GCN back-end branch

GCC and I would like to invite everyone interested to help tackling them, Martin 2017-03-10 Jan Hubicka <j...@suse.cz> Martin Jambor <mjam...@suse.cz> * config.sub: Added amdgcn cases. gcc/ * common/config/gcn/gcn-common.c: New file. * con

Re: dejagnu version update?

Hi, On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 01:25:18PM -0400, Trevor Saunders wrote: > On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 10:36:47AM -0600, Jeff Law wrote: > > ... > > I'd rather just move to 1.5 and get on with things. If some systems don't > > have a new enough version, I'm comfortable telling developers on those > >

Re: Help with getting started with adding IPA-related attribute

Hi, On Sat, Apr 29, 2017 at 06:28:31AM -0500, Daniel Santos wrote: > Brievity is not my forte, so let me start with the questions. Can somebody > please point me to the pass and/or function where gcc > > 1.) decides rather or not to inline a function, There are two inlining passes.

Re: RFC: Improving GCC8 default option settings

Hi, On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 11:55:21AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote: > On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 5:08 PM, Allan Sandfeld Jensen > wrote: > > On Mittwoch, 13. September 2017 15:46:09 CEST Jakub Jelinek wrote: > >> On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 03:41:19PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote: >

Re: pass manager question

Hi, On Mon, Oct 02, 2017 at 01:27:05PM -0600, Sandra Loosemore wrote: > Is there an idiom for target-specific back end code to ask the pass manager > if a particular pass (e.g., "split1") has already run? (I might be wrong but) I don't think there is. But it might be a useful thing to have

Re: I want to dump something when I compile the program. How should I do ?

Hi, On Thu, May 17 2018, 冠人 王 via gcc wrote: > My work is to modify the gcc source code so as to customize the warning > message, when the programmer writing the program violating some rules.  > When the violation occurs, I want to reveal some message such as "guanjen375 > warning: the rule ###

Re: I want to know the information about the function arguments

Hi, On Wed, Jun 06 2018, 冠人 王 via gcc wrote: > When I modify the gcc source code, sometimes I do not know what parameters > does the function call. > For example,  > bool warn_if_unused_value(const tree exp,location_t locus){    function > declaration ... > } > I want to know what "exp" and

Re: How to get GCC on par with ICC?

Hi Steve, On Fri, Jun 08 2018, Steve Ellcey wrote: > On Thu, 2018-06-07 at 12:01 +0200, Richard Biener wrote: >>  >> When we do our own comparisons of GCC vs. ICC on benchmarks >> like SPEC CPU 2006/2017 ICC doesn't have a big lead over GCC >> (in fact it even trails in some benchmarks) unless

Re: Gcc Plugin Api

Hi, On Fri, Jun 15 2018, Shubham Narlawar wrote: > Hello all, I have been figuring out to work on some project. So while > searching I found GCC Plugin API project quite interesting. > So, please can I get some more information and links about gcc Plugin API > project. > Can anyone help me

Re: [GSOC] LTO dump tool project

Hi, On Sun, Jun 17 2018, Hrishikesh Kulkarni wrote: > Hi, > > I am trying to isolate the dump tool into real lto-dump tool. I have > started with the copy of lto.c into lto-dump.c and done the > changes to Make-lang.in and config-lang.in suggested by Martin (patch > attached). However when I try

Google Summer of Code 2018: Call for mentors and ideas

Hi, following a discussion at IRC about an upcoming deadline to register GCC as an independent organization for Google Summer of Code 2018 (GSoC), I have volunteered to serve as the org-admin for GCC if: - there is not another volunteer (so step up if you are!), - the community does not

Re: Google Summer of Code 2018: Call for mentors and ideas

Hi, On Thu, Jan 18 2018, Martin Liška wrote: > On 01/17/2018 06:54 PM, Martin Jambor wrote: > ... >> >> 2) Martin Liška is willing to mentor either: >>2a) -fsanitize=type (He provided URL https://reviews.llvm.org/D32197 >>but it gives me a 404 error)

Re: Google Summer of Code 2018: Call for mentors and ideas

Hi Joseph, On Wed, Jan 17 2018, Joseph Myers wrote: > On Wed, 17 Jan 2018, Martin Jambor wrote: > >> 3?) Joseph Myers brought up idea to do "built-in functions for TS 18661 >> floating-point functions - which has the feature that there are a >> lot of simil

Re: Google Summer of Code 2018: Call for mentors and ideas

On Fri, Jan 19 2018, Martin Jambor wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Jan 18 2018, Martin Liška wrote: >> On 01/17/2018 06:54 PM, Martin Jambor wrote: >> > ... >>> >>> 2) Martin Liška is willing to mentor either: >>>2a) -fsanitize=ty

Re: Google Summer of Code 2018: Call for mentors and ideas

Hi Joel, On Wed, Jan 17 2018, Joel Sherrill wrote: > On 1/17/2018 11:54 AM, Martin Jambor wrote: >> Hi, >> >> following a discussion at IRC about an upcoming deadline to register GCC >> as an independent organization for Google Summer of Code 2018 (GSoC), I &

Re: Google Summer of Code 2018: Call for mentors and ideas

Hi, On Thu, Jan 18 2018, Joseph Myers wrote: > On Thu, 18 Jan 2018, Eric Gallager wrote: > >> Would it make sense to recycle old GSoC projects that never got >> completed? in principle that is definitely possible, but... >>I'm wondering about the "replace libiberty with gnulib" one > > I'd like

Re: Google Summer of Code 2018: Call for mentors and ideas

Hi Andi, On Thu, Jan 18 2018, Andi Kleen wrote: > Martin Jambor <mjam...@suse.cz> writes: >> >> Therefore I would like to ask all seasoned GCC contributors who would >> like to mentor a GSoC student to send a reply to this thread with their >> idea for a project

Re: Status of m32c target?

Hi, On Fri, Jan 19 2018, Sandra Loosemore wrote: > On 01/19/2018 10:14 AM, Jeff Law wrote: > >> cc0 needs to die. That doesn't mean that any particular target needs to >> be dropped -- it just means that someone has to step forward to do the >> conversion. > > Unifying two parallel threads:

Re: Google Summer of Code 2018: Call for mentors and ideas

Hi, On Wed, Jan 17 2018, Martin Jambor wrote: > Hi, > > following a discussion at IRC about an upcoming deadline to register GCC > as an independent organization for Google Summer of Code 2018 (GSoC), I > have volunteered to serve as the org-admin for GCC if: > > -

Re: Google Summer of Code 2018: Call for mentors and ideas

Hi, I am happy to announce that we were selected as a Google Summer of Code 2018 mentor organization. At this point I am being asked to "invite mentors," so I will soon invite all the people who have expressed interest in the January email thread (or on IRC). If anybody has an additional idea

Re: Google Summer of Code 2018: Call for mentors and ideas

Hi, On Wed, Feb 14 2018, Janus Weil wrote: > Hi Martin, > >> I am happy to announce that we were selected as a Google Summer of Code >> 2018 mentor organization. > > good to hear! > > >> At this point I am being asked to "invite mentors," so I will soon >> invite all the people who have expressed

Re: Google Summer of Code 2018: Call for mentors and ideas

Hi Christopher, On Thu, Feb 15 2018, Janus Weil wrote: > Hi Christopher, > > 2018-02-15 11:52 GMT+01:00 Christopher Dimech : >> I am the administrator of GNU Behistun, a package designed >> to image the internal constituents of the subsurface using seismic waves. >> It is written

Re: GSoC

Hi Thejazeto, I apologize for replying this late, I've been traveling and did not manage to write to you earlier as a consequence. On Wed, Feb 21 2018, Thejazeto Lhousa wrote: > Hello, > > I went through the GSoC 2018 idealist and found 'Improving GCC > Developer Documentation' to be interesting

Re: GSOC 2018 - Textual LTO dump tool project

Hello Hrishikesh, I apologize for replying to you this late, this has been a busy week and now I am traveling. On Mon, Feb 19 2018, Hrishikesh Kulkarni wrote: > Hi, > > I am Hrishikesh Kulkarni currently studying as an undergrad student in > Computer Engineering at Pune University, India. I find

Re: RTL compression in GCC

Hello Alfonso, On Sat, Aug 18 2018, ALFONSO LUIS CASTANO MARIN wrote: > Dear Martin, > > I am interested in contributing to GCC to speed-up the compiler and I > thought that the issues related with RTL are very interesting. I wonder if > still there has not been done any job in RTL compression

Re: Google Summer of Code 2018: Call for mentors and ideas

Hi, On Tue, Jan 23 2018, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote: > On 23 January 2018 at 16:26, Martin Jambor <mjam...@suse.cz> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Wed, Jan 17 2018, Martin Jambor wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> following a discussion at IRC about an u

Re: Regarding Google summer of code.

Hello Chaitanya, On Fri, Mar 02 2018, Sai Chaitanya wrote: > Hello, > I am Chaitanya.while checking the organisation for GSOC I am very > confused,sir I have skills in C,C++, Java and little bit of python,till now > I didn't take part in any big projects. > Please guide me which organisation and

Re: Further for GSoC.

Hello, Tejas, On Fri, Mar 02 2018, Joseph Myers wrote: > On Fri, 2 Mar 2018, Tejas Joshi wrote: > >> I have some university level experience of working and programming assembly >> language under Intel 80386DX architecture. I think it may help for >> implementing supports for other architectures.

Re: GCC GSOC Participation

Hello Prateek, On Sat, Mar 03 2018, Prateek Kalra wrote: > Hello GCC Community, > My name is Prateek Kalra.I am pursuing integrated dual > degree(B.tech+M.tech) in Computer Science Software Engineering,from Gautam > Buddha University,Greater Noida.I am currently in 8th semester of the >

Re: Queries on GSoC project on OMPD interface

Hello Siyuan, On Mon, Mar 12 2018, LIU SIYUAN wrote: > Dear all, > > Hi, my name is Siyuan and this is my first time using the GCC mailing list! Welcome! > > I’m a senior CS student from Nanyang Technological University, Singapore who > is interested in the GSOC project related to OMPD. > > I

Re: GSoC (Making C++ concepts conform to the current standard)

Hello Maria, On Wed, Mar 14 2018, Maria Kalikas wrote: > Hello anyone this concerns, > > My name is Maria Kalikas and I am a senior majoring in Computer Science at > The University of Akron. > > My familiarity and continuous reading of the C++ Standard has encouraged me > to extend the previously

Re: GSoC (Improvements to GCC on Windows)

Hello, On Tue, Mar 13 2018, Ko Phyo wrote: > Hello > > I want to apply the project "Improvements to GCC on Windows" of GCC > foundation. As a student, I have some theorectical knowledges about C/C++ > and compiler technologies. And I am sure that the Windows platform has > steps that are

Re: GSoC

Hello Gurav, On Thu, Mar 15 2018, Gaurav Ahuja wrote: > I had a query, while choosing project for GSoC. Actually I'm > contributing to GCC for the first time, and I am not sure about what > is expected of me. > > So, can you please explain me about , what GCC organisation expects me > to do, like

Re: about the gsoc

Hello Jagmeet, On Wed, Mar 07 2018, Jagmeet Singh wrote: > Any one for help me > > I want to ask question about the ideas > > reply please please ask your question directly to this mailing list (gcc@gcc.gnu.org). Martin

Re: eliminate dead stores across functions

Hi Bin, On Tue, Mar 06 2018, Bin Cheng wrote: > On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 2:28 PM, Richard Biener >> >> Do you think the situation happens often enough to make this worthwhile? > There is one probably more useful case. Program may use global flags > controlling > how it does (heavy) computation.

Re: GSOC

Hello Prashant, On Thu, Mar 08 2018, prashant kumar wrote: > Hello sir my self *Prashant kumar *second year B.TECH student and i am > interesting in *"GCC plugin Api" *project .i have a good hand in c,c++ > languages .Can u tell me what the further process i have to do and what > kind of thing i

GSoC 2018: Hrishikesh Kulkarni has been selected to work on LTO dumping tool

Hello, I am pleased to announce that Hrishikesh Kulkarni will be working on "Textual Representation of LTO Object Files (Textual LTO dump tool project)" as his Google Summer of Code 2018 project. I believe I write on behalf of everybody in the GCC community when I congratulate him and wish him

Re: Google Summer of Code 2018: Call for mentors and ideas

Hi, I was wondering how much I should announce publicly about GSoC proposals since students are not supposed to know in advance that we want any particular one before they are officially accepted or not by google, but I hope I will not overstep any line by saying the following: (I am willing to

Re: GSOC proposal

Hello Ismael, On Wed, Mar 21 2018, Ismael El Houas Ghouddana wrote: > Dear Mr./Mrs, > > First of all, I really appreciate your time and attention. I am Ismael El > Houas an aerospace engineer student with knowledge of Google Cloud Platform > and I want to express my interest in working on your

RE: Google Summer of Code 2018: Call for mentors and ideas

Hi Sebastian, On Tue, Apr 03 2018, Sebastian Peryt wrote: > Hi Martin, > > Frankly speaking I believe that students who discussed topics on mailing list > might > eventually just decide that they were too challenging for them and also > competition > appeared too difficult. As far as I

Re: About GSOC.

Hi Joseph, this seems related to your proposal GSoC proposal in the beginning of this year. Do you have any comments about Tejas's idea? Do you think this would be a good (part of) a GSoC project next year? Thanks a lot, Martin On Sat, Oct 13 2018, Tejas Joshi wrote: > Hello. > I reached

Re: Parallelize the compilation using Threads

Hi Giuliano, On Thu, Nov 15 2018, Richard Biener wrote: > You may want to search the mailing list archives since we had a > student application (later revoked) for the task with some discussion. Specifically, the whole thread beginning with https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2018-03/msg00179.html

Re: LTO Test Case Help

Hi, On Wed, Dec 05 2018, Michael Ploujnikov wrote: > Hi, > > I'm trying to write a testcase to reproduce duplicate clone symbols > such as in https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88297 I > started with a testcase that is known to have constprop clones and > split it into two object files:

Re: [GSOC] variations in testsuite results

Hi Siddhartha, On Tue, Nov 27 2018, Siddhartha Sen wrote: > I am Siddhartha Sen,currently pursuing my B.Tech degree in Information > Science and Engineering,2nd year. I have taken a keen interest in your > projects and have some ideas of my own as well. I am really interested in > working with

Re: Regarding GSOC Projects

Hello Aadrit, On Sun, Jan 20 2019, Aadrit Aggarwal wrote: > Greetings for the day!! > I'm an undergraduate in my 2nd year at Punjab Engineering College, > Chandigarh. I'm pursuing CSE. > This mail is regarding GSOC Projects. > > *It's my first time, that I'd be participating in an open source

Re: Google Summer Of Code

Hello Vikramsingh, On Mon, Jan 21 2019, Vikramsingh Kushwaha wrote: > Respected sir/madam > I, Vikramsingh Kushwaha, currently studying in B.Tech 3rd year computer > engineering in MIT Pune, India. I am very much interested to contribute in > the open source projects. But i am new to this so I

Re: [GSOC] variations in testsuite results

If you have any further specific questions, please feel free to ask, I'll make my best to be more diligent with replying. Martin > Thank You. > > On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 10:46 PM Martin Jambor wrote: > >> Hi Siddhartha, >> >> On Tue, Nov 27 2018, Siddhartha Sen wro

Re: [GSoC 2019] No application template?

Hi, On Sun, Mar 24 2019, 김규래 wrote: > Hello, > I was trying to write my application for GSoC 2019 but couldn't find an > application form for GCC. > Some other organizations seem to have GSoC application forms/templates. > The gcc GSoC wiki page doesn't mention any. > Is the application format

Re: GSoC

Hello Martin, On Sun, Mar 10 2019, Martin Emil wrote: > Hello , > I am Martin Emil last year computer engineering student from Egypt . > I came through your project in GSoC and i am very interested about it and > want to work on it. > I have strong knowledge in C,C++,Java and python programming

Re: GSoC

Hello Matias, On Thu, Mar 14 2019, Matias Barrientos wrote: > Hello, > > I am Matías Barrientos, I am in my third year studying computing > engineering at the Pontifical University of Valparaiso. > > I am very interested in contributing at GCC this year in GSoC. I have > followed the steps of the

Re: [GSoC 2019]: Interested in "Make C/C++ not automatically promote memory_order_consume to memory_order_acquire"

Hello Akshatg, On Tue, Mar 12 2019, Akshatg wrote: > Hello all, > > I'm a 2nd year Master's student at IIT Bombay. I have taken advance > compiler related courses in the past semesters. I'm interested to work > on the project "Make C/C++ not automatically promote > memory_order_consume to

Re: Regarding GSOC

Hi Aniket, On Mon, Mar 25 2019, Aniket Agarwalla wrote: > Hello Sir, > > I am interested in working with you in your shortlisted projects on Gsoc > 2019 namely > "Add new math.h and complex.h functions as built-ins". we are already in fairly advanced stage of putting together a proposal for the

Re: GSoC

Hello Youssuf, On Sat, Mar 23 2019, youssef Elmasry wrote: > What kind of experience i should have in c/c++ before applying? I am afraid that not only you need a very solid command of C and have to be comfortable navigating C++ mazes but that you also need at least some rudimentary theoretical

Re: GSOC 19 Add new math.h and complex.h functions as built-ins

Hi Thilakar, On Fri, Mar 22 2019, GSOC19TR I wrote: > Dear Sir, > I like to work on the project *Adding new math.h and complex.h functions as > built-ins**. we are already in fairly advanced stage of putting together a proposal for the same project with Tejas Joshi. You can of course try to

Re: Gsoc

Hello Darshan, On Tue, Mar 26 2019, FuN traveller wrote: > Hello , > I am Darshan jadhao, computer engineering student at Lovely Professional > University Jalandhar, > I would like to work with GNU on the project *Make C/C++ not automatically > promote memory_order_consume to

Re: [GSoC]

Hi Avinash, On Thu, Mar 28 2019, Avinash Tiwary wrote: > Hi, > I am Avinash Tiwary, fourth year engineering graduate from BIT Mesra. I > will like to contribute on "Add new math.h and complex.h functions as > built-ins". Please guide me. we are delighted you found contributing to GCC

Re: GCC GSOC 2019

Hello Shubham, On Fri, Mar 29 2019, Shubham Narlawar wrote: > Hi, here is my proposal for the above idea. Please review and suggest > necessary changes. > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/11MNhuuD7dbwAfSW6ZgFrAys9My1Lw1PuMVcAqeNGr7A/edit?usp=sharing I have had a quick look and the proposal

Re: [GSoC 2019] [extending Csmith for fuzzing OpenMp extensions]

Hello Joshi, On Mon, Apr 01 2019, sameeran joshi wrote: > HI, > Discussing the project with Andi, I have drafted a proposal, please > review and suggest > necessary changes. > If some OpenMP experts from GCC have some ideas or changes please suggest. > >

Re: GSoC OMPD

Hello Bryan, On Wed, Apr 03 2019, Bryan Carroll wrote: > Hi, > > I know my first email is vague. I wanted to throw it out there since > the April 9th deadline is coming up. I was hoping Jakub Jelinek, who would be the mentor, would chime in earlier. But unfortunately he has probably not been

Re: GSoC

ny case, remember to read "Before you apply" section of our GSoC wiki page at https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/SummerOfCode#Before_you_apply and make sure you are able to build, install and test GCC and then have it generate dumps and step through some function during compilation. Good luck, Martin Jambor

Re: [GSoC 2019] [extending Csmith for fuzzing OpenMp extensions]

Hi, On Wed, Apr 03 2019, sameeran joshi wrote: > On 4/3/19, Martin Jambor wrote: >> Hello Joshi, >> >> On Mon, Apr 01 2019, sameeran joshi wrote: >>> HI, >>> Discussing the project with Andi, I have drafted a proposal, please >>> review and s

Re: [GSoC] TySan

Hello, On Wed, Apr 03 2019, Youssef Mohamed wrote: > Hi, > > I hope you are healthy and all well 3> > I was applying to GCC GSoC and I want to implement TySan in GCC we are very happy to hear that you find contributing to GCC interesting. Unfortunately, I am quite confident that I will not be

Re: Google Summer of Code

us... but not this year I am afraid. Good luck, Martin Jambor

Re: GSOC

Hello, On Sun, Apr 07 2019, ashwina kumar wrote: > Hi , > > While working I just figured out that -Wconversion is buggy. Please see the > below code- - > > $ cat b.c > #include > > void main (void) > { > //contains build errors > uint16_t x = 1; > uint16_t y = 2; >

Re: [GSOC] Simple things to play with (Was: variations in testsuite results)

ically means implementing direct output of ELF-format field, from libiberty instead of the assembler one, so look into ELF format too. And perhaps Honza can suggest some further exploratory steps for you too. Good luck, Martin > > On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 11:03 PM Martin Jambor wrote

Re: [GSoC 2019] [extending Csmith for fuzzing OpenMp extensions]

Hello Sameeran, On Sun, Feb 10 2019, sameeran joshi wrote: > Hi,I am an undergraduate student currently in final year of computer > science and engineering degree course from Pune University, India. I > and Shubham have been working on Last year's GSoC project idea : > > Implement a fuzzer

Re: GCC GSOC 2019

Hello Shubham, On Sun, Feb 10 2019, Shubham Narlawar wrote: > Hi, > > I am Shubham Narlawar. Currently, I am a Computer Engineering undergrad > student at Pune University, India. I am interested in contributing to GCC > for GSOC 2019. > > We have done a project from GCC GSOC 2018 idea list which

Re: GSoC 2019

Hello Parashuram, On Tue, Feb 12 2019, Shourya IIT B wrote: > Respected Sir, > >I am Parashuram Shourya from India. Currently, I am doing my > Master’s in Geoinformatics from Centre of Studies in Resources > Engineering(CSRE), > Indian Institute of Technology Bombay(IITB). I have a

Re: question about inlining long call sequence

On Tue, Feb 12 2019, Bin.Cheng wrote: > Hi, > When reading inlining code in GCC, I wonder if we have size heuristics > to limit inlining long call sequence? For example, for call sequence > A -> B -> C -> D -> ... -> X -> Y -> Z > if each function call grows size by a very small amount, inlining

Gfortran GSoC (Was: Re: [patch, libgfortran RFC] Installation script for OpenCoarrays to enable multi-image gfortran)

Hello, On Fri, Jan 27 2017, Damian Rouson wrote: > I wonder if developing an OpenCoarrays rpm package would be a good > task as part of a Google Summer of Code (SoC) project.  February 9 is > the application deadline for organizations seeking to host an SoC No, February 6, 2019, 21:00 Central

Re: GCC GSoC project idea to make C/C++ not promote memory_order_consume to memory_order_acquire

Hi Jason and Andrew, On Mon, Feb 04 2019, Jason Merrill wrote: > On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 6:06 AM Martin Jambor wrote: >> >> I have received the following idea for a Google Summer of Code project, >> see the quotation from Paul McKenney below (I do not know myself where >&

GCC and GSoC 2019

Hi, today I have filed an application on behalf of the GCC project to be a mentoring organization in the year 2019 of Google Summer of Code. I'd like to have the following requests and announcements: 1. First and foremost, I would like to ask all (moderately) seasoned GCC contributors to

GCC GSoC project idea to make C/C++ not promote memory_order_consume to memory_order_acquire

Hi, I have received the following idea for a Google Summer of Code project, see the quotation from Paul McKenney below (I do not know myself where exactly it is from). I consider memory consistency models a very tough topic and so am doubly reluctant to just post it to wiki without having a

Re: dg-extract-results broken since rev 268511, was Re: Status of 9.0.1 20190415 [trunk revision 270358] on x86_64-w64-mingw32

Hi, On Tue, Apr 16 2019, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 02:49:13PM +0200, Christophe Lyon wrote: >> > I executed the dg-extract-results.sh manually in the gcc/testsuite >> > directory after a complete testsuite run which didn't give the correct >> > results. Rev. 240429 gives the

Re: About GSOC.

On Thu, May 30 2019, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 07:08:45PM +0200, Martin Jambor wrote: >> Interesting, I was also puzzled for a moment. But notice that: >> >> int main () >> { >> _Float128 x = 18446744073709551617.5f128; >>

Re: [GSoC'19, libgomp work stealing] baseline benchmark results

Hi, On Thu, May 30 2019, 김규래 wrote: > ​Hi everyone, > Just wanted to share some quick baseline benchmark results [3]. > I ran LU decomposition on a AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950x 16C/32T system. > LAPACK is currently plain loop parallel BLAS as far I believe. > And the upstream version of PLASMA

Committing patches and other conventions (Was: Re: About GSOC)

Hi, On Mon, Jun 03 2019, Tejas Joshi wrote: > Hello. > I have already sent a patch for roundeven implementation but I do not > know how do I commit my changes to GCC. Am I supposed to create a > branch or anything etc? You don't have to create a branch unless you think it would make ease your

Re: About GSOC.

Hi, On Thu, May 30 2019, Tejas Joshi wrote: > Hello. > I tried to check the values for significand words using _Float128 > using a test program with value larger than 64 bit. > Test program : > > int main () > { > _Float128 x = 18446744073709551617.5; (i.e. 2^64 + 1.5 which is > certainly

Re: Expanding roundeven (Was: Re: About GSOC.)

Hi, On Fri, Jun 14 2019, Tejas Joshi wrote: >> Of course the instruction is not present there, that is the next step in >> your project :-) > > Yes, of course, but what I meant was that instructions for existing > round/ceil functions and not roundeven. If inlining for these > functions is

Re: Committing patches and other conventions (Was: Re: About GSOC)

Hi Tejas, On Wed, Jun 12 2019, Tejas Joshi wrote: > Hello. > Is this the correct sequence for regression test: > 1. Revert back all the changes I made and then configure, build along with > make bootstrap > make -k check > collect the *.sum files > 2. Apply the patch and do the configuration,

Re: Expanding roundeven (Was: Re: About GSOC.)

Hi Tejas, On Thu, Jun 13 2019, Tejas Joshi wrote: > Hello. > As further part of implementing roundeven is inlining, I was studying > machine descriptions and I have a few questions. > > As suggested, builtin functions provided a strong model for > implementing roundeven. Keeping that in mind, I

Re: copyright assignment form

Hello, On Sat, May 18 2019, David Čepelík wrote: > Dear GCC devs, > > in accordance with [1] I'd like to ask you to provide me > with the copyright assignment form (the "for all future > changes" variant). I'll be submitting a larger patch soon. I believe the right process is to email the

Re: About GSOC.

Hello Tejas, On Wed, May 08 2019, Tejas Joshi wrote: > Hello. > I can't figure out from the documentation how to add test cases in the > testsuite and inspect the results. How can I do that? Although, Taking > the mentioned conditions under consideration, I have made another > patch, attached.

Re: GSoC'19 Thanks for acceptance

Hello Ray, On Wed, May 08 2019, 김규래 wrote: > Hi everyone, > Thanks for accepting my proposal Implementing OpenMP Work Stealing > Scheduling for GSoC 2019. I'll do my best to accomplish the proposed > goals. Ii is a pleasure, we are looking forward to your contributions. > Right now the

GCC GSoC 2019 projects: announcement and a mandatory first step

[Sorry for a re-post, I forgot to write a subject and as a consequence the email did not make it through to the mailing list] Hello, I am pleased to announce that six students will be working on GCC or GCC-related Google Summer of Code (GSoC) projects: - JeanHeyd Meneide will be working on

Re: RFC on a new optimization

Hi, On Tue, Jul 02 2019, Richard Biener wrote: > On Mon, Jul 1, 2019 at 11:58 PM Gary Oblock wrote: >> >> I've been looking at trying to optimize the performance of code for >> programs that use functions like qsort where a function is passed the >> name of a function and some constant

Re: How does one traverse all the global decls

Hi, On Wed, Aug 21 2019, Gary Oblock wrote: > I'm trying to do some analysis code for an optimization > that involves my code looking at all the declarations and > types there of during the link time optimizations. > > Note, doing this for the local variables seems to be trivial > because of

Re: [PATCH] Builtin function roundeven folding implementation

Hi, On Sun, Aug 25 2019, Tejas Joshi wrote: > I have made the respective changes and fixed the indentations and it > passes the testing. Great, please send the patch (to me and to the mailing list too), so that I can commit it. Thanks, Martin

Re: Expansion of narrowing math built-ins into power instructions

Hi, On Sat, Aug 24 2019, Richard Sandiford wrote: > Martin Jambor writes: ... >> >> 2. direct_internal_fn_supported_p on which replacement_internal_fn >>depends to expand built-ins as internal functions cannot handle >>conversion optabs... and narrow

Re: Expansion of narrowing math built-ins into power instructions

atives I do not see. Tejas, of course cases for other fadd variants should at least be added to expand_builtin. Thanks, Martin 2019-08-23 Tejas Joshi Martin Jambor * builtins.c (expand_builtin_binary_conversion): New function. (expand_builtin):

Re: Deprecate -traditional-cpp?

Hi, On Thu, Sep 05 2019, Nathan Sidwell wrote: > Is it time to deprecate traditional preprocessing? It's been 30 years > since C89. Are (non-compiler) tools that use it still things? xrdb runs .Xdefaults and I believe .Xresources files through the pre-processor and I still use the latter to

Expansion of narrowing math built-ins into power instructions

Hi Segher, as you might know, Tejas is our Google Summer of Code student working on adding built-in functions for some new math functions added in ISO/IEC TS 18661. His next step is to expand "functions rounding result to narrower type" (so fadd, fsub and possibly fmul and fdiv described in

Re: [GSoC-19] Implementing narrowing functions like fadd

Hi, On Sat, Jul 27 2019, Tejas Joshi wrote: > Hello. > >>> You'll need something different from CASE_MATHFN - these are a different >>> kind of functions that need handling in a different way, because they are >>> parametrized over certain *pairs* of types, rather than over a single >>> type. >>

Re: Commit messages and the move to git

On Mon, Nov 04 2019, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote: > Some tools, particularly gitk or git log --oneline, can use one-line > summaries from a commit's log message when listing commits. It would be > nice if we could start adopting a style that is compatible with this, so > that in future

Re: GCC GSoC 2020: Call for mentors and project ideas

Hi David, On Wed, Feb 12 2020, David Malcolm wrote: > On Thu, 2020-02-06 at 20:58 -0500, David Malcolm wrote: >> On Mon, 2020-01-27 at 16:30 +0100, Martin Liška wrote: >> > On 1/15/20 11:45 PM, Martin Jambor wrote: >> > > Therefore, first and foremost, I would like

Re: Make LTO Patch for Job Server Thread Detection Agnostic

Hi, On Fri, Feb 28 2020, Nathan Sidwell wrote: > On 2/27/20 12:04 PM, Paul Smith wrote: >> On Thu, 2020-02-27 at 16:58 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote: That's a problem then as were assuming a user's build system for this to work. I mean for now its fine but in the future wouldn't it de a

Re: C++ constructors and callgraph interaction ("__ct_comp " vs constructor function body)

Hi, On Wed, Feb 05 2020, David Malcolm wrote: > Answering my own question, calling ultimate_alias_target on the > __ct_comp cgraph_node seems to find the "right" cgraph_node. > > Is that the right general-purpose answer here? > sounds like it. If however you also want the function to look

Re: GIT conversion: question about tags & release branches

Hi, On Thu, Jan 09 2020, Martin Liška wrote: > Hi. > > I have question about release branches and release tags. For the current > git mirror, we do have release tags living on release branches. Example: > > commit 64e1a4df1bc9dbf4cedb3a842c4eaff6b3425a66 > Author: jakub > Date: Mon Aug 12

GCC GSoC 2020: Call for mentors and project ideas

Hello, Google Summer of Code (aka GSoC) 2020 yesterday started accepting Organization Applications. I believe the last year was very successful and so think that we want to take part again this year again. I'll be happy to volunteer to be the main Org Admin for GCC again (so let me know if you

Re: git conversion in progress

Hi, On Tue, Jan 14 2020, Andreas Schwab wrote: > On Jan 14 2020, Georg-Johann Lay wrote: > >> git clone --reference original-gcc ... > > Don't use --reference. It is too easy to lose work if you don't know > what you are doing. What are the risks, assuming I won't delete the referenced repo

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >