Hi,
This is a ping.
Is the patch ok for trunk?
Thanks, K
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 5:52 PM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 6:45 AM, Kirill Yukhin kirill.yuk...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi guys,
Thanks for your objections.
HJ, I scanned all AVX2 tests. So, every tests
The following patch fixed the bootstrap for me, will commit it
as obvious once also regtesting finishes.
2011-08-29 Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com
* gcc-interface/Makefile.in (../stamp-gnatlib1-$(RTSDIR)): Copy
tsystem.h into $(RTSDIR) instead of rts.
Patch is certainly
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 11:32 PM, Michael Meissner
meiss...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
David asked me to reverse the default for the -msave-toc-indirect option,
since
it is buggy in a few cases, and in other places causes slowdowns if the
function has an early exit before calling the indrect
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 9:44 PM, Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de wrote:
This patch makes a conversion optab from the direct optabs vcond
and vcondu. This allows to specify different modes for the
actual comparison and the value that is selected.
All targets but i386 are trivially
Hello,
this is a ping for
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-07/msg01503.html. I thought this
was integrated into MELT but it does not look to be in the current trunk.
It just add a primitive read_strv allowing to use meltgc_read_from_val
to get a list of s-expression from a boxed C string
On 08/29/2011 04:01 PM, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
I looked at the ISL sources and saw that they generally had license
notices of the form:
* Use of this software is governed by the GNU LGPLv2.1 license
Hi Joseph,
at least according to a license compatibility chart[1] published by the
FSF, it
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 8:39 AM, Kirill Yukhin kirill.yuk...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
This is a ping.
Is the patch ok for trunk?
OK.
Thanks,
Uros.
Ping.
BR,
Terry
-Original Message-
From: Terry Guo [mailto:terry@arm.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2011 7:46 PM
To: 'gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org'
Subject: [PATCH, testsuite] Avoid architecture options conflict for
case pr42894.c
Hello,
I think it is useful to run this case
Dear Arnaud,
Arnaud Charlet wrote:
+-- This version of Generic_Real_Arrays avoids the use of BLAS and
LAPACK. One
+-- reason for this is new Ada 2012 requirements that prohibit algorithms
such
+-- as Strassen's algorithm, which may be used by some BLAS
implementations. In
May I
On Tue, 30 Aug 2011, Uros Bizjak wrote:
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 9:44 PM, Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de wrote:
This patch makes a conversion optab from the direct optabs vcond
and vcondu. This allows to specify different modes for the
actual comparison and the value that is
Hello,
This is a small patch adding primitive isnull_tree (as there is already
a primitive isnull_basicblock).
Pierre Vittet
Index: gcc/melt/xtramelt-ana-base.melt
===
--- gcc/melt/xtramelt-ana-base.melt (révision 178282)
+++
... I committed the below because what we have now cannot possibly be
right, can easily break the build. Please the target maintainers double
check the whole thing, test it.
Paolo.
//
2011-08-30 Paolo Carlini paolo.carl...@oracle.com
*
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 10:50 AM, Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de wrote:
Hm, ok - that was the first variant I tried (well, but with modeless
operands 1 and 2, to keep 4 and 5 selcting int vs. fp compare). But
modeless operands get you that annoying warning from the gen* programs.
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 11:02:02AM +0200, Uros Bizjak wrote:
Hmm. But then I'd have to try emit an insn, right? Currently
the vectorizer simply looks for an optab handler ... the
operands are not readily available (but their mode is known).
So I'd create some fake regs, setup operands
On Tue, 30 Aug 2011, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 11:02:02AM +0200, Uros Bizjak wrote:
Hmm. But then I'd have to try emit an insn, right? Currently
the vectorizer simply looks for an optab handler ... the
operands are not readily available (but their mode is known).
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 11:07 AM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 11:02:02AM +0200, Uros Bizjak wrote:
Hmm. But then I'd have to try emit an insn, right? Currently
the vectorizer simply looks for an optab handler ... the
operands are not readily available
On Tue, 30 Aug 2011, Uros Bizjak wrote:
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 11:07 AM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 11:02:02AM +0200, Uros Bizjak wrote:
Hmm. But then I'd have to try emit an insn, right? Currently
the vectorizer simply looks for an optab handler ...
Hi Pedro,
The update of copyright date is ok.
The rest of the patch doesn't look right. Why you have here a stray
comma? Why you remove here leading spaces for comments?
Kai
2011/8/30 Paolo Carlini paolo.carl...@oracle.com:
... I committed the below because what we have now cannot possibly
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 11:15 AM, Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de wrote:
Hmm. But then I'd have to try emit an insn, right? Currently
the vectorizer simply looks for an optab handler ... the
operands are not readily available (but their mode is known).
So I'd create some fake
On 08/30/2011 11:18 AM, Kai Tietz wrote:
Hi Pedro,
Paolo
The update of copyright date is ok.
The rest of the patch doesn't look right. Why you have here a stray
comma?
Actually, *you* had wrong commas. Look closer.
Paolo.
2011/8/30 Paolo Carlini paolo.carl...@oracle.com:
On 08/30/2011 11:18 AM, Kai Tietz wrote:
Hi Pedro,
Paolo
The update of copyright date is ok.
The rest of the patch doesn't look right. Why you have here a stray
comma?
Actually, *you* had wrong commas. Look closer.
Paolo.
Yes, saw it
Thank you!
Guys who is able to write, could you please check-in my changes?
K
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 12:12 PM, Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 8:39 AM, Kirill Yukhin kirill.yuk...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
This is a ping.
Is the patch ok for trunk?
OK.
On Tue, 30 Aug 2011, Uros Bizjak wrote:
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 11:15 AM, Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de wrote:
Hmm. But then I'd have to try emit an insn, right? Currently
the vectorizer simply looks for an optab handler ... the
operands are not readily available (but their
On Tue, 30 Aug 2011, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Tue, 30 Aug 2011, Uros Bizjak wrote:
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 11:15 AM, Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de
wrote:
Hmm. But then I'd have to try emit an insn, right? Currently
the vectorizer simply looks for an optab handler ...
On 29/08/11 04:29, Michael Hope wrote:
On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 3:19 AM, Andrew Stubbsa...@codesourcery.com wrote:
Hi all,
This patch adds support for -mcpu=native, -mtune=native, and -march=native
for ARM Linux hosts.
So far, it only recognises Cortex-A8 and Cortex-A9, so I really need to
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 10:47 AM, Tom de Vries vr...@codesourcery.com wrote:
Hi Richard,
On 07/30/2011 09:21 AM, Tom de Vries wrote:
This is an updated version of the patch. I have 2 new patches and an updated
testcase which I will sent out individually.
Patch set was bootstrapped and
On Tue, 30 Aug 2011, Tobias Grosser wrote:
On 08/29/2011 04:01 PM, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
I looked at the ISL sources and saw that they generally had license
notices of the form:
* Use of this software is governed by the GNU LGPLv2.1 license
Hi Joseph,
at least according to a
I'm seeing several cases in which SMS's register move handling is
causing it to generate worse code than the normal schedulers on ARM
Cortex-A8. The problem is that we first schedule the loop without
taking the moves into account, then emit the required moves immediately
before the initial
This patch removes the (unused) undo_replace_buff_elem list.
Verges on the obvious, but still.
Patch 3 splits the generation of moves into two: one function to record
what needs to happen, and another function to actually do it. It's then
easy to bail out if we decide that we don't want the
I've run into PR48571 again, and after having fun with out data-dep
analysis code I indeed believe that we should not try to re-construct
ARRAY_REFs from code involving pointer arithmetic. ARRAY_REFs
have constraints imposed on them that are relied on by data dependence
analysis and that are
Instructions in a partial schedule are currently represented as a
ddg node. This patch uses a more abstract id instead. At the moment,
the ids map directly to ddg nodes, but the next patch will add register
moves to the end.
One slight advantage of using ids is that we can leave the ASAP value
This patch adds infrastructure that will be used by the final patch.
Specifically:
- it splits the generation of register moves into two: schedule_reg_moves
records moves in the partial schedule, while apply_reg_moves makes the
register substitutions.
This patch doesn't actually
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 4:49 PM, Ilya Enkovich enkovich@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
Here is a new version of the patch. Changes from the previous version
(http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-07/msg02240.html):
- updated to trunk
- TODO_remove_unused_locals flag was removed from
This is the move-scheduling patch itself. It should be fairly
self-explanatory. Let me know if it isn't, and I'll try to improve
the commentary.
One potentially controversial change is to the way we handle moves
in the prologue and epilogue. The current code uses a conservative
check to decide
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 2:29 PM, Richard Sandiford
richard.sandif...@linaro.org wrote:
This is the move-scheduling patch itself. It should be fairly
self-explanatory. Let me know if it isn't, and I'll try to improve
the commentary.
Can you add some testcases?
Thanks,
Richard.
One
Comparison of MELT version were not consistent accross the codebase:
- MELT .c meltdesc were generated with melt_versionstr using
MELT_VERSION_STRING define
- comparison at several places in the source code was done against
MELT_VERSION_STRING
- comparision at other places was done
Richard Guenther richard.guent...@gmail.com writes:
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 2:29 PM, Richard Sandiford
richard.sandif...@linaro.org wrote:
This is the move-scheduling patch itself. It should be fairly
self-explanatory. Let me know if it isn't, and I'll try to improve
the commentary.
Can
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 4:31 AM, Artem Shinkarov
artyom.shinkar...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
This is a patch for the explicit vector shuffling we have discussed a
long time ago here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-08/msg01092.html
The new patch introduces the new tree code, as we agreed,
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 2:43 PM, Richard Sandiford
richard.sandif...@linaro.org wrote:
Richard Guenther richard.guent...@gmail.com writes:
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 2:29 PM, Richard Sandiford
richard.sandif...@linaro.org wrote:
This is the move-scheduling patch itself. It should be fairly
Generic actuals are pre-analyzed in order to capture external names, but are
only fully analyzed within the instance. If an actual is a prefixed call to a
dispatching operation, it may appear syntactically as a call without actuals.
It is necessary to parse it as an object.operation again in order
This set of changes implements support for the Ada 2012 features of
implicit conversions for anonymous access types and membership tests
with a test expression of an anonymous access type (see AI05-0149).
Expressions of an anonymous access type are now generally allowed in
contexts where the
Richard Guenther richard.guent...@gmail.com writes:
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 2:43 PM, Richard Sandiford
richard.sandif...@linaro.org wrote:
Richard Guenther richard.guent...@gmail.com writes:
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 2:29 PM, Richard Sandiford
richard.sandif...@linaro.org wrote:
This is the
This set of changes implements support for AI05-0148, the Ada2012
rules concerting the accessibility of a stand-alone object of an
anonymous access type (hereafter, a saooaaat).
The Extra_Accessibility attribute was previously only used for a
formal parameter of an anonymous access type. The use
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 2:42 AM, Ilya Tocar tocarip.in...@gmail.com wrote:
Fixed.
2011/8/26 H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com:
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 8:47 AM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 8:06 AM, Ilya Tocar tocarip.in...@gmail.com wrote:
Done.
Also fixed
Instead of the full expansion targetting code generation, a light expansion is
now used in formal verification mode. Light expansion has three main objectives:
1. Perform limited expansion to explicit some Ada rules and constructs
2. Facilitate treatment for the formal verification back-end
3.
This patch incorporates support in the compiler to detect conflicts
in declarations of primitives of concurrent tagged types (see full
documentation in AI05-0090-1). In addition the patch also performs
a minor code cleanup in order to factorize the code which reports
an error on wrong formal of
This patch ensures that the full view of a designated type is available in the
body of an instance when the related access type acts as an actual in another
instance.
Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, committed on trunk
2011-08-30 Hristian Kirtchev kirtc...@adacore.com
* sem_ch12.adb
On Tue, 30 Aug 2011, Richard Guenther wrote:
I've run into PR48571 again, and after having fun with out data-dep
analysis code I indeed believe that we should not try to re-construct
ARRAY_REFs from code involving pointer arithmetic. ARRAY_REFs
have constraints imposed on them that are
Fix a non-compliance with the unwind ABI.
No pure Ada testcase.
Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, committed on trunk
2011-08-30 Tristan Gingold ging...@adacore.com
* raise-gcc.c: Never catch exception if _UA_FORCE_UNWIND flag is set,
to be compliant with the ABI.
Index:
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 6:55 AM, Ilya Tocar tocarip.in...@gmail.com wrote:
Little fix.
2011/8/30 Ilya Tocar tocarip.in...@gmail.com:
Sorry. Regenerated.
2011/8/30 H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 2:42 AM, Ilya Tocar tocarip.in...@gmail.com wrote:
Fixed.
2011/8/26 H.J.
Minor refactoring to clarify where full expansion applies wrt Alfa mode.
Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, committed on trunk
2011-08-30 Yannick Moy m...@adacore.com
* opt.adb, opt.ads (Full_Expander_Active): New function defines a
common shorthand for (Expander_Active and not
As this constant was a percentage, it is now renamed
to Sec_Stack_Percentage.
No functional change.
Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, committed on trunk
2011-08-30 Tristan Gingold ging...@adacore.com
* s-parame-vms-alpha.ads, s-parame-hpux.ads, s-tassta.adb,
s-tarest.adb,
Following up on the previous change, we now move all the formal
verification expansion in a separate exp_alfa.ad? file. Previous exp_*_light
change is reverted/canceled at the same time (not shown here for convenience).
Instead of the full expansion targetting code generation, a light expansion
On 26/08/11 11:03, Andrew Stubbs wrote:
There was a bug I found in final testing, so this has been delayed
somewhat.
I've just committed this version. There are a few minor changes to the
way negative/inverted constants are generated.
Bernd found another bug whist testing for arm. Apparently
[I'm going to respond to this piece-meal, to make sure I don't drop
anything. My apologies for the long thread, but I'm pretty sure it's in
everybody's kill file by now.]
+ /* Be as conservative as possible on variable offsets. */
+ if (TREE_OPERAND (exp, 2)
+ !host_integerp
On 30/08/11 15:32, Andrew Stubbs wrote:
On 26/08/11 11:03, Andrew Stubbs wrote:
There was a bug I found in final testing, so this has been delayed
somewhat.
I've just committed this version. There are a few minor changes to the
way negative/inverted constants are generated.
Bernd found
In this testcase, we weren't instantiating Foobarvoid until fairly
late, so the field and proxy variable didn't have a size, leading to
madness.
Tested x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, applying to trunk and 4.6.
commit 7082532a480501ab8f8f99bc62589a9045da303a
Author: Jason Merrill ja...@redhat.com
Date:
This is basically the same as c++/49924, but for classes instead of
arrays: if there is no explicit initializer written in the init-list,
the member is value-initialized.
Tested x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, applying to trunk and 4.6.
commit eccc1f7f9987a394dcf9856d43244a95c51bc880
Author: Jason
On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 11:36:42PM +0200, Mikael Morin wrote:
On Saturday 27 August 2011 02:34:24 Steve Kargl wrote:
The attached patch allows gfortran to compile the
attached testcase. The resulting executable runs
as expected.
Short story:
character(len=20) :: string = 'some
Hi,
tested x86_64-linux, committed.
Paolo.
///
2011-08-30 Paolo Carlini paolo.carl...@oracle.com
* include/bits/stl_iterator.h (make_move_iterator): Implement DR2061.
* testsuite/24_iterators/move_iterator/dr2061.cc: New.
*
On Mon, 29 Aug 2011, Gary Funck wrote:
1) The sanity check should probably read:
gcc_assert ((1U cl_lang_count) = CL_MIN_OPTION_CLASS);
In other words, it is off-by-one.
Please send a patch.
2) The fixed shift counts starting at CL_PARAMS probably need to be
adjusted upwards to allow
On 08/30/11 15:52:12, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
Please send a patch. [... on points 1, 2, and 3]0
OK, will do.
GF: Also, the use of fixed masks is problematic. Perhaps the AWK script
GF: could be changed to also generate values for CL_PARAMS, etc., ensuring
GF: that will not conflict with the
*bit_offset is supposed to be relative to *byte_offset then it should
be easy to calculate it without another get_inner_reference.
Since, as you suggested, we will terminate early on variable length
offsets, we can assume both DECL_FIELD_OFFSET and DECL_FIELD_BIT_OFFSET
will be constants by
The compiler aborts on the initialization of an object with an aggregate, if
its nominal subtype is a discriminated record type with a variant part for
which the variants all have the same size and one of the variants contains a
component whose type is tagged or controlled.
Tested on
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 09:16:40AM +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 11:32 PM, Michael Meissner
meiss...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
David asked me to reverse the default for the -msave-toc-indirect option,
since
it is buggy in a few cases, and in other places causes
This cleans up and documents the use of IN_GCC in the GNAT build system.
No functional change. Tested on x86_64-suse-linux, applied on the mainline.
2011-08-30 Eric Botcazou ebotca...@adacore.com
* raise-gcc.c: Do not include coretypes.h and tm.h.
(setup_to_install): Remove
Tested on x86_64-suse-linux, applied on the mainline.
2011-08-30 Eric Botcazou ebotca...@adacore.com
* gcc-interface/ada-tree.h (TYPE_EXTRA_SUBTYPE_P): Add internal check.
* gcc-interface/utils2.c (build_binary_op): Tighten condition.
(build_unary_op): Likewise.
--
Ping. Re-bootstrapped and re-tested yesterday on x86_64-linux.
THanks,
Martin
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 10:55:31PM +0200, Martin Jambor wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 06:52:05PM +0200, Martin Jambor wrote:
pass_split_functions is happy to split functions which have type
attributes
On Tue, 30 Aug 2011, Richard Guenther wrote:
oh, hum - now I remember ;) Eventually the C frontend should handle
this not via the function call mechanism but similar to how Joseph
added __builtin_complex support with
2011-08-19 Joseph Myers jos...@codesourcery.com
* c-parser.c
On Tue, 30 Aug 2011, Gary Funck wrote:
On 08/30/11 15:52:12, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
Please send a patch. [... on points 1, 2, and 3]0
OK, will do.
GF: Also, the use of fixed masks is problematic. Perhaps the AWK script
GF: could be changed to also generate values for CL_PARAMS, etc.,
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 2:03 PM, Richard Guenther
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 4:31 AM, Artem Shinkarov
artyom.shinkar...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
This is a patch for the explicit vector shuffling we have discussed a
long time ago here:
On Tue, 30 Aug 2011, Eric Botcazou wrote:
This cleans up and documents the use of IN_GCC in the GNAT build system.
The mess of IN_GCC isn't at all GNAT-specific. See what I said in
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-10/msg00947.html. Beyond that,
include/ansidecl.h tests IN_GCC to avoid
Hello!
The gcc.target/i386/fma-compile.c test did not escape [ and ]
correctly. Unfortunately, this problem terminated dejagnu testing
early, hiding the problem with -mfma target attribute handling.
Attached patch fixes both problems.
2011-08-30 Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com
*
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 10:46 AM, Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello!
The gcc.target/i386/fma-compile.c test did not escape [ and ]
correctly. Unfortunately, this problem terminated dejagnu testing
early, hiding the problem with -mfma target attribute handling.
Attached patch fixes
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 7:41 PM, Andi Kleen a...@firstfloor.org wrote:
H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com writes:
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 12:44 PM, Iyer, Balaji V
balaji.v.i...@intel.com wrote:
Hello Everyone,
Here is a link for a new patch (http://software.intel.com/file/38290).
This patch is
Btw, *byte_offset is still not relative to the containing object as
documented, but relative to the base object of the exp reference
tree (thus, to a in a.i.j.k.l instead of to a.i.j.k). If it were supposed
to be relative to a.i.j.k get_inner_reference would be not needed
either. Can you
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 10:47 PM, Stubbs, Andrew
andrew_stu...@mentor.com wrote:
On 29/08/11 04:29, Michael Hope wrote:
On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 3:19 AM, Andrew Stubbsa...@codesourcery.com wrote:
Hi all,
This patch adds support for -mcpu=native, -mtune=native, and -march=native
for ARM Linux
Please cleanup the formatting issues on cilkplus branch and please
follow GCC coding standard.
I'm not sure if following the coding standard is required for the library.
After all it's essentially a third party library and I assume shared
with other cilkplus implementations. It may make more
Hi,
apparently the doc wasn't updated 10 years ago when the macro
CP_TYPE_QUALS was replaced with the function cp_type_quals. I assume
the behavior didn't change, so the documentation change should be
minor. Or are functions documented differently?
2011-08-08 Marc Glisse
In this testcase the compiler was incorrectly treating the typedef as
giving a name to the class for linkage purposes, and then getting
confused by that. While looking at this I noticed that nothing was
actually looking at the user_defined_type_p bitfield, so I repurposed it.
Tested
Just needed to correct current_class_type to current_nonlambda_class
type here.
Tested x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, applying to trunk and 4.6.
commit 159563fe81e80fd23ff6252e17c86012a20b169b
Author: Jason Merrill ja...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Aug 30 15:46:31 2011 -0400
PR c++/50089
*
We play funny games with binding levels to support backward
compatibility with the ARM-era rules for for-loop scoping, and we play
funny games with binding levels to support lambdas, and the games didn't
play well with each other. It seems unlikely that people will still be
relying on ancient
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 11:31:38PM +0200, Tobias Burnus wrote:
Named common blocks are required to have the same size in all files and
scopes. gfortran was warning before when the size was extended, but not
when a smaller common block followed a larger common block with the same
name.
On Aug 30, 2011, at 10:01 AM, Artem Shinkarov wrote:
The patch at the moment lacks of some examples, but mainly it works
fine for me. It would be nice if i386 gurus could look into the way I
am doing the expansion.
Middle-end parts seems to be more or less fine, they have not changed
much
On 08/17/11 08:38:44, Gary Funck wrote:
I have been looking at changing UPC's method of
recording the blocking factor so that it uses less space
in the tree type node. The suggested method for
achieving this space reduction is to use a hash table to
map pointers to type nodes into UPC
Sure, the patch is safe enough. Done.
Peter Bergner berg...@vnet.ibm.com wrote:
On Tue, 2011-08-30 at 00:27 -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
The DFP classes are treated as transparent aggregates, so they get
mangled and passed like their first field. In the testcase it is
defined to have a base
86 matches
Mail list logo
