On 09/30/2014 04:24 AM, Konstantin Serebryany wrote:
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 4:26 PM, Alexey Samsonov samso...@google.com wrote:
I don't think we ever going to support recovery for regular ASan
(Kostya, correct me if I'm wrong).
I hope so too.
Another point is that with
Corrected patch: call pthread_setspecific (gomp_tls_key, NULL) in
gomp_thread_start if HAVE_TLS is not defined.
2014-09-19 Varvara Rainchik varvara.rainc...@intel.com
* libgomp.h (gomp_thread): For non TLS case create thread data.
* team.c (non_tls_thread_data_destructor,
On 09/30/2014 09:40 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 05:24:02PM -0700, Konstantin Serebryany wrote:
I don't think we ever going to support recovery for regular ASan
(Kostya, correct me if I'm wrong).
I hope so too.
Another point is that with
On 2014.09.28 at 14:57 +0200, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
On 2014.09.28 at 14:36 +0200, Steven Bosscher wrote:
Can you use HOST_WIDE_INT_1U for this?
Sure. Thanks for the suggestion.
(Fix now resembles similar idiom in data-streamer-in.c)
I checked in the fix as obvious.
--
Markus
On 09/30/2014 10:56 AM, Yury Gribov wrote:
On 09/30/2014 04:24 AM, Konstantin Serebryany wrote:
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 4:26 PM, Alexey Samsonov samso...@google.com
wrote:
I don't think we ever going to support recovery for regular ASan
(Kostya, correct me if I'm wrong).
I hope so too.
Hi,
this patch adds interface for froward propagation of polymorphic contexts.
The API is as follow:
- OFFSET_BY that allows to change offset of context
(to support ipa-prop ancestor functions),
- MAKE_SPECULATIVE to kill non-speculative info when we can not keep track
of dynamic type
David Sherwood david.sherw...@arm.com writes:
@@ -1859,9 +1861,11 @@ static basic_block curr_bb;
/* This recursive function creates allocnos corresponding to
pseudo-registers containing in X. True OUTPUT_P means that X is
- a lvalue. */
+ a lvalue. The 'parent' parameter
Richard Sandiford richard.sandif...@arm.com writes:
@@ -315,7 +318,7 @@ struct ira_allocno
number (0, ...) - 2. Value -1 is used for allocnos spilled by the
reload (at this point pseudo-register has only one allocno) which
did not get stack slot yet. */
- short int
*ping*
Thanks,
James
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 10:17:21AM +0100, James Greenhalgh wrote:
Hi,
The comment on widest_int_mode_for_size claims that it returns the
widest integer mode no wider than size. The implementation looks more
like it finds the widest integer mode smaller than size.
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 6:17 AM, Terry Guo terry@arm.com wrote:
Hi there,
The attached patch intends to provide option support to newly announced core
Cortex-M7 and related FPU:
http://www.arm.com/about/newsroom/arm-supercharges-mcu-market-with-high-perf
ormance-cortex-m7-processor.php
FX wrote:
Now, here's a tiny patch to silence the related warning in PR36534.
I also remove the condition on gfc_current_form != FORM_FIXED, as diagnostics
should be emitted based on language/pedantic options, not source form.
Looks good to me. However:
In the test case, could you also add a
On 30/09/14 05:26, Jeff Law wrote:
On 09/29/14 12:06, Jiong Wang wrote:
thanks for pointing this out, patch updated.
re-tested, pass x86-64 bootstrap and no regression on check-gcc/g++.
pass aarch64-none-elf cross check also.
ok for trunk?
Yes this is fine.
committed as 215709.
BTW,
Hi Jeff,
On Mon, 29 Sep 2014 22:40:58, Jeff Law wrote:
On 09/27/14 03:53, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
Comment before this change. Someone not familiar with this code is
going to have no idea why these two lines exist.
Ok, I added a comment now, do you like it?
Yes.
Please try to include a
Hi,
Last time I posted the patch pairing consecutive load/store instructions on
ARM, the patch got some review comments. The most important one, as
suggested by Jeff and Mike, is about to do the load/store pairing using
existing scheduling facility. In the initial investigation, I cleared up
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 11:03:47AM +0400, Varvara Rainchik wrote:
Corrected patch: call pthread_setspecific (gomp_tls_key, NULL) in
gomp_thread_start if HAVE_TLS is not defined.
2014-09-19 Varvara Rainchik varvara.rainc...@intel.com
* libgomp.h (gomp_thread): For non TLS case
Hi,
As analyzed in PR62178, IVOPT can't find the optimal iv set for that case.
The problem with current heuristic algorithm is it only replaces candidate
with ones not in current solution one by one, starting from small solution.
This patch adds another heuristic which starts from assigning the
Hello!
According to C99, reminder function returns:
If x or y is a NaN, a NaN is returned.
If x is an infinity, and y is not a NaN, a domain error occurs,
and a NaN is returned.
If y is zero, and x is not a NaN, a domain error occurs, and a
NaN is returned.
and fmod
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 04:36:21PM +0400, Ilya Verbin wrote:
2014-09-26 Bernd Schmidt ber...@codesourcery.com
Thomas Schwinge tho...@codesourcery.com
Ilya Verbin ilya.ver...@intel.com
Andrey Turetskiy andrey.turets...@intel.com
* configure:
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 8:54 PM, Aldy Hernandez al...@redhat.com wrote:
I'm rearranging some code in Michael's original patch to minimize the
difference with mainline.
It seems that the check for DECL_STRUCT_FUNCTION (decl)-gimple_df, was
merely a check to see if we had already set the FDE
Ping.
On 15 Sep 18:43, Ilya Tocar wrote:
On 01 Sep 18:38, Ilya Tocar wrote:
Please mention the PR in the ChangeLog entry and add some testcases
(can be gcc.target/i386/, but we should have it tested).
Does this change anything on say register short sil __asm (sil); in
32-bit
mode
Hello,
Exception propagation has been failing for a while for the SPE/e500 family of
powerpc targets. The issue boils down to an assert failure through:
uw_init_context_1 ()
...
_Unwind_SetSpColumn (context, outer_cfa, sp_slot);
then
_Unwind_SetSpColumn ()
...
int size
Hello,
ping on https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-09/msg00056.html
Thanks in advance,
With Kind Regards,
Olivier
On Sep 1, 2014, at 17:26 , Olivier Hainque hain...@adacore.com wrote:
Hello,
This patch is necessary for proper operation of a piece
of the Ada Makefile fragment which
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 02:44:21PM +0400, Ilya Tocar wrote:
2014-09-15 Ilya Tocar ilya.to...@intel.com
PR middle-end/62120
* varasm.c (decode_reg_name_and_count): Check availability for
registers from ADDITIONAL_REGISTER_NAMES.
Testsuite/
2014-09-15
This is what I have committed as r215715:
Index: gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
===
--- gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog (revision 215714)
+++ gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog (working copy)
@@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
+2014-30-09 Dominique d'Humieres
Andreas Schwab sch...@suse.de writes:
Richard Sandiford richard.sandif...@arm.com writes:
@@ -315,7 +318,7 @@ struct ira_allocno
number (0, ...) - 2. Value -1 is used for allocnos spilled by the
reload (at this point pseudo-register has only one allocno) which
did not get
Hi!
On Fri, 26 Sep 2014 16:36:21 +0400, Ilya Verbin iver...@gmail.com wrote:
--- a/gcc/Makefile.in
+++ b/gcc/Makefile.in
@@ -58,6 +58,7 @@ build=@build@
host=@host@
target=@target@
target_noncanonical:=@target_noncanonical@
+real_target_noncanonical:=@real_target_noncanonical@
#
Hi!
As just discussed for the libgcc changes in
http://news.gmane.org/find-root.php?message_id=%3C87d2ad73ze.fsf%40schwinge.name%3E,
just some suggestions regarding the terminology, where I think that the
term »target« might be confusing in comments or symbols' names. That is,
in the following,
Richard Sandiford richard.sandif...@arm.com writes:
Andreas Schwab sch...@suse.de writes:
Richard Sandiford richard.sandif...@arm.com writes:
@@ -315,7 +318,7 @@ struct ira_allocno
number (0, ...) - 2. Value -1 is used for allocnos spilled by the
reload (at this point
The patch will be committed to mainline and other release branches.
Thanks!
FX
Do not allow. Return type deduction only happens during instantiation,
and concepts are never instantiated. Therefore, we can't find the
return type of a function concept until you try to normalize the
return expression.
2014-09-25 Andrew Sutton andrew.n.sut...@gmail.com
Explicitly
On 22 September 2014 19:41, Carrot Wei car...@google.com wrote:
Hi
The extended register width in add/adds/sub/subs/cmp instructions is
not always the same as target register, it depends on both target
register width and extension type. But in current implementation the
extended register
This patch is the first of two to fix PR 63340, which is an ia64
regression caused by:
2014-09-22 Richard Sandiford richard.sandif...@arm.com
* hard-reg-set.h: Include hash-table.h.
(target_hard_regs): Add a finalize method and a x_simplifiable_subregs
field.
*
This part of the patch actually fixes the PR. It takes the reginfo.c
invalid mode changes into account when computing the cost classes,
rather than when using them. The code in the first patch then ensures
that we don't add X_AND_Y_REGS to the cost classes if only X or Y allow
the required mode
testcase in PR35545 shows case where profile feedback infrastructure ...
The test g++.dg/tree-prof/pr35545.C yields
UNRESOLVED: g++.dg/tree-prof/pr35545.C scan-ipa-dump-not optimized
OBJ_TYPE_REF
The following patch
--- ../_clean/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/tree-prof/pr35545.C 2014-09-27
On 24 September 2014 16:06, James Greenhalgh james.greenha...@arm.com wrote:
Hi,
As per the subject line this patch adds support for two arm_neon.h
intrinsics that we had missed.
We also need to fix the signature of vqdmulls_lane_s32, which is an
obvious extension to this patch while we
Hi all, hi Jason,
On 08/24/2014 12:11 PM, Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote:
PING: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-08/msg01709.html
Today, I picked this unreviewed patch prepared by Manuel back in August
and trivially completed it by adjusting the testcases (all the tweaks
seem the expected
On 30/09/14 12:51, Andreas Schwab wrote:
Richard Sandiford richard.sandif...@arm.com writes:
Andreas Schwab sch...@suse.de writes:
Richard Sandiford richard.sandif...@arm.com writes:
@@ -315,7 +318,7 @@ struct ira_allocno
number (0, ...) - 2. Value -1 is used for allocnos spilled by
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 11:59:16AM +0100, Dominique d'Humières wrote:
This is what I have committed as r215715:
Index: gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
===
--- gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog (revision 215714)
+++ gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
On 29/09/14 19:32, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 09/29/2014 11:12 AM, Jiong Wang wrote:
+inline rtx single_set_no_clobber_use (const rtx_insn *insn)
+{
+ if (!INSN_P (insn))
+return NULL_RTX;
+
+ if (GET_CODE (PATTERN (insn)) == SET)
+return PATTERN (insn);
+
+ /* Defer to the
... forgot to attach the complete patch ;)
Paolo.
Index: cp/cp-tree.h
===
--- cp/cp-tree.h(revision 215710)
+++ cp/cp-tree.h(working copy)
@@ -5418,7 +5418,6 @@ extern const char
On 10 July 2014 12:12, Marcus Shawcroft marcus.shawcr...@gmail.com wrote:
On 1 July 2014 11:05, Christophe Lyon christophe.l...@linaro.org wrote:
* documentation (README)
* dejanu driver (neon-intrinsics.exp)
* support macros (arm-neon-ref.h, compute-ref-data.h)
* Tests for 3 intrinsics:
On 09/29/2014 11:36 AM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
If C++ FE sets canonical type always to main variant, it should work.
Is it always the case?
No. For a compound type like a pointer or function the canonical type
strips all typedefs, but a main variant does not.
namespace {
struct
On 30/09/14 05:21, Jeff Law wrote:
On 09/29/14 13:24, Jiong Wang wrote:
I don't think so. from the x86-64 bootstrap, there is no regression
on the number of functions shrink-wrapped. actually speaking,
previously only single mov dest, src handled, so the disallowing
USE/CLOBBER will not
OK.
Jason
On 09/30/2014 02:52 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 11:03:47AM +0400, Varvara Rainchik wrote:
Corrected patch: call pthread_setspecific (gomp_tls_key, NULL) in
gomp_thread_start if HAVE_TLS is not defined.
2014-09-19 Varvara Rainchik varvara.rainc...@intel.com
*
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 05:26:14PM -0500, Bill Schmidt wrote:
The method used in this patch is to perform a byte-reversal of the
result of the lvsl/lvsr. This is accomplished by loading the vector
char constant {0,1,...,15}, which will appear in the register from left
to right as
Hello,
This patch creates 2 vectors with decls: offload_funcs and offload_vars.
libgomp will use addresses from these arrays to look up offloaded code.
During the compilation they are outputted to:
* .gnu.offload_lto_offload_table section as IR for offload compiler;
* .gnu.lto_offload_table
On 09/29/2014 11:18 AM, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
+ /* Nonzero to prevent macro expansion. */
+ unsigned char in__has_include__;
I don't see anything checking this flag to prevent macro expansion.
Does the comment just need a change?
+ /* Binary literals and variable length arrays
I don't want to cause you more work Paolo, but perhaps this should be
documented in https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-5/changes.html. ?
Something like:
* Excessive template instantiation depth is now a fatal error. This
prevents excessive diagnostics that usually do not help to identify
the problem.
On 27/09/14 22:20, Kugan wrote:
On 23/09/14 01:58, Jiong Wang wrote:
On 22/09/14 16:43, Kugan wrote:
AArch64 has the same issue ARM had where the LR register was not used in
leaf functions. This was reported in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42017. In AArch64, this
test-case
On 09/30/14 03:23, Richard Biener wrote:
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 8:54 PM, Aldy Hernandez al...@redhat.com wrote:
I'm rearranging some code in Michael's original patch to minimize the
difference with mainline.
It seems that the check for DECL_STRUCT_FUNCTION (decl)-gimple_df, was
merely a check
I did this as a part of preparing the testsuite to cope with the
(possible) gnu11 default. But I think it's a reasonable cleanup
on its own. With gnu11, we'd start to warn about defaulting to
int, missing function declarations, and functions without return
type. I added -fgnu89-inline when a
On Tue, 2014-09-30 at 09:50 -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 05:26:14PM -0500, Bill Schmidt wrote:
The method used in this patch is to perform a byte-reversal of the
result of the lvsl/lvsr. This is accomplished by loading the vector
char constant {0,1,...,15},
On 26/09/14 11:05 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 26/09/14 00:00 +0200, François Dumont wrote:
Apart from those minor adjustments I think this looks good, but I'd
like to know that it has been tested with -fsanitize=thread, even if
only lightly tested.
Hi
Dmitry, who reported the bug,
On 29/09/14 14:11 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 29/09/14 06:02 -0700, Siva Chandra wrote:
The attached patch refactors python/hook.in so that there are no
individual function calls to load pretty printers and xmethods. This
was suggested by Tom here:
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 3:09 AM, Markus Trippelsdorf
mar...@trippelsdorf.de wrote:
On 2014.09.28 at 14:57 +0200, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
On 2014.09.28 at 14:36 +0200, Steven Bosscher wrote:
Can you use HOST_WIDE_INT_1U for this?
Sure. Thanks for the suggestion.
(Fix now resembles
Hi,
On 09/30/2014 04:51 PM, Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote:
I don't want to cause you more work Paolo, but perhaps this should be
documented in https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-5/changes.html. ?
Something like:
* Excessive template instantiation depth is now a fatal error. This
prevents excessive
We install the header pass_manager.h, but it can't be included by a
plugin, since it includes pass-instances.def, and we don't current
install that.
Similarly, the installed header pretty-print.h now uses
wide-int-print.h, but the latter isn't installed.
FWIW, both of these issues prevent
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 10:24:23AM -0500, Bill Schmidt wrote:
On Tue, 2014-09-30 at 09:50 -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 05:26:14PM -0500, Bill Schmidt wrote:
The method used in this patch is to perform a byte-reversal of the
result of the lvsl/lvsr. This is
On Tue, 30 Sep 2014, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
GCC is written in C++ these days, so technically, you need the C++
standard :-)
And, while C++14 requires plain int bit-fields to be signed, GCC is
written in C++98/C++03.
--
Joseph S. Myers
jos...@codesourcery.com
On Tue, 2014-09-30 at 11:04 -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 10:24:23AM -0500, Bill Schmidt wrote:
On Tue, 2014-09-30 at 09:50 -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 05:26:14PM -0500, Bill Schmidt wrote:
The method used in this patch is to
A recent question from richi about the C++ FE's use of NOP_EXPR and
CONVERT_EXPR led me to switch these functions to use CONVERT_EXPR
instead, since we don't want STRIP_NOPS to remove them.
Tested x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, applying to trunk.
commit e1215a9814036a16bb97609e97c3402b9b78c84c
Author:
On 09/29/2014 11:36 AM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
If C++ FE sets canonical type always to main variant, it should work.
Is it always the case?
No. For a compound type like a pointer or function the canonical
type strips all typedefs, but a main variant does not.
namespace {
On 09/30/14 08:37, Jiong Wang wrote:
On 30/09/14 05:21, Jeff Law wrote:
On 09/29/14 13:24, Jiong Wang wrote:
I don't think so. from the x86-64 bootstrap, there is no regression
on the number of functions shrink-wrapped. actually speaking,
previously only single mov dest, src handled, so the
On 09/30/14 03:01, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
Sigh. Yea, I guess if we're hitting the allocator insanely hard,
scrubbing memory might turn out to slow things down in a significant
way. Or it may simply be the case that we're using free'd memory in
some way and with the MALLOC_PERTURB changes we're in
On 09/30/14 08:15, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
I think part of the problem is in the naming of single_set(). From the
name it's not entirely obvious to users that this includes insns that
clobber registers or which write other registers that are unused after
that point. I've previously had to fix
Hi,
Patch resubmitted from https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-09/msg01400.html
The patch fix PR62128 and gcc.target/i386/pr52252-atom.c in
core-avx2 make check.
The test in pr62128 is exactly TEST 22 from
gcc.dg/torture/vshuf-v32qi.c. It will check if the pattern is correct
or not.
The
On 09/30/14 09:22, Marek Polacek wrote:
I did this as a part of preparing the testsuite to cope with the
(possible) gnu11 default. But I think it's a reasonable cleanup
on its own. With gnu11, we'd start to warn about defaulting to
int, missing function declarations, and functions without
On 09/30/14 04:48, Olivier Hainque wrote:
Hello,
ping on https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-09/msg00056.html
Thanks in advance,
With Kind Regards,
Olivier
On Sep 1, 2014, at 17:26 , Olivier Hainque hain...@adacore.com wrote:
Hello,
This patch is necessary for proper operation of a
On 30/09/14 17:45, Jeff Law wrote:
On 09/30/14 08:15, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
I think part of the problem is in the naming of single_set(). From the
name it's not entirely obvious to users that this includes insns that
clobber registers or which write other registers that are unused after
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 9:47 AM, Evgeny Stupachenko evstu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Patch resubmitted from
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-09/msg01400.html
The patch fix PR62128 and gcc.target/i386/pr52252-atom.c in
core-avx2 make check.
The test in pr62128 is exactly TEST 22 from
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 6:47 PM, Evgeny Stupachenko evstu...@gmail.com wrote:
Patch resubmitted from
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-09/msg01400.html
The patch fix PR62128 and gcc.target/i386/pr52252-atom.c in
core-avx2 make check.
The test in pr62128 is exactly TEST 22 from
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 10:03:05AM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 9:47 AM, Evgeny Stupachenko evstu...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
Patch resubmitted from
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-09/msg01400.html
The patch fix PR62128 and gcc.target/i386/pr52252-atom.c in
Ville asked for help with the necessary compiler intrinsics for the
is_trivially_* C++11 library traits.
The first patch cleans up a few oddities I noticed with the existing
intrinsics. __is_convertible_to was never implemented and isn't needed.
There's no need for a second grokdeclarator
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 12:07 AM, Yury Gribov y.gri...@samsung.com wrote:
On 09/30/2014 09:40 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 05:24:02PM -0700, Konstantin Serebryany wrote:
I don't think we ever going to support recovery for regular ASan
(Kostya, correct me if I'm wrong).
Hi,
On 09/30/2014 07:13 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
Ville asked for help with the necessary compiler intrinsics for the
is_trivially_* C++11 library traits.
The first patch cleans up a few oddities I noticed with the existing
intrinsics. __is_convertible_to was never implemented and isn't
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 10:26:39AM -0700, Alexey Samsonov wrote:
I think we can summarize:
* the current option -fsanitize-recover is misleading; it's really
-fubsan-recover
* we need a way to selectively enable/disable recovery for different
sanitizers
The most promininet solution
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 10:33 AM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 10:26:39AM -0700, Alexey Samsonov wrote:
I think we can summarize:
* the current option -fsanitize-recover is misleading; it's really
-fubsan-recover
* we need a way to selectively
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 10:36:34AM -0700, Alexey Samsonov wrote:
Would we accept -fsanitize-recover=undefined
-fno-sanitize-recover=signed-integer-overflow
as recovering everything but signed integer overflows, i.e. the decision
whether to recover a particular call would check similar
I forgot to check pretty printer tests indeed, I will.
François
On 30/09/2014 17:32, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 26/09/14 11:05 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 26/09/14 00:00 +0200, François Dumont wrote:
Apart from those minor adjustments I think this looks good, but I'd
like to know that
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 7:06 PM, Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 6:47 PM, Evgeny Stupachenko evstu...@gmail.com
wrote:
Patch resubmitted from
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-09/msg01400.html
The patch fix PR62128 and gcc.target/i386/pr52252-atom.c in
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 9:33 PM, Jeff Law l...@redhat.com wrote:
On 09/29/14 08:19, Teresa Johnson wrote:
Just an update - I found some good test cases by compiling the
c-torture tests with profile feedback with and without my patch. But
in the cases I pulled out I saw that there were still
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 8:08 PM, Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 7:06 PM, Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 6:47 PM, Evgeny Stupachenko evstu...@gmail.com
wrote:
Patch resubmitted from
2014-09-30 17:30 GMT+01:00 Jeff Law l...@redhat.com:
On 09/30/14 08:37, Jiong Wang wrote:
On 30/09/14 05:21, Jeff Law wrote:
On 09/29/14 13:24, Jiong Wang wrote:
I don't think so. from the x86-64 bootstrap, there is no regression
on the number of functions shrink-wrapped. actually
Hi Jason.
As discussed on IRC, DIEs of abstract instances of functions (those
tagged with DW_AT_inline), cannot include information that would be
different between an abstract inline and an out-of-line copy. This, as
well as (seeming) gdb snafus regarding abstract origins, was the reason
I
On Sep 30, 2014, at 8:45 AM, David Malcolm dmalc...@redhat.com wrote:
We install the header pass_manager.h, but it can't be included by a
plugin, since it includes pass-instances.def, and we don't current
install that.
Similarly, the installed header pretty-print.h now uses
On Sep 30, 2014, at 9:15 AM, Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com wrote:
On Tue, 30 Sep 2014, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
GCC is written in C++ these days, so technically, you need the C++
standard :-)
And, while C++14 requires plain int bit-fields to be signed, GCC is
written in
Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com wrote:
The non-C++/libstdc++ parts are OK with those changes.
Jonathan Wakely jwak...@redhat.com wrote:
* libstdc++-v3/
* src/c++11/limits.cc: Add support for __intN types.
* include/std/type_traits: Likewise.
* include/std/limits:
What happens when shift == 16?
We emit just gen_avx2_permv2ti. We don't need additional palignr.
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 9:06 PM, Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 6:47 PM, Evgeny Stupachenko evstu...@gmail.com
wrote:
Patch resubmitted from
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 11:33 PM, Hans-Peter Nilsson h...@bitrange.com wrote:
On Thu, 18 Sep 2014, Janne Blomqvist wrote:
If you look back at the patch I posted, there's a
typo. :-} Duly warned about, but I'd rather expect the build to
fail.
Yes, strange that it didn't fail. There's no
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 6:51 PM, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
It's not just clobbers; it ignores patterns like
(parallel
[(set (a) (...)
(set (b) (...)])
[(reg_note (reg_unused(b))]
Which is probably fine before register allocation but definitely
something you have to think about
Hi
I prefer to submit this patch to you cause I am not very
comfortable with Python stuff.
I simply rely on Python cast feature. It doesn't really matter but
is it going to simply consider the debug iterator as a normal one or is
it going through the C++ explicit cast operator on
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 5:57 AM, Marcus Shawcroft
marcus.shawcr...@gmail.com wrote:
On 22 September 2014 19:41, Carrot Wei car...@google.com wrote:
Hi
The extended register width in add/adds/sub/subs/cmp instructions is
not always the same as target register, it depends on both target
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 11:18:39AM -0500, Bill Schmidt wrote:
I meant generating a sequence that just falls out as you want it after
optimisation. E.g. lvsr;vnot;vand(splat8(31));vperm can have the vand
absorbed by the vperm. But that splat is nasty when not optimised away :-(
On Sep 30, 2014, at 2:22 AM, Bin Cheng bin.ch...@arm.com wrote:
Then I decided to take one step forward to introduce a generic
instruction fusion infrastructure in GCC, because in essence, load/store
pair is nothing different with other instruction fusion, all these
optimizations
want is to
Hi,
I compiled libgfortran with -Werror, and fixed the fallout with the
attached patch. Committed r215742 as obvious.
2014-10-01 Janne Blomqvist j...@gcc.gnu.org
* intrinsics/pack_generic.c (pack_s_internal): Fix
-Wmaybe-uninitialized warning.
* m4/unpack.m4
expand_vselect for some reason ignores the expander.
Does it work with expanders?
The comment talks about insn only:
/* Construct (set target (vec_select op0 (parallel perm))) and
return true if that's a valid instruction in the active ISA. */
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 10:21 PM, Uros Bizjak
Bin Cheng wrote:
Hi,
As analyzed in PR62178, IVOPT can't find the optimal iv set for that case.
The problem with current heuristic algorithm is it only replaces candidate
with ones not in current solution one by one, starting from small solution.
This patch adds another heuristic which starts
Ville asked for help with the necessary compiler intrinsics for the
is_trivially_* C++11 library traits. The first patch cleans up a few
oddities I noticed with the
Great. I think this can be as well marked as PR c++/26099.
There's also PR c++/63362.
The intrinsics still fail to support
On 30/09/14 15:37 -0400, DJ Delorie wrote:
Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com wrote:
The non-C++/libstdc++ parts are OK with those changes.
Jonathan Wakely jwak...@redhat.com wrote:
* libstdc++-v3/
* src/c++11/limits.cc: Add support for __intN types.
* include/std/type_traits:
1 - 100 of 106 matches
Mail list logo
