Re: [PR middle-end/71373] Document missing OMP_CLAUSE_* in gcc/tree-nested.c

ssing > > handling for certain OMP_CLAUSE_*), but based on feedback received, it > > feels as if I'm the only supporter of such "defensive" programming > > paradigms? Any thoughts about that, <http://news.gmane.org/find-root.php?message_id=%3C874m8xqh5w.fsf%40hertz

Re: [PR middle-end/71373] Document missing OMP_CLAUSE_* in gcc/tree-nested.c

Hi! On Mon, 13 Jun 2016 16:43:25 +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > On Wed, 01 Jun 2016 17:06:42 +0200, Thomas Schwinge > wrote: > > Here are the OpenACC bits of . > > In the PR, Jakub clarified that all the missing

Re: [PR middle-end/71373] Document missing OMP_CLAUSE_* in gcc/tree-nested.c

I'm the only supporter of such "defensive" programming > paradigms? > > commit c6b10a9bc1437395c4931d43f30e778152a28cb2 > Author: Thomas Schwinge <tho...@codesourcery.com> > Date: Mon Jun 13 16:29:37 2016 +0200 > > [PR middle-end/71373] Document missing OMP

[PR middle-end/71373] Document missing OMP_CLAUSE_* in gcc/tree-nested.c

a28cb2 Author: Thomas Schwinge <tho...@codesourcery.com> Date: Mon Jun 13 16:29:37 2016 +0200 [PR middle-end/71373] Document missing OMP_CLAUSE_* in gcc/tree-nested.c gcc/ * tree-nested.c (convert_nonlocal_omp_clauses): (convert_local_omp_clauses): Document missing