Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: Adopt GDAL 3.6.3RC1 as 3.6.3 release

2023-03-09 Thread Tamas Szekeres
+1 Tamas Even Rouault ezt írta (időpont: 2023. márc. 9., Cs, 16:41): > Same motion, just fixing the title to reflect the correction version > number, as kindly pointed out. > > Le 09/03/2023 à 16:33, Even Rouault a écrit : > > Hi, > > > > Motion: > > > > Adopt GDAL 3.6.3RC1 as 3.6.3 release >

Re: [gdal-dev] Removal of Python SWIG python generated files from git

2023-03-09 Thread Kurt Schwehr
I am also okay with removing the files. I think removing the generated files will help the project's health. At Google, we have used the swig generated files from git for the python interfaces. It was helpful as we don't have a lot of control about which swig version is available. However, it's

Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: Adopt GDAL 3.6.3RC1 as 3.6.3 release

2023-03-09 Thread Rahkonen Jukka
+1 -Jukka Rahkonen- -Alkuperäinen viesti- Lähettäjä: gdal-dev Puolesta Even Rouault Lähetetty: torstai 9. maaliskuuta 2023 17.41 Vastaanottaja: gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org Aihe: [gdal-dev] Motion: Adopt GDAL 3.6.3RC1 as 3.6.3 release Same motion, just fixing the title to reflect the

Re: [gdal-dev] Removal of Python SWIG python generated files from git

2023-03-09 Thread Frank Warmerdam
Folks, At one time we were very sensitive to the exact version of SWIG so providing pre-generated bindings removed a large class of versioning problems. I am ok with removing them. Best regards, Frank On Thu, Mar 9, 2023 at 3:14 PM Even Rouault wrote: > > > To play devil's advocate, were

Re: [gdal-dev] Removal of Python SWIG python generated files from git

2023-03-09 Thread Even Rouault
To play devil's advocate, were there any (perceived) benefits to this arrangement when originally introduced, other than not needing the SWIG binary to compile Python bindings? That predates the start of my involvement with GDAL, so my guess would be that this was just what you mention: for

Re: [gdal-dev] Removal of Python SWIG python generated files from git

2023-03-09 Thread Daniel Evans
Hi Even, This sounds a sensible change, for the reasons outlined in your first paragraph. When first making contributions, I think I was caught out by this arrangement in just about all of the ways you mention! To play devil's advocate, were there any (perceived) benefits to this arrangement

[gdal-dev] Removal of Python SWIG python generated files from git

2023-03-09 Thread Even Rouault
Hi, take this email as a mini-RFC regarding the changes in https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/pull/7390 which remove the SWIG python generated files from git master, and thus make the SWIG binary a requirement to build the Python bindings. Below, the text of the PR: This removes a long-time

Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: Adopt GDAL 3.6.3RC1 as 3.6.3 release

2023-03-09 Thread Norman Barker
+1 Norman On Thu, Mar 9, 2023 at 10:38 AM Mateusz Loskot wrote: > +1 Mateusz > > On Thu, 9 Mar 2023 at 16:41, Even Rouault > wrote: > > > > Same motion, just fixing the title to reflect the correction version > > number, as kindly pointed out. > > > > Le 09/03/2023 à 16:33, Even Rouault a

Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: Adopt GDAL 3.6.3RC1 as 3.6.3 release

2023-03-09 Thread Mateusz Loskot
+1 Mateusz On Thu, 9 Mar 2023 at 16:41, Even Rouault wrote: > > Same motion, just fixing the title to reflect the correction version > number, as kindly pointed out. > > Le 09/03/2023 à 16:33, Even Rouault a écrit : > > Hi, > > > > Motion: > > > > Adopt GDAL 3.6.3RC1 as 3.6.3 release > > > >

Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: Adopt GDAL 3.6.3RC1 as 3.6.1 release

2023-03-09 Thread Mateusz Loskot
+1 Mateusz On Thu, 9 Mar 2023 at 16:33, Even Rouault wrote: > > Hi, > > Motion: > > Adopt GDAL 3.6.3RC1 as 3.6.3 release > > Starting with my +1 > > Even > > -- > http://www.spatialys.com > My software is free, but my time generally not. > > ___ >

Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: Adopt GDAL 3.6.3RC1 as 3.6.3 release

2023-03-09 Thread Howard Butler
> Le 09/03/2023 à 16:33, Even Rouault a écrit : >> Hi, >> >> Motion: >> >> Adopt GDAL 3.6.3RC1 as 3.6.3 release >> >> Starting with my +1 +1 ___ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev

[gdal-dev] Motion: Adopt GDAL 3.6.3RC1 as 3.6.3 release

2023-03-09 Thread Even Rouault
Same motion, just fixing the title to reflect the correction version number, as kindly pointed out. Le 09/03/2023 à 16:33, Even Rouault a écrit : Hi, Motion: Adopt GDAL 3.6.3RC1 as 3.6.3 release Starting with my +1 Even -- http://www.spatialys.com My software is free, but my time

[gdal-dev] Motion: Adopt GDAL 3.6.3RC1 as 3.6.1 release

2023-03-09 Thread Even Rouault
Hi, Motion: Adopt GDAL 3.6.3RC1 as 3.6.3 release Starting with my +1 Even -- http://www.spatialys.com My software is free, but my time generally not. ___ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org

Re: [gdal-dev] FileGDB_COMPILE fails during CMake

2023-03-09 Thread Jon Morris
So, does the OpenFileGDB driver work in the same way as the FileGDB driver? The build appeared to work, but when I try and use it in a Python shell, I get the following error. >>> from osgeo import gdal >>> drv=gdal.GetDriverByName('OpenFileGDB') >>> ds=drv.Create('/data/test.gdb',0,0,0) ERROR

Re: [gdal-dev] OpenFileGDB: add read-only support for raster datasets

2023-03-09 Thread Stefan Blumentrath
Hi Even,   This is great new esp. for people like me who work in mixed environments!   Thanks so much for this feature, which thanks to GDALs central position in OSGeo will propagate to all systems builing on top of it (and beyond OSGeo of course)! Vey cool!   Cheers Stefan     Gesendet: 

[gdal-dev] OpenFileGDB: add read-only support for raster datasets

2023-03-09 Thread Even Rouault
Hi, for those not actively monitoring github activity, I just want to point at https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/pull/7389 that adds read access to raster layers of File Geodatabases (.gdb directories) created by ArcGIS 10 and above (which is a capability that didn't even exist in the closed