[Bug target/29206] [4.6/4.7/4.8 regression] gcj-dbtool segfaults

2012-11-09 Thread dave.anglin at bell dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29206 --- Comment #22 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-11-10 01:28:52 UTC --- If possible, I think SJLJ support should go. I can't remember the exact status of SJLJ for HP-UX 10 but a comment in hpux-unwind.h suggests that I tested dwarf2

[Bug target/55332] [4.8 Regression] libsanitizer breaks build on hpux

2012-11-15 Thread dave.anglin at bell dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55332 --- Comment #2 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-11-15 13:47:24 UTC --- On 15-Nov-12, at 5:38 AM, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: It doesn't break bootstrap any longer, configure.tgt should enable it solely on i?86/x86_64-linux

[Bug target/55316] gcc/libsanitizer/asan/asan_linux.cc:70:3: error: #error Unsupported arch

2012-11-18 Thread dave.anglin at bell dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55316 --- Comment #2 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-11-18 17:18:20 UTC --- On 17-Nov-12, at 3:01 AM, hp at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: This should be fixed now by the general disabling of libsanitizer. In theory, it should be fairly easy

[Bug tree-optimization/54471] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/sms-8.c execution test

2012-11-20 Thread dave.anglin at bell dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54471 --- Comment #2 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-11-21 02:26:56 UTC --- On 20-Nov-12, at 7:06 AM, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: Can't reproduce that with a cross. The tree optimizers definitely don't optimize it into abort

[Bug middle-end/52650] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/pr51106-2.c * (internal compiler error)

2012-11-26 Thread dave.anglin at bell dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52650 --- Comment #15 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-11-26 14:58:12 UTC --- On 11/26/2012 4:47 AM, gjl at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: A milestone of 3.0.x?? It seems I did this while updating the Last reconfirmed date. As I understand

[Bug middle-end/52650] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/pr51106-2.c * (internal compiler error)

2012-11-26 Thread dave.anglin at bell dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52650 --- Comment #17 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-11-26 16:43:18 UTC --- On 11/26/2012 11:36 AM, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: P1 for an error-recovery bug sounds way too high, those should be P4-ish. I just restored the previous

[Bug libstdc++/55503] FAIL: 30_threads/condition_variable/members/53841.cc (test for excess errors)

2012-11-27 Thread dave.anglin at bell dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55503 --- Comment #2 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-11-28 01:13:14 UTC --- On 27-Nov-12, at 7:46 PM, redi at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: // { dg-options -std=gnu++11 { target hppa*-*-* } } Trying: Index: testsuite/30_threads

[Bug middle-end/55507] [4.8 Regression] ICE in vt_expand_var_loc_chain, at var-tracking.c:8020

2012-11-28 Thread dave.anglin at bell dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55507 --- Comment #3 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-11-28 18:50:26 UTC --- On 11/28/2012 1:25 PM, rth at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: Since this is _powtf2, you probably need --enable-long-double-128 in the configure line when cross-compiling

[Bug bootstrap/54926] [4.8 Regression] Bootstrap comparison failure for various files in libbacktrace

2012-12-03 Thread dave.anglin at bell dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54926 --- Comment #5 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-12-03 16:06:22 UTC --- I have a patch to ignore the comparison failure and a couple changes to libbacktrace for hpux. The btest program now runs successfully on hpux. However

[Bug bootstrap/54926] [4.8 Regression] Bootstrap comparison failure for various files in libbacktrace

2012-12-03 Thread dave.anglin at bell dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54926 --- Comment #6 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-12-03 22:33:39 UTC --- On 12/3/2012 11:06 AM, John David Anglin wrote: However, backtrace still doesn't work from within compiler. Problem is with fileline_initialize

[Bug bootstrap/54926] [4.8 Regression] Bootstrap comparison failure for various files in libbacktrace

2012-12-07 Thread dave.anglin at bell dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54926 --- Comment #9 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-12-07 13:33:16 UTC --- On 6-Dec-12, at 1:39 PM, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54926 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed

[Bug fortran/55633] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/g77/f90-intrinsic-bit.f -Os execution test

2012-12-10 Thread dave.anglin at bell dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55633 --- Comment #3 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-12-10 13:31:31 UTC --- On 10-Dec-12, at 3:57 AM, burnus at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: Can you pin-point which version causes the regression? At this point, I onnly know the test didn't

[Bug fortran/55633] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/g77/f90-intrinsic-bit.f -Os execution test

2012-12-10 Thread dave.anglin at bell dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55633 --- Comment #5 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-12-11 01:16:16 UTC --- On 10-Dec-12, at 11:29 AM, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55633 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc

[Bug middle-end/54120] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/random_2.f90 execution

2012-12-19 Thread dave.anglin at bell dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54120 --- Comment #4 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-12-19 12:58:32 UTC --- On 19-Dec-12, at 5:54 AM, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: Or is it libgfortran itself that when built with r189365 works and when r189366 doesn't? If so

[Bug driver/55884] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: libgomp.fortran/omp_parse3.f90 -O0 (test for excess errors)

2013-01-07 Thread dave.anglin at bell dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55884 --- Comment #4 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2013-01-07 16:09:14 UTC --- On 1/7/2013 7:50 AM, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: Guess related to -fintrinsic-module-path. Have being doing a regression search and it seems to be pointing

[Bug middle-end/54120] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/random_2.f90 execution

2013-01-07 Thread dave.anglin at bell dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54120 --- Comment #13 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2013-01-07 18:09:29 UTC --- On 1/7/2013 12:27 PM, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: I'd say after with r194800 or later you shouldn't get this failure. Yes, the failure is gone. So, PR can

[Bug driver/55884] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: libgomp.fortran/omp_parse3.f90 -O0 (test for excess errors)

2013-01-07 Thread dave.anglin at bell dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55884 --- Comment #5 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2013-01-08 03:34:15 UTC --- With the patch, the tests are unresolved with r194997: UNSUPPORTED: libgomp.fortran/omp_parse3.f90 -O0 UNSUPPORTED: libgomp.fortran/omp_parse3.f90 -O1

[Bug driver/55884] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: libgomp.fortran/omp_parse3.f90 -O0 (test for excess errors)

2013-01-08 Thread dave.anglin at bell dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55884 --- Comment #7 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2013-01-08 15:29:49 UTC --- On 1/8/2013 3:13 AM, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: On HP-UX or Linux? The test is guarded with ! { dg-require-effective-target tls_runtime } does the OS have

[Bug driver/55884] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: libgomp.fortran/omp_parse3.f90 -O0 (test for excess errors)

2013-01-08 Thread dave.anglin at bell dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55884 --- Comment #8 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2013-01-09 04:16:22 UTC --- On 8-Jan-13, at 10:29 AM, dave.anglin at bell dot net wrote: Can you attach libgomp.log ? Have to do another build... This time I ran the full libgomp

[Bug driver/55884] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: libgomp.fortran/omp_parse3.f90 -O0 (test for excess errors)

2013-01-08 Thread dave.anglin at bell dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55884 --- Comment #9 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2013-01-09 04:46:36 UTC --- On 8-Jan-13, at 11:15 PM, John David Anglin wrote: I'm thinking the -fintrinsic-modules-path option needs and '=' and that the tls_runtime check fails when I

[Bug driver/55884] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: libgomp.fortran/omp_parse3.f90 -O0 (test for excess errors)

2013-01-13 Thread dave.anglin at bell dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55884 --- Comment #10 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2013-01-13 21:27:19 UTC --- Can you try perhaps: --- libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.fortran/fortran.exp2012-12-20 11:38:48.663282599 +0100 +++ libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.fortran

[Bug middle-end/56000] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: libffi.call/cls_uchar_va.c -O0 -W -Wall output pattern test

2013-01-16 Thread dave.anglin at bell dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56000 --- Comment #4 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2013-01-16 16:24:47 UTC --- On 1/16/2013 3:08 AM, sch...@linux-m68k.org wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56000 --- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org

[Bug pch/54117] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: ./decl-3.h -O0 -g (internal compiler error)

2013-01-27 Thread dave.anglin at bell dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54117 --- Comment #14 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2013-01-27 23:48:04 UTC --- I believe it would be possible to implement dwarf on 32-bit hppa-hpux... -- John David Anglindave.ang...@bell.net

[Bug testsuite/56194] FAIL: g++.dg/init/const9.C -std=c++98 scan-assembler-not rodata

2013-02-04 Thread dave.anglin at bell dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56194 --- Comment #3 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2013-02-04 16:03:08 UTC --- One thought I had is to add the -fpic option. This should push the function descriptor into .data.

[Bug regression/58603] [4.9 Regression] hash-table.h:962: error: anachronistic old-style base class initia

2013-10-04 Thread dave.anglin at bell dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58603 --- Comment #5 from dave.anglin at bell dot net --- KDE added a trailing underscore to work around this issue.

[Bug sanitizer/59009] libsanitizer merge from upstream r191666 breaks bootstrap on powerpc64-linux

2013-11-13 Thread dave.anglin at bell dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59009 --- Comment #15 from dave.anglin at bell dot net --- As of revision 204772, there are still problems on hppa-linux. libtool: compile: /home/dave/gnu/gcc/objdir/./gcc/xgcc -shared-libgcc -B/home/dave/gnu/gcc/objdir/./gcc -nostdinc++ -L/home

[Bug sanitizer/59009] libsanitizer merge from upstream r191666 breaks bootstrap on powerpc64-linux

2013-11-14 Thread dave.anglin at bell dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59009 --- Comment #18 from dave.anglin at bell dot net --- On 11/14/2013 12:26 PM, bergner at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: Dave, can you try this patch to see if it cleans up the errors you're seeing? I will try it later today when I get home. Dave

[Bug sanitizer/59009] libsanitizer merge from upstream r191666 breaks bootstrap on powerpc64-linux

2013-11-14 Thread dave.anglin at bell dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59009 --- Comment #21 from dave.anglin at bell dot net --- On 14-Nov-13, at 12:26 PM, bergner at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: Dave, can you try this patch to see if it cleans up the errors you're seeing? Patch cleans up the errors. Dave -- John David

[Bug libfortran/35667] HP-UX 10 has broken strtod

2013-12-09 Thread dave.anglin at bell dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35667 --- Comment #9 from dave.anglin at bell dot net --- On 12/9/2013 5:01 AM, fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: Was that fixed with John's commit? I think so. I believe this was left open because the patch wasn't back ported. I could confirm

[Bug sanitizer/59009] libsanitizer merge from upstream r191666 breaks bootstrap on powerpc64-linux

2013-12-10 Thread dave.anglin at bell dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59009 --- Comment #31 from dave.anglin at bell dot net --- On 12/10/2013 11:49 AM, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: For that a patch has been posted, just not reviewed: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-12/msg00963.html Excellent. As for hppa

[Bug libfortran/58015] FAIL: gfortran.dg/round_4.f90: Unsatisfied symbol nextafterl

2013-12-15 Thread dave.anglin at bell dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58015 --- Comment #7 from dave.anglin at bell dot net --- On 13-Dec-13, at 5:08 PM, ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58015 --- Comment #6 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org --- Why

[Bug sanitizer/59009] libsanitizer merge from upstream r191666 breaks bootstrap on powerpc64-linux

2013-12-19 Thread dave.anglin at bell dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59009 --- Comment #39 from dave.anglin at bell dot net --- On 12/19/2013 5:36 PM, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote: Is there anything else left in this bug? I don't think so for darwin, but AFAICT it may remain issues for hppa-linux (comment 22

[Bug sanitizer/59009] libsanitizer merge from upstream r191666 breaks bootstrap on powerpc64-linux

2013-12-20 Thread dave.anglin at bell dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59009 --- Comment #40 from dave.anglin at bell dot net --- On 12/19/2013 5:53 PM, John David Anglin wrote: Rechecking status on the arm box. Problem is still there: ../../../../gcc/libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_platform_limits_linux.cc:58:30

[Bug c++/41090] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] Using static label reference in c++ class constructor produces wrong code

2013-12-26 Thread dave.anglin at bell dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41090 --- Comment #22 from dave.anglin at bell dot net --- On 26-Dec-13, at 7:28 AM, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41090 --- Comment #21 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr

[Bug middle-end/56791] [4.8/4.9 Regression] Segmentation fault in stage2 gengenrtl -- Incorrect instruction sequence generated by reload

2014-01-03 Thread dave.anglin at bell dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56791 --- Comment #11 from dave.anglin at bell dot net --- On 3-Jan-14, at 7:46 AM, bernds at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: I guess this means you've tested it and it works? Yes, I have tested it and it works fine. Dave -- John David Anglindave.ang

[Bug middle-end/53420] [4.8 Regression] ICE in iterative_hash_expr, at tree.c:7039

2012-08-18 Thread dave.anglin at bell dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53420 --- Comment #4 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-08-18 23:50:21 UTC --- On 15-Aug-12, at 4:16 AM, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: Can you still reproduce it? My HP-UX 11.00 box had a disk failure a couple of weeks ago, so I can't reproduce

[Bug tree-optimization/54317] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: c45532m c45532n c45532o c45532p

2012-08-20 Thread dave.anglin at bell dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54317 --- Comment #2 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-08-20 16:23:57 UTC --- On 8/20/2012 11:46 AM, glisse at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54317 --- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org 2012

[Bug debug/54460] FAIL: g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/nested-3.C

2012-09-02 Thread dave.anglin at bell dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54460 --- Comment #2 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-09-02 23:41:30 UTC --- On 2-Sep-12, at 2:12 PM, sch...@linux-m68k.org wrote: This uses yet another comment character. Thanks. I'll see if adding it to the regexp helps. -- John David

[Bug tree-optimization/39251] FAIL: g++.dg/tree-ssa/new1.C scan-tree-dump-not forwprop1 = .* \+ -

2012-09-23 Thread dave.anglin at bell dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39251 --- Comment #12 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-09-23 22:40:10 UTC --- Test hasn't been removed. I also don't see the fail anymore. -- John David Anglindave.ang...@bell.net

[Bug libstdc++/54757] FAIL: ext/random/beta_distribution/cons/default.cc (test for excess errors)

2012-09-29 Thread dave.anglin at bell dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54757 --- Comment #2 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-09-30 00:50:17 UTC --- On 29-Sep-12, at 7:34 PM, paolo.carlini at oracle dot com wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54757 --- Comment #1 from Paolo Carlini

[Bug libstdc++/54757] FAIL: ext/random/beta_distribution/cons/default.cc (test for excess errors)

2012-09-30 Thread dave.anglin at bell dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54757 --- Comment #12 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-09-30 16:06:52 UTC --- On 30-Sep-12, at 10:19 AM, glisse at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: Dominique, it would be more useful if you could show your libstdc++ config.log

[Bug libstdc++/54757] FAIL: ext/random/beta_distribution/cons/default.cc (test for excess errors)

2012-09-30 Thread dave.anglin at bell dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54757 --- Comment #14 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-09-30 17:15:24 UTC --- On 30-Sep-12, at 12:16 PM, paolo.carlini at oracle dot com wrote: Hopeless ;) Actually, the situation might not be completely hopeless as the libquadmath

[Bug libstdc++/54757] FAIL: ext/random/beta_distribution/cons/default.cc (test for excess errors)

2012-09-30 Thread dave.anglin at bell dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54757 --- Comment #16 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-09-30 18:04:26 UTC --- I will commit the attached change if there are no objections. -- John David Anglindave.ang...@bell.net

[Bug rtl-optimization/54739] [4.8 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/lower-subreg-1.c scan-rtl-dump subreg1 Splitting reg

2012-10-01 Thread dave.anglin at bell dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54739 --- Comment #4 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-10-01 23:51:23 UTC --- Thanks Ulrich for your analysis. On parisc, I believe it would be best to remove iordi3, anddi3, etc, for 32-bit targets if they are successfully split

[Bug target/26472] Default path for libgcc_s.sl is build directory

2012-10-03 Thread dave.anglin at bell dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26472 --- Comment #17 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-10-03 22:39:46 UTC --- On 3-Oct-12, at 6:18 PM, anilkris at hotmail dot com wrote: I am getting the following error when I run a concurrent programs in Oracle R12.1.3, which

[Bug middle-end/54850] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20041113-1.c execution, -Os

2012-10-08 Thread dave.anglin at bell dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54850 --- Comment #3 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-10-08 14:45:48 UTC --- On 8-Oct-12, at 10:18 AM, bernds at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54850 --- Comment #2 from Bernd Schmidt bernds at gcc

[Bug middle-end/54850] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20041113-1.c execution, -Os

2012-10-08 Thread dave.anglin at bell dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54850 --- Comment #4 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-10-08 14:45:51 UTC --- Created attachment 28389 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28389 20041113-1.c.224r.sched2.txt

[Bug bootstrap/54926] [4.8 Regression] Bootstrap comparison failure for various files in libbacktrace

2012-10-15 Thread dave.anglin at bell dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54926 --- Comment #2 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-10-15 11:55:29 UTC --- On 15-Oct-12, at 2:44 AM, ubizjak at gmail dot com wrote: The patch just introduces -funwind-tables to compile flags, so I really don't see how this can

[Bug rtl-optimization/54850] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20041113-1.c execution, -Os

2012-10-19 Thread dave.anglin at bell dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54850 --- Comment #10 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-10-19 18:33:27 UTC --- I'm not seeing the fail with the candidate patch.

[Bug middle-end/55195] [4.8 Regression] shorten_branches generates incorrect forward branch distances

2012-11-03 Thread dave.anglin at bell dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55195 --- Comment #2 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-11-04 02:52:31 UTC --- On 3-Nov-12, at 4:45 PM, amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55195 --- Comment #1 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke

[Bug target/55195] [4.8 Regression] shorten_branches generates incorrect forward branch distances

2012-11-04 Thread dave.anglin at bell dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55195 --- Comment #6 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-11-04 22:23:04 UTC --- On 4-Nov-12, at 12:31 PM, amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: The instruction call_symref_pic_post_reload has the following length attribute setting: (set

[Bug target/55195] [4.8 Regression] shorten_branches generates incorrect forward branch distances

2012-11-04 Thread dave.anglin at bell dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55195 --- Comment #7 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-11-04 23:50:44 UTC --- On 4-Nov-12, at 12:31 PM, amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: Such a length attribute is not considered variable by shorten_branches. You need to include

[Bug middle-end/55198] [4.8 Regression] libquadmath/math/fmaq.c:233:7: internal compiler error

2012-11-04 Thread dave.anglin at bell dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55198 --- Comment #2 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-11-05 00:20:16 UTC --- On 3-Nov-12, at 10:38 PM, pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: Exposed as this is a change in the library and the compiler is crashing with a valid input

[Bug middle-end/55195] [4.8 Regression] shorten_branches generates incorrect forward branch distances

2012-11-06 Thread dave.anglin at bell dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55195 --- Comment #10 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-11-06 12:26:06 UTC --- On 5-Nov-12, at 11:20 AM, amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: I take back that statement about this being straightforward. We need valid minimum and maximum

[Bug middle-end/55195] [4.8 Regression] shorten_branches generates incorrect forward branch distances

2012-11-06 Thread dave.anglin at bell dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55195 --- Comment #13 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-11-07 00:39:01 UTC --- On 6-Nov-12, at 10:40 AM, amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: I see now that you get INT_MAX substituted as the maximum length if the value is unknown

[Bug tree-optimization/54713] [4.8 Regression] error: non-trivial conversion at assignment in gcc.c-torture/compile/pr53410-2.c

2012-11-07 Thread dave.anglin at bell dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54713 --- Comment #11 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-11-07 17:17:47 UTC --- On 11/7/2012 8:29 AM, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: Which test started failing? pr53410 was failing here http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2012-10/msg02016

[Bug middle-end/56242] [4.8 Regression] libjava/classpath/gnu/javax/swing/text/html/parser/support/textPreProcessor.java:175:0: ICE: Segmentation fault

2013-02-13 Thread dave.anglin at bell dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56242 --- Comment #4 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2013-02-13 14:09:26 UTC --- On 2013-02-12 6:03 PM, vries at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: I've tried to reproduce this bug by building a cross compiler using the hppa2.0w-unknown-linux-gnu target

[Bug middle-end/56242] [4.8 Regression] libjava/classpath/gnu/javax/swing/text/html/parser/support/textPreProcessor.java:175:0: ICE: Segmentation fault

2013-02-14 Thread dave.anglin at bell dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56242 --- Comment #7 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2013-02-14 13:56:13 UTC --- Patch fixes ICE on hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11. Testsuite running...

[Bug c++/56346] FAIL: g++.dg/tls/thread_local3.C -std=gnu++11 (test for excess errors)

2013-02-15 Thread dave.anglin at bell dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56346 --- Comment #2 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2013-02-15 15:55:07 UTC --- On 2013-02-15 9:44 AM, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: Target doesn't use crtstuff.c. Why? That looks like the bug to me. It only supports ELF and COFF file

[Bug debug/56307] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr55579.c scan-tree-dump esra Created a debug-only replacement for s

2013-03-12 Thread dave.anglin at bell dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56307 --- Comment #11 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2013-03-12 18:27:01 UTC --- On 3/12/2013 1:59 PM, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: I think -fvar-tracking-assignments is disabled by default if selective scheduler is enabled, but I doubt

[Bug debug/56307] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr55579.c scan-tree-dump esra Created a debug-only replacement for s

2013-03-12 Thread dave.anglin at bell dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56307 --- Comment #12 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2013-03-13 01:50:05 UTC --- On 12-Mar-13, at 1:48 PM, jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: I'm just guessing, but is it possible that MAY_HAVE_DEBUG_STMTS is 0 even with -g on hppa-hpux

[Bug c++/56346] FAIL: g++.dg/tls/thread_local3.C -std=gnu++11 (test for excess errors)

2013-03-13 Thread dave.anglin at bell dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56346 --- Comment #7 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2013-03-13 15:23:11 UTC --- On 3/13/2013 10:42 AM, jason at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: That's odd, the change seems unlikely to have changed the flow analysis. But anyway, this patch always

[Bug libstdc++/56841] [4.9 Regression] ld: Unsatisfied symbol __atomic_exchange_8 in file /test/gnu/gcc/objdir/prev-hppa64-hp-hpux11.11/libstdc++-v3/src/.libs/libstdc++.a[eh_terminate.o]

2013-04-04 Thread dave.anglin at bell dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56841 --- Comment #2 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2013-04-04 15:57:16 UTC --- On 4-Apr-13, at 11:41 AM, redi at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: Drat, I completely forgot these still aren't available everywhere, sorry. There's some kind

[Bug libstdc++/56841] [4.9 Regression] ld: Unsatisfied symbol __atomic_exchange_8 in file /test/gnu/gcc/objdir/prev-hppa64-hp-hpux11.11/libstdc++-v3/src/.libs/libstdc++.a[eh_terminate.o]

2013-04-06 Thread dave.anglin at bell dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56841 --- Comment #5 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2013-04-06 15:18:44 UTC --- --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-05 10:14:42 UTC --- Dave, does it work after rev 197512 ? Two thumbs up! Dave

[Bug tree-optimization/57027] [4.9 Regression] ICE in gimple_assign_rhs_code, at gimple.h:2022

2013-05-03 Thread dave.anglin at bell dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57027 --- Comment #6 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2013-05-03 11:27:33 UTC --- On 3-May-13, at 6:11 AM, amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: The preprocessed testcase from the first attachment fails needs a different sanity check

[Bug tree-optimization/57027] [4.9 Regression] ICE in gimple_assign_rhs_code, at gimple.h:2022

2013-05-04 Thread dave.anglin at bell dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57027 --- Comment #7 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2013-05-04 23:03:36 UTC --- On 3-May-13, at 6:11 AM, amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: Created attachment 30016 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30016 amended patch

[Bug middle-end/52999] [4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE, segmentation fault in c_tree_printer

2012-04-24 Thread dave.anglin at bell dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52999 --- Comment #10 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-04-24 18:18:07 UTC --- On 4/24/2012 5:35 AM, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: What happens on this testcase is default_elf_select_rtx_section and the PA specific part of that is just that PA

[Bug other/53143] [4.8 Regression] ' in c_tree_printer, at c-objc-common.c:136

2012-04-27 Thread dave.anglin at bell dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53143 --- Comment #3 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-04-27 19:24:24 UTC --- On 4/27/2012 3:18 PM, manu at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: Can you try with the latest revision? I think I fixed this already. Ok, I'll give it a try.

[Bug c++/53261] [4.8 Regression] ICE in tree_strip_nop_conversions

2012-05-08 Thread dave.anglin at bell dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53261 --- Comment #4 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-05-08 15:26:51 UTC --- On 5/7/2012 12:25 PM, manu at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: Could you test on hppa? The patch fixes the compilation error. Actually, I am not sure whether if (!tem

[Bug libstdc++/53270] Error when bootstrapping gcc on hppa2.0-unknown-linux-gcc

2012-05-08 Thread dave.anglin at bell dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53270 --- Comment #11 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-05-08 19:23:48 UTC --- On 5/8/2012 3:03 PM, steven at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: Is that old a glibc still supported? The following still works except for libitm: dave@selway:/lib /lib/libc.so.6

[Bug libstdc++/53270] Error when bootstrapping gcc on hppa2.0-unknown-linux-gcc

2012-05-09 Thread dave.anglin at bell dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53270 --- Comment #15 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-05-09 18:45:15 UTC --- On 5/9/2012 1:12 PM, redi at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: We might want to put something in config/os/gnu-linux/os_defines.h so that the macro is defined when using

[Bug libstdc++/53270] Error when bootstrapping gcc on hppa2.0-unknown-linux-gcc

2012-05-09 Thread dave.anglin at bell dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53270 --- Comment #18 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-05-10 00:55:14 UTC --- On 9-May-12, at 8:41 PM, jimis at gmx dot net wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53270 --- Comment #16 from jimis jimis at gmx dot net 2012-05-10

[Bug middle-end/53381] [4.8 Regression] Bootstrap fails building stage1 libgcc

2012-05-16 Thread dave.anglin at bell dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53381 --- Comment #3 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-05-16 23:01:00 UTC --- On 16-May-12, at 6:30 PM, bernds at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53381 --- Comment #2 from Bernd Schmidt bernds at gcc dot

[Bug middle-end/53381] [4.8 Regression] Bootstrap fails building stage1 libgcc

2012-05-16 Thread dave.anglin at bell dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53381 --- Comment #5 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-05-17 00:18:46 UTC --- On 16-May-12, at 7:14 PM, bernds at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: Ok, seriously weird call insns. If you can fix that in the port, it'll benefit from the optimization

[Bug middle-end/53381] [4.8 Regression] Bootstrap fails building stage1 libgcc

2012-05-16 Thread dave.anglin at bell dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53381 --- Comment #6 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-05-17 01:52:03 UTC --- On 16-May-12, at 7:14 PM, bernds at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: Ok, seriously weird call insns. If you can fix that in the port, it'll benefit from the optimization

[Bug middle-end/53381] [4.8 Regression] Bootstrap fails building stage1 libgcc

2012-05-17 Thread dave.anglin at bell dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53381 --- Comment #9 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-05-17 14:39:41 UTC --- On 5/17/2012 2:48 AM, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: Note that e.g. dse.c (scan_insn) handles the AVX mem* just fine, but won't handle this PA pattern because (set (reg

[Bug libstdc++/53270] Error when bootstrapping gcc on hppa2.0-unknown-linux-gcc

2012-05-20 Thread dave.anglin at bell dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53270 --- Comment #29 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-05-20 14:18:39 UTC --- On 20-May-12, at 6:41 AM, jimis at gmx dot net wrote: init2.c:52: MPFR assertion failed: p = 2 p = ((mpfr_prec_t) ((mpfr_uprec_t) ~(mpfr_uprec_t)0)1)) built-in:0:0

[Bug rtl-optimization/53373] [4.8 regression] ICE on valid code with -march-native

2012-05-20 Thread dave.anglin at bell dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53373 --- Comment #8 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-05-20 18:21:37 UTC --- On 20-May-12, at 1:10 PM, vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch wrote: revision 187695 does not solve PR53393 I didn't say it did and I didn't merge the PRs. In particular

[Bug middle-end/53813] [4.7 Regression] ICE in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:2016

2012-06-29 Thread dave.anglin at bell dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53813 --- Comment #1 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-06-29 23:17:13 UTC --- Attached preprocessed source. -- John David Anglindave.ang...@bell.net

[Bug debug/53820] [4.8 Regression] ICE in vt_expand_var_loc_chain, at var-tracking.c:8029

2012-07-03 Thread dave.anglin at bell dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53820 --- Comment #4 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-07-03 12:46:16 UTC --- On 7/2/2012 11:20 AM, aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: This patchlet for var-tracking.c fixes the testcase. I'm now testing it on x86_64. John, would you be so kind

[Bug testsuite/54007] lto15.adb fails: gnat1: error: LTO support has not been enabled in this configuration

2012-07-18 Thread dave.anglin at bell dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54007 --- Comment #2 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-07-18 22:11:24 UTC --- On 18-Jul-12, at 4:37 AM, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: Supposedly also on trunk. Would need { dg-require-effective-target lto }. Can you check if that works

[Bug target/53974] [4.8 Regression] Nearly all tests fail with ADA.CALENDAR.TIME_ERROR : a-calend.adb:603

2012-07-18 Thread dave.anglin at bell dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53974 --- Comment #3 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-07-19 00:33:48 UTC --- On 18-Jul-12, at 6:15 AM, ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: I have seen the same error on SPARC. The fix is * config/sparc/sparc.md (adddi3_insn_sp32): Add

[Bug target/53974] [4.8 Regression] Nearly all tests fail with ADA.CALENDAR.TIME_ERROR : a-calend.adb:603

2012-07-20 Thread dave.anglin at bell dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53974 --- Comment #4 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-07-20 12:16:37 UTC --- On 18-Jul-12, at 6:15 AM, ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: I have seen the same error on SPARC. The fix is * config/sparc/sparc.md (adddi3_insn_sp32): Add

[Bug target/53974] [4.8 Regression] Nearly all tests fail with ADA.CALENDAR.TIME_ERROR : a-calend.adb:603

2012-07-20 Thread dave.anglin at bell dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53974 --- Comment #6 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-07-20 13:28:47 UTC --- On 7/20/2012 8:26 AM, ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: SPARC has essentially the same pattern (it's a splitter though) and there was a missing early clobber because

[Bug target/53974] [4.8 Regression] Nearly all tests fail with ADA.CALENDAR.TIME_ERROR : a-calend.adb:603

2012-07-20 Thread dave.anglin at bell dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53974 --- Comment #8 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-07-20 17:20:29 UTC --- On 7/20/2012 11:01 AM, ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: Sure, just like on SPARC, but DImode arguments can nevertheless be unaligned. I've never seen

[Bug target/53974] [4.8 Regression] Nearly all tests fail with ADA.CALENDAR.TIME_ERROR : a-calend.adb:603

2012-07-20 Thread dave.anglin at bell dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53974 --- Comment #10 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-07-20 18:48:25 UTC --- On 7/20/2012 1:42 PM, ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53974 --- Comment #9 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot

[Bug middle-end/53823] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/930921-1.c execution at -O0 and -O1

2012-07-31 Thread dave.anglin at bell dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53823 --- Comment #12 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-07-31 20:10:55 UTC --- Mine. Expected result for testcase is 112975202 (0x6bbdd62). Miscompiled result is 116077092194 (0x1b06bbdd62). -- John David Anglindave.ang...@bell.net

[Bug middle-end/53823] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/930921-1.c execution at -O0 and -O1

2012-07-31 Thread dave.anglin at bell dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53823 --- Comment #14 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-07-31 22:54:59 UTC --- On 31-Jul-12, at 5:29 PM, rth at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: How does this -O1 output compare with native? There seems to an off by one error in various shifts, etc

[Bug middle-end/53823] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/930921-1.c execution at -O0 and -O1

2012-07-31 Thread dave.anglin at bell dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53823 --- Comment #15 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-07-31 22:55:54 UTC --- Created attachment 27916 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27916 zz.s.txt

[Bug plugins/54148] FAIL: gcc.dg/plugin/selfassign.c compilation

2012-08-01 Thread dave.anglin at bell dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54148 --- Comment #2 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-08-01 13:10:36 UTC --- On 1-Aug-12, at 3:47 AM, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: I don't see any error in that? Test just fails with no message. -- John David Anglindave.ang...@bell.net

[Bug middle-end/53823] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/930921-1.c execution at -O0 and -O1

2012-08-01 Thread dave.anglin at bell dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53823 --- Comment #19 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-08-01 14:20:49 UTC --- On 31-Jul-12, at 10:25 PM, rth at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: The cross-compile *ought* not to affect costs, which means that we ought to be making the same algorithm

[Bug middle-end/53823] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/930921-1.c execution at -O0 and -O1

2012-08-01 Thread dave.anglin at bell dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53823 --- Comment #20 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-08-01 14:27:30 UTC --- On 1-Aug-12, at 10:20 AM, dave.anglin at bell dot net wrote: The difference in extracts and deposits may not be the problem. The - O2 code appears to have the same

[Bug c/57821] 'array is too large' error is missing when sizetype overflows

2013-07-25 Thread dave.anglin at bell dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57821 --- Comment #8 from dave.anglin at bell dot net --- On 25-Jul-13, at 12:51 AM, jasonwucj at gmail dot com wrote: John, does your case happen on 32-bit only as well? Yes. -- John David Anglindave.ang...@bell.net

[Bug c/57821] 'array is too large' error is missing when sizetype overflows

2013-07-25 Thread dave.anglin at bell dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57821 --- Comment #9 from dave.anglin at bell dot net --- On 25-Jul-13, at 6:56 AM, amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: hwint.h says that HOST_WIDE_INT should be 64 bit when targeting a machine with 64 bit size_t. You can insure that by setting

[Bug ipa/58329] [4.9 Regression] ld: Invalid symbol type for plabel (.libs/libstdc++.lax/libc++11convenience.a/system_error.o, std::error_category::default_error_condition(int) const [clone .localalia

2013-09-05 Thread dave.anglin at bell dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58329 --- Comment #2 from dave.anglin at bell dot net --- On 5-Sep-13, at 7:31 PM, hubicka at ucw dot cz wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58329 --- Comment #1 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at ucw dot cz --- Symbol has type data which

[Bug ipa/58329] [4.9 Regression] ld: Invalid symbol type for plabel (.libs/libstdc++.lax/libc++11convenience.a/system_error.o, std::error_category::default_error_condition(int) const [clone .localalia

2013-09-06 Thread dave.anglin at bell dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58329 --- Comment #5 from dave.anglin at bell dot net --- On 6-Sep-13, at 3:54 AM, hubicka at ucw dot cz wrote: I hoped that the targets either do not have runtime interposition in dynamic libraries or they do have working notion of alias

[Bug ipa/58329] [4.9 Regression] ld: Invalid symbol type for plabel (.libs/libstdc++.lax/libc++11convenience.a/system_error.o, std::error_category::default_error_condition(int) const [clone .localalia

2013-09-07 Thread dave.anglin at bell dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58329 --- Comment #9 from dave.anglin at bell dot net --- On 6-Sep-13, at 8:05 AM, hubicka at ucw dot cz wrote: perhaps we want to simply check for ASM_OUTPUT_DEF in symtab and refuse to use local aliases then? I think the other macros alow only

[Bug middle-end/58382] [4.9 Regression] unwind.inc:136:1: ICE: in trunc_int_for_mode, at explow.c:55

2013-09-10 Thread dave.anglin at bell dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58382 --- Comment #3 from dave.anglin at bell dot net --- Agreed. Testing fix. Thanks, Dave

[Bug libfortran/58015] FAIL: gfortran.dg/round_4.f90: Unsatisfied symbol nextafterl

2013-09-21 Thread dave.anglin at bell dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58015 --- Comment #3 from dave.anglin at bell dot net --- On 21-Sep-13, at 11:13 AM, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote: Is this PR different from pr58113 beside the missing nextafterl on hppa64-hp-hpux11.11? Don't know. It looks like libquadmath has

[Bug libfortran/58015] FAIL: gfortran.dg/round_4.f90: Unsatisfied symbol nextafterl

2013-09-27 Thread dave.anglin at bell dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58015 --- Comment #4 from dave.anglin at bell dot net --- On 9/21/2013 11:13 AM, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58015 --- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr --- Is this PR

  1   2   3   4   5   >