On 07/06/2017 07:25 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
There are several hundred named attribute keys that have been
introduced over many GCC releases. Applications typically need
to be compilable with multiple GCC versions, so it is important
for developers to know when GCC introduced support for
On 07/05/2017 01:36 AM, Torsten Duwe wrote:
Changes since v9:
* Do not store (declare static) the nop pattern template string.
In the future, it might depend on the particular function
being emitted. Fetch it freshly each time instead.
* On platforms without named sections, simply omit
On 06/28/2017 01:28 AM, Yvan Roux wrote:
Hi Sandra,
[snip]
OK, here is the new patch with the comments addressed. I've spotted
that there is also some m / -mno options at least in the ARM section,
I'll make another patch to fix that.
This version looks fine. Thanks for taking care of
On 06/27/2017 06:19 AM, Yvan Roux wrote:
diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.opt b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.opt
index 942a7d5..0fd1bfa 100644
--- a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.opt
+++ b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.opt
@@ -146,7 +146,7 @@ EnumValue
Enum(aarch64_abi) String(lp64)
On 06/11/2017 02:35 PM, Daniel Santos wrote:
diff --git a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
index c1168823af7..eec02b43a4f 100644
--- a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
+++ b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
@@ -25389,11 +25389,26 @@ using the function attributes @code{ms_abi} and
@code{sysv_abi}.
@opindex
On 06/06/2017 03:49 AM, Torsten Duwe wrote:
On Sun, Jun 04, 2017 at 08:12:49PM -0600, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
On 05/29/2017 04:29 AM, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote:
diff --git a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
index 65308c9d933..6cbb77a8dc4 100644
--- a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
+++ b/gcc/doc
On 05/29/2017 04:29 AM, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote:
diff --git a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
index 65308c9d933..6cbb77a8dc4 100644
--- a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
+++ b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
@@ -11382,6 +11382,32 @@ of the function name, it is considered to be a match.
For C99 and C++
On 05/26/2017 12:48 PM, Alexander Monakov wrote:
Hi,
This patch fixes a few issues in documentation of -mcx16 x86 backend option:
- remove implementor-speak ('oword')
- mention alignment restriction and availability only in 64-bit mode
- improve usage example
existing documentation uses a
On 04/28/2017 03:30 AM, Peryt, Sebastian wrote:
Hi,
Thank you for your comments. I edited my patch accordingly. As for some of your
doubts:
- REX is the opcode prefix to access 64-bit register extensions introduced in
IA-32e mode.
- EVEX is the encoding prefix which applies to SIMD operating
On 05/02/2017 07:52 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
This is the result of proofreading the release notes for GCC 7. Some
are obvious fixes for simple typos, but I've also tried to improve the
clarity of some text. Please take a look and let me know if you
disagree with any changes.
Overall this is
On 05/01/2017 09:40 AM, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
[snip]
diff --git a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.opt b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.opt
index 0466bb2..0422e07 100644
--- a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.opt
+++ b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.opt
@@ -84,6 +84,10 @@ mcmodel=
Target Report RejectNegative Joined
On 04/27/2017 02:09 AM, Daniel Santos wrote:
@@ -25308,6 +25308,17 @@ You can control this behavior for specific functions by
using the function attributes @code{ms_abi} and @code{sysv_abi}.
@xref{Function Attributes}.
+@item -mcall-ms2sysv-xlogues
+@opindex mcall-ms2sysv-xlogues
+@opindex
On 04/26/2017 08:29 AM, Peryt, Sebastian wrote:
Hi,
This patch updates x86 family machine constraints section in '16.8.5
Constraints for Particular Machines' section to match the ones in
'config/i386/constraints.md'.
gcc/
* doc/md.texi (Machine Constraints): Update x86 family machine
On 04/25/2017 07:03 AM, Claudiu Zissulescu wrote:
diff --git a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
index cebafe6..aa5cd27 100644
--- a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
+++ b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
@@ -606,7 +606,8 @@ Objective-C and Objective-C++ Dialects}.
-mnorm -mspfp -mspfp-compact -mspfp-fast
On 04/25/2017 07:03 AM, Claudiu Zissulescu wrote:
diff --git a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
index 0eeea7b..cebafe6 100644
--- a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
+++ b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
@@ -606,7 +606,7 @@ Objective-C and Objective-C++ Dialects}.
-mnorm -mspfp -mspfp-compact -mspfp-fast
On 04/18/2017 12:30 PM, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
2017-04-18 Denys Vlasenko
* doc/invoke.texi: Update option documentation.
[snip]
The documentation part of this version is OK.
-Sandra
On 04/17/2017 09:57 AM, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
Index: gcc/doc/invoke.texi
===
--- gcc/doc/invoke.texi (revision 246948)
+++ gcc/doc/invoke.texi (working copy)
@@ -351,9 +351,11 @@ Objective-C and Objective-C++ Dialects}.
@item
On 04/07/2017 03:25 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
This issue caused a lot of build failures during the GCC mass rebuilds
for Fedora, but isn't in the porting to guide yet.
Is this accurate and clear enough for casual readers?
Index: htdocs/gcc-7/porting_to.html
On 04/05/2017 03:02 PM, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
On 04/05/17 19:22, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
On 04/05/17 18:08, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Yes, exactly. I really want to reach the deadline for gcc-7.
Fixing the name is certainly the most important first step,
and if everybody agrees on
On 04/04/2017 06:14 AM, Alan Modra wrote:
Revised patch.
[snip]
+@smallexample
+static void
+dgemv_kernel_4x4 (long n, const double *ap, long lda,
+ const double *x, double *y, double alpha)
+@{
+ double *a0;
+ double *a1;
+ double *a2;
+ double *a3;
+
+ __asm__
+(
+
On 03/31/2017 07:30 AM, Alan Modra wrote:
Some people over at OpenBLAS were asking me whether I knew of a
whitepaper on gcc asm. I didn't besides the gcc manual, and wrote a
note explaining some tricks. This patch is that note cleaned up.
Tested by an x86_64-linux build. OK to apply?
The
On 03/26/2017 02:13 PM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
Hi Jonathan,
On Tue, 23 Feb 2016, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 19/02/16 13:17 -0700, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
I suppose the patch is OK as it stands, but I was going to suggest
restructuring it so that it talks about the default behavior first
On 03/15/2017 09:40 AM, Martin Sebor wrote:
On 03/15/2017 05:00 AM, Richard Kenner wrote:
First, I agree that the less formal language is becoming more
acceptable. Some style guides explicitly allow contractions,
but others advise against them. The technical specifications
that significant
On 02/24/2017 12:20 PM, Claudiu Zissulescu wrote:
Hi,
Indeed, we are not up to speed regarding updating and cleaning the
documentation.
On 12/02/2017 05:18, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
I noticed a bunch of copy-editing issues in the "ARC Options" section of
invoke.texi. I'm willi
On 02/27/2017 03:26 PM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
On Mon, 11 Jan 2010, Martin Reinecke wrote:
thanks for applying the patch!
Unfortunately I just noticed some mistakes in my wording :(
Currently the sentence says
"code [...] may run significantly slower [...] than they did [...]"
I'm not a native
On 02/21/2017 12:41 PM, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
On 02/21/2017 07:48 AM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
You cannot call REGNO on something that isn't a REG, and you cannot
call INTVAL on something that isn't a CONST_INT.
The way I fixed nios2_alternate_compare_const is admittedly a bit lame.
Yeah
On 02/21/2017 07:48 AM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
You cannot call REGNO on something that isn't a REG, and you cannot
call INTVAL on something that isn't a CONST_INT.
The way I fixed nios2_alternate_compare_const is admittedly a bit lame.
Yeah. :-P
2017-02-21 Segher Boessenkool
On 02/21/2017 06:54 AM, Rainer Orth wrote:
Hi Joseph,
On Fri, 13 Jan 2017, Rainer Orth wrote:
I'm unsure if the patch is large enough to need a copyright assignment
(in which case it's almost certainly too late for GCC 7), and even if
not if it's appropriate at this point in the release
On 02/13/2017 11:14 PM, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
2017-02-13 Sandra Loosemore <san...@codesourcery.com>
gcc/
* doc/invoke.texi (ARC Options): Copy-edit to fix punctuation,
markup, and similar issues. Remove @opindex entries for things
that aren't o
On 02/17/2017 09:57 AM, Torsten Duwe wrote:
diff --git a/gcc/doc/extend.texi b/gcc/doc/extend.texi
index 3d1546a..ef7e985 100644
--- a/gcc/doc/extend.texi
+++ b/gcc/doc/extend.texi
@@ -3076,6 +3076,23 @@ that affect more than one function.
This attribute should be used for debugging purposes
0:36, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
On 02/11/2017 06:21 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 11 February 2017 at 08:48, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
On Fri, 10 Feb 2017, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
The documentation for -Wno-non-template-friend refers to
"non-templatized
friend functions" and "templ
On 02/11/2017 09:18 PM, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
I noticed a bunch of copy-editing issues in the "ARC Options" section of
invoke.texi. I'm willing to take a stab at fixing them, but I need some
technical assistance since I'm not familiar with the details of this
architecture myself
I noticed a bunch of copy-editing issues in the "ARC Options" section of
invoke.texi. I'm willing to take a stab at fixing them, but I need some
technical assistance since I'm not familiar with the details of this
architecture myself.
* In e.g. "Compile for ARC 600 cpu with norm instruction
gizing",
respectively. Using made-up words that don't have a well-defined
technical meaning could be misleading, besides making the documentation
harder to search. So I've fixed everything to uniformly use the
standard terminology.
-Sandra
2017-02-11 Sandra Loosemore <san...@codeso
cases I found.
-Sandra
2017-02-11 Sandra Loosemore <san...@codesourcery.com>
gcc/
* doc/extend.texi: Fix some spelling mistakes and typos.
* doc/invoke.texi: Likewise.
Index: gcc/doc/extend.texi
===
--- gcc/doc/exten
On 02/09/2017 09:46 PM, Daniel Santos wrote:
On 02/08/2017 05:28 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
On 7 February 2017 19:40:17 CET, Daniel Santos
wrote:
+{ "-mmoutline-msabi-xlogues",MASK_OUTLINE_MSABI_XLOGUES }
};
s/mm/m/
I'd like to re-iterate my
I didn't see a v3 with the documentation patches go by yet, and I had
some nit-picky comments on v2 (in addition to the ones Joseph already
asked for):
> diff --git a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
index 4b13aeb..581c4ef 100644
--- a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
+++ b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
@@
On 02/01/2017 08:26 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
On 02/01/2017 08:06 PM, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
On 02/01/2017 06:57 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
As discussed in bug 32003 - Undocumented -fdump-tree options, rather
than duplicating the same boiler-plate text for each of the dozens
(138 by my count
On 02/01/2017 06:57 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
As discussed in bug 32003 - Undocumented -fdump-tree options, rather
than duplicating the same boiler-plate text for each of the dozens
(138 by my count) of undocumented passes, the attached patch removes
the pass-specific -fdump-tree- options
On 01/23/2017 10:28 AM, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Hi all,
I had forgotten to update the -fstore-merging documentation from a
previous iteration of the pass
and it says that it's enabled at -O and higher. The option is in fact
enabled at -O2 and higher, as well as -Os.
This patch clarifies that.
Is
On 01/16/2017 03:54 AM, Rainer Orth wrote:
Hi Sandra,
On 01/13/2017 05:59 AM, Rainer Orth wrote:
diff --git a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
--- a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
+++ b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
@@ -26391,6 +26391,13 @@ be as many clauses as you need. This ma
@end table
+The
On 01/13/2017 05:19 AM, Torsten Duwe wrote:
Changes since v4: hopefully addressed all of Sandra's requests
and suggestions concerning the documentation snippets, thanks
for the feedback. If it still isn't clear, feel free to rephrase
-- I'm a programmer, not a technical writer.
Thanks, this
On 01/13/2017 05:59 AM, Rainer Orth wrote:
diff --git a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
--- a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
+++ b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
@@ -26391,6 +26391,13 @@ be as many clauses as you need. This ma
@end table
+The switch matching text @code{S} in a %@{@code{S}@},
gcc.dg/pr77862.c was failing on targets that don't support -fPIC,
specifically nios2-elf. I've fixed this with a
dg-require-effective-target restriction, consistent with what similar
testcases do (e.g., gcc.dg/pic-2.c).
Committed as obvious.
-Sandra
2017-01-12 Sandra Loosemore <
On 01/10/2017 07:24 AM, Yunqiang Su wrote:
Hi, folks, any idea about this patch?
I can only comment on the documentation parts.
diff --git a/gcc/doc/install.texi b/gcc/doc/install.texi
index b911d76dd66..e548733537d 100644
--- a/gcc/doc/install.texi
+++ b/gcc/doc/install.texi
@@ -1338,6
such lists to use @gccoptlist
with a ragged right margin rather than flowed inline text. That would
be a fairly mechanical change but it would touch a lot of other sections
as well, so I thought it better to leave it separate, at least.
-Sandra
2017-01-10 Sandra Loosemore <
options in the list. I did a mechanical
search-and-replace to uniformly use two spaces.
There are some overfull hbox warnings elsewhere in the manual, too; I'll
take a look at those separately.
-Sandra
2017-01-08 Sandra Loosemore <san...@codesourcery.com>
gcc/
* invoke.texi (Option S
I've checked in this patch to fix another long-standing (but easy)
documentation PR.
-Sandra
2017-01-08 Sandra Loosemore <san...@codesourcery.com>
PR middle-end/17660
gcc/
* extend.texi (Common Variable Attributes): Add xref to GCC
Internals manual to explain mode attribute ke
in this patch to fix the -pthread docs.
-Sandra
2017-01-08 Sandra Loosemore <san...@codesourcery.com>
PR other/16519
gcc/
* doc/invoke.texi (Option Summary): Move -pthread to Linker Options
and Preprocessor Options.
(Options for Linking): Document -pthread here
(RS/6000 and P
re general
compiler dump options, in another section, does list the full name of
the options in the subtable. I've fixed the preprocessor -d option
documentation to be consistent with that format, and added
cross-references back and forth too.
-Sandra
2017-01-07 Sandra Loosemore <san...@cod
clear maintaining this
manual is a low priority, I've generally gone with the approach of not
providing too many details in the tutorial material and instead pointing
people at the relevant command-line options.
-Sandra
2017-01-07 Sandra Loosemore <san...@codesourcery.com>
PR prepro
2017-01-03 Sandra Loosemore <san...@codesourcery.com>
gcc/
* doc/cppdiropts.texi: Merge documentation of -I, -iquote,
-isystem, and -idirafter. Copy-edit.
* doc/cppopts.texi: Copy-edit. Remove contradiction about
default for -ftrack-macro-expansion. Delete obsolete and
.
-Sandra
2016-12-30 Sandra Loosemore <san...@codesourcery.com>
gcc/
* doc/cppopts.texi: Reorder table entries to put the most
commonly-used options first and debug options last.
Index: gcc/doc/cppopts.texi
===
--- g
installments coming.
-Sandra
2016-12-27 Sandra Loosemore <san...@codesourcery.com>
gcc/
* doc/cppdiropts.texi, doc/cppwarnopts.texi: New files, split from...
* doc/cppopts.texi: here.
* doc/cpp.texi (Invocation): Adjust includes.
* doc/invoke.texi (Option Summary): Add m
ere people will be more likely to find it.
More shuffling around and refactoring of include files coming in the
next installment.
-Sandra
2016-12-27 Sandra Loosemore <san...@codesourcery.com>
gcc/
* doc/cppopts.texi: Delete redundant documentation for -x. Move
-fno-show-colu
On 12/27/2016 09:26 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
Without RejectNegative one can cause an ICE in the compiler.
Patch can bootstrap on ppc64le-redhat-linux and survives regression tests.
Ready to be installed?
Martin
Any chance you can also fix the manual to fully document the
-fstrong-eval-order=
On 12/26/2016 11:19 AM, Eric Botcazou wrote:
This is very strange; I didn't get that error. We've got makeinfo 6.1
(Feb 2016) installed here. Are you using a newer or older version?
It's makeinfo 4.13 (from the vendor).
Hmmm, that's 8 years old, the last release from before the
On 12/26/2016 02:38 AM, Eric Botcazou wrote:
eric@arcturus:~/build/gcc/native/gcc> make doc
if [ xinfo = xinfo ]; then \
makeinfo --split-size=500 --split-size=500 --no-split -I .
-I /home/eric/svn/gcc/gcc/doc \
-I /home/eric/svn/gcc/gcc/doc/include -o
preprocessor options,
and correct the option summary section in the GCC manual.
-Sandra
2016-12-25 Sandra Loosemore <san...@codesourcery.com>
gcc/
* doc/cpp.texi (Invocation): Revise to indicate that GCC driver
options are only documented in the GCC manual.
* doc/cppopts.texi: D
On 12/21/2016 11:54 AM, Yunqiang Su wrote:
By this patch, I add a build-time option ` --with-unfused-madd4=yes/no’,
and runtime option -m(no-)unfused-madd4,
to disable generate madd.fmt instructions.
Your patch also needs a documentation change so that the new
command-line option is listed in
On 12/21/2016 10:23 AM, Torsten Duwe wrote:
diff --git a/gcc/doc/extend.texi b/gcc/doc/extend.texi
index 1f303bc..a09851a 100644
--- a/gcc/doc/extend.texi
+++ b/gcc/doc/extend.texi
@@ -3076,6 +3076,17 @@ that affect more than one function.
This attribute should be used for debugging purposes
On 12/20/2016 05:14 AM, James Greenhalgh wrote:
On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 11:48:26AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 6:58 PM, James Greenhalgh
wrote:
On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 10:44 PM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
Hello!
Attached patch
routine cleanup I've done no checking on whether the
remaining documentation is correct, whether the set of documented
features corresponds to those currently implemented, etc.
-Sandra
2016-12-19 Sandra Loosemore <san...@codesourcery.com>
gcc/
* doc/cpp.texi: Clean up anachronist
On 12/15/2016 03:27 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 11:23:14AM +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote:
On Dez 15 2016, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
So, shall we change also the first 3?
Yes, I'd think so.
So here is it in patch form. Is this ok for trunk?
2016-12-15
On 12/12/2016 05:40 PM, Kelvin Nilsen wrote:
@@ -15105,6 +15109,24 @@ If all of the enabled test conditions are false, t
The @code{scalar_test_neg} built-in functions return a non-zero value
if their @code{source} argument holds a negative value.
+The @code{__builtin_byte_in_set} function
On 12/12/2016 04:16 AM, James Greenhalgh wrote:
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 02:36:28PM +, James Greenhalgh wrote:
Hi,
As subject - update extend.texi to mention availability of _Float16 types
on ARM and AArch64.
OK?
*ping*
Thanks,
James
2016-11-30 James Greenhalgh
On 12/12/2016 04:16 AM, James Greenhalgh wrote:
On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 11:09:07AM +, James Greenhalgh wrote:
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 05:58:13PM +, Joseph Myers wrote:
On Wed, 30 Nov 2016, James Greenhalgh wrote:
+@code{_Float16} type defined by ISO/IEC TS18661:3-2005
Add a space
On 12/11/2016 12:30 PM, John David Anglin wrote:
+@item -mcaller-copies
+@opindex mcaller-copies
+The caller copies function arguments passed by hidden reference. This
+option should be used with care as it is not compatible with the default
+32-bit runtime. However, only aggregates larger
register load pair. Fixed thusly.
-Sandra
2016-12-11 Sandra Loosemore <san...@codesourcery.com>
gcc/
* config/nios2/nios2.c (nios2_emit_move_sequence): Call copy_rtx
to avoid shared structure error.
Index: gcc/config/nios2/n
On 12/11/2016 01:28 PM, Rainer Orth wrote:
Hi Sandra,
PR 16519 notes that -pthread has only ever been documented as an RS6000 and
Solaris 2 option. In fact it's supported by most/all(?) POSIX-flavored
targets, including GNU/Linux, BSD variants, Darwin, etc. It's probably best
to document it
before committing the attached patch,
in case anybody wants to argue that this is the wrong way to categorize it.
-Sandra
2016-12-11 Sandra Loosemore <san...@codesourcery.com>
PR other/16519
gcc/
* doc/invoke.texi (Option Summary): Move -pthread to Linker Options.
(Options for L
On 12/09/2016 05:48 AM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
This series includes most of the changes in group C from:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2016-11/msg00033.html
The idea is to add wrapper classes around machine_mode_enum
for specific groups of modes, such as scalar integers, scalar floats,
On 12/07/2016 12:30 PM, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 8:23 PM, Sandra Loosemore
<san...@codesourcery.com> wrote:
You need to fix doc/invoke.texi as well to reflect this change.
Done.
Attached updated patch.
The documentation change is OK.
-Sandra
On 12/07/2016 11:44 AM, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
Hello,
Revision 241896 added -fsanitize-address-use-after-scope and enabled
it whenever any sanitizer is enabled. This caused problems for kernel
which does not have necessary callbacks for
-fsanitize-address-use-after-scope. I've added the callbacks
On 11/29/2016 06:10 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
[snip]
r242985 seems to have broken the build, for me at least (with texinfo
5.1):
../../src/gcc/doc/install.texi:2199: use braces to give a command as an
argument to @=
make[2]: *** [doc/gccinstall.info] Error 1
The attached patch fixes it.
OK
On 11/22/2016 10:19 PM, Daniel Santos wrote:
diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/i386.opt b/gcc/config/i386/i386.opt
index 9eef558..f556978 100644
--- a/gcc/config/i386/i386.opt
+++ b/gcc/config/i386/i386.opt
@@ -528,6 +528,11 @@ Enum(calling_abi) String(sysv) Value(SYSV_ABI)
EnumValue
On 11/21/2016 04:23 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
On 21.11.2016 18:16, Rainer Orth wrote:
Hi Matthias,
ahh, didn't see that :-/ Now fixed, is this clearer now?
The options @option{--with-target-bdw-gc-include} and
@option{--with-target-bdw-gc-lib} must always specified together for
On 11/21/2016 05:57 AM, Matthias Klose wrote:
--with-target-bdw-gc=/opt/bdw-gc,32=/opt/bdw-gc32
sets the include and lib dirs by appending include and lib to the paths. If you
have options --with-target-bdw-gc-include= and --with-target-bdw-gc-lib= as
well, it overrides the settings done in
On 11/20/2016 01:42 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
+The options @option{--with-target-bdw-gc-include} and
+@option{--with-target-bdw-gc-include} must always specified together for
+each multilib variant and take precedence over
+@option{--with-target-bdw-gc-include}. If none of these options are
On 11/18/2016 11:52 AM, Martin Sebor wrote:
[snip]
I think it would be be ideal if all the options were sorted the same
way in all sections. Is there some command to have texinfo sort them
for us? If not, can we write a script to sort them, either each time
just before generating the docs or
On 11/18/2016 09:01 AM, Martin Sebor wrote:
On 11/17/2016 10:34 PM, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
On 11/16/2016 09:49 AM, Martin Sebor wrote:
I'm looking for an approval of the attached patch.
I've adjusted the documentation based on Sandra's input (i.e.,
documented the negative of the option
On 11/16/2016 09:49 AM, Martin Sebor wrote:
I'm looking for an approval of the attached patch.
I've adjusted the documentation based on Sandra's input (i.e.,
documented the negative of the option rather than the positive;
thank you for the review, btw.)
On 11/08/2016 08:13 PM, Martin Sebor
On 11/14/2016 02:55 AM, James Greenhalgh wrote:
On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 09:42:32PM -0700, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
On 11/11/2016 08:37 AM, James Greenhalgh wrote:
diff --git a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
index f133b3a..75ff8ec 100644
--- a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
+++ b/gcc/doc
On 11/11/2016 08:37 AM, James Greenhalgh wrote:
diff --git a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
index f133b3a..75ff8ec 100644
--- a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
+++ b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
@@ -378,7 +378,8 @@ Objective-C and Objective-C++ Dialects}.
-flto-partition=@var{alg} -fmerge-all-constants
es, but I
want to be sure I'm explaining it correctly now.
-Sandra
2016-11-09 Sandra Loosemore <san...@codesourcery.com>
PR c/37998
gcc/
* doc/invoke.texi (Code Gen Options) [-fno-common]: Use correct
terminology. Expand to remove a
On 11/08/2016 08:13 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
The -fprintf-return-value optimization has been disabled since
the last time it caused a bootstrap failure on powerpc64le. With
the underlying problems fixed GCC has bootstrapped fine on all of
powerpc64, powerpc64le and x86_64 and tested with no
On 11/07/2016 05:54 AM, Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
@@ -15261,6 +15262,13 @@ GCC supports the following AVR devices a
@include avr-mmcu.texi
+@item -mabsdata
+@opindex mabsdata
+
+Assume that all data in static stocage can be accessed by LDS / STS
s/stocage/storage/
+inctructions. This
copied the logic from that file to correct the other two
tests. Because this was a straight cut-and-paste, I thought this
qualified as an obvious fix, and have committed it.
-Sandra
2016-10-13 Sandra Loosemore <san...@codesourcery.com>
gcc/testsuite/
* scd42-1.c: Skip if -mcpu incomp
.
-Sandra
2016-09-29 Sandra Loosemore <san...@codesourcery.com>
gcc/testsuite/
* c-c++-common/pr27336.c: Make dependency on
-fdelete-null-pointer-checks explicit.
* g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-array-ptr10.C: Likewise.
* g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-nullptr-1.C: Likewise.
* g++.dg/lto/pr69589_0.
On 09/23/2016 04:39 AM, Andre Vieira (lists) wrote:
Hi Sandra,
Is this better?
Cheers,
Andre
gcc/ChangeLog
2016-09-23 Andre Vieira
* target.def(elf_flags_numeric): Change documentation to
present tense.
And here is the patch with the
On 09/22/2016 07:52 AM, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
On 11/07/16 17:56, Andre Vieira (lists) wrote:
+
diff --git a/gcc/target.def b/gcc/target.def
index
a4df363698ce776b51d11c187baed2069ba88a52..a3d46fa48d919a16699c33b2b78236e62a33e025
100644
--- a/gcc/target.def
+++ b/gcc/target.def
@@
On 09/02/2016 12:17 AM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
On Wed, 29 Aug 2012, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
* doc/invoke.texi: Fix numerous typos and punctuation/grammatical
errors throughout the file. Re-word some awkward sentences and
paragraphs.
There are three questions
On 09/01/2016 01:04 PM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
On Wed, 29 Aug 2012, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
* doc/invoke.texi: Fix numerous typos and punctuation/grammatical
errors throughout the file. Re-word some awkward sentences and
paragraphs.
I noticed you changed return-value
On 09/01/2016 06:22 AM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
Hi Sandra,
On Wed, 29 Aug 2012, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
I've had this largish pile of random copy-edits to invoke.texi left over
from my previous passes through that file earlier this year.
that was an amazing amount of changes; I admire your
On 09/05/2016 09:55 AM, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
On 09/05/2016 12:52 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
On Mon, Sep 05, 2016 at 12:35:13PM +0200, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
On 09/02/2016 05:13 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
diff --git gcc/doc/invoke.texi gcc/doc/invoke.texi
index 87da1f1..38d55d4 100644
---
On 08/18/2016 04:05 AM, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
I think it's probably best to just drop the entire parenthetical
subcluase. This is documentation of how to use MULTILIB_EXCEPTIONS not
precise documentation on what needs to be done on ARM.
In fact, it might be better to just rewrite
On 08/11/2016 04:31 AM, Thomas Preudhomme wrote:
diff --git a/gcc/doc/fragments.texi b/gcc/doc/fragments.texi
index
b6d8541c8ca820fa732363a05221e2cd4d1251c2..abf4e128671bb4751d21f24bb69625593d3c839e
100644
--- a/gcc/doc/fragments.texi
+++ b/gcc/doc/fragments.texi
@@ -117,12 +117,15 @@
On 08/11/2016 02:34 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
I sometimes find myself scouring assembler output from the compiler
and trying to figure out which instructions correspond to which
lines of source code; I believe this is a common activity for some
end-users.
The following patch adds a new
On 08/10/2016 09:51 AM, Thomas Preudhomme wrote:
diff --git a/gcc/doc/fragments.texi b/gcc/doc/fragments.texi
index
b6d8541c8ca820fa732363a05221e2cd4d1251c2..a060635c9cee7374d9d187858ac87acdd08860f2
100644
--- a/gcc/doc/fragments.texi
+++ b/gcc/doc/fragments.texi
@@ -117,12 +117,15 @@
On 08/10/2016 04:06 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
===
--- gcc/doc/invoke.texi (revision 239276)
+++ gcc/doc/invoke.texi (working copy)
@@ -4914,6 +4914,12 @@
construct, known from C++, was introduced with ISO C99 and is by default
601 - 700 of 1117 matches
Mail list logo