On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 02:00, Lex Trotman ele...@gmail.com wrote:
On 10 June 2010 02:57, Chow Loong Jin hyper...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, 09 Jun 2010 18:15:02 +0200
Thomas Martitz thomas.mart...@student.htw-berlin.de wrote:
Am 09.06.2010 18:09, schrieb Nick Treleaven:
On Wed, 09 Jun 2010
On Wed, 9 Jun 2010 13:06:45 +0200
Jiří Techet tec...@gmail.com wrote:
Sure its easier if everyone is using git, but ATM this is an SVN project.
It's true that I've used the workflow typical for a git project - from
geany web page, which offers both git and SVN repository I assumed
that I
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 15:06, Nick Treleaven
nick.trelea...@btinternet.com wrote:
On Wed, 9 Jun 2010 13:06:45 +0200
Jiří Techet tec...@gmail.com wrote:
Sure its easier if everyone is using git, but ATM this is an SVN project.
It's true that I've used the workflow typical for a git project
On Wed, 9 Jun 2010 15:36:32 +0200
Jiří Techet tec...@gmail.com wrote:
It's pretty clear from the GIT page that it's a read-only mirror. We
don't have a writable GIT repo.
OK, I've just noticed:
Read-only mirrors of the SVN repositories, updated shortly after real
commits in the SVN
Am 09.06.2010 18:09, schrieb Nick Treleaven:
On Wed, 09 Jun 2010 15:11:48 +0200
Thomas Martitzthomas.mart...@student.htw-berlin.de wrote:
Am 09.06.2010 03:40, schrieb Lex Trotman:
Sure its easier if everyone is using git, but ATM this is an SVN project.
Although most, if
On 10 June 2010 02:57, Chow Loong Jin hyper...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, 09 Jun 2010 18:15:02 +0200
Thomas Martitz thomas.mart...@student.htw-berlin.de wrote:
Am 09.06.2010 18:09, schrieb Nick Treleaven:
On Wed, 09 Jun 2010 15:11:48 +0200
Thomas Martitzthomas.mart...@student.htw-berlin.de
