Re: [Geany-devel] geany-plugins: Bleeding-edge compatibility

2012-05-18 Thread Frank Lanitz
On Thu, 19 Apr 2012 17:38:00 +0200 Quentin Glidic sardemff7+ge...@sardemff7.net wrote: On 19/04/2012 16:43, Matthew Brush wrote: An explanation would be useful. For MultiTerm, presumably it's to avoid a clash with GLib.Menu/MenuItem? Is GIO stuff part of the implicit namespace for

Re: [Geany-devel] geany-plugins: Bleeding-edge compatibility

2012-05-18 Thread Quentin Glidic
On 18/05/2012 22:37, Frank Lanitz wrote: I'm afraid its not applying. Can you rebuild it for current head? Cheers, Frank Here it is. Cheers -- Quentin Sardem FF7 Glidic From 240789b7f7508fdcd1025f251ae313c2d608d07e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Quentin Glidic

Re: [Geany-devel] geany-plugins: Bleeding-edge compatibility

2012-05-18 Thread Matthew Brush
On 12-05-18 01:47 PM, Quentin Glidic wrote: On 18/05/2012 22:37, Frank Lanitz wrote: I'm afraid its not applying. Can you rebuild it for current head? Cheers, Frank Here it is. Thanks both. Cheers, Matthew Brush ___ Geany-devel mailing list

Re: [Geany-devel] geany-plugins: Bleeding-edge compatibility

2012-05-10 Thread Frank Lanitz
Am 10.05.2012 02:20, schrieb Matthew Brush: On 12-05-09 01:02 PM, Frank Lanitz wrote: On Thu, 19 Apr 2012 17:38:00 +0200 Quentin Glidicsardemff7+ge...@sardemff7.net wrote: On 19/04/2012 16:43, Matthew Brush wrote: An explanation would be useful. For MultiTerm, presumably it's to avoid a

Re: [Geany-devel] geany-plugins: Bleeding-edge compatibility

2012-05-09 Thread Frank Lanitz
On Thu, 19 Apr 2012 17:38:00 +0200 Quentin Glidic sardemff7+ge...@sardemff7.net wrote: On 19/04/2012 16:43, Matthew Brush wrote: An explanation would be useful. For MultiTerm, presumably it's to avoid a clash with GLib.Menu/MenuItem? Is GIO stuff part of the implicit namespace for

Re: [Geany-devel] geany-plugins: Bleeding-edge compatibility

2012-05-09 Thread Matthew Brush
On 12-05-09 01:02 PM, Frank Lanitz wrote: On Thu, 19 Apr 2012 17:38:00 +0200 Quentin Glidicsardemff7+ge...@sardemff7.net wrote: On 19/04/2012 16:43, Matthew Brush wrote: An explanation would be useful. For MultiTerm, presumably it's to avoid a clash with GLib.Menu/MenuItem? Is GIO stuff

Re: [Geany-devel] geany-plugins: Bleeding-edge compatibility

2012-04-19 Thread Frank Lanitz
Am 16.04.2012 13:33, schrieb Quentin Glidic: Hello, Two minor compatibility patches to keep-up with bleeding-edge stuff. Dear Maintainer of Debugger and Multiterm Can you have a look at this patches and send pull request to geany-plugins master? Cheers, Frank

Re: [Geany-devel] geany-plugins: Bleeding-edge compatibility

2012-04-19 Thread Matthew Brush
On 12-04-19 01:09 AM, Frank Lanitz wrote: Am 16.04.2012 13:33, schrieb Quentin Glidic: Hello, Two minor compatibility patches to keep-up with bleeding-edge stuff. Dear Maintainer of Debugger and Multiterm Can you have a look at this patches and send pull request to geany-plugins master?

Re: [Geany-devel] geany-plugins: Bleeding-edge compatibility

2012-04-19 Thread Quentin Glidic
On 19/04/2012 16:43, Matthew Brush wrote: An explanation would be useful. For MultiTerm, presumably it's to avoid a clash with GLib.Menu/MenuItem? Is GIO stuff part of the implicit namespace for GLib? Yes, and yes. If the answer to those is yes, it looks fine to apply as is. Even if