esday, 29 August 2017 7:37 PM
> To: gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
> Cc: jratike80
> Subject: Re: [gdal-dev] Fwd: [OpenJPEG] OpenJPEG 2.2.0 is out ! Faster and
> safer.
> On mardi 29 août 2017 01:42:21 CEST jratike80 wrote:
> > N. Farah wrote
> >
> > > The results you get
] Fwd: [OpenJPEG] OpenJPEG 2.2.0 is out ! Faster and
safer.
On mardi 29 août 2017 01:42:21 CEST jratike80 wrote:
> N. Farah wrote
>
> > The results you get when enabling multi-threading are very interesting:
> > 26.s to 9.9 s. Then using the work in progress you end up with 1s.
&
On mardi 29 août 2017 01:42:21 CEST jratike80 wrote:
> N. Farah wrote
>
> > The results you get when enabling multi-threading are very interesting:
> > 26.s to 9.9 s. Then using the work in progress you end up with 1s.
> > Basically a 26 times speed improvement.
>
> Hi,
>
> As always when you re
N. Farah wrote
> The results you get when enabling multi-threading are very interesting:
> 26.s to 9.9 s. Then using the work in progress you end up with 1s.
> Basically a 26 times speed improvement.
Hi,
As always when you read benchmarks, you must keep the results and the
context together so it
Noureddine
From: Even Rouault
Sent: Monday, August 28, 2017 2:55 PM
To: N. Farah
Cc: gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
Subject: Re: [gdal-dev] Fwd: [OpenJPEG] OpenJPEG 2.2.0 is out ! Faster and
safer.
On lundi 28 août 2017 18:00:03 CEST N. Farah wrote:
> Thanks Even for the q
ouault
Sent: Monday, August 28, 2017 1:40:31 PM
To: N. Farah
Cc: gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
Subject: Re: [gdal-dev] Fwd: [OpenJPEG] OpenJPEG 2.2.0 is out ! Faster and
safer.
Hi,
>
>
> I rebuilt GDAL (older version: 2.1.2) using this new open jpeg 2.2.0
> (https://github.com/ucl
: N. Farah
Sent: Monday, August 14, 2017 11:42:31 AM
To: Even Rouault; gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
Subject: Re: [gdal-dev] Fwd: [OpenJPEG] OpenJPEG 2.2.0 is out ! Faster and
safer.
Right...since GDAL does not ship the 3rd party lib(s).
Thanks again
From: Even Rou
rom: Even Rouault
> Sent: Monday, August 28, 2017 2:55 PM
> To: N. Farah
> Cc: gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
> Subject: Re: [gdal-dev] Fwd: [OpenJPEG] OpenJPEG 2.2.0 is out ! Faster and
> safer.
> On lundi 28 août 2017 18:00:03 CEST N. Farah wrote:
> > Thanks Even for the quick r
On lundi 28 août 2017 18:00:03 CEST N. Farah wrote:
> Thanks Even for the quick response. I'll give it a try with setting
> OPJ_NUM_THREADS env variable to 8. Does it need to be used with
> GDAL_NUM_THREADS ? Any url to read about those two env variables ?
>
>
I've added some documentation per
h
Hi,
>
>
> I rebuilt GDAL (older version: 2.1.2) using this new open jpeg 2.2.0
> (https://github.com/uclouvain/openjpeg/releases/download/v2.2.0/openjpeg-v2
> .2.0-linux-x86_64.tar.gz)
>
> and tried to convert two jp2 dataset to tiff (gdal_translate):
>
> - bluemarble_4km.jp2: (10800 x 5400 pi
Vincent,
> Well, there might be some small change necessary. Apparently the
> configure script only checks path/include/openjpeg-2.0 and
> path/include/openjpeg-2.1 subdirectories for openjpeg.h, while my
> openjpeg is now in path/include/openjpeg-2.2 :
>
> configure: error: openjpeg.h not found
On 08/14/2017 10:49 AM, Even Rouault wrote:
On dimanche 13 août 2017 15:57:54 CEST N. Farah wrote:
> Great news. Thanks for the work.
>
>
> Any plans to integrate this new version in GDAL ?
Well, there's nothing to change in the GDAL source code. The existing
JP2OpenJPEG driver will work
Right...since GDAL does not ship the 3rd party lib(s).
Thanks again
From: Even Rouault
Sent: Monday, August 14, 2017 4:49:09 AM
To: gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
Cc: N. Farah
Subject: Re: [gdal-dev] Fwd: [OpenJPEG] OpenJPEG 2.2.0 is out ! Faster and
safer.
On
On dimanche 13 août 2017 15:57:54 CEST N. Farah wrote:
> Great news. Thanks for the work.
>
>
> Any plans to integrate this new version in GDAL ?
Well, there's nothing to change in the GDAL source code. The existing
JP2OpenJPEG driver will work with OpenJPEG 2.2. It is just a matter of
recompi
On 10.08.2017 20:10, Even Rouault wrote:
On jeudi 10 août 2017 20:04:09 CEST Sandro Mani wrote:
> Hi Even
>
> abidiff tells me:
>
>
> * Incompatible ABI changes between openjpeg2-2.1.2-4.fc26.x86_64.rpm and
> openjpeg2-2.2.0-1.fc26.x86_64.rpm. ABI comparison took 0.45 second(s).
> Pleas
On jeudi 10 août 2017 20:04:09 CEST Sandro Mani wrote:
> Hi Even
>
> abidiff tells me:
>
>
> * Incompatible ABI changes between openjpeg2-2.1.2-4.fc26.x86_64.rpm and
> openjpeg2-2.2.0-1.fc26.x86_64.rpm. ABI comparison took 0.45 second(s).
> Please review them.
>
> changes of 'l
Hi Even
abidiff tells me:
* Incompatible ABI changes between openjpeg2-2.1.2-4.fc26.x86_64.rpm and
openjpeg2-2.2.0-1.fc26.x86_64.rpm. ABI comparison took 0.45 second(s). Please
review them.
changes of 'libopenjp2.so.2.1.2'===
Functions changes summary: 9 Remove
Great efforts Even!
On 10 August 2017 at 09:17, Even Rouault wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> For those working with JPEG2000, see below
>
>
>
> Even
>
>
>
> -- Forwarded Message --
>
>
>
> Subject: [OpenJPEG] OpenJPEG 2.2.0 is out ! Faster and safer.
>
> Date: jeudi 10 août 2017, 04:58:13 CE
18 matches
Mail list logo
