; Jason Merrill
Subject: Re: PING: [PATCH] Fix PRs c/52283/37985
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 3:17 AM, Manuel López-Ibáñez
lopeziba...@gmail.com wrote:
On 19 April 2012 11:11, Christian Bruel christian.br...@st.com
wrote:
On 04/18/2012 11:51 AM, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012
Message-
From: H.J. Lu [mailto:hjl.to...@gmail.com]
Sent: 19 April 2012 15:32
To: Manuel López-Ibáñez
Cc: Christian Bruel; Richard Guenther; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Joseph
S. Myers; Jason Merrill
Subject: Re: PING: [PATCH] Fix PRs c/52283/37985
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 3:17 AM, Manuel
On 04/18/2012 11:51 AM, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 11:06 AM, Manuel López-Ibáñez
lopeziba...@gmail.com wrote:
On 18 April 2012 10:29, Christian Bruel christian.br...@st.com wrote:
Is it OK for trunk, bootstrapped and regtested on x86
I think Joseph Myers is on
On 19 April 2012 11:11, Christian Bruel christian.br...@st.com wrote:
On 04/18/2012 11:51 AM, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 11:06 AM, Manuel López-Ibáñez
lopeziba...@gmail.com wrote:
On 18 April 2012 10:29, Christian Bruel christian.br...@st.com wrote:
Is it OK for trunk,
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 3:17 AM, Manuel López-Ibáñez
lopeziba...@gmail.com wrote:
On 19 April 2012 11:11, Christian Bruel christian.br...@st.com wrote:
On 04/18/2012 11:51 AM, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 11:06 AM, Manuel López-Ibáñez
lopeziba...@gmail.com wrote:
On 18
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-04/msg00191.html
and discussed in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52283
I would like to close the associated PRs to fix a few discrepancies with
the folding of constant expressions warnings.
Original patch from Manu was slightly modified to
On 18 April 2012 10:29, Christian Bruel christian.br...@st.com wrote:
Is it OK for trunk, bootstrapped and regtested on x86
I think Joseph Myers is on vacation, and there are no other C FE
reviewers, but since this is c-common and convert.c, perhaps Jason
and/or Richard can review it?
Thanks,
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 11:06 AM, Manuel López-Ibáñez
lopeziba...@gmail.com wrote:
On 18 April 2012 10:29, Christian Bruel christian.br...@st.com wrote:
Is it OK for trunk, bootstrapped and regtested on x86
I think Joseph Myers is on vacation, and there are no other C FE
reviewers, but since
As far as I know, this patch hasn't been reviewed:
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/150636/
Cheers,
Manuel.
On 4 April 2012 10:17, Christian Bruel christian.br...@st.com wrote:
Hello,
Is it OK to push the cleaning of TREE_NO_WARNING to fix the constant
expressions errors discrepancies,
Hello,
Is it OK to push the cleaning of TREE_NO_WARNING to fix the constant
expressions errors discrepancies, as discussed in bugzilla #52283, now
that the trunk is open ?
Many thanks,
2012-03-29 Manuel López-Ibáñez m...@gcc.gnu.org
PR c/52283/37985
* stmt.c
Hi Christian,
You have to add the testcases from both PR52283 and PR37985, and an
appropriate Changelog, and bootstrap+regression test everything and
double-check that the new testcases don't fail and no old testcases
fail with the patch (by comparing with the testcases that fail without
the
On 04/04/2012 11:38 AM, Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote:
Hi Christian,
You have to add the testcases from both PR52283 and PR37985, and an
appropriate Changelog, and bootstrap+regression test everything and
double-check that the new testcases don't fail and no old testcases
fail with the patch (by
On 4 April 2012 13:05, Christian Bruel christian.br...@st.com wrote:
The testscase was part of the attached patch, along with the ChangeLog
entries
You are right! Sorry, I may have been looking at the wrong place.
It was bootstrapped and regtested for C and C++ on x86 (that was in bugzilla
13 matches
Mail list logo
