Hi,
On 1 November 2017 at 03:12, Jim Wilson <wil...@tuliptree.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-10-31 at 14:35 +1100, Kugan Vivekanandarajah wrote:
>> Ping ?
>>
>> I see that Jim has clarified the comments from Andrew.
>
> Andrew also suggested that we add a testcase
Hi Jim,
On 1 November 2017 at 03:12, Jim Wilson <wil...@tuliptree.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-10-31 at 14:35 +1100, Kugan Vivekanandarajah wrote:
>> Ping ?
>>
>> I see that Jim has clarified the comments from Andrew.
>
> Andrew also suggested that we add a testcase
Ping ?
I see that Jim has clarified the comments from Andrew.
Thanks,
Kugan
On 13 October 2017 at 08:48, Jim Wilson <wil...@tuliptree.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 2017-09-22 at 14:11 -0700, Andrew Pinski wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 11:39 AM, Jim Wilson <jim.wil...@li
Hi Richard,
On 18 September 2017 at 17:50, Richard Biener
<richard.guent...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 3:36 AM, Kugan Vivekanandarajah
> <kugan.vivekanandara...@linaro.org> wrote:
>> Hi Richard,
>>
>> On 15 September 2017 at 19:31, Richard B
Hi Richard,
On 15 September 2017 at 19:31, Richard Biener
<richard.guent...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 3:27 AM, Kugan Vivekanandarajah
> <kugan.vivekanandara...@linaro.org> wrote:
>> This patch adds separate params for rtl unroller so that they can
Hi Andrew,
On 15 September 2017 at 13:36, Andrew Pinski <pins...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 6:33 PM, Kugan Vivekanandarajah
> <kugan.vivekanandara...@linaro.org> wrote:
>> This patch adds aarch64_loop_unroll_adjust to limit partial unrolling
>>
Hi Ramana
On 15 September 2017 at 18:40, Ramana Radhakrishnan
<ramana@googlemail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 2:33 AM, Kugan Vivekanandarajah
> <kugan.vivekanandara...@linaro.org> wrote:
>> This patch adds aarch64_loop_unroll_adjust to limit partial u
Hi Andrew,
On 15 September 2017 at 13:20, Andrew Pinski <pins...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 6:28 PM, Kugan Vivekanandarajah
> <kugan.vivekanandara...@linaro.org> wrote:
>> This patch adds number of hw prefetchers available to
>> cpu_prefetch_
This patch adds aarch64_loop_unroll_adjust to limit partial unrolling
in rtl based on strided-loads in loop.
Thanks,
Kugan
gcc/ChangeLog:
2017-09-12 Kugan Vivekanandarajah <kug...@linaro.org>
* cfgloop.h (iv_analyze_biv): export.
* loop-iv.c: Likewise.
* config/aarch64/aar
Change iv_analyze_result to take const_rtx. This is just to make the
next patch compile. No functional changes:
Thanks,
Kugan
gcc/ChangeLog:
2017-09-12 Kugan Vivekanandarajah <kug...@linaro.org>
* cfgloop.h (iv_analyze_result): Change 2nd param from rtx to
const_rtx.
This patch prevent tree unroller from completely unrolling inner loops if that
results in excessive strided-loads in outer loop.
Thanks,
Kugan
gcc/ChangeLog:
2017-09-12 Kugan Vivekanandarajah <kug...@linaro.org>
* config/aarch64/aarch64.c (count_mem_load_streams
This patch adds number of hw prefetchers available to
cpu_prefetch_tune so it can be used in loop unrolling decisions.
Thanks,
Kugan
gcc/ChangeLog:
2017-09-12 Kugan Vivekanandarajah <kug...@linaro.org>
* config/aarch64/aarch64-protos.h (struct cpu_prefetch_tune): Add
new
This patch adds separate params for rtl unroller so that they can be
tunned accordingly. Default values I have are based on some testing on
aarch64. I am happy to leave it as the current value and set them in
the back-end.
Thanks,
Kugan
gcc/ChangeLog:
2017-09-12 Kugan Vivekanandarajah <
.
Thanks,
Kugan
Hi James,
On 29 August 2017 at 21:31, James Greenhalgh <james.greenha...@arm.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 11:20:02AM +1000, Kugan Vivekanandarajah wrote:
>> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-03/msg00614.html added this
>> workaround to get kern
ping^3
Thanks,
Kugan
On 11 August 2017 at 16:09, Kugan Vivekanandarajah
<kugan.vivekanandara...@linaro.org> wrote:
> Ping^2?
>
> Thanks,
> Kugan
>
> On 21 July 2017 at 20:12, Kugan Vivekanandarajah
> <kugan.vivekanandara...@linaro.org> wrote:
>> Ping ?
Ping^2?
Thanks,
Kugan
On 21 July 2017 at 20:12, Kugan Vivekanandarajah
<kugan.vivekanandara...@linaro.org> wrote:
> Ping ?
>
> Thanks,
> Kugan
>
> On 27 June 2017 at 11:20, Kugan Vivekanandarajah
> <kugan.vivekanandara...@linaro.org> wrote:
>> https://gcc.
Ping ?
Thanks,
Kugan
On 27 June 2017 at 11:20, Kugan Vivekanandarajah
<kugan.vivekanandara...@linaro.org> wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-03/msg00614.html added this
> workaround to get kernel building with when TARGET_FIX_ERR_A53_843419
> is enabled.
>
Hi Ramana,
On 27 June 2017 at 18:01, Ramana Radhakrishnan
<ramana.radhakrish...@foss.arm.com> wrote:
> On 27/06/17 02:20, Kugan Vivekanandarajah wrote:
>>
>> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-03/msg00614.html added this
>> workaround to ge
.wrf can be built (with LTO in this case) without
-mno-pc-relative-literal-loads
Bootstrapped and regression tested on aarch64-linux-gnu with no new regressions.
Is this OK for trunk?
Thanks,
Kugan
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2017-06-27 Kugan Vivekanandarajah <kug...@linaro.org>
* gcc.
ndence graph RDG and data dependences
+ in DDR_TABLE. Store data dependence relations for runtime alias
+ check in ALIAS_DDRS. */
+
+static void
+break_alias_scc_partitions (struct graph *rdg,
+ hash_table *ddr_table,
+ vec *partitions,
+
the internal function for this to some extend but for some
cases we should be able to say while in loop distribution itself that
the control flow will not result in loop being vectorized.
Btw, did you run Spec2006 with this? Any notable changes ?
Thanks,
Kugan
On 2 June 2017 at 21:51, Bin Cheng <bin
amp;& integer_zerop (vr0.min))
+set_value_range_to_nonnull (vr, TREE_TYPE (op0));
Just wondering if this has to be done only for POINTER_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE
(op))? Or is EXACT_DIV_EXPR always of POINTER_TYPE_P?
Thanks,
Kugan
Hi Richard,
On 30/01/17 21:08, Richard Biener wrote:
On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 12:23 AM, kugan
<kugan.vivekanandara...@linaro.org> wrote:
Hi All,
As suggested by Richard in the PR, I tried to implement variable size
structures for VR as shown in attached patch. That is, I changed ipa-
Hi Richard,
On 30/01/17 21:08, Richard Biener wrote:
On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 12:23 AM, kugan
<kugan.vivekanandara...@linaro.org> wrote:
lto1: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
0xdedc4b crash_signal
../../gcc/gcc/toplev.c:333
0xb46680 ipa_node_params_t::duplicate(cgrap
k it has anything to do with
variable structure.
Thanks,
Kugan
diff --git a/gcc/ipa-cp.c b/gcc/ipa-cp.c
index aa3c997..bc6670f 100644
--- a/gcc/ipa-cp.c
+++ b/gcc/ipa-cp.c
@@ -4945,21 +4945,29 @@ ipcp_store_vr_results (void)
for (unsigned i = 0; i < count; i++)
{
ipcp_par
the arm back-end?
Thanks,
Kugan
%O%s} \
+ crt0%O%s"
Some targets seems to use shared|pie. When you change it, shouldn't it
also include for pie?
Thanks,
Kugan
for arguments to param_type.
In propagate_vr_accross_jump_function also, we are doing the conversion.
Thanks,
Kugan
diff --git a/gcc/ipa-cp.c b/gcc/ipa-cp.c
index 2ec671f..9853467 100644
--- a/gcc/ipa-cp.c
+++ b/gcc/ipa-cp.c
@@ -1846,11 +1846,11 @@ propagate_bits_accross_jump_function (cgraph_edge *cs,
int
Hi Martin,
On 07/12/16 21:08, Martin Jambor wrote:
Hello Kugan,
sorry, I have lost track of this patch and re-discovered it only now.
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 04:25:00PM +1100, kugan wrote:
Hi,
On 24/11/16 19:48, Richard Biener wrote:
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 4:33 PM, Martin Jambor <m
Hi,
in propagate_vr_accross_jump_function, drop_tree_overflow should be
after fold_convert. Attached patch changes this.
Bootstrapped and regression tested on x86_64-linux-gnu with no new
regressions. Is this OK for trunk?
Thanks,
Kugan
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2016-12-09 Kugan
Hi Martin,
On 07/12/16 21:08, Martin Jambor wrote:
Hello Kugan,
sorry, I have lost track of this patch and re-discovered it only now.
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 04:25:00PM +1100, kugan wrote:
Hi,
On 24/11/16 19:48, Richard Biener wrote:
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 4:33 PM, Martin Jambor <m
Hi,
On 24/11/16 19:48, Richard Biener wrote:
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 4:33 PM, Martin Jambor <mjam...@suse.cz> wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 12:38:18PM +1100, kugan wrote:
Hi,
I was relying on ipa_get_callee_param_type to get type of parameter and then
convert arguments to thi
Hi,
On 24/11/16 19:48, Richard Biener wrote:
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 4:33 PM, Martin Jambor <mjam...@suse.cz> wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 12:38:18PM +1100, kugan wrote:
Hi,
I was relying on ipa_get_callee_param_type to get type of parameter and thenHi,
convert arguments to thi
);
Thanks,
Kugan
?
Thanks,
Kugan
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2016-11-18 Kugan Vivekanandarajah <kug...@linaro.org>
PR IPA/78365
* gcc.dg/torture/pr78365.c: New test.
gcc/ChangeLog:
2016-11-18 Kugan Vivekanandarajah <kug...@linaro.org>
PR IPA/78365
Hi Richard,
On 08/11/16 23:45, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 3:32 AM, kugan <kugan.vivekanandara...@linaro.org> wrote:
Hi,
In tree-ssa-coalesce, register_ssa_partition ) and
register_ssa_partition_check have lost their meaning over various commits
and now just ve
affected targets
aarch64-none-linux-gnu and powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu. I also tested
it on x86_64-linux-gnu with no new regressions. Is this OK?
Thanks,
Kugan
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2016-11-13 Kugan Vivekanandarajah <kug...@linaro.org>
* g++.dg/torture/pr78268.C: New test.
Hi David,
Sorry about the breakage. I have already reverted this patch as this is
causing bootstrap failures. I will test it on more targets before
submitting this patch again.
Thanks,
Kugan
On 11/11/16 00:25, David Edelsohn wrote:
Kugan
Is there a PR for this failure? It broke bootstrap
Hi Andrew,
On 10/11/16 17:14, Andrew Pinski wrote:
On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 12:01 AM, kugan
<kugan.vivekanandara...@linaro.org> wrote:
Hi Andrew,
On 09/11/16 17:02, Andrew Pinski wrote:
Either this patch or the patch for "Handle unary pass-through jump
functions for ipa-
e --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,go
--disable-werror --with-sysroot=/ --enable-plugins
--enable-gnu-indirect-function
I have not tried removing the +lse part though
Sorry about the breakage. I will try to reproduce this.
Thanks,
Kugan
Hi,
On 04/11/16 04:36, Martin Jambor wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 02:03:47PM +1100, kugan wrote:
...snip...
I have also separated the constant parameter conversion out and posted as
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-10/msg02309.html. This is now
handling just unary pass-through
Hi,
On 04/11/16 03:24, Martin Jambor wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 01:58:13PM +1100, kugan wrote:
Do I understand it correctly that extract_range_from_unary_expr deals
with any potential type conversions better (compared to what you did
before here)?
Yes, this can be wrong at times too
while reading the register_ssa_partition.
Attached patch just changes it to verify_ssa_for_coalesce to better
reflect what it is doing now.
Bootstrap and regression testing is ongoing. Is this OK for trunk if no
regressions?
Thanks,
Kugan
gcc/ChangeLog:
2016-11-08 Kugan Vivekanandarajah
Hi,
On 28/10/16 01:58, Jan Hubicka wrote:
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2016-10-25 Kugan Vivekanandarajah <kug...@linaro.org>
* gcc.dg/ipa/vrp7.c: New test.
gcc/ChangeLog:
2016-10-25 Kugan Vivekanandarajah <kug...@linaro.org>
* ipa-cp.c (ipa_get_jf_pass_th
orted in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78121. I have separated
this part of the patch with a testcase.
Please note that I am using fold_convert in the attached patch.
Bootstrapped and regression tested on x86_64-linux-gnu with no new
regressions. Is this OK for trunk?
Than
to handle other passes like constant propagation as
follow up based on the comments.
LTO bootstrapped and regression tested on x86_64-linux-gnu with no new
regressions.
Does this look OK?
Thanks,
Kugan
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2016-10-25 Kugan Vivekanandarajah <kug...@linaro.
need any special casing for NOP_EXPR here. bit_value_unop handles
already handles CASE_CONVERT.
Is this OK if no regressions in bootstrap and regression testing.
Thanks,
Kugan
gcc/ChangeLog:
2016-10-25 Kugan Vivekanandarajah <kug...@linaro.org>
* ipa-cp.c (ipcp_bits_l
On 21/10/16 18:16, Richard Biener wrote:
On Fri, 21 Oct 2016, kugan wrote:
Hi,
On 20/10/16 23:15, Jan Hubicka wrote:
Hi Richard,
On 20/10/16 18:41, Richard Biener wrote:
On Thu, 20 Oct 2016, kugan wrote:
On 20/10/16 01:26, Jan Hubicka wrote:
Would excluding weak symbols (I believe
Hi,
On 20/10/16 23:15, Jan Hubicka wrote:
Hi Richard,
On 20/10/16 18:41, Richard Biener wrote:
On Thu, 20 Oct 2016, kugan wrote:
On 20/10/16 01:26, Jan Hubicka wrote:
Would excluding weak symbols (I believe I can check DECL_WEAK for this)
good
enough. Or looking for acceptable subset
Hi Richard,
On 20/10/16 18:41, Richard Biener wrote:
On Thu, 20 Oct 2016, kugan wrote:
On 20/10/16 01:26, Jan Hubicka wrote:
Would excluding weak symbols (I believe I can check DECL_WEAK for this)
good
enough. Or looking for acceptable subset would work?
I think we should add a symtab
nes.
Though this is good, in order to preserve the tested functionality, we
need to add noclone attribute. Here is a patch to do this.
Regression tested on aatch64-linux-gnu. Is this OK for trunk?
Thanks,
Kugan
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2016-10-20 Kugan Vivekanandarajah <kug
sses bootstrap and regression testing on x86_64-linu-gnu.
Thanks,
Kugan
Honza
Richard.
Thanks,
Kugan
Richard.
Attached patch bootstraps and regression testing didn't introduce any new
regressions.
Thanks,
Kugan
gcc/ChangeLog:
2016-10-19 Kugan Vivekanandarajah <kug...@linaro.or
Hi Richard,
On 19/10/16 19:23, Richard Biener wrote:
On Wed, 19 Oct 2016, kugan wrote:
Hi,
While computing jump function value range for pointer, I am wondering if we
can assume that any tree with ADDR_EXPR will be nonnull.
That is, in cases like:
int arr[10];
foo ([1]);
OR
struct st
if this can be wrong. Any
thoughts?
Attached patch bootstraps and regression testing didn't introduce any
new regressions.
Thanks,
Kugan
gcc/ChangeLog:
2016-10-19 Kugan Vivekanandarajah <kug...@linaro.org>
* ipa-prop.c (ipa_compute_jump_functions_for_edge): Set
Hi Richard,
On 14/10/16 23:53, Richard Biener wrote:
On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 1:12 AM, kugan
<kugan.vivekanandara...@linaro.org> wrote:
Hi Richard,
On 13/10/16 20:44, Richard Biener wrote:
On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 6:49 AM, kugan
<kugan.vivekanandara...@linaro.org> wrote:
= data->loop_info;
+ basic_block *bbs = get_loop_body (loop);
Is this worth being part of the cost model such that it can have
different defaults for different micro-architecture?
Thanks,
Kugan
,
Kugan
gcc/ChangeLog:
2016-10-12 Kugan Vivekanandarajah <kugan.vivekanandara...@linaro.org>
* ipa-prop.c (ipa_compute_jump_functions_for_edge): Set value range
for pointer type too.
(ipcp_update_vr): set_ptr_nonnull for pointer.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2016
Hi Richard,
On 13/10/16 20:44, Richard Biener wrote:
On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 6:49 AM, kugan
<kugan.vivekanandara...@linaro.org> wrote:
Hi Richard,
what does this try to do? Preserve info VRP computed across PTA?
I think we didn't yet sort out the nonlocal/escaped vs. null ha
r now as you said, I
will document it.
When we start using pt.null from PTA analysis, we would also have to
take into account pt.anything/nonlocal/escaped.
Does that make sense?
Thanks,
Kugan
Hi Richard,
On 13/10/16 05:53, kugan wrote:
Hi Richard,
On 12/10/16 23:24, Richard Biener wrote:
On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 8:56 AM, kugan
<kugan.vivekanandara...@linaro.org> wrote:
Hi,
This patch uses get_ptr_nonnull in tree-vrp.
Bootstrapped and regression tested this with other p
Hi Richard,
On 12/10/16 23:24, Richard Biener wrote:
On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 8:56 AM, kugan
<kugan.vivekanandara...@linaro.org> wrote:
Hi,
This patch uses get_ptr_nonnull in tree-vrp.
Bootstrapped and regression tested this with other patched without any
new regressions on x86_64-lin
Hi,
This patch uses get_ptr_nonnull in tree-vrp.
Bootstrapped and regression tested this with other patched without any
new regressions on x86_64-linux-gnu.
Is this OK for trunk?
Thanks,
Kugan
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2016-10-12 Kugan Vivekanandarajah <kugan.vivekanandara...@linaro.
Hi,
This patch uses the get/set_ptr_nonnull so that ipa-vrp also propagates
nonnull ranges for pinter.
Bootstrapped and regression tested this with other patched without any
new regressions on x86_64-linux-gnu.
Is this OK for trunk?
Thanks,
Kugan
gcc/ChangeLog:
2016-10-12 Kugan
Hi Richard,
On 07/10/16 21:03, Richard Biener wrote:
On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 2:53 AM, kugan <kugan.vivekanandara...@linaro.org> wrote:
Hi Richard,
Thanks for the review.
On 09/08/16 18:58, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 12:58 AM, kugan
<kugan.vivekanandara...@l
Hi Richard,
On 12/10/16 00:14, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 2:57 AM, kugan
<kugan.vivekanandara...@linaro.org> wrote:
Hi Richard,
Hi Richard,
On 10/10/16 20:13, Richard Biener wrote:
On Sat, Oct 8, 2016 at 9:38 PM, kugan <kugan.vivekanandara...@linaro.org>
Hi Richard,
On 10/10/16 20:13, Richard Biener wrote:
On Sat, Oct 8, 2016 at 9:38 PM, kugan <kugan.vivekanandara...@linaro.org> wrote:
Hi Richard,
Thanks for the review.
On 07/10/16 20:11, Richard Biener wrote:
On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 12:00 AM, kugan
<kugan.vivekanandara...@linaro.o
Hi Richard,
Thanks for the review.
On 07/10/16 20:11, Richard Biener wrote:
On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 12:00 AM, kugan
<kugan.vivekanandara...@linaro.org> wrote:
Hi,
In vrp intersect_ranges, Richard recently changed it to create integer value
ranges when it is integer singleton.
Maybe we
Hi,
In vrp_intersect_ranges_1, when !vr0->equiv, we are copying vr1->equiv
without allocating bitmap. This patch fixes this.
Bootstrap and regression testing are ongoing. Is this OK if no new
regressions?
Thanks,
Kugan
gcc/ChangeLog:
2016-10-09 Kugan Vivekanandarajah <kug...@l
Hi Richard,
Thanks for the review.
On 09/08/16 18:58, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 12:58 AM, kugan
<kugan.vivekanandara...@linaro.org> wrote:
Hi Jakub,
Thanks for the review.
On 08/08/16 16:40, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Mon, Aug 08, 2016 at 01:36:51PM +1000, kugan
it will be
beneficial as the testcase in the patch. (For this testcase to work
with Early VRP, we need the patch posted at
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-10/msg00413.html)
Bootstrapped and regression tested on x86_64-linux-gnu with no new
regressions.
Thanks,
Kugan
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
Hi,
Attached patch Register ranges for y in (x COND y) for Early VRP.
Bootstrapped and regression tested on x86_64-linux-gnu with no new
regressions. Is this OK for trunk?
Thanks,
Kugan
gcc/ChangeLog:
2016-10-06 Kugan Vivekanandarajah <kug...@linaro.org>
* tree
with no new
regressions. Is this OK for trunk?
Thanks,
Kugan
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2016-10-06 Kugan Vivekanandarajah <kug...@linaro.org>
PR tree-optimization/77862
* gcc.dg/pr77862.c: New test.
gcc/ChangeLog:
2016-10-06 Kugan Vivekanandarajah <kug...@l
Hi Richard,
Thanks for the review.
On 04/10/16 19:56, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, 4 Oct 2016, kugan wrote:
Hi,
This patch improves Early VRP by folding stmts using vrp_fold_stmt as it is
done in ssa_propagate for VRP.
Why?
I thought it would be good for early vrp to simplify stmts
regressions. Is this OK for trunk?
Thanks,
Kugan
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2016-10-03 Kugan Vivekanandarajah <kug...@linaro.org>
* gcc.dg/pr68217.c: Adjust testcase as more cases are now handled in
evrp.
* gcc.dg/predict-1.c: Likewise.
* gcc.dg/predict-9.c: Li
On 25/09/16 04:50, kugan wrote:
Hi,
In make_new_ssa_for_def (tree-reassoc.c) we should use gimple_get_lhs to
get lhs instead of gimple_assign_lhs as stmt can be builtins too.
Attached patch fixes this.
Testcase from PR (attached) seems to fail. I dont any fortran so I didnt
try fixing
errors)
Excess errors:
I didn't add it due to this. I will leave it to someone else.
Bootstrapped and regression tested the attached patch on
x86_64-linux-gnu with no new regressions.
Is this OK for trunk?
Thanks,
Kugan
gcc/ChangeLog:
2016-09-24 Kugan Vivekanandarajah <kug...@linaro.
on x86_64-linux-gnu with no new
regressions. Is this OK for trunk?
Thanks,
Kugan
gcc/ChangeLog:
2016-09-24 Kugan Vivekanandarajah <kug...@linaro.org>
PR ipa/77677
* ipa-prop.c (ipa_compute_jump_functions_for_edge): Use
extract_range_from_unary_expr to convert value
Hi Richard,
Thanks for the review.
On 23/09/16 17:19, Richard Biener wrote:
On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 12:24 AM, kugan
<kugan.vivekanandara...@linaro.org> wrote:
Hi,
As Richard pointed out in PR77677, TREE_OVERFLOW is not cleared in IPA-VRP.
There are three places in which we set value
are ongoing. Is this OK if there is no regression.
Thanks,
Kugan
gcc/ChangeLog:
2016-09-23 Kugan Vivekanandarajah <kug...@linaro.org>
PR ipa/77677
* ipa-cp.c (propagate_vr_accross_jump_function):Drop TREE_OVERFLOW
from constant while creating value range
Hi Richard,
Thanks for the review.
On 19/09/16 22:56, Richard Biener wrote:
On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 10:50 PM, kugan
<kugan.vivekanandara...@linaro.org> wrote:
Hi Richard,
On 16/09/16 20:21, Richard Biener wrote:
On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 7:59 AM, kugan
<kugan.vivekanandara...@l
Hi Richard,
Thanks for the review.
On 19/09/16 23:40, Richard Biener wrote:
On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 10:21 PM, kugan
<kugan.vivekanandara...@linaro.org> wrote:
Hi Richard,
On 14/09/16 21:31, Richard Biener wrote:
On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 10:09 AM, Kugan Vivekanandarajah
<kugan.vive
Hi Richard,
On 16/09/16 20:21, Richard Biener wrote:
On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 7:59 AM, kugan
<kugan.vivekanandara...@linaro.org> wrote:
Hi Richard,
Thanks for the review.
On 14/09/16 22:04, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 4:11 AM, Kugan Vivekanandarajah
<kugan.vive
Hi Richard,
On 14/09/16 21:31, Richard Biener wrote:
On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 10:09 AM, Kugan Vivekanandarajah
<kugan.vivekanandara...@linaro.org> wrote:
Hi Richard,
On 25 August 2016 at 22:24, Richard Biener <richard.guent...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 1:
9/msg00993.html
Thanks,
Kugan
Hi Richard,
Thanks for the review.
On 14/09/16 22:04, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 4:11 AM, Kugan Vivekanandarajah
<kugan.vivekanandara...@linaro.org> wrote:
Hi,
On 19 August 2016 at 21:41, Richard Biener <richard.guent...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, Aug 16, 201
Hi Richard,
On 19/08/16 18:00, Richard Biener wrote:
On Fri, 19 Aug 2016, Kugan Vivekanandarajah wrote:
On 19 August 2016 at 12:09, Kugan Vivekanandarajah
<kugan.vivekanandara...@linaro.org> wrote:
The testcase pr33738.C for warning fails with early-vrp patch. The
reason is, with ear
Hi Jeff,
On 13/09/16 08:11, Jeff Law wrote:
On 08/18/2016 08:09 PM, Kugan Vivekanandarajah wrote:
The testcase pr33738.C for warning fails with early-vrp patch. The
reason is, with early-vrp ccp2 is folding the comparison that used to
be folded in simplify_stmt_for_jump_threading. Since early
Hi Richard,
On 7 September 2016 at 19:35, Richard Biener <richard.guent...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 2:21 AM, Kugan Vivekanandarajah
> <kugan.vivekanandara...@linaro.org> wrote:
>> Hi Richard,
>>
>> On 6 September 2016 at 19:08, Richar
Hi Bin,
On 07/09/16 17:52, Bin.Cheng wrote:
On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 1:10 AM, kugan <kugan.vivekanandara...@linaro.org> wrote:
Hi Bin,
On 07/09/16 04:54, Bin Cheng wrote:
Hi,
LOOP_VINFO_NITERS is computed as LOOP_VINFO_NITERSM1 + 1, which could
overflow in loop niters' type. Vect
Hi Richard,
On 6 September 2016 at 19:08, Richard Biener <richard.guent...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 2:24 AM, Kugan Vivekanandarajah
> <kugan.vivekanandara...@linaro.org> wrote:
>> Hi Richard,
>>
>> On 5 September 2016 at 17:57, Richar
overflows?
Thanks,
Kugan
+ return true;
+}
+
+ widest_int max;
+ struct loop *loop = LOOP_VINFO_LOOP (loop_vinfo);
+ /* Check the upper bound of loop niters. */
+ if (get_max_loop_iterations (loop, ))
+{
+ tree type = TREE_TYPE (LOOP_VINFO_NITERS (loop_vinfo));
+ s
Hi Richard,
On 6 September 2016 at 19:57, Richard Biener <richard.guent...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 11:33 AM, Kugan Vivekanandarajah
> <kugan.vivekanandara...@linaro.org> wrote:
>> Hi Richard,
>>
>> On 6 September 2016 at 19:08, Richar
Hi Richard,
On 6 September 2016 at 19:08, Richard Biener <richard.guent...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 2:24 AM, Kugan Vivekanandarajah
> <kugan.vivekanandara...@linaro.org> wrote:
>> Hi Richard,
>>
>> On 5 September 2016 at 17:57, Richar
Hi Richard,
On 5 September 2016 at 17:57, Richard Biener <richard.guent...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 7:26 AM, Kugan Vivekanandarajah
> <kugan.vivekanandara...@linaro.org> wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> While looking at gcc source, I noticed that w
to follow some consistent usage here.
It might be also good to gave a FOR_EACH_SSAVAR iterator as we do in
other case. Here is attempt to do this based on what is done in other
places. Bootstrapped and regression tested on X86_64-linux-gnu with no
new regressions. is this OK?
Thanks,
Kugan
gcc
Ping ?
Thanks,
Kugan
On 23 August 2016 at 12:11, Kugan Vivekanandarajah
<kugan.vivekanandara...@linaro.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 19 August 2016 at 21:41, Richard Biener <richard.guent...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 9:45 AM, kugan
>> <kuga
Hi Richard,
On 25 August 2016 at 22:24, Richard Biener <richard.guent...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 1:09 AM, kugan
> <kugan.vivekanandara...@linaro.org> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>> On 10/08/16 20:28, Richard Biener wrote:
>>>
>
structure with wide_int.
Thanks,
Kugan
t here. The analysis phase should
> not determine
> anything if function is reachable non-locally.
Removed it.
>> +/* Info about value ranges. */
>> +
>> +struct GTY(()) ipa_vr
>> +{
>> + /* The data fields below are valid only if known is true. */
>
101 - 200 of 525 matches
Mail list logo
