---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2636/#review5849
---
It think there are more (and bigger issues) at play here. I'd suggest to
* build/ALPHA/tests/opt/quick/se/00.hello/alpha/linux/minor-timing passed.
* build/ALPHA/tests/opt/quick/se/00.hello/alpha/linux/o3-timing passed.
* build/ALPHA/tests/opt/quick/se/00.hello/alpha/tru64/minor-timing passed.
*
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2637/#review5848
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Andreas Hansson
On Feb. 6, 2015, 12:38 a.m.,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2641/
---
Review request for Default.
Repository: gem5
Description
---
Changeset
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2640/
---
Review request for Default.
Repository: gem5
Description
---
Changeset
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2642/#review5862
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Gabe Black
On Feb. 6, 2015, 10:07 p.m., Brandon
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2643/
---
Review request for Default.
Repository: gem5
Description
---
Changeset
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2645/
---
Review request for Default.
Repository: gem5
Description
---
Changeset
changeset 94901e131a7f in /z/repo/gem5
details: http://repo.gem5.org/gem5?cmd=changeset;node=94901e131a7f
description:
cpu: Idle CPU status logic revised
This patch sets the CPU status to idle when the last active thread gets
suspended.
diffstat:
src/cpu/o3/cpu.cc | 7
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2638/
---
Review request for Default.
Repository: gem5
Description
---
Changeset
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2642/
---
Review request for Default.
Repository: gem5
Description
---
Changeset
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2644/
---
Review request for Default.
Repository: gem5
Description
---
Changeset
On Feb. 6, 2015, 8:18 a.m., Andreas Hansson wrote:
It think there are more (and bigger issues) at play here. I'd suggest to
try this out with: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2626/
If you run it with -p, prefetches enabled, it doesn't take many seconds
before it hits an assert. We're
On Feb. 6, 2015, 8:16 a.m., Andreas Hansson wrote:
Ship It!
Andreas Hansson wrote:
Here it would be good to test with the new memtest:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2612/
Note that the caches suffer from message deadlock at the moment, and the
test dies very quickly. I
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2626/#review5855
---
So would this replace memtest.py? If so, then factoring out the common
On Feb. 6, 2015, 5:10 p.m., Steve Reinhardt wrote:
So would this replace memtest.py? If so, then factoring out the common
code would not be an issue. If not, why not?
The two are complementary:
memtest.py uses MemTest and only tests false sharing, with some progress
detection built in
On Feb. 6, 2015, 5:10 p.m., Steve Reinhardt wrote:
So would this replace memtest.py? If so, then factoring out the common
code would not be an issue. If not, why not?
Andreas Hansson wrote:
The two are complementary:
memtest.py uses MemTest and only tests false
On Feb. 6, 2015, 9:10 a.m., Steve Reinhardt wrote:
So would this replace memtest.py? If so, then factoring out the common
code would not be an issue. If not, why not?
Andreas Hansson wrote:
The two are complementary:
memtest.py uses MemTest and only tests false
On Feb. 6, 2015, 12:18 a.m., Andreas Hansson wrote:
It think there are more (and bigger issues) at play here. I'd suggest to
try this out with: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2626/
If you run it with -p, prefetches enabled, it doesn't take many seconds
before it hits an assert. We're
On Feb. 6, 2015, 12:16 a.m., Andreas Hansson wrote:
Ship It!
Andreas Hansson wrote:
Here it would be good to test with the new memtest:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2612/
Note that the caches suffer from message deadlock at the moment, and the
test dies very quickly. I
On Feb. 6, 2015, 9:10 a.m., Steve Reinhardt wrote:
So would this replace memtest.py? If so, then factoring out the common
code would not be an issue. If not, why not?
Andreas Hansson wrote:
The two are complementary:
memtest.py uses MemTest and only tests false
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2626/#review5860
---
Ship it!
Minor optional comments below...
configs/example/memcheck.py
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2612/#review5861
---
Ship it!
configs/example/memtest.py
23 matches
Mail list logo