[Bug rtl-optimization/95267] [ICE][gcse]: in process_insert_insn at gcse.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95267 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to otcmaf from comment #4) > Do you mean that those pattern above are also wrong pattern ? YES those are broken.

[Bug rtl-optimization/95267] [ICE][gcse]: in process_insert_insn at gcse.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95267 --- Comment #4 from otcmaf --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3) > The internals documentation documents this even, read: > https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gccint/RTL-Template.html#index-match_005fdup > > From that: > Note that

[Bug target/92729] [avr] Convert the backend to MODE_CC so it can be kept in future releases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92729 Max changed: What|Removed |Added CC||f.mach4 at gmail dot com --- Comment #2 from Max

[Bug rtl-optimization/95267] [ICE][gcse]: in process_insert_insn at gcse.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95267 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug testsuite/95110] new test case in r11-345 error: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr94969.c: dump file does not exist

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95110 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Bin Cheng : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:466ad887c9e1cd5a6762e7ec620eef2c8175b50d commit r9-8614-g466ad887c9e1cd5a6762e7ec620eef2c8175b50d Author: Bin Cheng Date:

[Bug tree-optimization/94969] [8/9/10/11 Regression] Invalid loop distribution since r8-2390-gdfbddbeb1ca912c9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94969 --- Comment #12 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Bin Cheng : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:466ad887c9e1cd5a6762e7ec620eef2c8175b50d commit r9-8614-g466ad887c9e1cd5a6762e7ec620eef2c8175b50d Author: Bin Cheng Date:

[Bug rtl-optimization/95267] [ICE][gcse]: in process_insert_insn at gcse.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95267 --- Comment #2 from otcmaf --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > I think this is a back-end issue. > Can you provide the definition of movtv8hf16 ? > I don't think you can do: > (set (match_operand 0 predicate constraint) >

[Bug c++/95221] g++.dg/ubsan/vptr-12.C fails with -fstrong-eval-order=all

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95221 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug rtl-optimization/95267] [ICE][gcse]: in process_insert_insn at gcse.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95267 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug rtl-optimization/95267] New: [ICE][gcse]: in process_insert_insn at gcse.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95267 Bug ID: 95267 Summary: [ICE][gcse]: in process_insert_insn at gcse.c Product: gcc Version: 7.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c/95257] valgrind gives me error when fwprintf in stderr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95257 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |MOVED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/95266] New: [11 regression] gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-pr69907.c fails on power 7

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95266 Bug ID: 95266 Summary: [11 regression] gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-pr69907.c fails on power 7 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/95199] Remove extra variable created for memory reference in loop vectorization.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95199 --- Comment #5 from bin cheng --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1) > But IVOPTs is supposed to know how to eliminate equal IVs. Maybe it's > confused > about the IFN uses? It's an known issue that IVOPTs has difficulty in

[Bug sanitizer/95137] Sanitizers seem to be missing support for coroutines

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95137 --- Comment #20 from Rafael Avila de Espindola --- The attached testcase also fails with just -fsanitize=undefined. I have tested with gcc version gcc (GCC) 10.1.1 20200507 (Red Hat 10.1.1-1)

[Bug sanitizer/95137] Sanitizers seem to be missing support for coroutines

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95137 Rafael Avila de Espindola changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #48547|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug target/95265] aarch64: suboptimal code generation for common neon intrinsic sequence involving shrn and mull

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95265 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization

[Bug target/95265] New: aarch64: suboptimal code generation for common neon intrinsic sequence involving shrn and mull

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95265 Bug ID: 95265 Summary: aarch64: suboptimal code generation for common neon intrinsic sequence involving shrn and mull Product: gcc Version: 10.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/95264] New: Infinite Loop When Compiling Templated C++ code at -O1 and above

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95264 Bug ID: 95264 Summary: Infinite Loop When Compiling Templated C++ code at -O1 and above Product: gcc Version: 10.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/95263] [11 Regression] ICE in lookup_template_class_1 since r11-504-g74744bb1f2847b5b

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95263 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c++/95263] [11 Regression] ICE in lookup_template_class_1 since r11-504-g74744bb1f2847b5b

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95263 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|ice in |[11 Regression] ICE in

[Bug c++/95263] New: ice in lookup_template_class_1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95263 Bug ID: 95263 Summary: ice in lookup_template_class_1 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug fortran/95106] Bogus warning from module with long name and an equivalence

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95106 --- Comment #2 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Something like diff --git a/gcc/fortran/trans-common.c b/gcc/fortran/trans-common.c index bf163bc4f52..06313873002 100644 --- a/gcc/fortran/trans-common.c +++ b/gcc/fortran/trans-common.c @@

[Bug fortran/95106] Bogus warning from module with long name and an equivalence

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95106 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/79627] Ice with type of VLA in lambda

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79627 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug libstdc++/95209] std::filesystem::path::lexically_normal mangles "//foo"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95209 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to M Welinder from comment #4) > Sorry about the missing "-v". It is indeed a x86_64-suse-linux system. > (It's not internet facing or I'd go get the full output.) > > "Implementation

[Bug libfortran/95195] gfortran poorly handles a program error of writing a namelist to an unformatted file.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95195 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Component|fortran |libfortran

[Bug target/95169] [10/11 Regression] i386 comparison between nan and 0.0 triggers Invalid operation exception

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95169 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug target/95256] [11 Regression] ICE in convert_move, at expr.c:278 since r11-263-g7c355156aa20eaec

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95256 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||95125 CC|

[Bug c++/95262] New: Taking address of function pointer do full concept overload resolution

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95262 Bug ID: 95262 Summary: Taking address of function pointer do full concept overload resolution Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/95256] [11 Regression] ICE in convert_move, at expr.c:278 since r11-263-g7c355156aa20eaec

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95256 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.0 --- Comment #2 from Uroš Bizjak ---

[Bug target/95229] [11 Regression] in mark_jump_label_1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95229 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ubizjak at gmail dot com

[Bug middle-end/26163] [meta-bug] missed optimization in SPEC (2k17, 2k and 2k6 and 95)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26163 Bug 26163 depends on bug 95229, which changed state. Bug 95229 Summary: [11 Regression] in mark_jump_label_1 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95229 What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/95261] New: [11 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/pr80695-p8.c and gcc.target/powerpc/pr80695-p9.c fail starting with r11-478

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95261 Bug ID: 95261 Summary: [11 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/pr80695-p8.c and gcc.target/powerpc/pr80695-p9.c fail starting with r11-478 Product: gcc Version: 11.0

[Bug target/95169] [10/11 Regression] i386 comparison between nan and 0.0 triggers Invalid operation exception

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95169 --- Comment #8 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ddfb80adbd91a0e45cc6e04a8b0dbe3ca15ba45f commit r10-8167-gddfb80adbd91a0e45cc6e04a8b0dbe3ca15ba45f Author: Uros Bizjak

[Bug sanitizer/95244] GCC 10 no longer builds on RHEL5 [trivial patch]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95244 --- Comment #2 from Patrick J. LoPresti --- Done (https://github.com/google/sanitizers/issues/1253). Thanks.

[Bug libstdc++/95209] std::filesystem::path::lexically_normal mangles "//foo"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95209 --- Comment #4 from M Welinder --- Sorry about the missing "-v". It is indeed a x86_64-suse-linux system. (It's not internet facing or I'd go get the full output.) "Implementation defined", yes, but the implementation is the os, not the

[Bug target/95260] Confusing comments in cpuid.h

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95260 --- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #1) > Just a question: why do you create PRs for all these issues? > Is it because you want to backport fixes to active branches? That would be nice.

[Bug target/95259] Duplicated codes in libgcc, driver-i386.c and i386-builtins.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95259 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #48576|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug target/95260] Confusing comments in cpuid.h

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95260 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/95260] Confusing comments in cpuid.h

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95260 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a74630f3207d0bec63710c8c803685a0a4956986 commit r11-552-ga74630f3207d0bec63710c8c803685a0a4956986 Author: H.J. Lu Date: Thu May 21

[Bug target/95260] Confusing comments in cpuid.h

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95260 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug target/95260] New: Confusing comments in cpuid.h

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95260 Bug ID: 95260 Summary: Confusing comments in cpuid.h Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target

[Bug target/95259] Duplicated codes in libgcc, driver-i386.c and i386-builtins.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95259 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |hjl.tools at gmail dot com ---

[Bug target/95259] Duplicated codes in libgcc, driver-i386.c and i386-builtins.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95259 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug target/95256] [11 Regression] ICE in convert_move, at expr.c:278 since r11-263-g7c355156aa20eaec

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95256 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug target/95212] enum processor_features is out of sync

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95212 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9b7d71fdedcc360ad4fe8322ecb522cb7bf8a0f7 commit r10-8165-g9b7d71fdedcc360ad4fe8322ecb522cb7bf8a0f7 Author: H.J. Lu Date: Thu

[Bug c++/94038] [8/9/10 Regression] Compiling with -Wall causes function template body to get needlessly instantiated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94038 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f65a3299a521a44522c1e01724f75e36af22f40b commit r11-550-gf65a3299a521a44522c1e01724f75e36af22f40b Author: Patrick Palka Date:

[Bug target/95259] New: Duplicated codes in libgcc, driver-i386.c and i386-builtins.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95259 Bug ID: 95259 Summary: Duplicated codes in libgcc, driver-i386.c and i386-builtins.c Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/95212] enum processor_features is out of sync

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95212 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5855bdfa06fb25c0880af89cb2bfdcdf342beac2 commit r11-549-g5855bdfa06fb25c0880af89cb2bfdcdf342beac2 Author: H.J. Lu Date: Thu May 21

[Bug libstdc++/95209] std::filesystem::path::lexically_normal mangles "//foo"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95209 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #2) > You didn't provide the requested information when creating a new bug report, > please see https://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/ We're missing the output of 'gcc -v' but

[Bug target/95258] New: -march=native doesn't handle -mavx512vpopcntdq

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95258 Bug ID: 95258 Summary: -march=native doesn't handle -mavx512vpopcntdq Product: gcc Version: 8.4.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug libstdc++/95209] std::filesystem::path::lexically_normal mangles "//foo"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95209 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-05-21

[Bug target/95229] [11 Regression] in mark_jump_label_1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95229 --- Comment #9 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Martin Liska : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2f20c7040f884b542cadf46fd77188729ab3cb17 commit r11-548-g2f20c7040f884b542cadf46fd77188729ab3cb17 Author: Martin Liska Date: Thu

[Bug tree-optimization/95199] Remove extra variable created for memory reference in loop vectorization.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95199 --- Comment #4 from Kaipeng Zhou --- Sorry for not expressing clearly. I have debugged the testcase you provided. Not eliminating them is not caused by IFN. The relevant code is in the "get_computation_aff_1" function. In IVOPTs the IV_STEPs

[Bug c/95257] New: valgrind gives me error when wprintf in stderr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95257 Bug ID: 95257 Summary: valgrind gives me error when wprintf in stderr Product: gcc Version: 7.5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug target/95255] [10/11 Regression] ICE in gen_roundevendf2, at config/i386/i386.md:16328 since r10-2809-gd3b92f35d84f44a8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95255 --- Comment #2 from Martin Liška --- > $ gcc > /home/marxin/Programming/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/sse4_1-round- > roundeven-1.c -mfpmath=both They are here.

[Bug libgcc/91695] [X86] get_available_features only sets FEATURE_GFNI and FEATURE_VPCLMULQDQ when avx512_usable is true

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91695 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |8.5 Status|NEW

[Bug libgcc/95220] Incorrect GFNI dectection

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95220 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-8 branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:aad7ffb62247fce56e03b03dd696b49bbc8913e7 commit r8-10263-gaad7ffb62247fce56e03b03dd696b49bbc8913e7 Author: H.J. Lu Date: Tue

[Bug libgcc/91695] [X86] get_available_features only sets FEATURE_GFNI and FEATURE_VPCLMULQDQ when avx512_usable is true

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91695 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-8 branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:69b35b7c91ebbc1a6df57e957303e904210ad265 commit r8-10264-g69b35b7c91ebbc1a6df57e957303e904210ad265 Author: H.J. Lu Date: Tue

[Bug libgcc/91695] [X86] get_available_features only sets FEATURE_GFNI and FEATURE_VPCLMULQDQ when avx512_usable is true

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91695 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d7796c9d0c851392f91564cb8715dbea4f33eacd commit r9-8610-gd7796c9d0c851392f91564cb8715dbea4f33eacd Author: H.J. Lu Date: Tue

[Bug target/95255] [10/11 Regression] ICE in gen_roundevendf2, at config/i386/i386.md:16328 since r10-2809-gd3b92f35d84f44a8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95255 --- Comment #1 from Uroš Bizjak --- Please post your compile flags.

[Bug fortran/95195] gfortran poorly handles a program error of writing a namelist to an unformatted file.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95195 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/93956] Wrong array creation with p => array_dt(1:n)%component

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93956 Bug 93956 depends on bug 94788, which changed state. Bug 94788 Summary: [8/9 Regression] Severe regression leading to double free in tcache https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94788 What|Removed

[Bug fortran/94788] [8/9 Regression] Severe regression leading to double free in tcache

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94788 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/94361] [8/9/10/11 Regression] Memory leak in nested types with final

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94361 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||6.5.0, 7.2.0, 7.4.0, 8.1.0

[Bug target/95256] New: [11 Regression] ICE in convert_move, at expr.c:278

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95256 Bug ID: 95256 Summary: [11 Regression] ICE in convert_move, at expr.c:278 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code Severity: normal

[Bug c++/94141] c++20 rewritten operator== recursive call mixing friend and external operators for template class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94141 --- Comment #4 from Laurent Rineau --- (In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #3) > It seems that this is as currently specified in C++20, but that some people > are going to try and change the rules to avoid breaking code like this. Do you

[Bug c++/94141] c++20 rewritten operator== recursive call mixing friend and external operators for template class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94141 Marc Glisse changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-05-21 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/95255] New: [10/11 Regression] ICE in gen_roundevendf2, at config/i386/i386.md:16328 since r10-2809-gd3b92f35d84f44a8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95255 Bug ID: 95255 Summary: [10/11 Regression] ICE in gen_roundevendf2, at config/i386/i386.md:16328 since r10-2809-gd3b92f35d84f44a8 Product: gcc Version: 11.0

[Bug target/95255] [10/11 Regression] ICE in gen_roundevendf2, at config/i386/i386.md:16328 since r10-2809-gd3b92f35d84f44a8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95255 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Version|11.0

[Bug middle-end/90302] Implement __builtin_warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90302 --- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig --- There is a prototype patch by Martin Sebor at https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2019-October/531812.html

[Bug c++/94923] False positive -Wclass-memaccess with trivially copyable std::optional

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94923 --- Comment #6 from dawid_jurek at vp dot pl --- I quickly tried trunk and all false positive warnings vanished. Thanks Martin. Regards, Dawid

[Bug sanitizer/95244] GCC 10 no longer builds on RHEL5 [trivial patch]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95244 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/95248] [11 Regression] GCC produces incorrect code with -O3 for loops since r11-272-gb6ff3ddecfa93d53

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95248 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug target/95253] [10/11 Regression] Build failure on MSys. Wrong dependency file escaping on Windows.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95253 --- Comment #1 from Daniel Starke --- Edit: I meant colon character, not column operator.

[Bug target/95254] New: aarch64: gcc generate inefficient code with fixed sve vector length

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95254 Bug ID: 95254 Summary: aarch64: gcc generate inefficient code with fixed sve vector length Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/95253] New: [10/11 Regression] Build failure on MSys. Wrong dependency file escaping on Windows.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95253 Bug ID: 95253 Summary: [10/11 Regression] Build failure on MSys. Wrong dependency file escaping on Windows. Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/95125] Unoptimal code for vectorized conversions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95125 --- Comment #4 from Hongtao.liu --- (In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #3) > It turns out that a bunch of patterns have to be renamed (and testcases > added). > > Easyhack, waiting for someone to show some love to conversion patterns in >

[Bug libgomp/95150] Some offloaded programs crash with openmp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95150 --- Comment #4 from Chinoune --- after some tests, It looks like it fails with only with small sizes. The program doesn't crash when increasing matrices size. and It takes a shorter time to execute!.

[Bug libstdc++/93983] std::filesystem::path is not concept-friendly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93983 --- Comment #12 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:566ba72126288272607374a32ac646dcd36fe584 commit r10-8163-g566ba72126288272607374a32ac646dcd36fe584 Author: Jonathan

[Bug c++/67491] [meta-bug] concepts issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491 Bug 67491 depends on bug 93983, which changed state. Bug 93983 Summary: std::filesystem::path is not concept-friendly https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93983 What|Removed |Added

[Bug libstdc++/93983] std::filesystem::path is not concept-friendly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93983 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug target/95252] New: testcase gcc.dg/torture/pr67916.c failure when testing with -msave-restore

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95252 Bug ID: 95252 Summary: testcase gcc.dg/torture/pr67916.c failure when testing with -msave-restore Product: gcc Version: 10.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug target/69493] Poor code generation for return of struct containing vectors on PPC64LE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69493 luoxhu at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||luoxhu at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug libgcc/91695] [X86] get_available_features only sets FEATURE_GFNI and FEATURE_VPCLMULQDQ when avx512_usable is true

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91695 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Martin Liska : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:efcf41fcfa7351f2e941075d2f1fd73cc282de5b commit r10-8162-gefcf41fcfa7351f2e941075d2f1fd73cc282de5b Author: H.J. Lu Date:

[Bug libstdc++/93983] std::filesystem::path is not concept-friendly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93983 --- Comment #11 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f094665d465cdf8903797cc58bea13007e588616 commit r11-541-gf094665d465cdf8903797cc58bea13007e588616 Author: Jonathan Wakely Date:

[Bug c++/95233] Failure to compile regression in GCC 10.1 and 11 trunk with C++ 20

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95233 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|WAITING

[Bug libstdc++/93983] std::filesystem::path is not concept-friendly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93983 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added CC||s_gccbugzilla at nedprod dot com ---

[Bug target/30271] -mstrict-align can an store extra for struct agrument passing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30271 luoxhu at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||luoxhu at gcc dot gnu.org