Re: [Gen-art] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-ace-cbor-web-token-12

On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 11:47 PM, Jim Schaad wrote: > > > > > *From:* Dan Romascanu [mailto:droma...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Monday, February 26, 2018 1:19 PM > *To:* Jim Schaad > *Cc:* gen-art ; a...@ietf.org; ietf ;

Re: [Gen-art] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-ace-cbor-web-token-12

On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 11:03:07AM -0800, Dan Romascanu wrote: > > 1. CWT is derived from JWT (RFC 7519) using CBOR rather than JSON for > encoding. > The rationale as explained in the document is related to efficiency for some > IoT systems. The initial claims registry defined in Section 9.1 is

Re: [Gen-art] [Ace] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-ace-cbor-web-token-12

On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 11:19:04PM +0200, Dan Romascanu wrote: > Hi Jim, > > Thank you for your answer and for addressing my comments. > > On item #2: > > > > On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 10:12 PM, Jim Schaad wrote: > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From:

Re: [Gen-art] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-trill-vendor-channel-00

Hi Joel, On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 1:24 PM, Joel Halpern wrote: > Reviewer: Joel Halpern > Review result: Ready > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > by the IESG for the

Re: [Gen-art] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-ace-cbor-web-token-12

From: Dan Romascanu [mailto:droma...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, February 26, 2018 1:19 PM To: Jim Schaad Cc: gen-art ; a...@ietf.org; ietf ; draft-ietf-ace-cbor-web-token@ietf.org Subject: Re: Genart telechat review of

Re: [Gen-art] [6tisch] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-6tisch-6top-protocol-09

Thanks, those changes look good. Regards Brian On 27/02/2018 05:31, Qin Wang wrote: > Hi Bian, > Thank you for your comments. Please see inline. > > > > On Friday, February 23, 2018 6:11 PM, Brian E Carpenter > wrote: > > > Hi Qin, see in line: > >

Re: [Gen-art] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-ace-cbor-web-token-12

Hi Jim, Thank you for your answer and for addressing my comments. On item #2: On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 10:12 PM, Jim Schaad wrote: > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Dan Romascanu [mailto:droma...@gmail.com] > > > > ... > > > > 2. I am a little confused by

Re: [Gen-art] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-ace-cbor-web-token-12

> -Original Message- > From: Dan Romascanu [mailto:droma...@gmail.com] > Sent: Monday, February 26, 2018 11:03 AM > To: gen-art@ietf.org > Cc: a...@ietf.org; i...@ietf.org; draft-ietf-ace-cbor-web-token@ietf.org; > droma...@gmail.com > Subject: Genart telechat review of

[Gen-art] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-ace-cbor-web-token-12

Reviewer: Dan Romascanu Review result: Almost Ready I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new

[Gen-art] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-trill-vendor-channel-00

Reviewer: Joel Halpern Review result: Ready I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version

[Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-hip-dex-06.txt

tps://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-ietf-hip-dex-06.txt Reviewer: Francis Dupont Review Date: 20180224 IETF LC End Date: 20180226 IESG Telechat date: unknown Summary: Ready Major issues: None Minor issues: None Nits/editorial comments: - ToC page 3: you use the US sp

Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-sidr-slurm-06.txt

On 02/26/2018 11:24 AM, Francis Dupont wrote: - authors' addresses page 17: I am not sure that to be affilated to his own personal organization is to be "unaffiliated"... IMHO the problem is the XML schema requires the organization field to be set (:-). I think that's a hold-over from

[Gen-art] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-6man-ndpioiana-02

Reviewer: Dan Romascanu Review result: Almost Ready I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new

[Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-sidr-slurm-06.txt

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at

Re: [Gen-art] [6tisch] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-6tisch-6top-protocol-09

Hi Bian, Thank you for your comments. Please see inline. On Friday, February 23, 2018 6:11 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote: Hi Qin, see in line: On 24/02/2018 04:16, Qin Wang wrote: > Hi Brian, > Thank you very much for your comments. Please see inline. > >

[Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-pce-lsp-setup-type-08

Reviewer: Roni Even Review result: Almost Ready I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-hip-rfc4423-bis-18

These changes very nicely address my concerns.b You should check with your chair,and AD before submitting a,revision. Thank you,Joel Sent via the Samsung Galaxy S® 6, an AT 4G LTE smartphone Original message From: Miika Komu Date: 2/26/18 06:56

[Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-lisp-signal-free-multicast-07

Reviewer: Roni Even Review result: Ready with Nits I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more

[Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-hip-native-nat-traversal-27

Reviewer: Roni Even Review result: Almost Ready I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-hip-rfc4423-bis-18

Hi Joel, thanks for the nice review! My suggested changes for HIP architecture document are below (in "diff" format). On 02/18/2018 07:33 AM, Joel Halpern wrote: Reviewer: Joel Halpern Review result: Ready with Nits I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review