further updates, best propose a patch against
https://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html , that is the fastest way
and ensure things show up as you want them
Hi Timo,
On Wed, 13 Nov 2013, Timo Jacob wrote:
Hi, I have set up new mirrors for GCC for the following locations:
:
+ Mirrors-usa:
http://mirrors-usa.go-parts.com/crux/
ftp://mirrors-usa.go-parts.com/crux/
rsync://mirrors-usa.go-parts.com/mirrors/crux/
these did not look
On Wed, 23 Jul 2014, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
The page https://gcc.gnu.org/simtest-howto.html is
unfortunately out of date (e.g. binutils+sim now lives in the
same git repo) but it gives you the idea.
Sooo, any volunteer to update this page? Doesn't have to be
perfect, even incremental
Packaging last week's GCC 5 snapshot, I ran into a couple of issues
due to the version number change.
One is this: We are still creating libdata/pkgconfig/libgcj-5.0.pc
as we used to create libgcj-4.10.pc.
Shouldn't that be libgcj-5.pc now?
Gerald
On Sun, 20 Jul 2014, Geert Bosch wrote:
Can we use the switch to 5.0, a supposedly stable C++11 ABI etc,
also as an excuse to finally configure for --with-sse2 by default
for 32-bit x86? Maybe then we can finally retire PR 323 and its
dozens of duplicates...
I did not see a response to
On Fri, 10 May 2013, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
At the very bottom of the above page (http://gcc.gnu.org/contribute.html),
there is no indication of GCC only accepting *plain text* messages.
That would belong on http://gcc.gnu.org/lists.html but it could be
improved, as it only says Please refrain
On Fri, 29 Aug 2014, ConcertPass Mirrors Admin wrote:
we set up a new GCC mirror for the community.
URL: http://mirrors.concertpass.com/gcc/
Organization/Contact: ConcertPass (ad...@mirrors.concertpass.com)
Location: United States, Michigan
Please, add it to your mirror list page.
Done
Now the gmp.h error is gone on my nightly FreeBSD test systems,
I am getting the following:
In file included from /scratch2/tmp/gerald/gcc-HEAD/libcc1/plugin.cc:58:
In file included from /usr/include/c++/v1/string:438:
In file included from /usr/include/c++/v1/cwchar:107:
In file included from
On Thursday 2014-11-13 12:41, David Edelsohn wrote:
The patches have broken bootstrap on AIX and probably on other non-GNU
platforms. strchrnul() is a GNU extension.
Yep, FreeBSD 8 is broken as well.
The failure rate of my nightly testers over the last two weeks
must be around 50%.
Gerald
On Saturday 2014-08-23 12:38, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
Packaging last week's GCC 5 snapshot, I ran into a couple of issues
due to the version number change.
One is this: We are still creating libdata/pkgconfig/libgcj-5.0.pc
as we used to create libgcj-4.10.pc.
Shouldn't that be libgcj-5.pc
On Thursday 2014-12-18 10:05, Sebastian Huber wrote:
I have a question regarding the localized write permission for OS
maintainers. In
https://www.gnu.org/software/gcc/svnwrite.html
we have
Localized write permission.
This is for people who have primary responsibility for ports,
In case anyone wonders about this extra snapshot: both this week's,
and last week's snapshot were broken in that a complete bootstrap
failed even on i386, so I manually triggered another one.
Gerald
On Thu, 5 Jul 2007, Tom Tromey wrote:
In this case the library has to follow the external project policy:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2006-03/msg00558.html
It at least needs an entry on the coding conventions page.
Good point. HJ, would you mind updating our coding conventions page
On Thu, 26 Jul 2007, Diego Novillo wrote:
I've always found the term Non-Autopoiesis too pretentious and
unnecessarily complex. In a recent thread, Tobias Schluter proposed
Non-autonomous, which is at least more readily understandable.
Disclaimer: I am writing this in my capacity as
On Fri, 27 Jul 2007, Phil Edwards wrote:
Putting gcc-help as the first address mentioned in lists.html is a
good idea.
That's a good idea. Done thusly.
Gerald
Index: lists.html
===
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/lists.html,v
On Fri, 27 Jul 2007, Rask Ingemann Lambertsen wrote:
This part of the documentation is fragmented in a way such that I
sometimes can't find what I'm looking for, even if I know it is there
(somewhere). For example, when it comes to submitting patches, we have
On Fri, 27 Jul 2007, Diego Novillo wrote:
Why not provide a permanent home for the GCC summit proceedings at
gcc.gnu.org? It seems the logical place.
That's what I've done. The .pdf is *in* gcc.gnu.org. The others could
be sucked in as well. They're now pointing to gccsummit.
Currently I
Hi Max,
On Fri, 3 Aug 2007, Max Bear wrote:
I just add a new mirror. The server is located at US (Dallas, 100mb
connection). I am doing daily upate on this mirror. Here is the url:
http://gcc.site2nd.org/gcc/
It's a little thing that I can do to contribute to the community.
If you have
I have been getting the following for a couple of days, but it seems
nobody else is seeing this? This is on a FreeBSD 5.4 machine which has
been bootstrapping mainline for months w/o problems, apart from the usual
short-lived breakages:
libtool: compile:
On Sat, 8 Sep 2007, Andrew Pinski wrote:
Rerun the command without the /dev/null 21, libtool likes to say
that PIC mode will give the same output as non PIC mode (which is not
always true).
Blind me. Obviously that redirection removed all traces of the real
error. Ahem. Thanks, Andrew.
On Tue, 4 Sep 2007, Dave Korn wrote:
On 04 September 2007 10:05, me wrote:
The point of this is that __COUNTER__ would assign consecutive numbers
I can not find g++'s equivalent wonder how I could achieve the same
thing?
This feature was just added recently. It will be in all upcoming
Vladimir,
On Fri, 15 Jun 2007, Vladimir N. Makarov wrote:
Sorry, it is even make me a bit scary becuase I don't know when the SC
decides that we need more maintainers and what maintainers. When should
we propose. After that I am just starting to think who usually propose
them.
I know
On Sun, 9 Sep 2007, Jan Hubicka wrote:
[bootstrap/33352] invalid rtl sharing -- bootstrap failure compiling
libgomp/team.c on i386
I can definitly take alook on it, however i386-linux bootstrap fine for
me. Can I have testcase?
After a couple of days of failure (at least four nightly
On Tue, 11 Sep 2007, Tom Tromey wrote:
Also, I recently added a new -fdirectives-only option which improves
distcc and ccache performance. Does that merit a release note update
as well?
IMO, yes.
Seconded. :-)
Gerald
On Tue, 28 Aug 2007, Mark Mitchell wrote:
Dave Korn wrote:
I do think that generating the same code, independent of host system, is
a very important property of GCC's design, just like generating the same
code independent of whether or not we're compiling with -g.
Can the SC please consider
And now to the most important issue of all to address before we can
release GCC 4.3.0. ;-)
In our current documentation we have both command-line option and
command line option. Like other such cases, we should make a choice
and document this in codingconventions.html.
I am willing to take care
On Mon, 17 Sep 2007, Dave Korn wrote:
Hyphenated. It's not a line option of a command, it's an option of a
command-line.
On Mon, 17 Sep 2007, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
As an adjective I think it should be command-line; I'm sure Sandra will
correct me if I'm wrong here.
On Mon, 17 Sep 2007,
On Tue, 2 Oct 2007, Volker Reichelt wrote:
the starting pages for the mailing lists like
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc or http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches
are broken. To be more precise, the entry generated for September is
corrupted: It shows a strange size, and the link points to a wrong
Hi FX,
On Fri, 28 Sep 2007, François-Xavier Coudert wrote:
how was metahtml compiled for the current webserver (the error I see
is certainly not target-specific), and should we use a tool that has
been deceased for 8 years to produce our website?
let me provide a bit of historical background:
On Mon, 8 Oct 2007, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
As others noted, MetaHTML can be made to work on a current GNU/Linux
system, and while this probably will not be our long term strategy, I
am trying to brush up my scripts/patches that will allow for this more
easily and then share this with you
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Snapshot gcc-4.2-20071011 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.2-20071011/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
I ran this script manually and reenabled the generation of snapshots off
the
On Tue, 2 Oct 2007, François-Xavier Coudert wrote:
The documentation for different releases of GCC in the same branch
vary only slightly. For that reason, I think it would be nice to be
able to have a URL for the doc of a given branch, meaning the doc
of the last released version of this
[ Omitting gcc-patches ]
On Sun, 30 Sep 2007, Janne Blomqvist wrote:
I think that if indeed metahtml is in such a bad shape as you
describe, moving away from it asap is the right thing to do. But I'm
not convinced that developing a gcc.gnu.org-specific template engine
is the correct answer.
On Wed, 10 Oct 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I estabilished an http mirror via rsync, updated four times a day with a
cron job, located in Utah (US), available at the URL
http://gcc.bigsearcher.com/;, from my server bigsearcher.com;
Please add this mirror to the list of available mirror
On Thu, 25 Oct 2007, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
'deprecated' in the standard does not carry much semantics weight,
unless the feature is also removed. But, even then we would have to
worry about existing codes that were written using the feature.
I have to admit I am also surprised about the use
On Thu, 25 Oct 2007, Andrew Pinski wrote:
Well technically these headers have been deprecated since at least 3.2
(maybe even back in 3.0) with them producing a warning. So I don't
know if we should move them or not but we have followed our own rules
here.
Sorry, I misread the Subject: what
On Sun, 28 Oct 2007, David Daney wrote:
You need at least 256MB of memory to compile HTML_401F. A lot of time
is also useful. If the system is not thrashing, I would give it a
couple of hours before calling it broken.
Have we reduced memory consumption recently? On i386-freebsd the number
I
On Sun, 28 Oct 2007, Richard Guenther wrote:
Don't be sorry, I can reproduce a compilation time surge for libjava on
my machine (AMD64, 2.4 GHz, 1 GB). In particular, HTML_401F.o now
takes 40 min to compile for each version of the library.
The surge comes from the fix for PR
On Sun, 28 Oct 2007, David Daney wrote:
On i386-freebsd the number I identified earlier this year was 700MB,
512MB definitely _not_ being sufficient. I'd be very interested in
your measurements, perhaps we can reduce the limit somewhat!
I regularly bootstrap c,c++,java on a mips-linux-gnu
On Mon, 29 Oct 2007, Jason Merrill wrote:
I think I prefer Richard's suggestion of not branching until we're ready to
make the .0 release. The effect should be the same except that people don't
have to deal with checking patches in on the branch vs. the trunk until after
4.3.0 goes out.
I
On Thu, 1 Nov 2007, Richard Guenther wrote:
Well, there are installable gcc 4.3 builds for openSUSE available,
and I know of at least Debian packages in experimental. I wouldn't
be surprised if Fedora also has gcc 4.3 packages ready.
FreeBSD also has packages (and of course the source ports)
On Thu, 1 Nov 2007, J.C. Pizarro wrote:
What is there inside of fat .gch file? What means the .gch file?
This is a question for the gcc-help list, not gcc. The latter is
for the development *of* GCC, not the development *with* GCC.
You can easily find the answer to your question by Googling
On Thu, 25 Oct 2007, Britt Snodgrass wrote:
I've noticed that the GCC changes pages
(http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.2/changes.html and
http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.3/changes.html ) are not usually updated for
Ada and/or GNAT. It anyone designated as a maintainer for this?
Yes, Geert, Robert, and Arnaud
1 - 100 of 3481 matches
Mail list logo
