https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105739
--- Comment #10 from Jan Hubicka ---
I am testing
diff --git a/gcc/ipa-prop.cc b/gcc/ipa-prop.cc
index afd9222b5a2..c037668e7d8 100644
--- a/gcc/ipa-prop.cc
+++ b/gcc/ipa-prop.cc
@@ -1112,6 +1112,10 @@ ipa_load_from_parm_agg (struct
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105915
--- Comment #3 from Benda Xu ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #2)
>
> Only when compiling with clang, presumably.
Yes, that's true. To be specific, we meet it in the AMD ROCm on Gentoo, where
the HIP compiler is based on llvm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=74765
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Some comments on the topic are in PR104702
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=74765
--- Comment #12 from Eric Botcazou ---
> Some comments on the topic are in PR104702
Indeed, thanks for the pointer. I'll probably submit my fixlet though because
the current behavior of gimple_set_location is clearly broken.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105739
--- Comment #9 from Jan Hubicka ---
Indeed volatile checks seems to be missing across ipa-prop code. Here is
smaller testcase:
__attribute__((noinline))
static int
test2(int a)
{
if (__builtin_constant_p (a))
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105913
--- Comment #1 from Rainer Orth ---
Also known as gccrs Issue #1229.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105915
--- Comment #1 from Benda Xu ---
Hi Jonathan, I am involving you in the Cc thinking that you will have a better
idea on this issue. Thanks!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105915
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Benda Xu from comment #0)
> With a MWE of
>
> ```c++
> #include
>
> int main(){}
> ```
> would produce
> ```
> /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/11.3.1/include/g++-v11/experimental/bits/
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105913
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|13.0|rust/master
See Also|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105915
Bug ID: 105915
Summary: commit 42eff613 should be backported to gcc-11 for
bits/fs_path.h consistency
Product: gcc
Version: 11.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105917
Bug ID: 105917
Summary: Missed passthru jump function
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ipa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105908
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105913
Bug ID: 105913
Summary: gccrs doesn't compile on 32-bit targets
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: rust
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105916
Bug ID: 105916
Summary: gfortran -fdiagnostics-format=json yields incorrect
output
Product: gcc
Version: 12.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105915
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Benda Xu from comment #0)
> 2. https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/25313
N.B. I'm fixing it like this instead of backporting 42eff613d0, so that pull
request might want to use the same
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105911
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 53114
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53114=edit
gcc13-pr105911.patch
Untested fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105914
Bug ID: 105914
Summary: gccrs setting warn_unused_variable breaks thousands of
non-Rust tests
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105915
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-06-10
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105906
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105914
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|13.0|rust/master
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105915
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:60c84707034f025de3c8821cc5d6f27ff59143b0
commit r11-10058-g60c84707034f025de3c8821cc5d6f27ff59143b0
Author: Jonathan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105915
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101926
Bug 101926 depends on bug 95126, which changed state.
Bug 95126 Summary: [10/11/12/13 Regression] Missed opportunity to turn static
variables into immediates
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95126
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95126
Roger Sayle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|10.4|13.0
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7061
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Roger Sayle :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1753a7120109c1d3b682f9487d6cca64fb2f0929
commit r13-1038-g1753a7120109c1d3b682f9487d6cca64fb2f0929
Author: Roger Sayle
Date: Fri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105101
--- Comment #17 from Michael_S ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #15)
> From what I can see, it is mostly integral implementation and we already
> have one such in GCC, so the question is if we just shouldn't use it (most
> of the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105915
--- Comment #5 from Benda Xu ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #4)
> (In reply to Benda Xu from comment #0)
> > 2. https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/25313
>
> N.B. I'm fixing it like this instead of backporting 42eff613d0, so
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105919
Bug ID: 105919
Summary: Internal compiler error when using -fanalyzer on
php-src
Product: gcc
Version: 11.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105880
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105915
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105915
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f2385d1fe9f9ee0b5940ba27b41b79c9db051104
commit r10-10824-gf2385d1fe9f9ee0b5940ba27b41b79c9db051104
Author: Jonathan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105920
Bug ID: 105920
Summary: __builtin_cpu_supports ("f16c") should check AVX
Product: gcc
Version: 11.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105915
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[11 Regression] commit |[10 Regression] commit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105907
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b370ed0bf93ecf0ff51d29e7fc132c433b2aa1be
commit r13-1037-gb370ed0bf93ecf0ff51d29e7fc132c433b2aa1be
Author: Jonathan Wakely
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92978
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:671970a5621e18e7079b4ca113e56434c858db66
commit r13-1040-g671970a5621e18e7079b4ca113e56434c858db66
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105844
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:671970a5621e18e7079b4ca113e56434c858db66
commit r13-1040-g671970a5621e18e7079b4ca113e56434c858db66
Author: Jonathan Wakely
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105917
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Missed passthru jump|[10/11/12/13 regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105918
Bug ID: 105918
Summary: Spurious Warray-bounds in std::to_chars
Product: gcc
Version: 12.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105880
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1e65f2ed99024f23c56f7b6a961898bcaa882a92
commit r13-1039-g1e65f2ed99024f23c56f7b6a961898bcaa882a92
Author: Jonathan Wakely
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105690
--- Comment #3 from Franz Sirl ---
I managed to minimize the testcase a bit more:
unsigned int gvar1;
void fun1(int);
void fun2(unsigned int, char *);
int fun2_maxlen;
typedef struct {
int exist;
int mode;
} table_t;
table_t gtable[20];
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105101
--- Comment #16 from Michael_S ---
(In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #14)
> @Michael: Now that gcc 12 is out of the door, I would suggest we try to get
> your code into the gcc tree for gcc 13.
>
> It should follow the gcc style
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103902
Lewis Hyatt changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||maik.urbannek at cattatech dot
de
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103902
--- Comment #3 from Lewis Hyatt ---
I can look into that.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104642
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill ---
The suggested -funreachable-traps seems to have a lot of overlap with
-fsanitize-undefined-trap-on-error; I wonder about combining them, and having
it by itself imply -fsanitize=unreachable.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105921
--- Comment #1 from Yclept Nemo ---
AFAICT, the attachment includes everything needed in a bug report. Inlining the
code here for convenience:
#include
template
auto a = (struct A {
template
using Temp = T1;
template
auto
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105732
--- Comment #18 from Loren Osborn ---
It appears this fix has already been merged into trunk. Is there a reason this
isn't marked "Resolved"? Is that usually not updated until the next release?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105101
--- Comment #18 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
libquadmath is essentially legacy code. People working directly in C
should be using the C23 _Float128 interfaces and *f128 functions, as in
current glibc, rather than libquadmath
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95038
--- Comment #10 from Bill Long ---
The original issue seems fixed in 12.1. However, the wording of the ERROR
message (objecting that something is not a DATA entity when it really is) could
still be improved. Can we either convert this bug to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65328
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:343d83c7a89d0c7a78139e685395228115a28f6e
commit r13-1047-g343d83c7a89d0c7a78139e685395228115a28f6e
Author: Patrick Palka
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105732
--- Comment #19 from Jakub Jelinek ---
It hasn't been fixed on 11 and 10 branches yet, that is why it is kept open but
12/13 has been removed from the Summary.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105920
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-06-10
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105921
Bug ID: 105921
Summary: internal compiler error: in cp_parser_template_id, at
cp/parser.cc:18362
Product: gcc
Version: 12.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104640
Lewis Hyatt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101836
--- Comment #15 from qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org ---
the following patch will fix the issue with this testing case:
[opc@qinzhao-ol8u3-x86 gcc]$ git diff
diff --git a/gcc/tree-object-size.cc b/gcc/tree-object-size.cc
index
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105923
Bug ID: 105923
Summary: unsupported return type ‘complex double’ for simd
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105923
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|target |c
Severity|normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101836
--- Comment #16 from qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org ---
additional work are needed in order to make this task complete:
1. add one more new gcc option:
-fstrict-flex-arrays
when it's on, only treat the following cases as flexing array:
trailing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105922
Bug ID: 105922
Summary: AArch64 SVE instruction generated with all SIMD lane
active and zero-divide exception flag raised
Product: gcc
Version: 12.1.1
Status:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105756
--- Comment #4 from Sam James ---
Thanks! Could you consider backporting to 12.x soonish, if possible? I ask
because with this, the 12.x branch is then in a pretty good state for more
widespread testing.
(Unfortunately, I got a bit unlucky and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65328
--- Comment #11 from juchem at gmail dot com ---
great job
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99858
James Y Knight changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||foom at fuhm dot net
--- Comment #3
61 matches
Mail list logo
