---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2996/#review7020
---
At a first glance this patch seems to make all the modifications that
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3037/#review7022
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Steve Reinhardt
On Aug. 17, 2015, 1:16 a.m.,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3045/#review7024
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Tony Gutierrez
On Aug. 19, 2015, 2:06 a.m.,
Hi Curtis,
Can you please hold a bit on pushing these? I do have some patches on related
topic which got ship it, though they still have some issues with long
regressions in Full System mode (initially all my modifications were intended
for SE mode). I suspect one of your patches will help
On July 30, 2015, 11:59 p.m., Steve Reinhardt wrote:
so what is the difference between
xc-getCpuPtr()-wakeup(xc-threadId());
and
xc-activate();
? I think we need to clarify whether or not these are equivalent, and if
so, why we need both, and if not, what the differences
On Aug. 19, 2015, 2:56 p.m., Steve Reinhardt wrote:
src/mem/packet.hh, line 580
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3044/diff/1/?file=49083#file49083line580
Looks like you need to update this comment. I assume that no one ever
used the capability described here?
Indeed, it was never
Hi all,
We have been trying to setup tests with a debian 6 image with gnome, and we
need UI/desktop environment. Our image works fine with VirtualBox and Qemu.
However we cannot get it booting successfully in gem5. Not sure if it hangs on
boot, or it boots fine but we just cannot see the
On Aug. 14, 2015, 12:42 a.m., Brad Beckmann wrote:
Nilay, you cannot just eliminate RubySlicc_ComponentMapping files without
having a lot discussion on gem5-dev on the implications. Component mapping
functions are very complicated and error prone. The simple protocols and
* build/ALPHA/tests/opt/quick/se/60.rubytest/alpha/linux/rubytest-ruby
passed.
* build/ALPHA/tests/opt/quick/se/00.hello/alpha/tru64/simple-timing-ruby
passed.
* build/ALPHA/tests/opt/quick/se/00.hello/alpha/tru64/minor-timing passed.
*
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2995/#review7018
---
I have mixed feelings about this patch---on the one hand, the uniformity
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2972/#review7019
---
Would it make sense (or is it not possible) to put the scripts in a
11 matches
Mail list logo
