--- Comment #6 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-25 21:33 ---
Subject: Bug 44566
Author: amylaar
Date: Fri Jun 25 21:33:02 2010
New Revision: 161417
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=161417
Log:
PR other/44566
gcc:
* configure.
--- Comment #5 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-25 19:13 ---
Subject: Bug 44566
Author: amylaar
Date: Fri Jun 25 19:12:37 2010
New Revision: 161408
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=161408
Log:
PR other/44566
* cor
--- Comment #4 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-25 19:00 ---
Subject: Bug 44566
Author: amylaar
Date: Fri Jun 25 19:00:34 2010
New Revision: 161404
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=161404
Log:
PR other/44566
* fu
--- Comment #3 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-25 18:44 ---
Subject: Bug 44566
Author: amylaar
Date: Fri Jun 25 18:44:18 2010
New Revision: 161401
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=161401
Log:
PR other/44566
* function.h (target-
--- Comment #2 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-25 18:41 ---
Subject: Bug 44637
Author: amylaar
Date: Fri Jun 25 18:41:06 2010
New Revision: 161400
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=161400
Log:
PR bootstrap/44637
* config/rs6000/
--- Comment #8 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-25 18:39 ---
Subject: Bug 44512
Author: amylaar
Date: Fri Jun 25 18:38:47 2010
New Revision: 161399
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=161399
Log:
PR bootstrap/44512
* genenums
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet
--- Comment #4 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-24 15:22 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> > It's supposed to specify the testsuite driver. That it does, but then
> > it forgets that it was supposed to run a specific test.
>
> dg.exp=files_to_test
>
--- Comment #2 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-24 13:36 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Confirmed. Yet another bug or feature dilemma!-)
>
> Using
>
> make check-fortran RUNTESTFLAGS='dg.exp=data_invalid.f90'
>
> works for me. I don't
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: testsuite
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44654
--- Comment #1 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-23 23:51 ---
Subject: Bug 44637
Author: amylaar
Date: Wed Jun 23 23:51:11 2010
New Revision: 161301
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=161301
Log:
PR bootstrap/44637
* config/rs6000/
--- Comment #4 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-23 23:35 ---
Subject: Bug 44644
Author: amylaar
Date: Wed Jun 23 23:35:04 2010
New Revision: 161300
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=161300
Log:
PR other/44644
* df-core.c (s
--- Comment #4 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-23 23:32 ---
Subject: Bug 44640
Author: amylaar
Date: Wed Jun 23 23:32:38 2010
New Revision: 161299
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=161299
Log:
PR target/44640
* config/spu/spu-
--- Comment #3 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-23 14:25 ---
Subject: Bug 44644
Author: amylaar
Date: Wed Jun 23 14:25:33 2010
New Revision: 161281
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=161281
Log:
PR other/44644
* df-core.c (s
--- Comment #2 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-23 13:41 ---
A patch is here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-06/msg02330.html
--
amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-23 13:19 ---
spu patches have been committed to trunk, the remaining issue is PR44512.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44640
--- Comment #1 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-23 10:08 ---
Created an attachment (id=20985)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20985&action=view)
patch from multi-target-20100613-branch
This is the patch that I have just unbundled from multi
--- Comment #2 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-23 08:58 ---
Should I add PR44644 to the list of PRs blocking this one? Although you
can bootstrap gcc without fixing that PR, it causes considerable problems
when debugging gcc, and it could be easily fixed.
--
http
ReportedBy: amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44644
--- Comment #2 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-22 22:43 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Well this is caused by bool being a define in C to being unsigned char and the
> spu.c file using unsigned char. A simple fix is an obvious fix.
I still have to verify that that
: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: sp
ormal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC target triplet: ppc-elf
BugsThisDependsOn: 44512
OtherBugsDependingO 44433
nThis:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bu
--- Comment #7 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-22 18:06 ---
Subject: Bug 44512
Author: amylaar
Date: Tue Jun 22 18:06:11 2010
New Revision: 161220
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=161220
Log:
PR bootstrap/44512
* genenums
--- Comment #6 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-17 15:20 ---
Subject: Bug 44512
Author: amylaar
Date: Thu Jun 17 15:20:20 2010
New Revision: 160922
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=160922
Log:
PR bootstrap/44512
* c-cppb
--- Comment #5 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-17 14:12 ---
A patch set is here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-06/msg01765.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-06/msg01766.html
--
amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #1 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-17 11:40 ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> multi-target configurations, thus PR44362 doesn't actually block.
Sorry, I meant PR44431. But then, the remaining part of PR44362 also
doesn't block PR44566 (and not P
nds is not
supported.
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: amylaar at gcc dot gnu
--- Comment #4 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-13 16:56 ---
Subject: Bug 44512
Author: amylaar
Date: Sun Jun 13 16:56:23 2010
New Revision: 160685
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=160685
Log:
gcc:
PR bootstrap/44512
* genenums
--- Comment #2 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-13 12:04 ---
When I add a cast to the offending line in c-cppbuiltin.c, the bootstrap
shows another failure:
g++ -g -DIN_GCC -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wcast-qual
-Wmissing-format-attribute -pedantic -Wno-long-long -Wno
d-with-cxx bootstrap fails in revision
160669
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: amylaar at g
--- Comment #3 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-10 19:58 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> This could be a disaster if floating point exceptions are enabled, as it would
> trigger an exception whenever some part of the block was an invalid floating
> point number.
>
--- Comment #5 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-10 09:28 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> I've found now that the runtime is picked up from the install location.
P.S.: That doesn't happen when I cut & paste the LD_LIBRARY_PATH settings
and the compile command
--- Comment #4 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-10 09:18 ---
I've found now that the runtime is picked up from the install location.
For default configuration, I use --prefix=/user/inria , and the file is
then picked up from
/user/inria/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.6.0/in
--- Comment #3 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-10 05:41 ---
I see the same problem now with revision 160389.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44488
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: testsuite
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
OtherBugsDependingO 44433
nThis:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla
--- Comment #5 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-09 10:49 ---
Fixed in trunk by revision 160461.
--
amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-09 10:47 ---
Fixed in trunk by revision 160460.
--
amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-09 10:40 ---
Subject: Bug 42843
Author: amylaar
Date: Wed Jun 9 10:40:28 2010
New Revision: 160461
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=160461
Log:
gcc:
PR testsuite/42843
* gcc-plugi
--- Comment #2 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-09 10:32 ---
Subject: Bug 44432
Author: amylaar
Date: Wed Jun 9 10:32:23 2010
New Revision: 160460
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=160460
Log:
PR bootstrap/44432
* configure.ac
--- Comment #5 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-09 03:14 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
updated patch for revision 160454:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-06/msg00846.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44034
--- Comment #7 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-08 23:21 ---
Subject: Bug 44459
Author: amylaar
Date: Tue Jun 8 23:21:48 2010
New Revision: 160448
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=160448
Log:
PR plugins/44459:
* gcc-
--- Comment #1 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-08 23:15 ---
I think PR44362 no longer block adoption of --enable-build-with-cxx
in trunk, since the C++ part of the patch for that PR was checked in.
It might sense to keep it in the dependency list if we need this to
backport
--- Comment #1 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-08 22:50 ---
A patch is here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-06/msg00835.html
--
amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-08 20:52 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> A patch is here:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-01/msg01200.html
This is an update of the patch to revision 160389:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-06/msg0082
--- Comment #6 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-08 20:34 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> There is no specifications for plugins really. And really this is on purpose
> as we don't want to freeze down the rest of the compiler just for plugins.
There is a differe
--- Comment #4 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-08 12:40 ---
This is the patch set for the fix:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-06/msg00741.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-06/msg00740.html
--
amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What
--- Comment #3 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-08 09:56 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> "By switching the GCC build language to C++, we introduce name mangling,
> which means that we loose plugin dynamic link compatibility to previous
> versions of gcc. Also,
--- Comment #1 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-08 00:17 ---
Using C linkage for all of gcc-plugin.h is straightforward, and we it also
makes sense to put some popular other symbols there, e.g. warning.
However, there is a limit what we can reasonably put into C linkage
--- Comment #1 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-07 23:59 ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> I am building a plugin and would like to use some of the macros defined in
> flags.h, but that file is not installed in the plugin/include directory.
>
At least as of revisi
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44459
--- Comment #4 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-07 22:22 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
updated patch for revision 160389:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-06/msg00665.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44034
--- Comment #6 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-04 00:46 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Ok, let me open another PR. Would you suggest somebody to add in CC?
Maybe we should have a meta-bug for all the issues with this warning flag.
So that'd be at least this one,
--- Comment #4 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-04 00:25 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Is this also the same issue? Probably not, but it causes tons of warnings in
> the libstdc++ testsuite (with -Wall in CXXFLAGS) and seems bogus to me.
I don't see any connect
--- Comment #1 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-03 17:59 ---
I'm currently testing if the patch for PR 44361 helps for this failure too.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44405
us: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: build
Severity: blocker
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44405
--- Comment #5 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-01 19:22 ---
I posted an autoconf patch on the autoconf list, which has not been
reviewed since it was posted in February:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/autoconf/2010-02/msg00057.html
The problem persists with gcc trunk
--- Comment #3 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-26 07:57 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
updated patch for revision 159828:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-05/msg01938.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44034
: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: web
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44269
--- Comment #4 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-25 12:09 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Subject: Bug 18249
>
> Author: pzhao
> Date: Tue May 25 06:26:07 2010
> New Revision: 159808
>
> URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=159808
--- Comment #2 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-12 06:54 ---
A patch is here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-05/msg00788.html
--
amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
ReportedBy: amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org
OtherBugsDependingO 44033
nThis:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44035
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: other
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org
OtherBugsDependingO 44033
nThis:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44034
with the facts
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: documentation
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: other
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: amylaar at gcc
cker
Priority: P3
Component: other
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44032
--- Comment #39 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-22 06:04
---
(In reply to comment #38)
> Maybe this issue migrated into PR31849?
Not entirely, PR31849 is tree-optimization, and a lot of auto-increment
opportunities are only visible at the rtl level.
--
h
--- Comment #22 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-19 12:29
---
(In reply to comment #21)
> The patch would need updating now. Micha, does your tracer handle this case?
See comment #20 for an updated patch. However, I don't have EEMBC available
at the moment
--- Comment #4 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-17 15:43 ---
This is the current patch under discussion:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2010-02/msg00176.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42798
--- Comment #2 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-30 05:20 ---
Subject: Bug 42843
Author: amylaar
Date: Sat Jan 30 05:20:40 2010
New Revision: 156380
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=156380
Log:
gcc:
PR testsuite/42843
* Mak
--- Comment #3 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-30 05:08 ---
Subject: Bug 42798
Author: amylaar
Date: Sat Jan 30 05:08:11 2010
New Revision: 156379
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=156379
Log:
include:
PR bootstrap/42798
* lib
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC host triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42902
--- Comment #20 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-29 20:33
---
Subject: Bug 38785
Author: amylaar
Date: Fri Jan 29 20:33:19 2010
New Revision: 156365
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=156365
Log:
PR tree-optimization/38785
2009-02-02 J"
--- Comment #3 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-27 20:04 ---
Subject: Bug 39141
Author: amylaar
Date: Wed Jan 27 20:03:57 2010
New Revision: 156301
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=156301
Log:
PR tree-optimization/39141
* tree-
--- Comment #8 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-25 18:01 ---
Subject: Bug 42813
Author: amylaar
Date: Mon Jan 25 18:01:29 2010
New Revision: 156218
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=156218
Log:
PR libstdc++/36101, PR libstdc
--- Comment #29 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-25 18:01
---
Subject: Bug 36101
Author: amylaar
Date: Mon Jan 25 18:01:29 2010
New Revision: 156218
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=156218
Log:
PR libstdc++/36101, PR libstdc
--- Comment #7 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-23 11:35 ---
Fixed by these patches:
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=revision&revision=156172
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=revision&revision=156189
--
amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What
--- Comment #28 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-23 11:17
---
Subject: Bug 36101
Author: amylaar
Date: Sat Jan 23 11:17:30 2010
New Revision: 156189
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=156189
Log:
PR libstdc++/36101, PR libstdc
--- Comment #6 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-23 11:17 ---
Subject: Bug 42813
Author: amylaar
Date: Sat Jan 23 11:17:30 2010
New Revision: 156189
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=156189
Log:
PR libstdc++/36101, PR libstdc
--- Comment #1 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-23 00:00 ---
A patch is here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-01/msg01200.html
--
amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #26 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-22 19:23
---
(In reply to comment #24)
> So I misinterpreted your ChangeLog, the adjective is referred to
> both
> ;)
The 'partial' was in my patch submission to gcc-patches, and that
patch completely f
--- Comment #25 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-22 19:17
---
Created an attachment (id=19696)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19696&action=view)
patch to make --enable-build-with-cxx bootstrap work
I am currently using this patch in addition
--- Comment #23 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-22 19:09
---
(In reply to comment #22)
> I see that the patch is in. Excellent. I understand the other PR is completely
> fixed by now, thus I would suggest closing it as fixed.
No, it isn't. In fact, --enable-bui
--- Comment #21 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-22 13:35
---
Subject: Bug 36101
Author: amylaar
Date: Fri Jan 22 13:35:38 2010
New Revision: 156172
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=156172
Log:
PR libstdc++/36101, PR libstdc++/42813
[
--- Comment #5 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-22 13:35 ---
Subject: Bug 42813
Author: amylaar
Date: Fri Jan 22 13:35:38 2010
New Revision: 156172
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=156172
Log:
PR libstdc++/36101, PR libstdc++/42813
[
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: testsuite
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla
--- Comment #20 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-22 10:55
---
(In reply to comment #19)
> I have a patch to hack the dependency of libstdc++-v3 on libgomp into
> configure.ac .
I have posted this patch together with the other Makefile* / configure*
patches for PR l
--- Comment #4 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-22 10:48 ---
A patch is here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-01/msg01168.html
--
amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-22 00:01 ---
I can't do any--enable-build-with-cxx bootstraps / test without this patch.
--
amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |
--- Comment #19 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-21 23:38
---
(In reply to comment #18)
> Yes, marking libgomp as bootstrappable should make a difference. I
> suggest looking at Makefile.in differences from my patches (in the
> dependencies section).
Th
--- Comment #17 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-21 15:29
---
(In reply to comment #16)
> > Wrong submitter's proposal, you mean.
>
> Yes. What I don't understand is, why is anything else than this needed:
>
> -target_modules = { mod
--- Comment #12 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-21 10:17
---
(In reply to comment #11)
> So, sorry if I'm missing some steps in the reasoning, do I understand
> correctly
> that with your experimental patch the problems would be solved?
No, it removes the
--- Comment #10 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-21 07:53
---
(In reply to comment #7)
> At this time I don't know --enable-build-with-cxx enough to contribute much to
> the solution of the specific issue having to to with that configure option,
> just wante
--- Comment #9 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-21 07:44 ---
Created an attachment (id=19674)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19674&action=view)
experimental patch to remove dependency of configure-target-libstdc++-v3 on
configure-target-libgomp
--- Comment #6 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-21 00:53 ---
The configuration test can be replaced with some configure / makefile
hackery, but this doesn't help:
he compilation of libstdc++-v3 also depends on the header file:
/bin/sh ../libtool --tag CXX --mode=co
--- Comment #3 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-20 18:49 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Is this issue related to PR36101?
Yes, if PR36101 was fixed, I'd expect this problem to go away.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42813
: gcc
Version: 4.5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: other
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42813
--- Comment #3 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-20 08:20 ---
patch applied:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-01/msg01071.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2010-01/msg00529.html
--
amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #2 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-20 07:52 ---
Subject: Bug 42812
Author: amylaar
Date: Wed Jan 20 07:52:18 2010
New Revision: 156062
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=156062
Log:
PR bootstrap/42812
* gfortran.h
--- Comment #1 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-20 07:49 ---
Actually, I see now that the patch for PR40011 was all right at the time,
it was the patch for PR39626 which introduced PR42812.
--
amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: build
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42812
--- Comment #1 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-19 15:31 ---
This patch:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-01/msg01019.html
gets past this failure, and has also been successfully
bootstrapped & regtested without --enable-build-with-cxx bootstrap on
i686-pc-linux
101 - 200 of 799 matches
Mail list logo
