[Bug target/89261] ix86_data_alignment has wrong argument type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89261 --- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #1) > (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #0) > > i386.c has > > > > int > > ix86_data_alignment (tree type, int align, bool opt) > > > > But "align" passed down is unsigned.

[Bug fortran/89266] ICE with TRANSFER of len=0 character array constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89266 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/88761] [8/9 Regression] ICE in tsubst_copy, at cp/pt.c:15478 when chaining lambda calls & fold-expressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88761 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/89268] New: [9 Regression] r268689 caused FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/pr79887.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89268 Bug ID: 89268 Summary: [9 Regression] r268689 caused FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/pr79887.c Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug ipa/88711] [9 Regression] scan-ipa-dump inline "Inlined tp_sum/

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88711 --- Comment #5 from Jan Hubicka --- Author: hubicka Date: Sat Feb 9 16:28:45 2019 New Revision: 268723 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268723=gcc=rev Log: PR ipa/88711 * gfortran.dg/pr79966.f90: Xfail everwyhere.

[Bug target/89112] Incorrect code generated by rs6000 memcmp expansion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89112 --- Comment #10 from acsawdey at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: acsawdey Date: Sat Feb 9 17:11:06 2019 New Revision: 268725 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268725=gcc=rev Log: 2019-02-09 Aaron Sawdey Backported from mainline

[Bug ipa/87957] [9 Regression] ICE tree check: expected tree that contains ‘decl minimal’ structure, have ‘identifier_node’ in warn_odr, at ipa-devirt.c:1051 since r265519

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87957 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/89269] RISC-V stack variable as global variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89269 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/88343] [7/8 Regression] R31 is unconditionally saved/restored on powerpc-darwin even when it's not necessary.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88343 --- Comment #35 from Alan Modra --- Author: amodra Date: Sat Feb 9 12:44:02 2019 New Revision: 268722 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268722=gcc=rev Log: [RS6000] Correct save_reg_p PR target/88343 *

[Bug libbacktrace/69314] Use of uninitialised value in libbacktrace/pecoff.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69314 Tom de Vries changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/88326] [7/8/9 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_array_initializer, at fortran/trans-array.c:6085

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88326 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org Target

[Bug tree-optimization/89268] [9 Regression] r268689 caused FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/pr79887.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89268 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/89267] [8 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/cpp1z/constexpr-lambda8.C (test for excess errors)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89267 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- The trunk has unlike 8.x the first hunk from r268377 which handles CALL_FROM_THUNK_P elsewhere, and that is where it clears EXPR_LOCATION on the call too.

[Bug ipa/88711] [9 Regression] scan-ipa-dump inline "Inlined tp_sum/

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88711 --- Comment #8 from Jan Hubicka --- > "I committed a patch that causes a regression in the Fortran > testsuite. Clearly, the problem is with Fortran not my patch. > I don't care about Fortran or respect those that work on the > Fortran FE.

[Bug c++/87770] [8 Regression] ICE in type_dependent_expression_p, at cp/pt.c:25230

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87770 --- Comment #7 from Konrad Dabrowski --- Thank you for fixing this. Would it be possible to backport this patch to the gcc-8 branch?

[Bug c++/89267] [8 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/cpp1z/constexpr-lambda8.C (test for excess errors)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89267 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug libbacktrace/60240] libbacktrace problems with nested functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60240 Tom de Vries changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ian at airs dot com, |

[Bug target/89112] Incorrect code generated by rs6000 memcmp expansion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89112 acsawdey at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/89077] ICE using * as len specifier for character parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89077 --- Comment #13 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: anlauf Date: Sat Feb 9 17:25:23 2019 New Revision: 268726 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268726=gcc=rev Log: 2019-02-09 Harald Anlauf PR fortran/89077 *

[Bug libstdc++/87809] [8/9 Regression] Can't create empty std::optional>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87809 --- Comment #8 from Jan Hubicka --- Author: hubicka Date: Sat Feb 9 18:01:03 2019 New Revision: 268728 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268728=gcc=rev Log: PR lto/87809 * tree.c (fld_simplified_type_name): Use

[Bug d/89177] unaligned memory access in libphobos

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89177 --- Comment #1 from Bernd Edlinger --- Created attachment 45651 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45651=edit proposed patch

[Bug c/89269] New: RISC-V stack variable as global variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89269 Bug ID: 89269 Summary: RISC-V stack variable as global variable Product: gcc Version: 8.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug fortran/71860] [7/8 Regression] [OOP] ICE on pointing to null(mold), verify_gimple failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71860 --- Comment #8 from Thomas Koenig --- Author: tkoenig Date: Sat Feb 9 20:07:28 2019 New Revision: 268730 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268730=gcc=rev Log: 2019-02-09 Thomas Koenig PR fortran/71860 Backport from trunk *

[Bug ipa/88711] [9 Regression] scan-ipa-dump inline "Inlined tp_sum/

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88711 --- Comment #7 from Steve Kargl --- On Sat, Feb 09, 2019 at 06:12:53PM +, hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88711 > > --- Comment #6 from Jan Hubicka --- > Definitly not P1 anymore. The

[Bug c++/86943] [7 Regression] Wrong code when converting stateless generic lambda to function pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86943 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||8.2.1 Summary|[7/8

[Bug tree-optimization/89268] [9 Regression] r268689 caused FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/pr79887.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89268 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |9.0

[Bug ipa/88755] [9 Regression] ICE in compute_fn_summary, at ipa-fnsummary.c:2513 since r267601

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88755 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/71860] [7/8 Regression] [OOP] ICE on pointing to null(mold), verify_gimple failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71860 --- Comment #9 from Thomas Koenig --- Author: tkoenig Date: Sat Feb 9 20:09:56 2019 New Revision: 268731 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268731=gcc=rev Log: 2019-02-09 Thomas Koenig PR fortran/71860 Backport from trunk *

[Bug fortran/71860] [7/8 Regression] [OOP] ICE on pointing to null(mold), verify_gimple failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71860 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug bootstrap/44756] [meta-bug] --enable-werror-always issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44756 Bug 44756 depends on bug 21014, which changed state. Bug 21014 Summary: read-rtl.c:670: warning: missing sentinel in function call https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21014 What|Removed |Added

[Bug middle-end/21014] read-rtl.c:670: warning: missing sentinel in function call

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21014 John David Anglin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libbacktrace/57591] gcc-4.8 libbacktrace btest failure on Linux ppc64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57591 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/89266] ICE with TRANSFER of len=0 character array constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89266 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Blocks|

[Bug tree-optimization/56457] Bogus warning: loop-invariant.c:786:20: error: unused variable ‘regno’ when building vax-*-*

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56457 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug ipa/88755] [9 Regression] ICE in compute_fn_summary, at ipa-fnsummary.c:2513 since r267601

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88755 --- Comment #4 from Jan Hubicka --- Author: hubicka Date: Sat Feb 9 17:56:22 2019 New Revision: 268727 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268727=gcc=rev Log: PR ipa/88755 * params.def (uninlined-function-insns,

[Bug fortran/71703] [7/8/9 Regression] [OOP] ICE in wide_int_to_tree, at tree.c:1488

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71703 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/89267] New: [8 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/cpp1z/constexpr-lambda8.C (test for excess errors)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89267 Bug ID: 89267 Summary: [8 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/cpp1z/constexpr-lambda8.C (test for excess errors) Product: gcc Version: 8.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug ipa/88711] [9 Regression] scan-ipa-dump inline "Inlined tp_sum/

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88711 --- Comment #6 from Jan Hubicka --- Definitly not P1 anymore. The testcase is still not optimized well, but I think it falls into the general category that Fotran programming style prefers more inlining than C/C++ and it may make sense to

[Bug tree-optimization/89268] [9 Regression] r268689 caused FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/pr79887.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89268 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 45650 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45650=edit gcc9-pr89268.patch Full untested patch.

[Bug c/89270] New: [9 regression] AVR ICE: verify_gimple failed

Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: gandalf at winds dot org Target Milestone: --- I get an ICE on the following code with GCC 9.0.1 20190209 (experimental) compiled for AVR. Works in GCC 8.x. void test() { extern const unsigned char __memx __data_load_end

[Bug fortran/71066] [7/8/9 Regression] ICE in set_loop_bounds, at fortran/trans-array.c:4680

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71066 --- Comment #10 from Thomas Koenig --- Removing the assert gcc_assert (loop->dimen == 1); > $ cat z3.f90 > program p >real :: a(2,2)[*] >data a /4*0.0/ > end just hits a check later on: d.f90:1:0: 1 | program p | interner

[Bug fortran/89266] New: ICE with TRANSFER of len=0 character array constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89266 Bug ID: 89266 Summary: ICE with TRANSFER of len=0 character array constructor Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug libbacktrace/57591] gcc-4.8 libbacktrace btest failure on Linux ppc64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57591 --- Comment #7 from Tom de Vries --- (In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #6) > please reopen it if it still happens (with trunk or another supported > version). Thanks! And if it still happens, please attach the log for the failing

[Bug target/48595] score-elf fails to build with --enable-werror-always

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48595 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug lto/87089] [9 regression] tree check: expected class 'type', have 'declaration' (namespace_decl) in type_with_linkage_p, at ipa-utils.h

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87089 --- Comment #10 from Jan Hubicka --- Jason, I can avoid the ICE by simply not simplifying contexts for all C++ destructors. Index: tree.c === --- tree.c (revision 268728) +++

[Bug target/89093] [9 Regression] C++ exception handling clobbers d8 VFP register

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89093 --- Comment #28 from Bernd Edlinger --- (In reply to Ramana Radhakrishnan from comment #27) > (In reply to Bernd Edlinger from comment #25) > > you might consider adding something like that to your patch: > > > > Index: elf.h > >

[Bug libbacktrace/60240] libbacktrace problems with nested functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60240 Ian Lance Taylor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/89271] New: gcc.target/powerpc/vsx-simode2.c stopped working in GCC 9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89271 Bug ID: 89271 Summary: gcc.target/powerpc/vsx-simode2.c stopped working in GCC 9 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/88835] overly aggressive -Werror=format-overflow for printf since r265648

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88835 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||88993 --- Comment #8 from Martin Sebor

[Bug c++/89244] __builtin_is_constant_evaluated not documented

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89244 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libbacktrace/89273] New: Count inlined functions in skip parm for backtrace_full and backtrace_print

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89273 Bug ID: 89273 Summary: Count inlined functions in skip parm for backtrace_full and backtrace_print Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug rtl-optimization/89271] gcc.target/powerpc/vsx-simode2.c stopped working in GCC 9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89271 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||8.0 Version|unknown

[Bug lto/89272] New: [9 Regression] r268728 caused FAIL: g++.dg/lto/pr65316 cp_lto_pr65316_0.o assemble

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89272 Bug ID: 89272 Summary: [9 Regression] r268728 caused FAIL: g++.dg/lto/pr65316 cp_lto_pr65316_0.o assemble Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c/89051] -Wno-error= does not work for warning groups

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89051 --- Comment #4 from Martin Sebor --- LangEnabledBy is used by optc-gen.awk to generate options.c with calls like those below. Other than that, I don't think GCC has an internal data structure to represent this relationship (one that could be

[Bug lto/89272] [9 Regression] r268728 caused FAIL: g++.dg/lto/pr65316 cp_lto_pr65316_0.o assemble

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89272 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/89263] Simplify bool expression to OR

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89263 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/89263] Simplify bool expression to OR

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89263 Marc Glisse changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/88343] [7/8 Regression] R31 is unconditionally saved/restored on powerpc-darwin even when it's not necessary.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88343 --- Comment #34 from Iain Sandoe --- (In reply to Alan Modra from comment #33) > It looks to me like that hunk is just removing some dead code, so it doesn't > matter whether it stays or goes. yes, just a tidy-up, should not affect function

Publish Article and Become Editorial Board Members/Reviewers

Dear Scholar/Processor, We publish open access, peer-reviewed journals which devoted to promoting the development of science and technology. Now we sincerely invite scholars and researchers to submit papers to the journals or to join us as one of the editorial

[Bug fortran/81552] -finit-integer=n is restricted to 32-bit INTEGER.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81552 --- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > > IMO this PR should be closed as WONTFIX. > > Or document it - a single sentence should be enough. Well the following patch (untested) "fixes" this PR: --- ../_clean/gcc/fortran/gfortran.h

[Bug fortran/89200] [9 Regression] Erroneous copying of a derived type with a deferred-length character array component

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89200 --- Comment #5 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sat Feb 9 11:11:33 2019 New Revision: 268721 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268721=gcc=rev Log: 2019-02-09 Paul Thomas PR fortran/89200 * trans-array.c

[Bug fortran/68241] [meta-bug] [F03] Deferred-length character

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68241 Bug 68241 depends on bug 89200, which changed state. Bug 89200 Summary: [9 Regression] Erroneous copying of a derived type with a deferred-length character array component https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89200 What

[Bug fortran/89200] [9 Regression] Erroneous copying of a derived type with a deferred-length character array component

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89200 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/88835] overly aggressive -Werror=format-overflow for printf since r265648

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88835 --- Comment #7 from Mark Wielaard --- Is this a regression that will probably be fixed for GCC 9.1 or should we be adding workaround to the code. Currently elfutils won't build on distros that started using the GCC 9.0 prerelease on 32bit

[Bug lto/89260] ICE in read_cgraph_and_symbols, at lto/lto.c:2800 while compiling harfbuzz

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89260 --- Comment #2 from ohaiziejohwahkeezuoz at xff dot cz --- The main problem is elsewhere (read_cgraph_and_symbols looks just like some cascading assertion failure because of some other segfault). I recompiled gcc with -Og -ggdb and managed to

[Bug c/89265] New: Incorrect bitfield type in -Wconversion warnings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89265 Bug ID: 89265 Summary: Incorrect bitfield type in -Wconversion warnings Product: gcc Version: 7.4.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c/89264] New: Incorrect bitfield type in -Wconversion warnings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89264 Bug ID: 89264 Summary: Incorrect bitfield type in -Wconversion warnings Product: gcc Version: 7.4.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c/89264] Incorrect bitfield type in -Wconversion warnings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89264 --- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab --- *** Bug 89265 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug c/89265] Incorrect bitfield type in -Wconversion warnings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89265 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/89251] [2018-q4m] Wrong datatype optimization on bitfield

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89251 --- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski --- Using a smaller than declared size for standard loads is a valid and well defined optimization (sometimes those use less bandwidth, othertimes it is better for alignment reasons). The case you are running

[Bug target/89251] [2018-q4m] Wrong datatype optimization on bitfield

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89251 --- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Kochise from comment #5) > That the "standard" never really ruled about bitfield order is already > baffling and common sense (ie. current implementation) telling to start from > bit 0 and

[Bug target/88343] [7/8 Regression] R31 is unconditionally saved/restored on powerpc-darwin even when it's not necessary.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88343 --- Comment #31 from Alan Modra --- Author: amodra Date: Sat Feb 9 08:39:58 2019 New Revision: 268715 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268715=gcc=rev Log: [RS6000] Correct save_reg_p PR target/88343 *

[Bug middle-end/89243] [8 Regression] ICE in new test case g++.dg/opt/pr89188.C from r268647

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89243 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libbacktrace/89262] New: [libbacktrace] dwarf5 support

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89262 Bug ID: 89262 Summary: [libbacktrace] dwarf5 support Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: libbacktrace

[Bug target/89261] ix86_data_alignment has wrong argument type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89261 --- Comment #1 from Uroš Bizjak --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #0) > i386.c has > > int > ix86_data_alignment (tree type, int align, bool opt) > > But "align" passed down is unsigned. Where is the bug? I don't think anybody passed

[Bug tree-optimization/89263] New: Simplify bool expression to OR

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89263 Bug ID: 89263 Summary: Simplify bool expression to OR Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization

[Bug target/88343] [7/8 Regression] R31 is unconditionally saved/restored on powerpc-darwin even when it's not necessary.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88343 --- Comment #33 from Alan Modra --- It looks to me like that hunk is just removing some dead code, so it doesn't matter whether it stays or goes.

[Bug target/88343] [7/8 Regression] R31 is unconditionally saved/restored on powerpc-darwin even when it's not necessary.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88343 --- Comment #32 from Iain Sandoe --- Thanks for the patches Alan. Note that 7 and 8 back ports might need this hunk which was applied to trunk but removed from 7 and 8 when we backed out the change because of breakage there. @@ -23970,13

[Bug target/88861] [9 Regression] ICE in calc_dfs_tree, at dominance.c:458

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88861 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Sat Feb 9 08:51:41 2019 New Revision: 268717 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268717=gcc=rev Log: PR middle-end/89243 * g++.dg/opt/pr89188.C: Include

[Bug middle-end/89243] [8 Regression] ICE in new test case g++.dg/opt/pr89188.C from r268647

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89243 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Sat Feb 9 08:51:41 2019 New Revision: 268717 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268717=gcc=rev Log: PR middle-end/89243 * g++.dg/opt/pr89188.C: Include

[Bug rtl-optimization/89234] [7/8 Regression] ICE in get_eh_region_and_lp_from_rtx at gcc/except.c:1824

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89234 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Sat Feb 9 08:50:05 2019 New Revision: 268716 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268716=gcc=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2019-02-08 Jakub Jelinek PR

[Bug middle-end/89246] LTO produces references to cloned symbols which the compiler failed to clone

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89246 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Sat Feb 9 08:55:39 2019 New Revision: 268718 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268718=gcc=rev Log: PR middle-end/89246 * config/i386/i386.c

[Bug rtl-optimization/89234] [7 Regression] ICE in get_eh_region_and_lp_from_rtx at gcc/except.c:1824

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89234 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/89234] [7 Regression] ICE in get_eh_region_and_lp_from_rtx at gcc/except.c:1824

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89234 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED

[Bug tree-optimization/49552] missed optimization: test for zero remainder after division by a constant.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49552 Alexander Monakov changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug middle-end/82853] Optimize x % 3 == 0 without modulo

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82853 Alexander Monakov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vermaelen.wouter at gmail dot com