Thanks!
> -Original Message-
> From: Wassim Haddad
> Sent: Monday, May 21, 2018 4:41 PM
> To: gen-art
> Cc: Wassim Haddad ; draft-ietf-v6ops-
> conditional-ras@ietf.org
> Subject: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of
Works for me.
> -Original Message-
> From: Stewart Bryant [mailto:stewart.bry...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 6, 2017 12:19 PM
> To: Ron Bonica <rbon...@juniper.net>; Joel M. Halpern
> <j...@joelhalpern.com>; gen-art@ietf.org
> Cc: draft-ietf-i
.
Ron
> -Original Message-
> From: Stewart Bryant [mailto:stewart.bry...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 6, 2017 6:24 AM
> To: Ron Bonica <rbon...@juniper.net>; Joel M. Halpern
> <j...@joelhalpern.com>; gen-art@ietf.org
>
t: Monday, December 4, 2017 4:19 PM
> To: Ron Bonica <rbon...@juniper.net>; gen-art@ietf.org
> Cc: draft-ietf-intarea-probe@ietf.org; int-a...@ietf.org; i...@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-intarea-probe-07
>
> Thank you Ron.
>
> On the E-b
Hi Joel,
Thanks for the review. Responses inline..
Ron
> -Original Message-
> From: Joel Halpern [mailto:j...@joelhalpern.com]
> Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2017 4:45 PM
> To: gen-art@ietf.org
> Cc: draft-ietf-intarea-probe@ietf.org;
Joel M. Halpern [mailto:j...@joelhalpern.com]
> Sent: Monday, May 8, 2017 8:31 PM
> To: Brzozowski, John <john_brzozow...@comcast.com>; Ron Bonica
> <rbon...@juniper.net>; Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com>;
> Van De Velde, Gunter (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)
Joel,
Are you OK with the change that Brian recommends, below?
Ron
> -Original Message-
> From: Ron Bonica
> Sent: Saturday, May 6, 2017 8:36 PM
> To: 'Brian E Carpenter' <brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com>; Van De Veld
Wfm
Joel, are you ok with this?
Ron
> -Original Message-
> From: Brian E Carpenter [mailto:brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, May 5, 2017 4:06 PM
> To: Ron Bonica <rbon...@juniper.net>; Van De Velde, Gunter (Nokia -
> BE/Antwe
Gunter,
Thanks much. A brief chat with Joel may clear this up.
Ron
> -Original Message-
> From: Van De Velde, Gunter (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)
> [mailto:gunter.van_de_ve...@nokia.com]
> Sent: Friday, May 5, 2017 2:47 AM
> To: Ron Bonica <r
Folks,
The following is status for draft-ietf-v6ops-unique-ipv6-prefix-per-host:
- WG last call complete
- OPSDIR, GENART and INTDIR reviews complete
- write-up complete
The following issue was raised in the GENART Review:
" The proposed status seems questionable. We as a community are not
Hi Jari,
Sorry for the slow response. We worked all of Francis' comments into the draft
except for one. In his first comment, Francis suggests that the title is
misleading. We asked for a better title but got no response.
If Francis can recommend a better title, there is still time to change
Francis,
Thanks for the careful review. Can you suggest a better title?
Ron
P.S. I have worked the other comments into the next version of the draft.
> -Original Message-
> From: Gen-art [mailto:gen-art-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Cerveny, Bill
viewer: Ron Bonica
Review Date: 2016-09-29
IETF LC End Date: 2016-11-08
IETF Telechat Date: 2016-09-15
Summary: This document is ready for publication.
Major Issues: None
Minor Issues
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART,
please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>
Document: draft-ietf-sipcore-dns-dual-stack
Reviewer:
minimal. There has been extensive
comments on this proposal during the working group meetings.
Personnel
Lenny Giuliano is the Document Shepherd, Ron Bonica is the
Responsible Area Director.
RFC Editor Note
(Insert RFC Editor Note here or remove section)
IRTF Note
(Insert IRTF
Francis,
Yes, I also wish that we could have applied the ICMP extensions to the
ICMPv6 Packet Too Big message. Unfortunately, there are no unused bits
in that message. So, we couldn't add a length attribute. And without a
length attribute, we couldn't add an extension structure.
Folks,
Please accept version 16 of this draft. I catches a few nits that were
left on version 15 (submitted last night).
Ron
Internet R. Bonica
Internet-Draft
Hi Sharon,
Thanks for the thoughtful review. Lots of responses inline, below.
I have attached a new version of the draft which I will post in a bit.
Ron
Sharon Chisholm wrote:
I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer
for this
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft, currently on an IESG
telechat agenda. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html.
IMO, this draft is very will thought out and ready for publication.
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft, currently on an IESG
telechat agenda. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html.
IMO, this draft is well written and ready for publication. Can I assume
that this schema is already
Resend. There was a small cut-and-paste error on the last attempt.
-r
Ron Bonica wrote:
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft, currently on an IESG
telechat agenda. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art
I have no further comments on this document.
-ron
Ron Bonica wrote:
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft, currently on an IESG
telechat agenda. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html
OK. I guess you have addressed all of my comments.
-r
Deacon, Alex wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for your comments. My responses are included inline.
-Original Message-
From: Ron Bonica [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2006 11:23 AM
To: Deacon, Alex
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft, currently on an IESG
telechat agenda. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html.
Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before
posting a new version of the draft.
Ok. In that case, you are fine. The MIB Rx is the MIB Doctor Review
group. Your AD will introduce you to them somewhere in the process.
Ron
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Ron,
Thanks for the review, see below for some answers
Ron Bonica wrote:
I am the assigned Gen
This document is well written and ready for publication.
-r
___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
Attached is my review of the specified document, submitted as part of
the Gen-ART process. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html.
Document:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-iptel-tel-np-09.txt
Comments:
The
27 matches
Mail list logo