(for example, it aligns
our diagnostic to that of current clang)
Tested x86_64-linux.
Thanks,
Paolo.
/cp
2014-03-13 Paolo Carlini paolo.carl...@oracle.com
PR c++/60383
* pt.c (maybe_process_partial_specialization): Check return value
processing_template_decl, actually checking if
type and expr are dependent? Does this kind of audit make sense for next
Stage 1?
/cp
2014-03-17 Paolo Carlini paolo.carl...@oracle.com
PR c++/59571
* typeck2.c (check_narrowing): Use fold_non_dependent_expr_sfinae.
/testsuite
Hi,
I'm adding the below testcases for bugs already fixed in mainline and 4.8.x.
Thanks,
Paolo.
//
2014-03-18 Paolo Carlini paolo.carl...@oracle.com
PR c++/54250
* g++.dg/cpp0x/lambda/lambda-ice12.C: New.
Index: g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-ice14.C
Hi,
the attached is slightly larger than my last ones but, assuming the
analysis is correct, should be pretty safe, it avoids a segfault: in
fact, for a pure virtual called from a NSDMI, current_function_decl is
null and the existing warning about *structors breaks. I'm reading
12.7/4 and I
(with TREE_TYPE an
error_mark_node, like TREE_TYPE (x) in the case at issue). Thus the
additional check I'm suggesting. Tested x86_64-linux.
Thanks,
Paolo.
//
/cp
2014-03-19 Paolo Carlini paolo.carl...@oracle.com
PR c++/60384
* name-lookup.c
Hi
On 19/mar/2014, at 23:28, Jonathan Wakely jwak...@redhat.com wrote:
On 19/03/14 21:39 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
I think the safe thing to do is (as I suggested at the time) to have a
trait saying which iterator types refer to contiguous memory. Our
debug mode only supports our own
Hi,
I'm committing this as obvious.
Thanks,
Paolo.
2014-03-21 Paolo Carlini paolo.carl...@oracle.com
* g++.dg/cpp1y/pr60033.C: Use target c++1y.
* g++.dg/cpp1y/pr60393.C: Likewise.
Index: g++.dg/cpp1y/pr60033.C
Hi,
On 10/22/2014 11:05 PM, François Dumont wrote:
+ VERIFY( counter_type::less_compare_count = 2.0 * std::log2(nb_values) );
Nit: log2 isn't in C89, thus we shouldn't use it unconditionally, ie, if
the test isn't guarded by { dg-require-cmath }. Thus, either the
latter, or just express
Hi,
tested x86_64-linux.
Thanks,
Paolo.
///
2014-10-24 Paolo Carlini paolo.carl...@oracle.com
* include/bits/atomic_base.h: Avoid including stdbool.h.
* include/std/atomic: When __cplusplus 201103L skip the rest of
the header.
* testsuite
.. thanks a lot Jon! (after all this parallel mode is still useful for
something ;)
Paolo.
Hi again,
On 11/04/2014 05:34 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 04/11/14 03:41 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 03/11/14 22:07 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 3 November 2014 17:51, Paolo Carlini paolo.carl...@oracle.com
wrote:
.. other than the above issue, I see a segmentation fault
.. and also:
performance/ext/pb_ds/priority_queue_text_pop_mem.cc
.../libstdc++-v3/scripts/check_performance: line 41: 16905 Segmentation
fault ./$EXE_NAME tmp.$FILE_NAME
Paolo.
Hi,
On 11/04/2014 04:32 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
Not a big deal of course, but unfortunately today I'm seeing *two* segfaults
for pb_ds:
performance/ext/pb_ds/multimap_text_insert_mem_large.cc
.../libstdc++-v3/scripts/check_performance: line 41: 16173 Segmentation
fault ./$EXE_NAME
Hi,
On 11/04/2014 04:37 PM, Martin Jambor wrote:
Hi,
since revision 216728, testsuite/g++.dg/ipa/devirt-40.C is failing
because although the tested-for devirtualization does happen, it is
probably being done earlier and the string we are trying to match is
not emitted. But the important thing
On 11/04/2014 04:46 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
Hi,
On 11/04/2014 04:32 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
Not a big deal of course, but unfortunately today I'm seeing *two*
segfaults
for pb_ds:
performance/ext/pb_ds/multimap_text_insert_mem_large.cc
.../libstdc++-v3/scripts/check_performance: line 41
picked are the same already used by clang.
Tested x86_64-linux. In case, what about 4.9?
Thanks,
Paolo.
//
2014-11-10 Paolo Carlini paolo.carl...@oracle.com
PR c++/63265
* c-family/c.opt ([Wshift-count-negative, Wshift-count-overflow]): Add
Hi,
On 11/10/2014 06:16 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 11/10/2014 12:16 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
I don't think we want to suppress this warning in general. The problem
in this PR is that the warning code is failing to recognize that the
first operand is constant false.
But adding the warning
Hi again,
thus the below only adds the warnings. Would be mainline only of course.
Thanks!
Paolo.
2014-11-10 Paolo Carlini paolo.carl...@oracle.com
* doc/invoke.texi ([-Wshift-count-negative, -Wshift-count-overflow]):
Add.
/c-family
2014-11-10
Hi,
On 11/10/2014 07:34 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 10/11/14 12:01 -0600, Joel Sherrill wrote:
cc'ing since both lists should be included.
The m32c has 24-bit pointers and 16-bit size_t. This changes
pushing a pointer through a size_t to pushing it through a
uintptr_t.
I'm OK with this
Hi,
On 08/26/2014 10:56 AM, Rainer Orth wrote:
bits/c++config...
Which won't help users seeing them in the headers. Maybe the issue
could be avoided by chosing names that make it clear that they are
g++/libstdc++ specific, not generic?
Sure, whatever works, the names were tentative, for the
Hi,
On 08/26/2014 08:58 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 08/26/2014 12:01 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
the difference, for the latter and for more complex cases, is that
adjust_temp_type calls cp_fold_convert which ends up returning a
NOP_EXPR (eg, build in fold_convert_loc).
Perhaps we should
Hi again,
On 08/26/2014 08:58 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 08/26/2014 12:01 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
the difference, for the latter and for more complex cases, is that
adjust_temp_type calls cp_fold_convert which ends up returning a
NOP_EXPR (eg, build in fold_convert_loc).
Perhaps we should
.. two additional remarks (maybe obvious, I don't know):
- It also appears to work - for sure for all the tests in c++/52892 +
the tests in c++/52282 not involving data members (eg, the original one)
- simply unconditionally calling STRIP_NOPS right after the
cxx_eval_constant_expression at
Hi,
On 08/27/2014 04:19 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 08/27/2014 04:41 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
.. two additional remarks (maybe obvious, I don't know):
- It also appears to work - for sure for all the tests in c++/52892 +
the tests in c++/52282 not involving data members (eg, the original one
Hi,
I think that in order to implement the resolution we simply have to
remove the check. Tested x86_64-linux.
Thanks,
Paolo.
//
/cp
2014-09-01 Paolo Carlini paolo.carl...@oracle.com
DR 1405
PR c++/58102
* semantics.c
Hi,
while looking into c++/58102 and DR 1405 I noticed that we don't
implement DR 1453 either, sort of dual issue with volatile instead of
mutable. Tested x86_64-linux.
Thanks,
Paolo.
/cp
2014-09-02 Paolo Carlini paolo.carl...@oracle.com
DR 1453
Hi,
On 09/02/2014 04:11 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 09/01/2014 09:47 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
-constexpr A b = a;// { dg-error mutable }
+constexpr A b = a;
This is wrong; we still need to get an error here.
Hum, interesting. Neither current EDG nor current clang error out
Hi,
On 09/02/2014 04:28 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 09/02/2014 10:17 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
Let's see if I can tease the case out...
I think you need to leave that hunk alone, and instead fix the new
testcase by treating = {} more like {}, just as we already don't
require a copy
Hi again,
On 09/02/2014 04:28 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 09/02/2014 10:17 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
Let's see if I can tease the case out...
I think you need to leave that hunk alone, and instead fix the new
testcase by treating = {} more like {}, just as we already don't
require a copy
Hi,
On 09/02/2014 05:45 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 09/02/2014 11:07 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
Anyway, what about the below? Certainly works for the tests which we
have got.
Hmm. This is definitely an improvement, as it allows a subset of
a non-volatile glvalue of literal type that refers
Hi,
On 08/19/2014 02:18 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
Hi,
two more functions. Tested x86_64-linux.
I'm pinging this.
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-08/msg01853.html
Frankly, the cp_parser_constant_expression bits seem rather
straightforward to me. As regards
,
Paolo.
/
/cp
2014-09-10 Paolo Carlini paolo.carl...@oracle.com
PR c++/61489
* typeck2.c (process_init_constructor_record): Do not warn about
missing field initializer if EMPTY_CONSTRUCTOR_P (init).
/testsuite
2014-09-10 Paolo Carlini paolo.carl
Hi,
On 09/11/2014 05:06 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
Do we need a documentation update?
I agree. Something like the below would do?
Thanks,
Paolo.
2014-09-11 Paolo Carlini paolo.carl...@oracle.com
PR c++/61489
* doc/invoke.texi ([-Wmissing-field-initializers
Hi,
On 09/14/2014 07:44 PM, Ville Voutilainen wrote:
Tested on Linux-x64.
Thanks. In such cases you can as well remove the main: then is also
immediately obvious the the testcase is a dg-do compile.
Paolo.
Hi again,
On 08/26/2014 10:54 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
Hi,
On 08/26/2014 10:52 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
That seems like a good idea, but I'm not convinced there's any benefit
in Ed's changes to do:
-#if __cplusplus 201103L
+#if __cplusplus = 201402L
It seems like unnecessary churn to me
Hi,
On 09/16/2014 10:42 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 08:28:48AM +, VandeVondele Joost wrote:
+dg-test $gfortran_test_path/[lindex $args 1] $gfortran_aux_module_flags
+# cleanup-modules isn't intentionally invoked here.
should this be 'is intentionally not
Hi,
clang recently, in 3.5.0 if I remember correctly, stopped
-Wnon-virtual-dtor warning for final classes. I think it makes sense to
do the same.
Tested x86_64-linux.
Thanks,
Paolo.
7
/cp
2014-09-17 Paolo Carlini paolo.carl...@oracle.com
PR c++/62232
Hi,
On 09/19/2014 08:03 AM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
Hi Paolo,
On Wed, 17 Sep 2014, Paolo Carlini wrote:
clang recently, in 3.5.0 if I remember correctly, stopped -Wnon-virtual-dtor
warning for final classes. I think it makes sense to do the same.
mind adding a note to wwwdocs/htdocs/gcc-5
Hi,
I had a quick look at this issue and it immediately reminded me
c++/60605, which Jason fixed by handling local functions at the
beginning of check_default_tmpl_args. In the present case of:
template class = void
struct S
{
friend void foo( S )
{
[](){};
}
};
it occurs to me
Hi,
On 09/19/2014 07:32 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 09/19/2014 11:40 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
if (TREE_CODE (CP_DECL_CONTEXT (decl)) == FUNCTION_DECL
- || (TREE_CODE (decl) == FUNCTION_DECL DECL_LOCAL_FUNCTION_P
(decl)))
+ || (TREE_CODE (decl) == FUNCTION_DECL
, at the end of
g++.old-deja/g++.other/crash28.C. In fact, the context is slightly
different, because in cp_parser_skip_to_closing_square_bracket we are in
error recovery. I suppose we can further investigate this later...
/cp
2014-09-23 Paolo Carlini paolo.carl...@oracle.com
PR c++/61857
.. looks like the patch fixes c++/55245 too.
Thanks!
Paolo.
On 12/06/2012 11:14 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
When we look through a typedef, we need to keep any cv-quals that were
added to it.
Thanks! Patch fixes also c++/54975, but it didn't look (to me ;) as an
obvious duplicate, thus before closing it, I'm also going to add the
testcase.
Thanks again,
enough...
Thanks!
Paolo.
///
2012-12-07 Paolo Carlini paolo.carl...@oracle.com
* tree.c (build_aggr_init_expr): Remove tsubst_flags_t parameter.
(build_cplus_new): Adjust.
* cp-tree.h: Adjust declaration.
* init.c (build_value_init): Adjust
Hi,
On 12/13/2012 07:42 PM, Steve Ellcey wrote:
I have been running the libstdc++ testsuite using the gnu simulator for
my mips-mti-elf target. Some of the tests fail due to the amount of
memory they need and I would like to 'shrink' them when run on a
simulator using the same technique I see
Hi,
On 12/21/2012 08:59 AM, Kai Tietz wrote:
Index: libsupc++/cxxabi.h
===
--- libsupc++/cxxabi.h (Revision 194655)
+++ libsupc++/cxxabi.h (Arbeitskopie)
@@ -356,7 +356,7 @@ namespace __cxxabiv1
{
public:
const
Hi,
On 12/21/2012 10:16 AM, Kai Tietz wrote:
Well, I thought it is always present for gcc due gstdint.h header,
As far as I know, that project isn't finished yet, there are still
targets which neither provide the header, neither GCC synthetizes it.
See also dg-require-effective-target
On 12/21/2012 10:36 AM, Kai Tietz wrote:
well, issue isn't that 'long' is always 'ptrdiff_t'.
But then, if we just change the type without paying attention to size
(and alignment) aren't we looking for BIG ABI trouble?!?
Paolo.
On 12/21/2012 10:59 AM, Kai Tietz wrote:
Hello,
I changed type in __base_class_type_info to wide-enough type only for
llp64 target.
By this we have no (new) side-effects to other targets.
Thanks. This is something I can approve at once.
Paolo.
Hi,
Jason Merrill ja...@redhat.com ha scritto:
On 12/21/2012 06:38 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
I was looking a bit more into this Bug, and something seems still
weird about the testcase in Comment #1 of the audit trail, which we
also didn't reject with 4.6.x:
What's weird about it?
Well, we
On 12/24/2012 05:56 AM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 12/22/2012 06:02 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
Well, we still reject it after the patch
My 4.7 and trunk compilers both accept it (with -std=c++11, of course).
I just updated and rebuilt my 4.7 for you (which definitely I didn't
hack over the next
... to explain more concretely what I mean, if I *brutally* hack
mainline per the below, then the testcase is accepted.
Paolo.
//
Index: call.c
===
--- call.c (revision 194659)
+++ call.c (working copy)
Hi,
On 01/02/2013 11:07 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Hi!
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 12:27:40PM +0100, Paolo Carlini wrote:
--- gcc/cp/parser.c (revision 192887)
+++ gcc/cp/parser.c (working copy)
@@ -12655,9 +12655,8 @@ cp_parser_template_id (cp_parser *parser,
/* Otherwise, emit
Hi,
On 01/03/2013 10:56 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 01/03/2013 05:44 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
+ /* C++11 - 2.5 p3, bullet 2. */
Please flesh out this comment some more.
Ok, I extended it like this.
Thanks,
Paolo.
/
Index: gcc/cp/parser.c
As per the subject, although I'd love to hear about this imaginary
2010. :-)
Well, in physics imaginary time is a pretty useful abstraction, eg, you can
easily switch between statistical mechanics and quantum field theory in
interesting calculations :-)
Paolo
this is finish_id_expression
(a bit earlier), where we already use error_operand_p, by not calling at
all get_tls_wrapper_fn on such a decl.
Tested x86_64-linux.
Thanks,
Paolo.
/
/cp
2013-01-08 Paolo Carlini paolo.carl...@oracle.com
PR c++/55801
* semantics.c
Hi,
On 01/08/2013 09:00 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
I think I'd rather handle this by returning false from
var_needs_tls_wrapper.
Ah Ok. Then what about the below?
Thanks,
Paolo.
//
/cp
2013-01-09 Paolo Carlini paolo.carl...@oracle.com
PR c++/55801
* decl2
Hi,
barring objections, I'm going to commit as obvious the below, which
removes a left over bit of documentation, thus completing
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=revisionrevision=97318
Thanks,
Paolo.
2013-01-22 Paolo Carlini paolo.carl...@oracle.com
PR c
Hi,
today I had a look to this PR, maybe it's simple enough to be fixed at
this time. The issue is that we ICE in check_initializer in:
init = build_functional_cast (type, init, tf_none);
- if (init != error_mark_node)
+ if (TREE_CODE (init) == TARGET_EXPR)
Hi,
tested x86_64-linux, committed mainline and 4_7-branch.
Thanks,
Paolo.
///
2013-01-24 Paolo Carlini paolo.carl...@oracle.com
PR libstdc++/56085
* include/std/complex (pow(const complex, int)): Avoid __n
signed overflow.
Index: include/std
Hi,
Tested on x86_64-linux-gnu, including with a -D_GLIBCXX_DEBUG run.
OK to install?
Ok, thanks!
Paolo
Hi,
tested x96_64-linux, committed to mainline.
Thanks,
Paolo.
/
2013-02-04 Manuel López-Ibáñez m...@gcc.gnu.org
Paolo Carlini paolo.carl...@oracle.com
PR libstdc++/56202
* include/bits/random.tcc (binomial_distribution::
_M_waiting
... committed this follow up. See Audit trail for details.
Paolo.
//
2013-02-04 Manuel López-Ibáñez m...@gcc.gnu.org
Paolo Carlini paolo.carl...@oracle.com
PR libstdc++/56202 (again)
* include/bits/random.tcc (binomial_distribution
Hi Dodji,
On 02/04/2013 04:53 PM, Dodji Seketeli wrote:
Hello,
Since commit r195676[1], it looks like
libstdc++-v3/src/c++11/hashtable_c++0x.cc is missing an explicit
instantiation for std::lower_bound. This leads to libstdc++.so having
the symbol for that (missing) instantiation be
Hi,
no real reason to add this tiny bit of C++11, and the related export
ungliness, at this late stage in the 4.8 release process. I would say,
let's just do it in the next ABI.
Committed.
Thanks,
Paolo.
/
2013-02-11 Paolo Carlini paolo.carl...@oracle.com
Hi,
On 02/11/2013 04:33 PM, Julian Brown wrote:
Hi,
It seems that glibc 2.17 changes the abbreviated names of weekdays for
ru_RU locales by removing an extraneous ., as described in:
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10873
An earlier patch (circa glibc 2.14) changed (IIUC!)
Hi,
On 02/11/2013 06:33 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
While I was going over the C++11 status page, I noticed that
quick_exit is implemented by glibc, it just needed to be added to the
libstdc++ cstdlib header.
Does this configury/feature macro handling look right? Is this enough
testcase? Is
.. also, I think we should have #if __cplusplus = 201103L protecting
these functions too, exactly like all the other C++11 bits. Eg, I don't
think we should unconditionally, ie in C++03 mode too, declare
at_quick_exit and quick_exit in namespace std.
I can tweak things for the two issues I
On 02/11/2013 07:54 PM, Benjamin De Kosnik wrote:
I can tweak things for the two issues I noticed.
Thanks.
It seems like this is still 4.8 material to me.
Great. I'll take care of that later today. I'm also going to make sure
the new testcase doesn't spuriously fail if the functions aren't
... this is what I committed.
Thanks,
Paolo.
/
2013-02-11 Paolo Carlini paolo.carl...@oracle.com
* include/c_std/cstdlib (at_quick_exit, quick_exit): Do not declare.
* include/c_global/cstdlib (at_quick_exit, quick_exit): Declare only
in C++11 mode
On 02/12/2013 12:26 PM, domi...@lps.ens.fr wrote:
The test fails on x86_64-apple-darwin10 with
FAIL: 18_support/quick_exit/quick_exit.cc (test for excess errors)
Excess errors:
/opt/gcc/work/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/18_support/quick_exit/quick_exit.cc:36:3:
error: 'at_quick_exit' is not a member
On 02/12/2013 12:32 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
On 02/12/2013 12:26 PM, domi...@lps.ens.fr wrote:
The test fails on x86_64-apple-darwin10 with
FAIL: 18_support/quick_exit/quick_exit.cc (test for excess errors)
Excess errors:
/opt/gcc/work/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/18_support/quick_exit/quick_exit.cc
On 02/12/2013 12:40 PM, domi...@lps.ens.fr wrote:
IIRC I have already asked a similar question about atan2, erf, ...
which don't appear in the std namespace on darwin.
You should check whether darwin by chance uses by default c_std instead
of c_global. The former doesn't provide C++11
On 02/12/2013 01:47 PM, domi...@lps.ens.fr wrote:
But the last time I checked, modern darwin defined
_GLIBCXX_USE_C99_MATH_TR1, no problems.
AFAICT this is true, but I think darwin10 was released in 2011
so I doubt it has any support for c++11.
Anyway, about the cstdlib issue the below makes
Hi,
On 02/13/2013 03:38 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 02/12/2013 07:55 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
Again, the current status is in a sense good because when the
_GLIBCXX_HAVE_AT_QUICK_EXIT and _GLIBCXX_HAVE_QUICK_EXIT are defined,
thus the system has the functions in its c library, including
Hi,
2013-02-13 Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr
PR libstdc++/56111
* include/std/complex (complex): Undefine.
* include/c_compatibility/complex.h (complex): Only undefine if
complex has been included.
* testsuite/26_numerics/complex/56111.cc: New testcase.
Hi Rainer,
On 02/14/2013 04:45 PM, Rainer Orth wrote:
Jason Merrill ja...@redhat.com writes:
While I was going over the C++11 status page, I noticed that quick_exit is
implemented by glibc, it just needed to be added to the libstdc++ cstdlib
header.
The test fails on Solaris 9:
FAIL:
... or the below, just in case an interesting system provides the
*quick_exit functions but doesn't define _GLIBCXX_USE_C99.
Paolo.
///
Index: testsuite/18_support/quick_exit/quick_exit.cc
===
---
On 03/05/2011 03:05 PM, Jim Meyering wrote:
diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/libsupc++/del_opnt.cc
b/libstdc++-v3/libsupc++/del_opnt.cc
index 75051d5..29eab10 100644
--- a/libstdc++-v3/libsupc++/del_opnt.cc
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/libsupc++/del_opnt.cc
@@ -31,6 +31,5 @@ extern C void free (void *);
Hi,
tested x86_64-linux multilib + debug-mode, committed to mainline (see
Audit trail for details)
Thanks,
Paolo.
2011-03-09 Paolo Carlini paolo.carl...@oracle.com
* testsuite/util/testsuite_rvalref.h: Minor tweaks.
2011-03-09 Jonathan Wakely r
Hi,
Hi,
This patch fixes the problem in bug 48123. The problem is that
some headers include c++config.h, which in turn includes cpu_defines.h
but cpu_defines.h is not installed. This has been broken for a long
time. Patch was tested by bootstrapping on x86_64 and building a
cross-gcc
On 03/15/2011 08:05 PM, Benjamin Kosnik wrote:
I've also changed the bad_function_call exports to not be in libsupc++,
or the freestanding version. (ie to GLIBCXX from CXXABI). I think this
was probably a simple thinko, right Paolo?
Yes, as far as I can see now. Sorry about that and thanks for
... and I suppose the thinko alone should be fixed in 4_6-branch too, right?
Paolo.
the other discrete
distributions will be pretty straightforward; for the continuous ones
we'll need an integration routine (I hope something simpler than
gsl_integration_qags will be enough).
Tested x86_64-linux, committed to mainline.
Paolo.
2011-03-18 Paolo Carlini
On 03/18/2011 06:16 PM, dnovi...@google.com wrote:
Paolo,
Splitting this test fixes the failures I described in
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++/2011-03/msg00076.html
OK for trunk?
Sure, it's Ok. A nit, however: we have been using quite consistently the
*_neg suffix for such kind of testcases,
On 03/18/2011 06:29 PM, Diego Novillo wrote:
Will do. Thanks.
Sorry again - otherwise I have to do it myself anyway: why don't you
split it a more meaningful way, like splitting out all the comparisons?
That would avoid the naming issue in the first place.
Thanks,
Paolo.
Hi,
Like this? Tested on my insanely deep tree and on mainline on x86_64.
Sure.
Thanks,
Paolo
Hi,
The test compiles and runs if I add -D_GLIBCXX_USE_C99_MATH_TR1:
Unfortunately I cannot debug the issue over the next few hours. If you are
willing to further help I suggest checking why the dg-require I addes and used
exactly because of that doesn't automatically skip the testcase on
... turns out, something insane is going on with name: if I use
*c99_math anywhere the dg-require is totally ignored. For the time being
I'm simply renaming everything per the below.
Paolo.
//
2011-03-19 Paolo Carlini paolo.carl...@oracle.com
* testsuite/lib/libstdc
Hi,
After a bit of poking around with nm in various objects I determined
that the baseline_symbols files define what should be exported. The
following grep+sed combo adds the necessary export for any architecture
that exports the C1 constructor symbol.
grep _ZNSsC1EOSs
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 01:10:14PM -, Adam Butcher wrote:
After a bit of poking around with nm in various objects I determined
that the baseline_symbols files define what should be exported. The
following grep+sed combo adds the necessary export for any architecture
that exports the C1
Il 22/03/11 14.52, Paolo Carlini ha scritto:
Jakub, such a patch would be ok with me, if isn't too late, but,
frankly I don't see why we are not seeing the issue in the existing
cons/char/moveable.cc, maybe it's something sensitive to inlining
decisions (yes a testcase is welcome
Hi,
tested x86_64-darwin, committed to mainline.
Paolo.
///
2011-03-22 Paolo Carlini paolo.carl...@oracle.com
* include/bits/shared_ptr.h (operator, operator=, operator=): Add,
per DR 1401.
(operator==, operator!=, operator): Fix per the letter of DR 1401
Hi,
this does fix a bad thinko of mine in negative_binomial_distribution
(the fix will certainly go in 4.6.1, unless Jakub wants it now) + I'm
adding basic statistical tests (adapted from GSL) for all the other
discrete distributions.
Thanks,
Paolo.
//
2011-03-24 Paolo Carlini
Hi,
I think this is a candidate to backport to libstdc++-4.6.1.
exception_ptr.h needs the forward declaration because it's
included fromtypeinfo beforetypeinfo defines std::type_info.
before going ahead with the patch - I'm not at all sure it's enough, for
exception itself for example - I
On 03/31/2011 09:41 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
I think this is a candidate to backport to libstdc++-4.6.1.
exception_ptr.h needs the forward declaration because it's
included fromtypeinfo beforetypeinfo defines std::type_info.
before going ahead with the patch - I'm not at all sure it's enough
Hi,
I think this is a candidate to backport to libstdc++-4.6.1.
Ok mainline and 4_6-branch if testing passes.
Thanks,
Paolo
Hi,
noticed last week. Enabling the tests is also useful to have a clearer
picture of which parallel-mode std algorithms need to be fixed vs C++0x.
Tested x86_64-linux check-parallel, committing to mainline.
Paolo.
//
2011-04-11 Paolo Carlini paolo.carl...@oracle.com
/unordered_set/requirements/iterator_null_neg.cc
(working copy)
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
// 2005-09-10 Paolo Carlini pcarl...@suse.de
//
-// Copyright (C) 2005, 2009 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
+// Copyright (C) 2005, 2009, 2011 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
//
// This file is part of the GNU ISO C
On 04/14/2011 10:32 AM, Magnus Fromreide wrote:
This is just a nit, but why do you remove the /// is_function comments?
Because was on the forward declaration, not on the implementation
itself, where I wanted it.
Paolo.
301 - 400 of 2918 matches
Mail list logo
