Re: [GEM-dev] financing Gem development

2017-11-21 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
On 2017-11-21 10:22, cyrille henry wrote: > As I said in earlier mail, my aim is (for now) to be able to release a > Gem version that incorporate the development made in the last 5 years. > Time is not to add functionalities, but to keep Gem alive. > > Starting new development now is, imo, a

[GEM-dev] Gem on linux (was Re: financing Gem development)

2017-11-21 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
On 2017-11-21 10:15, cyrille henry wrote: > Gem on Linux has no major problem that prevent a release. can this be confirmed by all the other linux enthusiast? personally i could think of a number of issues, all related to the new multi-context abilities. however, i'd say that these can be ignored

Re: [GEM-dev] Gem on linux (was Re: financing Gem development)

2017-11-21 Thread cyrille henry
Le 21/11/2017 à 11:15, IOhannes m zmoelnig a écrit : On 2017-11-21 10:15, cyrille henry wrote: Gem on Linux has no major problem that prevent a release. can this be confirmed by all the other linux enthusiast? personally i could think of a number of issues, all related to the new

Re: [GEM-dev] financing Gem development

2017-11-21 Thread Jack
Yes sure ! ++ Jack Le 21/11/2017 à 10:22, cyrille henry a écrit : > As I said in earlier mail, my aim is (for now) to be able to release a > Gem version that incorporate the development made in the last 5 years. > Time is not to add functionalities, but to keep Gem alive. > > Starting new

Re: [GEM-dev] Gem on linux (was Re: financing Gem development)

2017-11-21 Thread Jack
On my side, no big trouble to deplore on Linux. ++ Jack Le 21/11/2017 à 11:15, IOhannes m zmoelnig a écrit : > On 2017-11-21 10:15, cyrille henry wrote: >> Gem on Linux has no major problem that prevent a release. > can this be confirmed by all the other linux enthusiast? > > personally i

Re: [GEM-dev] financing Gem development

2017-11-21 Thread me.grimm
+1 On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 4:22 AM, cyrille henry wrote: > As I said in earlier mail, my aim is (for now) to be able to release a Gem > version that incorporate the development made in the last 5 years. > Time is not to add functionalities, but to keep Gem alive. > > Starting

Re: [GEM-dev] financing Gem development

2017-11-21 Thread Jaime Oliver La Rosa
Sorry, just saw the pages in the email chain. Are these going to be posted in the general pd mailing list as well? thanks for your work! J On 11/21/2017 04:41 PM, me.grimm wrote: +1 On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 4:22 AM, cyrille henry > wrote: As I

Re: [GEM-dev] financing Gem development

2017-11-21 Thread Jaime Oliver La Rosa
I am getting errors in the bountysource page when trying to pay. I'll try again later with other browsers and report back. error says: {"error":"Internal server error."} best, J On 11/21/2017 05:04 PM, Jaime Oliver La Rosa wrote: Sorry, just saw the pages in the email chain. Are these going to

Re: [GEM-dev] financing Gem development

2017-11-21 Thread cyrille henry
Le 20/11/2017 à 16:58, Jack a écrit : Or for all platforms ? In vertex processing with have : - vertex shader - geometry shader What about tesselation shader ? can you please add all freature request on Gem github? thx I use Gem a lot so i will be happy to participate financially if that