--- Comment #2 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2005-11-30 08:15 ---
I have an obvious patch, which is to invert the CONSTANT_CLASS_P and
TREE_CONSTANT_OVERFLOW tests in line 3330.
Will commit after bootstrapping/testing succeeds.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25169
--- Comment #6 from law at redhat dot com 2005-11-30 08:55 ---
Subject: Re: [4.1/4.2 Regression] ICE in
coalesce_abnormal_edges, at tree-outof-ssa.c:646
On Mon, 2005-11-28 at 23:26 +, janis at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
--- Comment #4 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot
--- Comment #7 from law at redhat dot com 2005-11-30 08:55 ---
Subject: Re: [4.1/4.2 Regression] ICE in
coalesce_abnormal_edges, at tree-outof-ssa.c:646
On Mon, 2005-11-28 at 23:26 +, janis at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
--- Comment #4 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot
--- Comment #9 from law at redhat dot com 2005-11-30 08:57 ---
Fixed via today's patch to tree-ssa-uncprop.c.
--
law at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
I tried to install gfortran following the instructions on the
webpages
http://gcc.gnu.org/fortran/
http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GFortranBinaries
http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GFortranBinariesWindows
I did the installation two times once on a Windows XP, where MinGWin
has been installed since more than a
--- Comment #2 from r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com 2005-11-30
09:37 ---
Michael Weiser supplied two patches to binutils-2.16.1 which resolve the
libpthread issue.
see http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1150
I used the MIPS_OPTIONAL.patch and the
--- Comment #10 from giovannibajo at libero dot it 2005-11-30 09:52 ---
Jeff, did you backport the patch to the 4.1 branch? I don't see the commit
there.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25000
--- Comment #11 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-30 09:54
---
I guess he had svn problems. Reopened so we don't forget.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |3.4.6
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25163
When both -fpie and -fpic are given on the command line, -fpie wins,
independent on the order of the arguments. This is unfortunate, as
PIC objects are more widely usable. It would be more useful to either
let the last one win, or let -fpic win over -fpie, from a usability
standpoint: for
--- Comment #7 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-30 10:16
---
Here's an even shorter testcase:
=
templateint struct A;
void foo(A0);
templateint struct A
{
friend void foo(A0);
};
void bar()
{
foo(A0());
}
=
--- Comment #4 from nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-30 10:29 ---
Subject: Bug 21166
Author: nathan
Date: Wed Nov 30 10:29:09 2005
New Revision: 107712
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=107712
Log:
.:
PR c++/21166
* c-decl.c (finish_struct):
--- Comment #1 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-30 11:33
---
Currently gfortran crashes on this code, because of PR 22146. I'll leave this
PR (rather than marking it as a duplicate) as a reminder that, when we fix PR
22146, we need to check conformance of arguments as well.
--- Comment #3 from laurent at guerby dot net 2005-11-30 11:56 ---
Could you post the link failure for test in-build?
May be it's something like running ranlib on the libraries, a step that we
might be doing only at install, could you try that?
Thanks,
Laurent
--
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #1 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-30 12:32
---
Confirmed. ifort 8.1 -e95 says:
The CALL statement is invoking an external function subprogram as a
subroutine. [S]
CALL S()
--^
--
eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #1 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-30 12:36
---
Confirmed.
--
eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-30 12:46
---
Confirmed.
--
eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-30 12:49
---
Confirmed.
--
eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-30 12:52 ---
Subject: Bug 25162
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Nov 30 12:52:07 2005
New Revision: 107715
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=107715
Log:
PR fortran/25162
* openmp.c
gcc-4.1.0-20051126 rev 107546
[EMAIL PROTECTED] linux-2.6.14.3]$ gcc attrib.i -c -O2
fs/ntfs/attrib.c: In function 'ntfs_attr_lookup':
fs/ntfs/attrib.c:1025: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
$ gcc -v
Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc/ppc-pld-linux/4.1.0/specs
Target: ppc-pld-linux
--- Comment #2 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-30 12:59 ---
Fixed in SVN.
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from pluto at agmk dot net 2005-11-30 13:03 ---
Created an attachment (id=10365)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10365action=view)
testcase
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25180
--- Comment #2 from amodra at bigpond dot net dot au 2005-11-30 13:07
---
I had a little play at implementing unwinder info for the epilogue. It's easy
to arrange for a DW_CFA_def_cfa_offset: 0 to be emitted on the stack restore.
However, often the function exit isn't emitted last.
--- Comment #2 from pluto at agmk dot net 2005-11-30 13:10 ---
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
(gdb) bt
#0 gen_peephole2_993 (curr_insn=Variable curr_insn is not available.)
at rs6000.md:10847
#1 0x1020341c in peephole2_insns (x0=Variable x0 is not
--
eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #2 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-30 13:23
---
While not identical, this is so close to PR 25099 that I think we can consider
them duplicates.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 25099 ***
--
eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
--- Comment #2 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-30 13:23
---
*** Bug 25100 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25099
--- Comment #2 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-30 13:38
---
F2k draft standard, section 7.4.4.2.1 says: The value m3 shall not be zero.,
where m3 is the stride in a FORALL triplet. Confirmed.
--
eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-30 13:44 ---
Confirmed.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
--- Comment #4 from claudio_mantegna at modemsoft dot it 2005-11-30 13:45
---
Created an attachment (id=10366)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10366action=view)
Log file of Buld
This is all log file that produce during the compile
--
--- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-30 13:49 ---
(reducing)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25180
--- Comment #9 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-30 14:02 ---
See http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-11/msg02110.html.
--
danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-30 14:10 ---
Created an attachment (id=10367)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10367action=view)
reduced testcase
reduced testcase.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25180
--- Comment #2 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-30 14:18
---
(In reply to comment #1)
What broken here? Where are the details?
I wondered that as well for a while. The problem, IIUC is that the
case-selector
must be an initialization expression. I'm no language
--- Comment #4 from r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com 2005-11-30
14:28 ---
Subject: link failure for several acats tests
Here's the link failure:
splitting
/SCRATCH/gcc-build/IRIX64/mips-sgi-irix6.5/gcc-4.0.2/gcc-4.0.2/gcc/testsuite/ada/acats/tests/a/a83a02b.ada
into:
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-30 15:29 ---
Caused by:
2005-08-23 Paolo Bonzini [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* config/rs6000/predicates.md (equality_operator): New.
* config/rs6000/rs6000.md: Rewrite as a peephole2 the split for
comparison
--- Comment #7 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-30 15:31 ---
The peephole2 has logical_operand which means it accepts register so
simplify_const_binary_operation will fail as we have a register here and not
just an int.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-30 15:36 ---
Fixed:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2005-11/msg01412.html
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
The following code will report this:
C:\Dev-Cpp\Projects\test-stlport\main_18.cpp In function `int test_18()':
13 C:\Dev-Cpp\Projects\test-stlport\main_18.cpp [Warning] will never be
executed
extern int abort();
int test_18()
{
int type;
switch (type)
{
case 1:
/* bug.i */
# 1 bug.c
# 0 built-in
# 1 command line
# 1 bug.c
# 1 error.h 1
enum err {
err_none,
err_IO = 0x8a45,
err_NM,
err_EOF,
err_SE,
err_PT,
err_PS,
err_SI,
err_UH,
err_CF,
err_CT,
err_LT,
err_UT,
err_CS,
err_MS,
err_SM
};
void seterror(enum
/* gcc version */
Using built-in specs.
Target: i686-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../gcc-4.1-20050508/configure --prefix=/home/jklaue/local
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.1.0 20050508 (experimental)
/* command line and errors */
gcc -pedantic -save-temps -c bug.c
In file included from
--- Comment #1 from klaue at dresearch dot de 2005-11-30 16:01 ---
Created an attachment (id=10368)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10368action=view)
bug.i
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25183
--- Comment #6 from drow at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-30 16:02 ---
However, I think this is a convincing reason for the patch to merged to at
least 4.1.0.
--
drow at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #7 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-30 16:06 ---
(In reply to comment #6)
However, I think this is a convincing reason for the patch to merged to at
least 4.1.0.
If you reopen the bug at least mark this as 4.0/4.1 only so that people know
that it only effects
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-30 16:06 ---
Testing the patch right now
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-30 16:08 ---
This is invalid code:
t.cc: In function int test_18():
t.cc:15: error: jump to case label
t.cc:9: error: crosses initialization of int ret
t.cc:18: error: jump to case label
t.cc:9: error: crosses
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-30 16:11 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
We should reject this.
But that is a different bug.
Anyways fixing up the code to be legal code:
extern int abort();
int test_18()
{
int type;
switch (type)
{
--- Comment #8 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2005-11-30 16:11 ---
Reduced testcase:
typedef unsigned long long u64;
extern u64 f (u64 x);
int g (unsigned x, u64 *z)
{
u64 w = *z;
u64 h = f (w) 32;
u64 l = f (w);
u64 g = h | l;
unsigned p = g;
if (p == x)
f (*z);
}
--
With the attached code I get
C:\Dev-Cpp\Projects\test-stlport\main_19.cpp In function `void test_19(long
unsigned int)':
8 C:\Dev-Cpp\Projects\test-stlport\main_19.cpp [Warning] will never be executed
8 C:\Dev-Cpp\Projects\test-stlport\main_19.cpp [Warning] will never be executed
and when I
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-30 16:13 ---
Closing as a dup of bug 25183 as that one is cleaner done.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 25183 ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-30 16:13 ---
*** Bug 25182 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25183
--- Comment #9 from harald dot vogt at desy dot de 2005-11-30 16:17 ---
(In reply to comment #8)
Subject: Re: csqrtf, csqrt, csqrtl
Do you have a patch? Because I have no idea want you
mean. libgfortran/configure already checks for the existence
of these functions. glibc's
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-30 16:17 ---
Confirmed, reduced testcase:
enum err {
err_IO = 0x8a45,
err_NM,
err_EOF,
err_SE,
err_PT,
};
static enum err E_;
int error()
{
switch (E_) {
case err_IO : break;
case err_NM : break;
case
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-30 16:20 ---
Confirmed, only a 3.4 regression.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2005-11-30 16:32 ---
Subject: Bug 25169
Author: bonzini
Date: Wed Nov 30 16:32:52 2005
New Revision: 107721
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=107721
Log:
2005-11-30 Paolo Bonzini [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR c/25169
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-30 16:44 ---
I am going to fix this one.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #9 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-30 16:48 ---
This is exactly the same issue as PR 23295 now (I should copy some of the
comments from here to there).
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-30 16:51 ---
Note fixing this will also fix PR 23666 after my patch for moving - ~a = a+1
to negate_expr.
But this needs to depend on the fix for PR 25125 since otherwise we expose a
latent bug in convert.c which shows up in the
--- Comment #12 from law at redhat dot com 2005-11-30 16:54 ---
Subject: Re: [4.1/4.2 Regression] ICE in
coalesce_abnormal_edges, at tree-outof-ssa.c:646
On Wed, 2005-11-30 at 09:52 +, giovannibajo at libero dot it wrote:
--- Comment #10 from giovannibajo at libero
--- Comment #13 from law at redhat dot com 2005-11-30 17:07 ---
SVN problems addressed, patch checked into both the mainline and the 4.1
branch.
--
law at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #19 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-30 17:26 ---
Subject: Bug 15809
Author: pault
Date: Wed Nov 30 17:26:40 2005
New Revision: 107727
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=107727
Log:
2005-11-30 Paul Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-30 17:32 ---
Actually it is better for ~(a ^ CST) to come out as a ^ ~CST.
Right now we actually already implement ~(a^CST) as a ^ ~CST. So we need just
to implement (~a) ^ CST as a ^ ~CST. In fact this is what simplify_rtx
--- Comment #9 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2005-11-30 17:36 ---
Created an attachment (id=10369)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10369action=view)
proposed patch
This patch enables the peephole2 only if operands[1] and operands[2] are
constant.
An alternative
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-30 17:41 ---
~(a^CST) is done in fold_unary with the comment of:
/* Convert ~(X ^ Y) to ~X ^ Y or X ^ ~Y if ~X or ~Y simplify. */
Only (~a^~b) is simplified. That can be expanded to:
(~a^b) if ~b simplifies, simplify the
--- Comment #3 from gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-30 17:43 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
Absolutely not! There is no best way: sometimes it is better to go through
the typedef, sometimes it is better to print the typedef.
To tell you the truth, I consider the fact that GCC
--- Comment #8 from gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-30 17:47 ---
(In reply to comment #7)
diagnostic.c gets #include stack information from input_file_stack. cpplib
gets it from source_locations. With --enable-mapped-location, this regression
could be fixed by diagnostic.c
The enclosed produces the following as part of the error backtrace:
../../../../boost/sequence/make_range.hpp:60: instantiated from
'boost::sequence::range_::rangeElements, Begin, End, typename
boost::result_ofCalcSize ()()::type
boost::sequence::detail::range_makerElements, Begin, End,
--- Comment #1 from dave at boost-consulting dot com 2005-11-30 17:48
---
Created an attachment (id=10370)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10370action=view)
preprocessed source
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25185
--- Comment #6 from ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-30 18:04 ---
Subject: Bug 19275
Author: ghazi
Date: Wed Nov 30 18:04:46 2005
New Revision: 107729
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=107729
Log:
PR testsuite/19275
Backport from mainline:
--- Comment #7 from ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-30 18:06 ---
Subject: Bug 19275
Author: ghazi
Date: Wed Nov 30 18:06:01 2005
New Revision: 107730
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=107730
Log:
PR testsuite/19275
Backport from mainline:
--- Comment #7 from dalej at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-30 18:19 ---
Retested on powerpc-apple-darwin and committed.
--
dalej at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Take the following example:
short *a;
int f(void)
{
*a = (short)(((int)*a) 1);
}
the Shift should be done in the same type as *a.
This is done in simplify_subreg on the RTL level but we really should be able
to do it in fold also.
--
Summary: (short)(((int)short_var) 1) should
--- Comment #8 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-30 18:22 ---
(In reply to comment #7)
Retested on powerpc-apple-darwin and committed.
Since this is a regression, this should stay open until the patch has been
committed in the release branches. I will backport the fix to
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org
--- Comment #3 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-30 18:29
---
(In reply to comment #2)
context, so I'm not sure what to think here ... I leave this as unconfirmed
for now.
Ifort 8.1 reports the following error:
In a CASE statement, the case-value must be a constant
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-30 18:32 ---
It also should be done for:
int f1(void)
{
*a = (short)(((int)(unsigned short)*a) 1);
}
Which is a little more complicated on the tree level than the RTL level:
tree level:
*a.1 = (short int) ((int) (short
--- Comment #10 from sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu
2005-11-30 18:38 ---
Subject: Re: sqrt, csqrt may give a wrong result if real part of compex
argument is zero
On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 04:17:01PM -, harald dot vogt at desy dot de wrote:
--- Comment #8 from ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-30 18:41 ---
Patch backported to 3.4 and 4.0.
--
ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
/home/pinskia/src/newtest/trunk/libjava/java/lang/Class.h: In member function
'java::lang::Class* java::lang::Class::getComponentType()':
/home/pinskia/src/newtest/trunk/libjava/java/lang/Class.h:339: warning:
dereferencing type-punned pointer will break strict-aliasing rules
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-30 18:55 ---
Some more:
/home/pinskia/src/newtest/trunk/libjava/java/lang/ref/natReference.cc: In
member function 'void java::lang::ref::Reference::create(java::lang::Object*)':
--- Comment #4 from brad dot king at kitware dot com 2005-11-30 19:01
---
Okay, if you don't consider it a bug that is fine with me. I just reported it
to make sure you were aware of the inconsistency. I'm changing this bug's
status to Verified.
Meanwhile I'm still a bit curious as
--- Comment #3 from gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-30 19:15 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
On the mainline (20030526), I only get one warning:
pr5310.cc: In function `void bar()':
pr5310.cc:9: warning: passing NULL used for non-pointer argument 1 of `void
foo(int)'
Here
--- Comment #11 from sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu
2005-11-30 19:24 ---
Subject: Re: sqrt, csqrt may give a wrong result if real part of compex
argument is zero
On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 10:38:13AM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
Your patch is incorrect. See page 472 of
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-30 19:26 ---
Subject: Bug 24705
Author: pault
Date: Wed Nov 30 19:26:23 2005
New Revision: 107732
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=107732
Log:
2005-11-30 Paul Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #8 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-30 19:26 ---
Subject: Bug 24223
Author: pault
Date: Wed Nov 30 19:26:23 2005
New Revision: 107732
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=107732
Log:
2005-11-30 Paul Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #20 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-30 19:26 ---
Fixed on trunk, just waiting 24 hours before fixing in 4.0 and 4.1
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-30 19:27 ---
A regression hunt using the testcase from comment #3 identified:
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=revrev=85599
r85599 | nathan | 2004-08-05 09:03:42 + (Thu, 05 Aug 2004) | 17 lines
* tree.h
--- Comment #2 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-30 19:34 ---
This is fixed in trunk, by the patch to pr15809, and will be fixed in 4.0 and
4.1 on friday morning.
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #9 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-30 19:35 ---
Fixed in all 4.x
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #7 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-30 19:36 ---
fixed in all 4.x
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-30 19:41 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
Confirmed. Reminds a bit of PR 15809.
Oh woe is me! Unfortunately it is not the same.
OK, I am onto it.
Paul T
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24789
--- Comment #5 from gdr at integrable-solutions dot net 2005-11-30 20:19
---
Subject: Re: typedef in class scope not reported by error message
brad dot king at kitware dot com [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Okay, if you don't consider it a bug that is fine with me. I just reported
it
--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-30 20:34 ---
Confirmed, I completely forgot about these. Most of them were false positives,
if I remember correctly.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from oliverst at online dot de 2005-11-30 20:38 ---
I forgot to meintion, that this happens with C and C++, so I guess it's a
middle-end bug!?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25181
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-30 20:55 ---
Subject: Bug 22501
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Nov 30 20:55:41 2005
New Revision: 107737
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=107737
Log:
2005-11-30 Richard Guenther [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #9 from nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-30 20:56 ---
Add dg-skips for cris
--
nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #33 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-30 20:58 ---
Subject: Bug 21123
Author: jason
Date: Wed Nov 30 20:58:27 2005
New Revision: 107738
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=107738
Log:
PR c++/21123
* cp-gimplify.c (cp_genericize_r):
--- Comment #7 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-30 21:07 ---
Subject: Bug 21655
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Nov 30 21:07:10 2005
New Revision: 107739
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=107739
Log:
2005-11-30 Richard Guenther [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #9 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-30 21:08 ---
For my self (when backporting the fix):
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=107731
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24930
1 - 100 of 155 matches
Mail list logo
