[Gen-art] draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8022bis: Re: review of https://pad.isc.org/p/Kea_Planning_2018-01-25 (update)

Hi Francis, I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. For more

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-netmod-yang-model-classification-06

Thanks Pete, Version 7 has been posted. All your feedback has been taken into account. https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-netmod-yang-model-classification-07 Regards, Benoit Reviewer: Pete Resnick Review result: Ready with Issues I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft.

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-mpls-tp-linear-protection-mib-11

Loa, Brian, Brian, et.al., We could of course update 3812 (and 3813), though this would probably lead to another discussion on what updates means. What is refereed to is that there is now another preferred method for configuration - netconf/yang. In fact this draft doe not change 3812 or

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-l3sm-l3vpn-service-model-16

Hi Brian, all, [including the L3SM mailing list] It will be a very useful addition to add a few words about : "We did not wanted to add all the possible options, but the most current ones. New scenarios can always been added through augmentations.", as mentioned by Stephane. In terms of

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art Last Call/Telechat Review of draft-ietf-ipfix-mib-variable-export-09

Thank you Elwyn for your review. Regards, Benoit I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-v6ops-pmtud-ecmp-problem-04

Thanks Paul. Regards, B. I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft.

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-radext-radius-fragmentation-09

Dear draft-ietf-radext-radius-fragmentation authors, Can you please address the GEN-ART review. Regards, Benoit I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq. Please resolve these

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-ipfix-text-adt-05

Hi Brian, Juergen, Do I understand correctly that you plan on submitting a new draft version to address David's feedback? Juergen, As far as I know, this is the only feedback received during IETF LC. If that's correct, when this feedback is addressed, I'll put this document on the IESG

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-bfd-mib-17

this mentioned in the shepherd writeup. If the OPS Area has not been consulted, I strongly suggest doing so during IETF Last Call, e.g., starting with Benoit Claise (AD). The OPS Directorate and the MIB Doctors will have been alerted to this document by the last call and we can expect their comments

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-eman-framework-15

On 24/02/2014 08:03, Christer Holmberg wrote: I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-radext-ieee802ext-10

Dear authors, Can you please follow up on that one. Regards, Benoit I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq. Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-oam-overview-08.txt

Elwyn, Thanks for your review. I don't plan to reply for the authors (btw, not sure I've seen a reply to this), and but a few clarification questions in line, to engage the discussion. I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-oam-overview-08.txt

Elwyn, Please disregard this email. I wrongly read the date: 22/01/2014 instead of 22/01/2013. My understanding is that the points have been addressed in the version 13. Regards, Benoit Elwyn, Thanks for your review. I don't plan to reply for the authors (btw, not sure I've seen a reply to

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art review of draft-yourtchenko-cisco-ies-09

Kathleen, Hi Paul, In that case, please update the abstract and introduction to make the intent of the document clear. That makes sense. Regards, Benoit It would be helpful for the reader to understand the intent as they start reading the document. The discussion referenced was

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-Art review of draft-ietf-opsawg-lsn-deployment-04

Martin, On 15 January 2014 19:40, Victor Kuarsinghvic...@jvknet.com wrote: Which seems wise given their somewhat contentious nature. But then the entirely of Section 2 does exactly the opposite. I don't know what the right answer is here, but maybe the right thing to do is delete Section 2.

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-Art review of draft-ietf-opsawg-lsn-deployment-04

On 22/01/2014 16:01, Martin Thomson wrote: On 22 January 2014 13:00, Benoit Claise bcla...@cisco.com wrote: Is your concern that the sentence IPv6 is considered the strategic answer in section 2 is not stressed enough? I think that the text in the second paragraph is slightly more loaded

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-Art review of draft-ietf-opsawg-lsn-deployment-04

Dear authors, doc. shepherd, Can you please answer Martin. Regards, Benoit I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq. Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-ipfix-data-link-layer-monitoring-06

On 31/10/2013 09:05, Paul Aitken wrote: Thanks for the review, Ben. As you pointed out, the description in 3.2.18 wrongly specified a delta rather than a total; I've fixed it. I also clarified the third paragraph of the Introduction to say that the existing models don't yet contain enough

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-ipfix-data-link-layer-monitoring-06

Ben, A new draft version has been posted https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ipfix-data-link-layer-monitoring/ Regards, Benoit Thanks for the response. Those changes would address all of my comments. Thanks! Ben. On Oct 31, 2013, at 11:05 AM, Paul Aitken pait...@cisco.com wrote:

Re: [Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6021-bis-01

Forwarding to the authors and WG Regards, Benoit I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq. Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive.

Re: [Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-ipfix-flow-selection-tech-14.txt

Joel, Thanks for your review. Minor issues: If compliance is a big issue, then this document seems under-specified. For example, it says in section 5.1 In order to be compliant with this document, at least the Property Match Filtering MUST be implemented. However, Property Match

Re: [Gen-art] R: Last Call Expired: draft-ietf-ipfix-flow-selection-tech-14.txt

:*Benoit Claise [mailto:bcla...@cisco.com] *Inviato:* lunedì 8 aprile 2013 15:21 *A:* draft-ietf-ipfix-flow-selection-t...@tools.ietf.org *Cc:* ipfix-cha...@tools.ietf.org *Oggetto:* Fwd: Last Call Expired: draft-ietf-ipfix-flow-selection-tech-14.txt Dear authors, The IETF last call has finished

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-ipfix-information-model-rfc5102bis-09

Thanks Wassim, We will integrate the changes in the next version. Regards, Benoit I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq Document:

Re: [Gen-art] Telechat review of draft-ietf-dime-erp-16.txt

draft-ietf-dime-erp authors, Please address this feedback, ideally before the IESG telechat this Thursday. Regards, Benoit I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq. Please

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-eman-rfc4133bis-05.txt

Thanks Brian for your review, Let me answer two points below, starting with BENOIT Regards, Benoit draft-ietf-eman-rfc4133bis-05-carpenter.txt I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-claise-export-application-info-in-ipfix-05

Hi Roni, [keeping only the open discussions] Hi Benoit, Thanks, see in-line Roni I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq. Please resolve these comments along with any

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-claise-export-application-info-in-ipfix-05

Hi Roni, Thanks for your review. See in-line. I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq. Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive.

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-psamp-info-10.txt

Hi Vijay, Thanks for reviewing the draft. See inline. I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-Art IETF LC review: draft-ietf-ipfix-testing-04.txt

Dear Joel, I posted a new version of the testing draft A new version of I-D, draft-ietf-ipfix-testing-05.txt has been successfuly submitted by Benoit Claise and posted to the IETF repository. Filename: draft-ietf-ipfix-testing Revision: 05 Title:Guidelines

[Gen-art] Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-psamp-framework-12

Hi Ben, Thanks for your review. See inline. I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call

[Gen-art] Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-psamp-protocol-08.txt

Hi Suresh, Thanks for taking the time to review the draft. See inline. I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for draft-ietf-psamp-protocol-08.txt For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html. Please resolve these comments along with any