* build/ALPHA_SE/tests/fast/quick/00.hello/alpha/linux/simple-timing passed.
* build/ALPHA_SE/tests/fast/quick/00.hello/alpha/tru64/simple-atomic passed.
* build/ALPHA_SE/tests/fast/quick/00.hello/alpha/tru64/simple-timing passed.
*
I want to move the minimum SCons version forward. Currently, the
minimum is 0.96.91 which has a bunch of warts which are annoying.
Does anyone have a reason for me not to move to 0.98.0? Should I move
it even further forward?
There's always scons-local if people don't have local
What are the specific warts and in what version are they fixed?
Ali
On Feb 9, 2009, at 2:09 PM, nathan binkert wrote:
I want to move the minimum SCons version forward. Currently, the
minimum is 0.96.91 which has a bunch of warts which are annoying.
Does anyone have a reason for me not to
How new can a distro be and still not have 0.98? I realize there's
probably a big range, but what's a reasonable approximation?
Gabe
Quoting Ali Saidi sa...@umich.edu:
What are the specific warts and in what version are they fixed?
Ali
On Feb 9, 2009, at 2:09 PM, nathan binkert wrote:
What are the specific warts and in what version are they fixed?
Sigh. Alright, here goes.
I'm trying to significantly improve the build framework and there is a
lot that has improved in scons with respect to our minimum version.
More specifically, I've figured out how to reduce both the null
Thank you. To me that sounds worth it. Although a page describing
scons-local perhaps linked to the EnusreScons() check would be a
necessity.
Ali
On Feb 9, 2009, at 4:20 PM, nathan binkert wrote:
What are the specific warts and in what version are they fixed?
Sigh. Alright, here goes.
Thank you. To me that sounds worth it. Although a page describing
scons-local perhaps linked to the EnusreScons() check would be a
necessity.
That's exactly what I'd do.
Nate
___
m5-dev mailing list
m5-dev@m5sim.org
Are you talking about just x86?
Nate
On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 1:19 PM, Gabriel Michael Black
gbl...@eecs.umich.edu wrote:
I have a patch in my queue which, for reasons I can get into if people
are interested, prevents fetching in the simple CPU while in the
middle of a macroop. A side effect
The huge change will be just x86 since it uses microcode so much, but
there will also be a much smaller change for SPARC which does as well.
ARM probably changes a little too.
Gabe
Quoting nathan binkert n...@binkert.org:
Are you talking about just x86?
Nate
On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at
changeset 50fb2cb40609 in /z/repo/m5
details: http://repo.m5sim.org/m5?cmd=changeset;node=50fb2cb40609
description:
scons: Don't build the intermediate static library unless explicitly
requested.
This means that similar to libm5_fast.so, you need to explicitly build
changeset f73e06bc8765 in /z/repo/m5
details: http://repo.m5sim.org/m5?cmd=changeset;node=f73e06bc8765
description:
scons: Require SCons version 0.98.1
This allows me to clean things up so we are up to date with respect to
deprecated features. There are many features
changeset 780dd1bead5c in /z/repo/m5
details: http://repo.m5sim.org/m5?cmd=changeset;node=780dd1bead5c
description:
copyright: This file need not have had the more restrictive copyright.
diffstat:
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
src/arch/x86/SConsopts | 45
Hi Developers,
I just wanted to let everyone know that I pushed a change that will
move the minimum version of SCons forward to 0.98.1. This release is
less than a year old, but it prepares us for upcoming fatal errors for
removed features while also allowing me to work on some significant
See /z/m5/regression/regress-2009-02-10-03:00:01 for details.
___
m5-dev mailing list
m5-dev@m5sim.org
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev
14 matches
Mail list logo
